A "MUST READ", DonkeyFan

talking about who was arrested today

Moderators: Shoalzie, Biggie

Post Reply
User avatar
WhatsMyName
Elwood
Posts: 807
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:10 am
Location: Denver

Post by WhatsMyName »

Hacks will have their opinions. So will jealous Chef fans.

The bottom line is Pittsburgh will win or lose on their own merits, not because of what some dickbag at ESPN says.

Frankly, you should start thinking about how your team missed its Super Bowl window, douchebag. Got tackling drills? Are you still going to make the league's 2nd best tight end a glorified tackle this year too? How old is TrINT?

Later fag.
User avatar
Qbert
Moderator
Posts: 2187
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:41 pm
Contact:

Post by Qbert »

if PISSPuke brings this effort next week vs. the Donkeys---the Stillerz are going to the Super Bowl.

That was a Beat~down.

they even tried to give it away at the end.....and the drunken Kicker saved the day for STOOLERFan.

THE 2 Charmed Teams are now OUT of the playoffs.

now its time for FOOTBALL!

Stoolerz v Carolina Super Bowl.

fvck PISC in advance.
January 1, 2010....we're having DUCK for Dinner...
User avatar
Adelpiero
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 5208
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 9:23 pm

Re: A "MUST READ", DonkeyFan

Post by Adelpiero »

Quoting Espn and one of their College Basketball guys, for a NFL take?



WOW, talk about desperation and flailing.
User avatar
Red
Elwood
Posts: 707
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:11 pm
Location: Texas, USA

Re: A "MUST READ", DonkeyFan

Post by Red »

[The Broncos] won it because the Patriots lost three fumbles, had those two interceptions, missed a field goal, committed eight penalties, rushed for a grand total of 79 yards and set a New England record for Most Sideline Meltdowns...
What a complete and utter load of horseshit.

With the exception of Brown's fumble, each turnover was forced. Hell, even Brown's fumble was a result of the Pat's gripping to make a play, leaving Brown out of position. There was no Shaun Alexander fumble in open space, no Chrissy Simms pass to a wide-open linebacker; Denver's defense took the ball away time and again.

I guess the Patriots just chose to only run for 79 yards, too...
User avatar
rozy
Cowboy
Posts: 2928
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 3:45 pm

Post by rozy »

That was a well-thought out accurate take.

Sin,
No It Wasn't
John Boehner wrote:Boehner said. "In Congress, we have a red button, a green button and a yellow button, alright. Green means 'yes,' red means 'no,' and yellow means you're a chicken shit. And the last thing we need in the White House, in the oval office, behind that big desk, is some chicken who wants to push this yellow button.
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: A "MUST READ", DonkeyFan

Post by poptart »

Red wrote:I guess the Patriots just chose to only run for 79 yards, too...
The Pats were not an efficient running team all year.

Denver's gonna have it's hands full with Pittsburgh's running game.
User avatar
Red
Elwood
Posts: 707
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:11 pm
Location: Texas, USA

Re: A "MUST READ", DonkeyFan

Post by Red »

poptart wrote:
Red wrote:I guess the Patriots just chose to only run for 79 yards, too...
The Pats were not an efficient running team all year.

Denver's gonna have it's hands full with Pittsburgh's running game.
I agree, but the author's contention that the game was a gift is just crap.

Denver's done fairly well against some decent running teams all year and only allowed two 100-yard rushers. If Pittsburgh plays the same game they played against Indy, we don't stand a chance. If they're off just a little, though, Denver at home is going to be tough to beat.
User avatar
Felix
2012 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 9271
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:37 pm
Location: probably on a golf course

Post by Felix »

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
Don't fucking shoot the messenger.
Okay, how about if we just lash you to a couple of concrete blocks and drop you off the nearest bridge.....
get out, get out while there's still time
User avatar
RockyMountainWayz
Elwood
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: A Mile High in So-Cal

Post by RockyMountainWayz »

Who the fuck is Gene Wojychodeski?

Sounds like a Clam Choder fan.

Denvers D payed a hell of a game and the Offense did what they had to to win. This douchebag must have put to much of his unearned salary on the Pats! What a POLE!
User avatar
Joe in PB
2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
Posts: 4522
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
Location: Pacific Beach
Contact:

Post by Joe in PB »

I agree, but the author's contention that the game was a gift is just crap.
Would Denver had won the game without the turnovers and short field for the offense?

No they probably wouldn't have, NE was controlling the game until their meltdown.

Sure Denver made the plays on defense/special teams and scoreboard is all that matters, but don't expect the Steelers to turn it over a bunch. Denver's offense will have to actually score points on their own merits for a Bronco victory this week.

I think the Steelers will contain Denver's ground game and force Jake Bummer to beat them, & that spells trouble for the mules.

Then again that's what I thought would happen Vs NE.

Gary, double or nothing on that 12 pack?
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
User avatar
RockyMountainWayz
Elwood
Posts: 101
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: A Mile High in So-Cal

Post by RockyMountainWayz »

Joe in PB wrote:
I agree, but the author's contention that the game was a gift is just crap.
Would Denver had won the game without the turnovers and short field for the offense?

No they probably wouldn't have, NE was controlling the game until their meltdown.

Sure Denver made the plays on defense/special teams and scoreboard is all that matters, but don't expect the Steelers to turn it over a bunch. Denver's offense will have to actually score points on their own merits for a Bronco victory this week.

I think the Steelers will contain Denver's ground game and force Jake Bummer to beat them, & that spells trouble for the mules.

Then again that's what I thought would happen Vs NE.

Gary, double or nothing on that 12 pack?


You'll never learn Joe!!

Sounds good...more brew for the SuperBowl Party!

Denver will have to tighten it up on offense if they want to Spank the Stoolers as hard as they Spanked the Pats. These teams are very similar when it comes to play calling and neither truly want their QBs tossing more than 20 balls. A clock munching... low scoring game in Denver.

I think between the altitude and Stooler players holding their breath whilse their fired up coach spits at them it will be another SuperBowl for the Donkeys.
User avatar
Red
Elwood
Posts: 707
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:11 pm
Location: Texas, USA

Post by Red »

Joe in PB wrote:
I agree, but the author's contention that the game was a gift is just crap.
Would Denver had won the game without the turnovers and short field for the offense?

No they probably wouldn't have, NE was controlling the game until their meltdown.
Who knows? Who cares? In the game I watched, there was a defense on the other side of the ball that caused those turnovers. They weren't cheap ones; they were forced. Denver has made a living this season off of forcing turnovers while avoiding giving up the football. That, plus a stout run defense and a strong rushing attack is why this game is being played in Denver and is why I think we've got a great chance.
Sure Denver made the plays on defense/special teams and scoreboard is all that matters, but don't expect the Steelers to turn it over a bunch. Denver's offense will have to actually score points on their own merits for a Bronco victory this week.
Did anyone expect Tom Brady and New England to turn it over a bunch?
I think the Steelers will contain Denver's ground game and force Jake Bummer to beat them, & that spells trouble for the mules.

Then again that's what I thought would happen Vs NE.
Brilliant game plan. You think opponents haven't been trying to do that all season? Pittsburgh does match up very well though. "Physical" is going to be the word of the day.

I cannot for Sunday!
User avatar
godzilla2002
2011 NFL Best Bet Champ
Posts: 1313
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 8:58 am
Location: Denver

Post by godzilla2002 »

Watching KC Paul and Dinsdale melt under the Broncos succsess is fucking priceless! You two need to get a room, ahhh never mind, I guess you aready do have a room.

Dinsdale walks into his bedroom with a sheep under his arm
and says to KC Paul: "Darling, this is the pig I have sex with when you have a headache."

KC Paul is lying in bed and replies: "I think you'll find that's a sheep, you idiot."

Dinsdale says: "I think you'll find I wasn't talking to you."
Run if you have to but keep up!
User avatar
d-townmike
"Q-Town"
Posts: 778
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:23 pm
Location: Now in the STL!

Post by d-townmike »

^^^^ :lol:

As I mentioned in another thread, the ESPN guys have been giving very little, if any, respect to the Broncos and this pathetic attempt at an article just proves my theory.

Next Sunday's game seems to be very easy, but the Steelers are a little better than what their #6 seed deems them to be. I would expect a lot of running plays to Bettis, but that same Denver defense and forced those fumbles and turnovers agains the Pats will be able to stop Bettis and the rest of the offense without any problem.

Still expect this to be a pretty defensive game, not as much as the Patriots game, and Denver will come out with yet another win to go to Superbowl XL and maybe those ESPN honks will actually realize that the Broncos are for real this year!

Steelers 10

Broncos 20
Last edited by d-townmike on Wed Jan 18, 2006 3:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
kcdave wrote:kicked my own ass many times
User avatar
PSUFAN
dents with meaning
Posts: 18324
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: BLITZBURGH

Post by PSUFAN »

Pittsburgh will win or lose on their own merits, not because of what some dickbag at ESPN says.
:applause:
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
Post Reply