Christian .. ?MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:But the evidence is pretty clear that your hero was a Christian.
Not.
Fervently anti-Jew ... ?
Certainly.
Masterful propagandist ... ?
Of course.
Evil ... ?
OH yeah.
Don't be a simpleton.
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
A. Why not? Plenty of your kind still idolize him even though he failed.mvscal wrote:A. He's not my hero.
B. You're a fucking moron who can't recognize even the most sophomoric propaganda when it sticks it's foot up your ass.
Well, that's not something that he alone engaged in. You can sit back and say that he was not truly acting as a Christian, but the same would have to be said for Pat Robertson, Richard the Lionhearted, and Osama bin Laden. All of these folks manipulated their followers with the use of boilerplate rhetoric.Of course he was intelligent enough to make use of boilerplate rhetoric to manipulate people
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
No, Peter (along with Urban) was attempting to liberate lands subjegated by the Muslims. Emicho of Flonheim and others decided to attack the Jews (being closer at hand and having all that 'hidden wealth' and all) for mainly secular purposes also, namely taking all their money. And no, the Spainish inquisition had nothing to do with spreading the Gospel, it was a logical outcome of the secularization of the papacy.SunCoastSooner wrote:Are you trying to state that the Spanish Inquisition was anything other than theological? Peter the Hermit wasn't attempting to lead a theological crusade against the Jews?Diogenes wrote:The differance, of course, is that so called 'christian' atrocieties had nothing to do with Christianity, while Muslim ones were a logical application of Islam. But of course both pale before the record of the atheists.PSUFAN wrote:Deciding which was more barbarous over the years - Christianity or Islam - is tantamount to splitting hairs. There are so many atrocities to choose from on both accounts.
If you are relying on historical precedent to enhance your pride in your reputed beliefs, then you're in trouble, regardless of what flag's sewn onto your sleeve.
Actually OBL is following Islam to its logical conclusion, it being a theology of conquest and all. Richard I didn't need boilerplate rhetoric to manipulate his followers, there actually were Islamic invaders in the Holy Land. I'm not that familiar with this Robertson guy, who all is he supposed to have killed again?PSUFAN wrote:Well, that's not something that he alone engaged in. You can sit back and say that he was not truly acting as a Christian, but the same would have to be said for Pat Robertson, Richard the Lionhearted, and Osama bin Laden. All of these folks manipulated their followers with the use of boilerplate rhetoric.Of course he was intelligent enough to make use of boilerplate rhetoric to manipulate people
Misinterpret Much???S Wrote:
I'm not the one attacking someone for stating the facts about a religions beliefs. That is you.
#1 quit putting words in my mouth and I'll take my dick out of yours. I didn't state a damn thing as to what I believe. I stated what the Qu'ran itself states and what the Islamic religion believes. Like I said you have problem with it oh flipping well. Their beliefs are about as nutty as a virgin birth, a Son/Sun God, and Paul being the supreme authority of Jesus (which the vast majority of Christianity doesn't even realize wasn't his name at all) a man he never met. I also know multiple muslims here in America in a number of different communities and the vast majority of them have the same opinon as we do concerning the Palesteinians. Shoot 'em. There is a reason these people weren't brought into other Islamic countries. The Palesteinians were given a country even before the Jews were (Jordan) and the people who aren't there now were the trouble makers thsat their own relatives didn't want.tough love wrote:What the Muslims, and Adolf Hitler say, must be true.
Priceless Idiots
Misinterpret Much???S Wrote:
I'm not the one attacking someone for stating the facts about a religions beliefs. That is you.
I am not attacking you for stating what you choose to believe to be the facts, I am simply saying -> that which they believe is full of pig crap.
Humankind needs to put aside the history argument right quick and pay attention to their present time.
Murdering twisted mussie satan fuc_tools are just getting started.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
The answers for most nazis were yes and yes. It hardly matters whether your evaluation of their beliefs would jibe.The swastika is a Christian symbol? Pan-German racialism is a Christian identity?
I don't necessarily disagree...but I do think your estimation of the role of Christianity in the Third Reich is off. There was no hurry to dismantle the Church, only a willingness to recast it according to Nazi principles.Hitler made use of Christianity because he needed it. It was to play no role in his long term goals.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
Get it through your over-inflated head, I honest to God don't care what you think.I am simply saying -> that which they believe is full of pig crap.
You are only proving my point mvscal, thanks. I don't really care whether or not Hitler himself was a Christian but you have gone on and on the last page of this thread contradicting your original statement directed towards me. Hitler did use Christianity as a way to the means for his plans. Whether or not he personaly practiced the the religion or not is besides the point. He used Christian fanatacism in Germany to solidfy his plans, period, end of story.mvscal wrote:The swastika is a Christian symbol? Pan-German racialism is a Christian identity? Which Christian leader was incorporated into the Nazi pantheon?PSUFAN wrote:Hitler and National Socialism understood the role of Christianity in Germany, and were at great pains to incorporate Christian symbols, leaders, and identity into their pantheon. It appears that Hitler was bent on remaking the German Church, but at no point did he appear to be interested in abandoning it.
Don't confuse short term exediency with long term planning. Hitler made use of Christianity because he needed it. It was to play no role in his long term goals.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
And what makes you think that they or I care what you think.tough love wrote:Sunshine, are you working over time at being ignorant, or does it just come natural to you?
Get it through your over-inflated head, I honest to God don't care what you think.I am simply saying -> that which they believe is full of pig crap.
Seriously, Obsessed Boy, you need to seek help now.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
The Germans were Christians what part of that is so difficult for you to understand?mvscal wrote:They were German fanatics not Christian fanatics, dumbfuck.
What part of "Ein Reich, Ein Volk, Ein Führer" are you struggling to comprehend?
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
Not to simply side track what this thread has become but I thought I would return to this point.mvscal wrote:How do you suppose that Islam has spread from the Arabian Peninsula to Indonesia, Europe, the Atlantic coast of Africa and all points in between?SunCoastSooner wrote:Throughout history? Yes. Today? No. But overall throughout history the Christian religion has been the bloodiest of just about any I can think of.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
Maybe you should try cracking a book!!!SunCoastSooner wrote:Dio: I think you seriously need to google Peter the Hermit!!!
Desperate essay.tough love wrote:Your desperate essay like attempts to seek my understanding, approval or sympathy concerning your stupidity for one, which I can't be bothered to read.S Wrote:
And what makes you think that I care what you think.
Save it for your heathen following, Pig.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
What a shock that all of your links ignores all his actions in Germany, Austria, and various other european locals.Diogenes wrote:Maybe you should try cracking a book!!!SunCoastSooner wrote:Dio: I think you seriously need to google Peter the Hermit!!!
This one is pretty good...
Pages 10-20 of the first edition, to be precise.
But if you like google....
Contemporary sources.
Wikipedia page.
Page on Emichio.
I missed the part about The Hermit 'leading a theological crusade asgainst the Jews'.
You might want to just bail on this one.
I guess you can call it a "gathering" considering he attempted to kill the entire Jewish population of Speyer on the Sabbath as they gathered to worship. This after the NOble of the area and the Archbishop encouraged Jews to move there and promised protection.Wikipedia wrote:He did so, and in the first half of 1096 he gathered an army, which arrived at Speyer in May.
Or hey those little blue words on wikipedia they represent links, dio. Maybe you should have clicked on the one for Metz...wikipedia wrote:Emicho, or his followers in separate groups, also went to Worms, Mainz, Cologne, Trier, and Metz, where they forcibly converted the Jewish communities, and massacred those who resisted. Eight hundred Jews were killed at Worms alone. Peter the Hermit's mob massacred communities in other cities as well.
wikipedia wrote:In the spring of 1096, Metz became one of the scenes of the Rhineland massacres of non-Christians as Count Emicho of Fionheim gathered followers for the First Crusade. A group of these crusaders entered Metz, forcibly converting Jewish families, and killing those who resisted baptism.
wikipedia wrote:The Turks soon followed the retreating People's Crusade into Byzantine territory, and in Peter's absence the pilgrims were ambushed and cut to pieces in detail by the Turks. Despite Peter's pronunciations of divine protection, the vast majority of the pilgrims were slaughtered by the swords and arrows of the Turks, or were enslaved.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
Actually what you stated was that Peter was 'leading a theological crusade against the Jews'.SunCoastSooner wrote:As I stated and confirmed by your own links. Peter da Hermit barely even made his way into the "Holy Land" before his little army of Christian nutcases were made stains in the sand.
Nah; I packed in the pearls before swine thang a long time ago.S Wrote:
Keep trying dumbass.
I am perfectly at peace with what I believe TL. It's one of the reasons I accepted moderating this forum. I've been discussing theology on the net since long before I even came to the Troll boards. Don't believe ask BtH. My thoughts on religion and theology eveolve as I get older.tough love wrote:Nah; I packed in the pearls before swine thang a long time ago.S Wrote:
Keep trying dumbass.
Out of love I would suggest that you give it a rest and stop trying so hard to convince yourself of that which I doubt even you truely believe.
Pride will only bring you more harm to this mess which you have made for yourself.
Do your better self a favor and stop taking everything that mv say's so literally...You need to stop fucking yourself, douchebag. :wink:
Just a thought...Free will makes it your call.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
S Wrote:
I am perfectly at peace with what I believe TL. It's one of the reasons I accepted moderating this forum. I've been discussing theology on the net since long before I even came to the Troll boards. Don't believe ask BtH. My thoughts on religion and theology eveolve as I get older.
The fact that this is your thought process only tells me that this is what you think of yourself because I have never given any indication of it applying to me. Thanks for outing yourself.
As I and others have already shown in this thread... The Nazis at the very least used Christian fanatacism to aid their cause. The fact that you can't accept this is very telling about your own strength of faith, not mine.tough love wrote:S Wrote:
I am perfectly at peace with what I believe TL. It's one of the reasons I accepted moderating this forum. I've been discussing theology on the net since long before I even came to the Troll boards. Don't believe ask BtH. My thoughts on religion and theology eveolve as I get older.
The fact that this is your thought process only tells me that this is what you think of yourself because I have never given any indication of it applying to me. Thanks for outing yourself.
I was referring to your "Nazi's were/are Christians" garbage, but i'm not surprised that you didn't let that stop you from being the self-absorbed gasbag.
Keep 'em coming.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
Again, you don't know what you're talking about.SunCoastSooner wrote:Peter spent more time attcking Jews in Europe than he did even traveling to the Holy Land.
SunCoastSooner wrote:I guess you can call it a "gathering" considering he attempted to kill the entire Jewish population of Speyer on the Sabbath as they gathered to worship. This after the NOble of the area and the Archbishop encouraged Jews to move there and promised protection.
Blaming the pograms on Peter and Urban is just idiotic, and you have yet to show where that was a goal of those who originated the Crusades.1096 May 3, EMICHO (Emico), COUNT OF LEININGEN (Germany) On his way to join the Crusade led by Peter the Hermit, he attacked the synagogue at Speyer. The Jews defended themselves but were systematically slain. Until this time atrocities in Europe were sporadic. From here on in they became organized and frequent, and Jewish martyrdom began in earnest. (It should be remembered that the atrocities committed by the rampaging crusaders were not always supported by the local burghers and bishops. Furthermore, in many countries - especially the Slavic states - the local Christian community suffered from pillages as well. John, bishop of Speyer even called out his army after 11 Jews were killed in a riot, but he was an exception rather than the rule. Approximately 5,000 Jews were murdered in Germany in 1096.)
Emico was under the guidance of Peter and Peter hadn't reached the Holy Land or even Constantinople yet for that matter. Peter took a different route and as the same link shows Dio committed his own attrocities along the way. Peter had so much faith in their Divine protection that he abandonned his soldiers and left them to the sword of the mussies who treated them like the drunk girl on Prom night.Diogenes wrote:Again, you don't know what you're talking about.SunCoastSooner wrote:Peter spent more time attcking Jews in Europe than he did even traveling to the Holy Land.
SunCoastSooner wrote:I guess you can call it a "gathering" considering he attempted to kill the entire Jewish population of Speyer on the Sabbath as they gathered to worship. This after the NOble of the area and the Archbishop encouraged Jews to move there and promised protection.
From your own link...
Blaming the pograms on Peter and Urban is just idiotic, and you have yet to show where that was a goal of those who originated the Crusades.1096 May 3, EMICHO (Emico), COUNT OF LEININGEN (Germany) On his way to join the Crusade led by Peter the Hermit, he attacked the synagogue at Speyer. The Jews defended themselves but were systematically slain. Until this time atrocities in Europe were sporadic. From here on in they became organized and frequent, and Jewish martyrdom began in earnest. (It should be remembered that the atrocities committed by the rampaging crusaders were not always supported by the local burghers and bishops. Furthermore, in many countries - especially the Slavic states - the local Christian community suffered from pillages as well. John, bishop of Speyer even called out his army after 11 Jews were killed in a riot, but he was an exception rather than the rule. Approximately 5,000 Jews were murdered in Germany in 1096.)
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
1) Emicho was never 'under the Guidance of Peter'.SunCoastSooner wrote:Emico was under the guidance of Peter and Peter hadn't reached the Holy Land or even Constantinople yet for that matter. Peter took a different route and as the same link shows Dio committed his own attrocities along the way. Peter had so much faith in their Divine protection that he abandonned his soldiers and left them to the sword of the mussies who treated them like the drunk girl on Prom night.Diogenes wrote:Again, you don't know what you're talking about.SunCoastSooner wrote:Peter spent more time attcking Jews in Europe than he did even traveling to the Holy Land.
SunCoastSooner wrote:I guess you can call it a "gathering" considering he attempted to kill the entire Jewish population of Speyer on the Sabbath as they gathered to worship. This after the NOble of the area and the Archbishop encouraged Jews to move there and promised protection.
From your own link...
Blaming the pograms on Peter and Urban is just idiotic, and you have yet to show where that was a goal of those who originated the Crusades.1096 May 3, EMICHO (Emico), COUNT OF LEININGEN (Germany) On his way to join the Crusade led by Peter the Hermit, he attacked the synagogue at Speyer. The Jews defended themselves but were systematically slain. Until this time atrocities in Europe were sporadic. From here on in they became organized and frequent, and Jewish martyrdom began in earnest. (It should be remembered that the atrocities committed by the rampaging crusaders were not always supported by the local burghers and bishops. Furthermore, in many countries - especially the Slavic states - the local Christian community suffered from pillages as well. John, bishop of Speyer even called out his army after 11 Jews were killed in a riot, but he was an exception rather than the rule. Approximately 5,000 Jews were murdered in Germany in 1096.)
YOU have a strenght of faith...Who woulda thunk it.C Wrote:
The fact that you can't accept this is very telling about your own strength of faith, not mine.
That is a far cry from saying that Nazi's were Christians.The Nazis at the very least used Christian fanatacism to aid their cause.
You are just about the most paranoid and self absorbed person I have ever seen on the net, Tina.tough love wrote:YOU have a strenght of faith...Who woulda thunk it.C Wrote:
The fact that you can't accept this is very telling about your own strength of faith, not mine.
Does it involve Satan?
That is a far cry from saying that Nazi's were Christians.The Nazis at the very least used Christian fanatacism to aid their cause.
Every poli-tard is a user of people, you dumb over-inflated shit.
My guess is the poser christians got used, and the "True Christians" got gassed, but nice job with the back pedalling.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
Where do you get this out of my post?tough love wrote:^
Okay...So Hitlers Nazi's were not Christians after all.
Glad to see that you have finally come to your senses on at least one thing, heathen.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
First it doesn't matter which one, A, B, or C, it is but you and every other poster on here who initialy argued otherwise has since conceded that it is one of the three. Now you are just trying to argue details because your initial argument has been shot to shit by more than just lonely little me. But to answer you question... I don't think the issue is so black and white as you try and make it. I believe it was a little bit of all three.tough love wrote:I was calling you a heathen, but if that shoe also fit's Pus, so be it.
Did he or another mention that Hitler once attended seminary school.
According to your logic, shouldn't that then make him a Pope.![]()
Your fish flopping makes it difficult to know exactly what your stupidity suggests.
Please Pick One:
A: Hitler was a "Christian"
B: The evil nazi's used folk, including those whom you and others precieve to be "Christian" to murder and dispose of millions of Jews, and assorted others.
C: The evil nazi's were "Christians"
Or Not!
Whichever one you pick won't change what you are.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote: Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Whatever you say Tina. I answered your question but you can't accept it. Not my problem that you are an intellectual midget.tough love wrote:So the answer is D for deflection then.
I attended Methodist Sunday School and Service for 17 years of my life. I have spent the last five years attending a non denominational Church with my wife numerous times a year out respect to her beliefs. I attended Summer Christian Camp for as long as a month at a time in Davis, Oklahoma for much of my childhood. One of my best employees, and like a brother to me from childhood, is a devout Southern Baptist. I have another close associate from a Sooner Message board who is a Luthern Minister and we have had more than our fair share of conversations about a wide range os issues. I do not need to answer to you, and according to your very own religion it is not your place in this world to judge me; that is God's job!!! I know exactly what a Christian is and you sir are not an example of one. You want to proclaim you are a Christian then start acting like one.Again; I doubt you even know what a Christian is, and your threats to ban just show you out to be the little insecure man that you really are.
Spin it any way you like, 'Bro, but your pissed because I refuse to accept your anti-christ bull-crap, and now you suggest to me that if I continue to stand up to your Nazi/Missie lies, you will turn modster on me.
Like I said you know about as much about it as the rest of us in this world. In truth I believe it is you who doesn't have a clue as to what a Christian is.In Truth:
You appear to be content to reside with pigeon holing sinners who go by the convenient anti-god media and the anti-christ friendly global poli_po$er engineered version of what being a "Christian" means.
I believe that you choose this wrongful version just to suit your own pathetic over read pea brained conclusions, yet sadly you truely understand jack shit about that which you/they speak.
Christiuans rioted and killed dozens of Muslims in Narobi, Kenya as recently as four years ago so keep drinking the Kool-Aid, tina.I don't need to read shit to know that when I hear on the world news that in some backward country "Christians are now burning the Muslim bodies which they previously murdered and mutulated" to know that those evil freaks were/are as much "Christian" as were/are your Nazi pals.
There were Jews who proclaimed Jesus to be a prophet and not a Messiah, or the Mosiach long before anyone ever called themselves a "Christian".I also do not need a degree in theology to know that the murdering mussies who attempt to belittle the True Christian Faith by claiming Jesus Christ to be nothing more then the for runner of their bloody idol, are full of crap on the truth scale, even when they add, as do you, to have The Followers to back them up.
The same can be said for Christianity in the same breath. YOU are all sinners by article of your own faith. You are not sinless and the only person who has ever been sinless according to your very own theology that you supposedly adhere to is Jesus Christ.Judging a tree by it's fruit, The Mussie Tree has root rot. Period.
No, I am not an arborist, I am simply a person who chooses to see, and not be blinded by what other sin infested humans put forth.
And I'll keep returning as long as you use religious epithets.SunCoast WAS here.
BSmack wrote:I can certainly infer from that blurb alone that you are self righteous, bible believing, likely a Baptist or Presbyterian...
Miryam wrote:but other than that, it's cool, man. you're a christer.
LTS TRN 2 wrote:Okay, Sunny, yer cards are on table as a flat-out Christer.
I warned this forums mods what would happen if one of you inserted your crap within one of my posts again.Suncoast WAS here
I don't know whether to laugh or feel sorry for him. It's gotta be a troll job, right? Nobody is really that fucking ignorant, are they?Martyred wrote:Remeber folks, this thread started out with tough love's utter bewilderment at Islam's recognition of Jesus as a prophet.
Just reminding y'all of the bed-ridden, no-job-having crank you're dealing with.
Now, back to the show...