Next years Super Bowl participants will be...
- The Assassin
- Raider Fan
- Posts: 3171
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 12:27 am
- Location: Las Vegas,Nevada 89130
Next years Super Bowl participants will be...
New England vs Carolina.
the Colts are about to lose Edggerin James (could he end up in Carolina?). And this was the year for Seattle. Belichick is an evil yet dull genius and will find a way to get the Patsys back into the Super Bowl.
the Colts are about to lose Edggerin James (could he end up in Carolina?). And this was the year for Seattle. Belichick is an evil yet dull genius and will find a way to get the Patsys back into the Super Bowl.
Last edited by The Assassin on Tue Feb 07, 2006 10:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Al Davis=Fidel Castro
- Diego in Seattle
- Rouser Of Rabble
- Posts: 9619
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:39 pm
- Location: Duh
- The Assassin
- Raider Fan
- Posts: 3171
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 12:27 am
- Location: Las Vegas,Nevada 89130
- The Assassin
- Raider Fan
- Posts: 3171
- Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 12:27 am
- Location: Las Vegas,Nevada 89130
Re: Next years Super bowl participants will be...
Would love it but they can't afford it.The Assassin wrote:New England vs Carolina.
the Colts are about to lose Edggerin James (could he end up in Carolina?). And this was the year for Seattle. Belichick is an evil yet dull genius and will find a way to get the Patsys back into the Super Bowl.
I am very concerned that Foster will never play a full season and that is disappointing because he truly is a great talent. He should not command too much money either. If Carolina has another power at running back, it will be a rookie (although I have no idea who) or a free agent back up. I would actually prefer that they try and pry Ricky Williams from Miami because I think he still has plenty of game and would be a perfect back for Carolina in The NFC South. He may be too much too though and it isn't like CAR has a whole that they can part with and/or have what Miami needs.
I think CAR and NWE stand a great chance of meeting again but Pittsburgh and a (hopefully) Palmer lead Bengals team will have plenty to say.
In the NFC, I expect CAR to be right there again but it will be very interesting to see what develops from all the coaching change overs. A lot of these teams are finally goig to get fixed. I would not be surprised to see only 1-2 NFC teams return to the playoffs next year. I would also not be surprised to see all 6 AFC teams back but it will most likely be 5. Barring injuries to the starting QBs they should all be kicking again next year.
Striving to be a victim of Polly's plagiarizing ways.
- DallasFanatic
- Nobody's Punk
- Posts: 2112
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 6:37 pm
- Location: Rancho Cucamonga, CA
- WhatsMyName
- Elwood
- Posts: 807
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:10 am
- Location: Denver
-
- 2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 29350
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
- Location: Lookin for tards
I love watching tards kick themselves upside the head.WhatsMyName wrote:Houston vs. San Francisco
Seriously, who the fuck knows anymore?? The Steelers were never one of the top 5 teams in the power rankings until they got into the playoffs.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerrank ... eason=2005
Feel free to STFU for the reast of the offseason.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
—Earl Sinclair
"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.
- Antonio Brown
- frodo_biguns
- gibbering dumbfuck
- Posts: 2202
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 10:03 am
Ah, you must be one of them guys that rank according to win loss record.WhatsMyName wrote:Houston vs. San Francisco
Seriously, who the fuck knows anymore?? The Steelers were never one of the top 5 teams in the power rankings until they got into the playoffs.
Striving to be a victim of Polly's plagiarizing ways.
- WhatsMyName
- Elwood
- Posts: 807
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:10 am
- Location: Denver
I'm sure you had Pittsburgh pegged to win it all.Dumbass wrote:Ah, you must be one of them guys that rank according to win loss record.WhatsMyName wrote:Houston vs. San Francisco
Seriously, who the fuck knows anymore?? The Steelers were never one of the top 5 teams in the power rankings until they got into the playoffs.
Jake is out. Jay is in. Finally.
- WhatsMyName
- Elwood
- Posts: 807
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:10 am
- Location: Denver
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 8978
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:44 pm
- Location: La Choza, Tacos al Pastor
Broncos vs. Broncos
sin,
Bronco fan in Denver
sin,
Bronco fan in Denver
""On a lonely planet spinning its way toward damnation amid the fear and despair of a broken human race, who is left to fight for all that is good and pure and gets you smashed for under a fiver? Yes, it's the surprising adventures of me, Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar!"
"
"
Um, yea I had PIT in The Super Bowl when they weren't even qualifying for the playoffs.WhatsMyName wrote:I'm sure you had Pittsburgh pegged to win it all.Dumbass wrote:Ah, you must be one of them guys that rank according to win loss record.WhatsMyName wrote:Houston vs. San Francisco
Seriously, who the fuck knows anymore?? The Steelers were never one of the top 5 teams in the power rankings until they got into the playoffs.
I had them pegged to play my Panthers and said Rothlisberger would look like shit enough in his first Super Bowl for Carolina to get over (eventhough I felt PIT had more punch than CAR).
So, yea I pretty much had them there biotch. I called out everyone putting Indy in the Super Bowl and I usually call out most people during these in year "power rankings" because most of you guys just look at their records. The only stunner that has caught me in the 2000s was Oakland.
When you win/loss chodes start analyzing the schedules better, you may be able to pick them as good as I do.
Striving to be a victim of Polly's plagiarizing ways.
- WhatsMyName
- Elwood
- Posts: 807
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:10 am
- Location: Denver
Ah, I am generalizing , I know. Every year though I see power rankings come out and unless it is a homer call, you do not see many people putting a team with a lower win/loss percentage above a team with a better one.
I rarely use a win loss record to determine my rankings because you can not shaft a 0-2 Philly team after playig TB and NWE when IND is playing HOU and CLE and is 2-0. You can't degrade PIT for losing games with Maddox at the healm when you know he won't be there in a month. Anyway, a lot of clowns do that around here and you can easily see that there isn't a whole ot of thought behind there opinions. It is real easy to say a 9-0 IND or KC team is #1 eventhough they haven't really played anybody. It was real easy to say The Rams and then KC had the best offenses in the league when they were pounding a bunch of pussies. Wasn't it Paul?
I rarely use a win loss record to determine my rankings because you can not shaft a 0-2 Philly team after playig TB and NWE when IND is playing HOU and CLE and is 2-0. You can't degrade PIT for losing games with Maddox at the healm when you know he won't be there in a month. Anyway, a lot of clowns do that around here and you can easily see that there isn't a whole ot of thought behind there opinions. It is real easy to say a 9-0 IND or KC team is #1 eventhough they haven't really played anybody. It was real easy to say The Rams and then KC had the best offenses in the league when they were pounding a bunch of pussies. Wasn't it Paul?
Striving to be a victim of Polly's plagiarizing ways.