Why USC is overrated (link)

M2 · Post by M2 » Wed Jan 04, 2006 10:16 pm

Van · Post by **Van** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 10:25 pm

The article is silly and all these "USC vs other great teams in history" talks are equally silly (especially when USC still needs to win one more game to deserve such talk and to lend proper persepctive to such talks) but because of your avatar you're hereby granted eternal clemency from me no matter what you say or do from here on out.

Roberto Clemente...

You rule, m2.

MClub · Post by **MClub** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 10:32 pm

why exactly is it silly? prolly b/c some usc homer was looking to shoot his load and that writer wasn't there to take it in the face.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 10:52 pm

Van wrote:
You rule, m2.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 10:54 pm

The Seer wrote:
Van wrote:
You rule, m2.

Holy shit. That "observation post" was my 1k.....

Props to me, I guess.........

DiT · Post by **DiT** » Wed Jan 04, 2006 11:06 pm

USC is the farthest thing from being overrated.
calling them anything short of a juggernaut is intellectually dishonest.

See You Next Wednesday · Wed Jan 04, 2006 11:12 pm

I do agree that it was too early to start all the "How would USC fare against the best teams of all-time?" talk on ESPN. Couldn't that have waited until after the Rose Bowl?

Van · Post by **Van** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 12:47 am

All such talk has to wait until after the Rose Bowl.

If USC loses it's all moot.

If USC wins big and their D looks great then the whole perception of this year's team changes. No longer will it be, "Well, the Trojans may've had the best offense ever but their D was a bit suspect so we like the 1923 Holyoke Pantybadgers better..."

It'd then be, "Best offense ever, best winners ever and once their D got reasonably healthy late in the year and on into Bowl Season they were a very well balanced squad with no major weaknesses..."

Leading into last year's OU game USC's D was also presumed to be their achilles' heel but that's no longer considered to be the case after they decimated OU's previously dominant offense.

Let the game take place and let the dust settle and then people can talk...

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 1:19 am

Van wrote: If USC loses it's all moot.

INCONCEIVABLE!

Not that USC will lose, but that you would concede that even the remotest possibility existed that it could.

Let the game take place and let the dust settle and then people can talk...

Wha... :?

You in particular Van, have been flapping your gums incessantly about USC's invincibility and NOW, right before the big game starts, you want to take a wait and see approach?

Too funny.

I knew those buttcheeks would start to clench the closer that Texas sized cock came towards penetration.

Too late bitch!

Spread 'em wide and get ready to be violated.

The Assassin · Post by **The Assassin** » Thu Jan 05, 2006 2:58 am

War Wagon wrote:

Spread 'em wide and get ready to be violated.

Something you've been told many times and something you've gleefully done each time.