Top Five and Bottom Five

KUTTER · Post by **KUTTER** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 7:19 pm

1. Colts
2. Broncos
3. Seahawks
4. Panthers
5. Bengals

28. Packers
29. Titans
30. Niners
31. Jets
32. Texans

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Wed Nov 23, 2005 3:04 am

KC Scott wrote:Updated for Week 11

Top 5

1. Indy - 4 of last 6 games home - tests left w/ Pitt, SD & Seattle
2. Denver - Very good on both sides of the ball
3. Seattle - Weak schedule, weak division, weak conference = great record
4. Dallas - better than I thought - Beat Denver and Giants and I'll be convinced
5. Tie Pittsburg & Chicago - Very Similar teams Pitt can't win without Ben - Bears are for real after beating Panthers

Actually, they've been for real all year, just not given the credit.

Inluding me underestimating them last week, first time i bet against them all season.

Very good team to avoid meeting in the playoffs.

KUTTER · Post by **KUTTER** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 11:59 am

1. Colts -- will lose to SD
2. Broncos -- should get first round bye
3. Bengals -- will walk to AFC North title
4. Seahawks -- best of crappy conference
5. Panthers -- first round bye by default

28. Jets -- haven't quit yet
29. Ravens -- close to quitting
30. Lions -- already quitters
31. Niners -- horrible
32. Texans -- I feel bad for them and Reggie Bush/Matt Leinart

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 4:07 pm

1. Colts
2. Broncos
3. Seahawks
4. Bengals
5. Bears

28. Jets
29. Ravens
30. Packers
31. Niners
32. Texans

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 5:25 pm

1. Colts
2. Broncos
3. Steelers
4. Chargers
5. Bungles

No NFC teams need apply.

28. Lions
29. Ravens
30. Niners
31. Jets
32. Texans

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:04 pm

Steelers are 2nd in the division but the 3rd best team in football?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:18 pm

Cicero wrote:Steelers are 2nd in the division but the 3rd best team in football?

Let me know when the Bengals beat a team with a winning record.

And no, the Bears don't count.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:47 pm

BSmack wrote:1. Colts
2. Broncos
3. Steelers
4. Chargers
5. Bungles

No NFC teams need apply.

Chargers are 2-2 against the NFC. The Panthers are 3-1 against the AFC this year.

I'd probably move the Bungles to 4th and make the Panthers 5th.

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:00 pm

BSmack wrote:
Cicero wrote:Steelers are 2nd in the division but the 3rd best team in football?
Let me know when the Bengals beat a team with a winning record.

This Sunday okay?

Dumbass · Post by **Dumbass** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:14 pm

The Bears don't count? Bwa!

From a Pantherfan, The Bears are a force to be reckoned with. The pass rush is suffocating.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:21 pm

Dumbass wrote:The Bears don't count? Bwa!

From a Pantherfan, The Bears are a force to be reckoned with. The pass rush is suffocating.

Not in September, Not when Kyle Orton was still getting broken in.

Dumbass · Post by **Dumbass** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:25 pm

ah, point taken.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:39 pm

1. Indianapolis
2. Denver
3. San Diego
4. Seattle
4. NY Giants
4. Chicago

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Fri Dec 09, 2005 10:42 pm

Going into week 14:

1. Colts
2. Panthers
3. Bears
4. Broncos
5. Bengals

Bottom 5

28. Saints
29. Packers
30. 49ers
31. Texans
32. Jets

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 1:47 am

Da bears? No rook has ever made it to the big game. Orton won't win ONE playoff game. Watch. TB's defense is just as good as the bears with a better offense.

1. Indy

everyone else

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 2:14 am

Tampon's defense is not as good as the Bears.

The Bears have given up fewer yds per game, a ridiculously low (4.1) yds per play, and another ridiculously low (28.5%) 3rd down conversion percentage.

They've done all this with verrah little help at all from their offense, controlling the clock, helping gain field position advantage, etc.

Give it up, dude.

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 2:34 am

poptart wrote:Tampon's defense is not as good as the Bears.

The Bears have given up fewer yds per game, a ridiculously low (4.1) yds per play, and another ridiculously low (28.5%) 3rd down conversion percentage.

They've done all this with verrah little help at all from their offense, controlling the clock, helping gain field position advantage, etc.

Give it up, dude.

Uh, dude, they play in a shit division.....TB gave up 260 yards to GB, 248 to Minnie, and 228 to the Lions.........uhhhhh.....they(the Bears) have fucking six of these games right off the top. I didn't even go over the rest of the teams the Bears have played. I am sure THAT doesn't help their stats at all.

Give it up, dude........

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 2:53 am

The Yucs have played a SOFTER schedule than the Bears.

Yuc opp: 60-84
Bears opp: 62-82

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 2:17 pm

poptart wrote:The Yucs have played a SOFTER schedule than the Bears.

Yuc opp: 60-84
Bears opp: 62-82

That means a lot.......for example.......the NFC South is only a game or two better record-wise overall. Near identical overall records, are you going to tell me that the NFC South isn't a way better division?
Sorry, but you are just bitter raider fan because you got shafted in the Gruden deal. It will forever be a shitstain on the underwear of your organization. How's that cash spending? How are those draft picks coming along? We are actually rebuilding and doing better than your sorry, pathetic waste........

Furthermore, find soemthing else to do besides bothering your betters.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 2:57 pm

Deflect, sidestep the issue at hand.

You came in here and stated that the Suc defense is as good as the Bears.

It isn't.

Further, your 'schedule' line of horseshit became your facial.

That must suck.

Learn not to run your yap and you'll be better off.

Duh.

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 3:26 pm

poptart wrote:Deflect, sidestep the issue at hand.

You came in here and stated that the Suc defense is as good as the Bears.

It isn't.

Further, your 'schedule' line of horseshit became your facial.

That must suck.

Learn not to run your yap and you'll be better off.

Duh.

No...."schedule" and record does not accurately represent statistics IS what I am saying. A 7-5 Minniesota team I do not feel is as good as a 7-5 Pittsburgh team, do you?

Aren't your shitty 4-8 Raiders BETTER than the 4-8 Cardinals???? Records do not represent everything in black and white. You are trying to make that case. I just said they played in a shitty division which helps their STATS. You came back with schedule. Okie, dokie.

Deflect? You are a bitter mutant that got ram-fucked by the Bucs in a deal that sent a great coach to us for FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS. Thanks asshole. Let it go........I am sure there is some local professional softball team you can cheer on.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 3:38 pm

Yeah, I get it now, T MELT, your Sucs have played all the "good" bad teams, and the Bears have played all the "bad" bad teams.

Bwahahahahahaha

Let's try to keep you on task now and see if you manage better.

On what do you base your frothing that the Buc defense 'as good' as the Bear defense....?

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 3:53 pm

Damn, bitter raiderfan this morning. As good? Look at the overall stats. The Bucs are right behind in a lot of categories. Regardless, you wanted to DEBATE the topic. I could care less. A rookie QB in the playoffs never makes it. So, they can KEEP their best defense in favor of the Bucs having a more complete team. Okay......Bears best defense........poptart is a bitter raider fan who's teams sucks ass again. SOunds good to me.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 4:53 pm

T REX wrote:As good? Look at the overall stats. The Bucs are right behind in a lot of categories.

So, they can KEEP their best defense in favor of the Bucs having a more complete team.

Your 'more complete' team recently got it's ass BEAT....at HOME......by the Bears, you insufferable jackass.

This thing started out bad for you and it has ended in abject humiliation.

'BODE

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 7:36 pm

13-10 is ASS beat?????

Their only TD was a ONE yard drive.

We missed a 29 yard FG that would have sent the game to OT.

BUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!

An ASS-beating is what Tampa did to Oakland in the Super Bowl when we punked your sorry asses silly. An ass-beating is what the raiders are taking every week on their coaching carosel.

Ya bitter fuck.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 8:04 pm

Ass beating is what you've taken here.

This isn't about my team, your coach, or anything else, jerkweed.

No, it's about your penchant for mouthing checks your brain can't cover.

The moment I refuted your silly statement about the Suc defense being as good as Chicago's you should have simply stayed silent, or come back with a post admitting your take was a bit off.

Instead you chose to run your fat trap on and on, like you always seem to, in attempt to cover your ridiculous take.

All it did was push the plunger in deeper, my friend.

Geez, talk about fucking oneself to death.

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:05 pm

A bit off?

LOL? Wow, you really got me.....plungered.....blah, blah, blah........

fact is.....you suck and your teams sucks. You are jealous worthless raider bitter fuck. Refute? What did you refute? The Bears defense is about .5 yds/game better on the ground. And about 7 yds/game through the air. That's pretty close or not in your bitter head, is it?

Yeah, thanks for clearing it up.

Thanks for the Super Bowl.

Mississippi Neck · Post by **Mississippi Neck** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:22 pm

I thought the part about the Bears beating TBay at TBay was quite the plungering...

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Dec 10, 2005 11:37 pm

Merry Christmas, T MELT