Michelle Troll?!?!

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 3:52 pm

Smokin' body? More like a "smoked" body. That girl's part raisin.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 3:53 pm

Carrottop has a younger brother?

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:44 pm

What is it with you goatee wearing, bald fatassed motherfuckers that critique women's bodys as though you have a chance?

I know my haytah's will respond like the fucked up tools they are, but come on Dave, you couldn't "hit it" with a mouthful of Viagra. You'd be like a turned on donkey with nothing nearby other than a rubber tire that surrounds the water bucket.

Uncle Fester · Post by **Uncle Fester** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:47 pm

That's one scary-looking dude.

Headhunter · Post by **Headhunter** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:52 pm

I "couldn't hit it" because it would be like shooting pool with a rope. That chick is fucking gnarly. Fucked up face, fake 'n' bake tan, and forearms like a longshoreman. No thanks. Not to mention the fucked up superman insignia she's sporting a s a belly button.

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:55 pm

Check that chick for a dick.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:57 pm

Her C-cup implants were done poorly. The underwire bra can't even make her proportional as you can see in the cleavage where the underwire supports cannot fix the gap.

However, all flat-chested girls should get implants as a general rule whether they are gnarly or not. At least there is the effort.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 5:00 pm

I like a little girl with my "circulatory structure draped o'er aged parchment."

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:01 pm

Cicero wrote:Check that chick for a dick.

Ever the optimist.

Van Plowboy · Post by **Van Plowboy** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 6:59 pm

She had hands as big as Andre the Giant's, and she had an Adam's apple as big as her balls.

Headhunter · Post by **Headhunter** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 7:11 pm

I'm just glad to hear that Hulk Troll is ok. Hadn't heard from that dude in some time!

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 7:54 pm

Atomic Punk wrote:What is it with you goatee wearing, bald fatassed motherfuckers that critique women's bodys as though you have a chance?

Who cares if any of us could hit it or not? She puts herself up for critique when she puts her pics on the net.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:04 pm

Or in other words...what does critique have to do with "having a chance"?

Also, I'm with HH on this one. I'm not so sure I'd be attracted to that...silicon balls injected into the body of a male, not really my bag. The more they remove her female characteristics, the less I'm interested--btw

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:13 pm

Look, my point is that if you actually know women in real life then you wouldn't blast their appearances. Now if they are fat or very ugly, then count me in to pile on. Wait.... bad thing to say...

Smacking a girl for her looks is evil, IMO.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:22 pm

Sudden Sam wrote:

What the hell is this?

We still don't even know, my friend.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:31 pm

big hands? pfffttt. You wanna see big hands?

sin,
ann coulter

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:05 pm

smackaholic wrote:big hands

MichelleTroll™ ain't the one.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:16 pm

Smacking a girl for her looks is evil, IMO.

Fair enough. Michelle Troll makes lk_pick look like a roadburned Lisbon fishwife.

Happy?

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 9:18 pm

e......Shhhhhhhh!

Didn't you get the memo?

You know, the one that was group-PMed to everyone except AP, that detailed how nobody was ever supposed to say anything like you just did?

I guess you didn't get that memo.

In it, it explained how if we played our cards right, we could get years of behind-the-scenes laughter when the fat, lazy-eyed, underemployed nomadic loser tried to tell us how smooooooth he is with the ladies, despite the fact he's trying to sell it to people who have actually seen his pic.

I hope you didn't just ruin the "inside joke" for everybody with that post, e.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:00 pm

e wrote:amblyopic drifter fetish

Verrrrrrrrry nice.

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan · Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:13 pm

Atomic Punk wrote:What is it with you goatee wearing, bald fatassed motherfuckers that critique women's bodys as though you have a chance?

I know my haytah's will respond like the fucked up tools they are, but come on Dave, you couldn't "hit it" with a mouthful of Viagra. You'd be like a turned on donkey with nothing nearby other than a rubber tire that surrounds the water bucket.

Dude, normally I'm right there with you on this sentiment. When the idiots in the peanut gallery are dissing some chick like Hillary Swank, it's fucking ridiculous. But this broad (and I use that term loosely) is grotesque.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:17 pm

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote: Dude, normally I'm right there with you on this sentiment.

Which "sentiment?"

The one where the dweebs here put famous hotties below their standards-threshold, or the sentiment that the Elephant Man's twin brother who used to actually come to these boards crying about how he couldn't pull chicks, recieved a pile-on for the ages over his malformed physical appearance, and made lonely phone calls to the skank chicks on the boards...has now deemed himself "King Babe-magnet?"

If it's the former, than so be it.

If it's the latter...seek help, dude.

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan · Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:26 pm

Dinsdale wrote:
MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote: Dude, normally I'm right there with you on this sentiment.

Which "sentiment?"

The one where the dweebs here put famous hotties below their standards-threshold, or the sentiment that the Elephant Man's twin brother who used to actually come to these boards crying about how he couldn't pull chicks, recieved a pile-on for the ages over his malformed physical appearance, and made lonely phone calls to the skank chicks on the boards...has now deemed himself "King Babe-magnet?"

If it's the former, than so be it.

If it's the latter...seek help, dude.

It's the former, man. I take a small degree of pride in not knowing all the minutae of SCIII history. I never saw the pics of AP. I'd ask for a reset, but I really don't care. I mostly just hang out in the CFB forum, but it's the off-season, and I'm bored.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:38 pm

Dins is so good looking that he is well-known by all. I'll put my current looks up to anyone's. I'll bet you Dins wouldn't cut it.

Yes, the skank is fucking ugly. I'm going to Hell for stating the obvios. hahaha Fuck you Dims. Put your picture up you hot stud!.

Just sayin'

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:41 pm

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:
Dude, normally I'm right there with you on this sentiment. When the idiots in the peanut gallery are dissing some chick like Hillary Swank, it's fucking ridiculous. But this broad (and I use that term loosely) is grotesque.

Hillary Swank's above reproach?? She played a dude in a movie!! If that's not a prime example of a chick with questionable looks, what is?

AP, I teach my kids to say whatever they want to a person if someone's giving them shit, but never make fun of someone's looks...unless they go there first. :D But this is not real life, it's a message board!

If I say that Keira Knightly's horse teeth are so big she can barely close her lips around them, will she read it here? No. So I'll say it. Saying so also doesn't make her unbangworthy, it means she'd do well to log some time at the Hanoi Hilton and have those suckers filed down a 1/4 inch or so.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:06 pm

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:I take a small degree of pride in not knowing all the minutae of SCIII history. I never saw the pics of AP.

That's OK. Picture Barney from the Simpsons, only with a great deal more birth defects.

Ans whn he took the massive pile-on for being so fat and ugly, the tears coming from behind his keyboard temporarily solved all drought conditions in california.

That was one of the biggest meltdowns I have EVER witnessed on these boards...and I laughed my ass off.

But then, to try and make amends for melting, dude actually told a a bunch of men on a messageboard that they had inspired him to improve himself.

And no...I'm not making this up. Truth is stranger(and funnier) than fiction.

But don't take my word for it...ask around(of course discounting the compulsive liars...like Anotomically Punked).

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan · Wed Jul 12, 2006 12:04 am

OCmike wrote:
MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:
Dude, normally I'm right there with you on this sentiment. When the idiots in the peanut gallery are dissing some chick like Hillary Swank, it's fucking ridiculous. But this broad (and I use that term loosely) is grotesque.
Hillary Swank's above reproach?? She played a dude in a movie!! If that's not a prime example of a chick with questionable looks, what is?

Technically, she played a chick (who lived as a dude) in that movie. But even if she had played a dude, who fucking cares? Are you going to tell me about Charlize Theron's "questionable looks" because of her roles in Monster and North Country?

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:01 am

So basically Dims is a pussy and won't man up. Dumbshit, I put this stuff up to bait retards like yourself. Because the board is what it is, I come here to make fun of morons like yourself. It's what makes this place fun.

Terry in Crapchester · Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:11 pm

Ya know, I spend a lot of time either staring at a computer monitor or driving, so from time to time, my eyes get blurry, so much so that at the ripe old age of 41, my inability to read the phone book has driven me to bifocals.

:twisted: :brad: Then I came across this:

Dins is so good looking that he is well-known by all. I'll put my current looks up to anyone's. I'll bet you Dins wouldn't cut it.

And of course, my first instinct was that my eyes were playing tricks on me. So I did one of these:

<Rubs eyes>

Try again.

Nope, still there. :twisted: :brad:

Guys comparing their looks to other guys on the board? Fuggin' ponderous, as Dins would say. The discourse on the board has hit a new low. At this point, we might just as well surrender to the Gay Axis of Evil right now.

And I'll save AP the trouble with an objective opinion. As the old saying goes, good news and bad news. I'll start with the bad news, AP: you're ugly. Now for the good news: you're far from alone in that regard. You see, I'm ugly too. And although I've never seen his picture, I have no doubt that Dins is also ugly.

It's really a matter of simple deductive reasoning: there is no such thing as a physically attractive adult man. Never was, never will be. Adult men are hairy, smelly, sweaty disgusting creatures. Period, end of discussion, and not open for debate. If you disagree, you might as well save yourself, and the rest of us, the time and trouble and just come out of the closet right now.

Now that that's over, can we please get back to some topic that might actually make the board readable?

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:15 pm

Yes sir, the very first time YOU make an intersting post, thread, point, or any combination of the aforementioned, then I'll rack you.

Last I've checked, I've never racked you for the above reasons. Everybody is ugly, BTW.

Terry in Crapchester · Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:29 pm

Ahh, but you've moved the bar. You're talking about racks. I'm talking about readable posts. I certainly won't rack the overwhelming majority of posts on this board, but most of them are at least readable, if one stretches the meaning of "readable," that is.

To steal a lyric from your former nic-sake, I ain't asking for much . . .

Headhunter · Post by **Headhunter** » Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:30 pm

Atomic Punk wrote:So basically Dims is a pussy and won't man up. Dumbshit

That's like getting in a farting contest with a dude who has already shit his pants.

Have you never seen Dins' own descriptions of himself. He doesn't purport himself to be Adonis, quite the opposite in fact.

Are you faggots going to bust out the ruler and digicam any time soon? Arch Angel wants to know!

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:37 pm

Headhunter wrote:That's like getting in a farting contest with a dude who has already shit his pants.

Awesome. Can't wait to use this in every day conversation. Might even mix it into a business meeting. Rack.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:45 pm

Arch Angel? bwhahaha I forgot all about that one.

Damn, clones or whatever have memories like elephants.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:51 pm

Rack Terry! Good work.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:27 pm

Headhunter wrote: Have you never seen Dins' own descriptions of himself. He doesn't purport himself to be Adonis, quite the opposite in fact.

I change my stance on an occasion.

But to be truthful -- I'm pretty fucking good looking.

But really, this is neither here nor there.

What is weighing heavy right now, is that, once again, a man(allegedly) is soliciting my picture over the internet.

If I had eaten breakfast, I'm quite sure I would have tossed it by now.

Dude.....WHOA!

Just a little creepy, dontcha think?

At this point, I'm just going to eject, for fear of learning any more about your sordid view from the closet.

Aren't there people you know in real life posting here? I wouldn't look for that to continue Ru Punk.

Grrrrrrroooooooosssssssss!

Dude, at least keep that shit to yourself and collect dude's pics the old-fashioned way -- by posing as an 18 year old chick on Myspace.

Fucking disturbing.

Invictus · Post by **Invictus** » Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:37 pm

Terry in Crapchester wrote:Ya know, I spend a lot of time either staring at a computer monitor or driving, so from time to time, my eyes get blurry, so much so that at the ripe old age of 41, my inability to read the phone book has driven me to bifocals. :twisted: :brad: Then I came across this:

Dins is so good looking that he is well-known by all. I'll put my current looks up to anyone's. I'll bet you Dins wouldn't cut it.
And of course, my first instinct was that my eyes were playing tricks on me. So I did one of these:

<Rubs eyes>

Try again.

Nope, still there. :twisted: :brad:

Guys comparing their looks to other guys on the board? Fuggin' ponderous, as Dins would say. The discourse on the board has hit a new low. At this point, we might just as well surrender to the Gay Axis of Evil right now.

And I'll save AP the trouble with an objective opinion. As the old saying goes, good news and bad news. I'll start with the bad news, AP: you're ugly. Now for the good news: you're far from alone in that regard. You see, I'm ugly too. And although I've never seen his picture, I have no doubt that Dins is also ugly.

It's really a matter of simple deductive reasoning: there is no such thing as a physically attractive adult man. Never was, never will be. Adult men are hairy, smelly, sweaty disgusting creatures. Period, end of discussion, and not open for debate. If you disagree, you might as well save yourself, and the rest of us, the time and trouble and just come out of the closet right now.

Now that that's over, can we please get back to some topic that might actually make the board readable?

Excellent. Very excellent. Terry, unfortunately, this board has had a number of men post their pics to either show how good they look or to show off their physique. While I've questioned that, and still do, neither myself nor you can stop the tide ot gheyness seeping onto these board.

Oh, and rack father D and Hoontah.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:57 pm

an 18 year old chick on Myspace

Grrrrrrroooooooosssssssss!

um...

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:01 pm

Invictus wrote:Terry, unfortunately, this board has had a number of men post their pics to either show how good they look or to show off their physique.

Some do it for other reasons just to show how much :bode:

they have.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:04 pm

IndyFrisco wrote: Some do it for other reasons just to show how much :bode: they have.

Oh yeah, well....

well...

OK, I have no negative response to that.

Some nudie pics of Mrs. Frisco would really cement that BODE, though.

T1B

Michelle Troll?!?!

Re: Michelle Troll?!?!