DEN at KC - In-game Thread

Frank Football · Post by **Frank Football** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 4:57 am

KC Paul 3.0 wrote: Thank you for clarifying, Bill- you layed it out PERFECTLY. I admit that I wouldn't have explained it nearly as well.

Not a surprise, Homer. Chiefs finish 9-7 and miss the playoffs. :wink:

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 5:27 am

If the Lynch play was a penalty then the league may as well cancel the rest of it's season.

Football no longer exists.

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 1:41 pm

JHawkBCD wrote:
Not at all.

The past Chiefs defenses could not make halftime adjustments.

This Chiefs defense vs. Denver today?

1st half - allowed 282 yards, 21 points
2nd half - allowed 106 yards, 6 points

The defense got tough when it counted, and has exhibited the ability to force turnovers at twice the rate of the past three Chiefs defensive abortions.

Thank you........I missed one.......

joe6pac · Post by **joe6pac** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:20 pm

poptart wrote:If the Lynch play was a penalty then the league may as well cancel the rest of it's season.

Football no longer exists.

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA it was a fumble not a tuck!!!!WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Fuck, try having a new take on football besides allways blaming the refs.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:55 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
poptart wrote:If the Lynch play was a penalty then the league may as well cancel the rest of it's season.

Football no longer exists.
It had NO RELEVANCE WHATSOEVER to the final outcome of the game.

Get over it.

The Chiefs went from having a 3rd and 7 on the 9 to 1st and goal on the 4 and they scored a TD on the very next offensive play which put them up by 4 and that penalty had NO RELEVANCE WHATSOEVER TO THE final outcome of the game?

For Christsakes, Paul, it was the game winning TD when all was said and done. Are you really that fucking stupid?

JHawkBCD · Post by **JHawkBCD** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:05 pm

jiminphilly wrote:The Chiefs went from having a 3rd and 7 on the 9 to 1st and goal on the 4 and they scored a TD on the very next offensive play which put them up by 4 and that penalty had NO RELEVANCE WHATSOEVER TO THE final outcome of the game?

And to add insult to injury, Vermeil copied Shanahan's picks this week. How fucking rude!

For Christsakes, Paul, it was the game winning TD when all was said and done. Are you really that fucking stupid?

Who's to say that KC wouldn't have gone for it on 4th & inches had the spon not gone KC's way?

You fucking people really need to get a grip.

JHawkBCD · Post by **JHawkBCD** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 3:06 pm

JHawkBCD wrote:inches

:swoon:

- IRIE

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 6:54 pm

d-townmike wrote: I am not one to put blame on the officiating but we got screwed. I know, in the end it's scoreboard, but we got completely screwed by those KC fans that the NFL calls "refs."

Sounds like you are blaming the refs. Instead, maybe you should look at the doinks inability to stop this:

Plus, that WAS a first down that Anderson had.

Take off the Orange colored glasses. Every angle showed him stood up before he got to the 48 and the end result was Anderson on his back

But the truth is the Chiefs won the game because their defense stopped Anderson on fourth and 1, and Bill Leavy was man enough to correct the spotting error of one of his co-workers. To be honest, the replays were all pretty inconclusive. An avalanche of Chiefs defenders blocked the camera angles from picking up Anderson and the ball. Leavy could have let the spot stand and hid behind “inconclusive evidence.” He could have left KC’s defense on the field and told Gunther Cunningham’s guys to protect those last 52 yards.

“A lot of guys might not have reversed that,” Vermeil said. “That’s a gutsy call.”

“The runner was clearly short by a couple of feet of the 48-yard line,” Leavy said after the game. “He had to reach the 48.”

Anderson was short because defensive tackle Ryan Sims stood up the guard in front of him, which stopped Anderson’s momentum, and Lional Dalton and Jared Allen crashed into Anderson as he tried to cut back.

“Sims blew up the guard,” Dalton said.

The Chiefs blew up the interior of Denver’s offensive line on the play. Linebackers Kawika Mitchell and Derrick Johnson charged the “A” gaps. Safety Sammy Knight blitzed from the outside. Allen didn’t have a gap responsibility. He was just supposed to go with his offensive tackle and then find the football.

If your really looking for blame, you may also want to take a look at the sideline:

Kansas City’s defensive performance clearly surprised Shanahan. “The Mastermind” coached with an arrogance that surely delighted the Chiefs’ coaching staff. The Broncos entered the game with a two-game lead in the AFC West and thoroughly convinced that there was no way KC’s offense could keep pace with Shanahan’s offensive unit.

Shanahan didn’t acknowledge that Denver’s running game needed its No. 1 running back until the second half. Tatum Bell ran the ball just five times all afternoon. He didn’t play in the first half. He picked up 46 yards on his five second-half carries. His replacements — Anderson and Ron Dayne — carried the ball 21 times for 63 yards.

Given a turnover in KC territory just 15 seconds before halftime, Shanahan ran a draw play on first down that moved the ball to the Kansas City 34. On third down, Shanahan eschewed a 52-yard field-goal attempt or a 34-yard Hail Mary pass. Instead, Shanahan called for another draw play and jogged into the locker room happy with a 21-21 tie.

Early in the third quarter, trailing 24-21, the Broncos were set up first and goal at the 6. Shanahan ran Dayne twice and Anderson once and then trotted out Denver’s field-goal unit.

Shanahan does not respect the Chiefs. He coached the Broncos as if it were 2002 or 2003 and Greg Robinson was controlling Kansas City’s defense. The Chiefs’ defense doesn’t give away points anymore. Shanahan never anticipated Gunther Cunningham regrouping his defenders and slowing Denver’s offense.

Well, that’s what happened in the second half. The effort the Chiefs put forth on Sunday was good enough to beat every team in football except the Colts. Kansas City played its most complete game during Vermeil’s tenure. Against one of the league’s best run defenses, Larry Johnson rushed for 140 yards and two TDs. Trent Green completed 16 of 23 passes for 253 yards, two TDs and two interceptions. The Chiefs overcame adversity. They made big plays on both sides of the ball.

Time to step back and come correct........ all the Doinkskinners

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:51 pm

joe6pac wrote:
poptart wrote:If the Lynch play was a penalty then the league may as well cancel the rest of it's season.

Football no longer exists.

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA it was a fumble not a tuck!!!!WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Fuck, try having a new take on football besides allways blaming the refs.

I picked KC to win the game, troll6braincells.

Dungver didn't do enough to win the game, period.

Try swallowing my TAKE rather than dream-spinnin' it into something that isn't there.

That hit was a penalty....?

Shit man, strap the double red flag belts on the players and let's get on with the modern NFL, league.

Quick fuggen around and get on with it.

JHawkBCD · Post by **JHawkBCD** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:59 pm

T REX wrote:
JHawkBCD wrote:The defense got tough when it counted, and has exhibited the ability to force turnovers at twice the rate of the past three Chiefs defensive abortions.

Thank you........I missed one.......

Your failed attempt at humor has once again left you with plungermarks on your sphinchter, and another notch on the Chiefs' plunger.

I'm all for trolling myopic homers... but you really suck at it.

Off yourself at your earliest convenience.

Cuda · Post by **Cuda** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:03 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
poptart wrote:If the Lynch play was a penalty then the league may as well cancel the rest of it's season.

Football no longer exists.
It had NO RELEVANCE WHATSOEVER to the final outcome of the game.
.

No, not nearly as much as Tony Gonzales holding the LB on that last touchdown.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Mon Dec 05, 2005 11:31 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote: It had NO RELEVANCE WHATSOEVER to the final outcome of the game.

So what you're saying here is that 3rd and goal from the nine is the same as 1st and goal from the four........

Okey doke coach.....

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 12:13 am

JHawkBCD wrote:
Your failed attempt at humor has once again left you with plungermarks on your sphinchter, and another notch on the Chiefs' plunger.

I'm all for trolling myopic homers... but you really suck at it.

Off yourself at your earliest convenience.

Failed? In your eyes? Dude, that shit is funny and since you don't like it.....that is successful comedy at your expense. No wonder you can't appreciate good humor....its usually about you or your "greatest team of all-time".

In conclusion, I called out your sorry ass for using cliche type descriptions of your defense.......on cue....you followed it up with........

The defense got tough when it counted,

I couldn't ask for it any better. Thanks again.

JHawkBCD · Post by **JHawkBCD** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 1:28 am

T REX wrote:No wonder you can't appreciate good humor....its usually about you or your "greatest team of all-time".

I don't recall making the comment that the Chiefs have ever fielded "the greatest team of all-time" at any point, but feel free to continue to slobber all over yourself every time I or any other KC fan posts. That's where the true comedy gold lies.

Tool.

T REX · Post by **T REX** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 2:30 am

Hey, my posting got tough when it counted.

Red · Post by **Red** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 3:16 am

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
Cuda wrote:
KC Paul 3.0 wrote: It had NO RELEVANCE WHATSOEVER to the final outcome of the game.
.
No, not nearly as much as Tony Gonzales holding the LB on that last touchdown.
What fucking game were YOU watching? Tony G blocked TWO Mule players cleanly, fucko.

Fuck off bitch.

Tony held on that play, but it was within the framework of the player's body :?... that, or his shoulderpad. But it really was a minor hold and with first and goal it wouldn't have mattered the way Johnson was running and the way our defense was playing.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Tue Dec 06, 2005 3:31 am

Felix wrote:
KC Paul 3.0 wrote: It had NO RELEVANCE WHATSOEVER to the final outcome of the game.
So what you're saying here is that 3rd and goal from the nine is the same as 1st and goal from the four........

Actually, you misinformed, pink dress wearing misanthrope, it would have been 3rd and 7 from the nine, not 3rd and goal. But don't let a little thing like 'facts' get in the way of making a bitter redass out of yourself.

Either way, you think the Donks could've stopped KC from the 9 yard line any better than from the four? Afterall, you had all game up to that point, right? Suuure you did.

Red · Post by **Red** » Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:29 am

War Wagon wrote:
Red wrote: You think you are?

Jacksonville is a game up and closes out the season against m2l's Niners, the Texuns and Tennessee. They're in. Pittsburgh is one game back, but they have Minny, Cleveland and Detroit. I'm liking their chances. Throw Sandy Eggo into the mix, and no, you're not sniffing the playoffs.

Hope you savored today.
This just in. We control our own destiny now.

You miserable donk bitches still have to go play in San Diego. The AFC West is still up for grabs.

War grabbing the bull by the horns.