George W. Pottymouth

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:45 pm

ST. PETERSBURG, Russia (CNN) -- An open microphone caught President Bush in an unguarded moment Monday as the escalating crisis in the Middle East prompted him to use an expletive in a conversation with British Prime Minister Tony Blair.

Bush and Blair were unaware that an event at the Group of Eight summit was a photo opportunity, with media representatives present. Blair later turned off the microphone.

The president was expressing frustration at the United Nations' stance on the Israeli-Hezbollah conflict in Lebanon. (Watch Bush use the 's' word during a chat with Blair -- 1:31)

Apparently not expecting an open mike to pick up his remarks, Bush told Blair: "See the irony is what they need to do is get Syria to get Hezbollah to stop doing this shit and it's over."

Neely8 · Post by **Neely8** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:48 pm

South Park only aired an entire episode where they used that word 191 times.....

Headhunter · Post by **Headhunter** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 7:48 pm

I never liked you. You know why? You don't curse. I don't trust a man who doesn't curse. Not a "fuck" or a "shit" in all these years.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 8:31 pm

mvscal wrote:(Watch Bush use the 's' word during a chat with Blair -- 1:31)

Oooooo. Not the 's' word!!!

Word. Meanwhile Blair could have responded, "Right you are. Those Syrian cunts need to fuck off" and it wouldn't have even made the papers in England.

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 8:41 pm

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 8:43 pm

mvscal wrote:(Watch Bush use the 's' word during a chat with Blair -- 1:31)

Oooooo. Not the 's' word!!!

KatMode · Post by **KatMode** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 8:51 pm

There's the straw. IMPEACH HIM!

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 8:57 pm

Howard Dean would have said:

"See the irony is what they need to do is get Syria to get Hezbollah to stop doing this shit and it's over. YEAAAAAAAAAAAAGH!"

mothster · Post by **mothster** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 8:59 pm

i'll take that old codger cheney's 'you're an asshole ' and 'go fuck yourself' plus kerry's old lady sayin 'shove it' over dubya......hell he probably doesn't know what 'shite' is

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 9:06 pm

Rack Dubya!

bbqjones · Post by **bbqjones** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:29 pm

rack W

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:51 pm

Apparently not expecting an open mike to pick up his remarks, Bush told Blair: "See the irony is what they need to do is get Syria to get Hezbollah to stop doing this shit and it's over."

I'm surprised that CNN didn't bleep the word "shit" from the report. Pretty much can guarantee that the major broadcast networks most certainly will.

Whatever, I wonder what "irony" W was talking about?

I also wonder what he thinks would be "over"? The current crises? Maybe so, but the under lying causes of the Israeli/Palestinian/Lebanese conflict will be anything but "over".

I can't pass out any racks to W over this. Sure, he's always been a straight shooter and plain talker, and I dig the guy for just that...but this unguarded comment seems to me to be overly simplistic considering the situation.

bbqjones · Post by **bbqjones** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:55 pm

rack the ____ out of W

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Tue Jul 18, 2006 12:59 am

BFD

Johnson & Nixon were prolific cussers.

mothster · Post by **mothster** » Tue Jul 18, 2006 1:11 am

Diego in Seattle wrote:BFD

Johnson & Nixon were prolific cussers.

vr m. allen

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:38 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:RACK W- FUCK those fucking towelheads if they don't like it.

If some of you could make it through a full day without a diaper change, you'd realize just how fucking stupid you sound.

"RACK W"

Forrrr......

What?

On 9/11/2001, a group of mostly Saudis hijacked American airliners, and smashed them into buildings, causing ~3000 deaths.

W's response?

Well, his most recent one was to propose to Congress that the FUCKING SAUDIS should be allowed to buy up large stakes of AMERICAN AIR CARRIERS.

When the sheeple figure out that those 3000 deaths have meant nothing but a bunch of vile filth getting richer, a plot engineered by the Busheney cartel, they should be pissed.

Unfuckingbelievable. Way to sell the country off, fucking idiots. Leave your stupidity out of the ballot box next time, retards.

Doesn't really matter though, does it? The Bush apologists(which is a mental defect) will make excuses on his behalf, since holding elected ofiicials accountable for their crimes has now been deemed "unpatriotic."

Idiots.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:46 pm

mvscal wrote: Speaking of sounding stupid. Way to kick your own ass there, sport.

The corporation that the VP used to run recently had its "no-bid"(synonym for "stealing") contracts revoked recently for overcharging and abuse.

TRUE, OR FALSE?

The Bush Administration tried to sneak through a law allowing SAUDIS to buy up American air carriers by hiding the law in a transportation spending bill, even though the last time Saudis had "control" of American passenger planes, things didn't go so well.

TRUE, OR FALSE?

You've been duped.

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:50 pm

Dinsdale wrote:It puts the lotion in the basket.

go fuck yourself.

Terry in Crapchester · Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:56 pm

Dinsdale wrote:On 9/11/2001, a group of mostly Saudis hijacked American airliners, and smashed them into buildings, causing ~3000 deaths.

W's response?

Why, attack Iraq, of course!

Terry in Crapchester · Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:01 pm

mvscal wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:On 9/11/2001, a group of mostly Saudis hijacked American airliners, and smashed them into buildings, causing ~3000 deaths.

W's response?
Why, attack Iraq, of course!
Actually he attacked Afghanistan.

Until he decided it was too hard to find a 6'5" camel jockey lugging a dialysis machine around the mountains, at which time he engaged in a bait-and-switch.

Terry in Crapchester · Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:03 pm

If I were ever asked to describe this board in two words or less, my reply most likely would be:

Rack Dubya!

A sentiment that's been repeated no less than three times in this thread alone.

Someday you people will wake up. Until that time, I fear for this country.

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:07 pm

Terry in Crapchester wrote:I fear for this country.

nobody cares.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:14 pm

Terry in Crapchester wrote: Someday you people will wake up.

Who cares if they do or not. He'll be gone in two years either way.

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:15 pm

Terry in Crapchester wrote:I fear for this country.

Lying down like a girl and letting these islamic pieces of shit bring the fight to us doesn't rate, sorry. I'd fear for this country if we weren't taking it to them.

Liberal (n) - 1. a political faction that over-simplifies international relations and national security issues. 2. a group that thinks 'just being friends' will keep the world safe. 3. dumbfucks on T1B

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:25 pm

Jimmy Medalions wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:I fear for this country.
Lying down like a girl and letting these islamic pieces of shit bring the fight to us doesn't rate, sorry. I'd fear for this country if we weren't taking it to them.

Liberal (n) - 1. a political faction that over-simplifies international relations and national security issues. 2. a group that thinks 'just being friends' will keep the world safe. 3. dumbfucks on T1B

4. A group that feels that diplomacy is always the answer, even when dealing with irrational despots who lack the ability to reason.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:27 pm

Jimmy Medalions wrote:Lying down like a girl and letting these islamic pieces of shit bring the fight to us doesn't rate, sorry. I'd fear for this country if we weren't taking it to them.

So, how does giving control of our airlines to these "islamic pieces of shit" factor into this?

Terry in Crapchester · Thu Jul 20, 2006 11:18 pm

Jimmy Medalions wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:I fear for this country.
Lying down like a girl and letting these islamic pieces of shit bring the fight to us doesn't rate, sorry. I'd fear for this country if we weren't taking it to them.

We're fighting the wrong group. Iraq didn't attack us on 9/11.

Liberal (n) - 1. a political faction that over-simplifies international relations and national security issues.

Talk about pot-meet-kettle. This has to take the cake in that category.

Jimmy Medalions · Post by **Jimmy Medalions** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 2:09 am

Yeah bu..bu..bu..but they didn't find WMD's so Saddam couldn't have been providing a safe place for islamic radicals.

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 1:43 pm

Rack Dubya

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 3:17 pm

W is an idiot, few people will deny this. Some folks think that's a positive, others :facepalm:

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Jul 21, 2006 3:50 pm

Jimmy Medalions wrote:they didn't find WMD's . . .

Which proves that your boy is either a lying sack of crap or incompetent. Take your pick.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 3:55 pm

Cheney and Rumsfeld

LTS TRN 2 · Post by **LTS TRN 2** » Fri Jul 21, 2006 7:11 pm

Bab's, it was a neocon rush-to-war plan that needed only the "Pearl Harbor" of 9-11 (yea, nineteen guys with box-cutters and pepper spray) to launch. That and smearing anyone who opposed the invasion plan.

There were no WMDs or Al Qaeda connections. AlQaeda HATED Saddam.

More to the point, the invasion of Iraq has proved a total disaster. Not only to the millions of Iraqis assaulted, tortured, raped, and murdered, and their destroyed nation, but to the thousands of dead Americans, and tens of thousands who are permanently damaged--blown off legs, serious psychological damage.

And the fiscal catastrophe of this grotesque war crime is, like our ever-balooning debt, still to be exacted. Or what, do you like $5.00 a gallon for gasoline?

Contiued mantra-like parrotings of the neocon line for supporting the attack on the Arab world a re disgusting. Just like you, bab's, in your wretched, soulless make-believe world of Rovian reality.

As for the Chimp and his pottymouth, no one cares about his saying "shit." Of course not. The chilling revelation of the open-mike comments are more:

--the astonishingly stupid and (blasted?) sort of comments to the Chinese premier...."You're a big country....yea Russia's big too"

--the bizarre misuse of "Ironic" along with the grossly uninformed take on Damascus somehow being able to shut the whole situation down like a faucet,

No one has ever considered the Chimp to be in any way intelligent or poised. And after all, he was NEVER duly elected in the first place. He stole the election in Florida in 2000, and again in Ohio in 2004. He and his cabal are outright criminals. But still his childish behavior and deportment is really disgusting.

We deserve a LOT better.

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Jul 21, 2006 9:24 pm

mvscal wrote:
LTS TRN 2 wrote:AlQaeda HATED Saddam.
They hate the United States and House of Saud even worse. Nice try, douche, but that isn't going to fly.

I wouldn't be so sure about the House of Saud.

And besides, even if one assumes that al-Qaeda hated the U.S. and House of Saud worse than Saddam, it does not follow that al-Qaeda and Saddam were allies.

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:07 pm

mvscal wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:And besides, even if one assumes that al-Qaeda hated the U.S. and House of Saud worse than Saddam, it does not follow that al-Qaeda and Saddam were allies.
Only a fucking idiot would believe that they weren't.

Do you ever get tired of KYOA, or your rather obvious black-and-white worldview? Just a few examples:

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0211-11.htm
http://www.rotten.com/library/bio/crime ... bin-laden/
http://www.truthout.org/docs_02/021303A.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3715396.stm
http://www.president-bush.com/osamabinhussein.html
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... Jun16.html

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:12 pm

mvscal wrote:

Well, if commie agitprop sites say so...it must be true.

Dumbfuck.

Commie agitprops sites?

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:20 pm

mvscal wrote:Yes. The BBC article doesn't even support your contention.

Say what?

Rumsfeld questions Saddam-Bin Laden link

US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has cast doubt on whether there was ever a relationship between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda.
The alleged link was used as a reason by President Bush for invading Iraq.

Mr Rumsfeld was asked by a New York audience about connections between Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden.

"To my knowledge, I have not seen any strong, hard evidence that links the two," he said, though he later issued a statement saying he was misunderstood.

When asked about the putative link during a session at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York on Monday, the defence secretary said: "I have seen the answer to that question migrate in the intelligence community over a period of a year in the most amazing way."

How's that GED treating you?

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:41 pm

It wasn't false. He did question the link between Iraq and al-Qaeda, although he later backpedaled when he realized he had gotten off his talking points.

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:45 pm

What part of this:

"To my knowledge, I have not seen any strong, hard evidence that links the two," he said

do you not get?

He rather obviously questioned any link between Saddam and bin Laden. Only later, when he realized he spoke out of turn, did he backpedal.

Terry in Crapchester · Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:54 pm

mvscal wrote:
Terry in Crapchester wrote:What part of this:

"To my knowledge, I have not seen any strong, hard evidence that links the two," he said
do you not get?

He rather obviously questioned any link between Saddam and bin Laden. Only later, when he realized he spoke out of turn, did he backpedal.
He never said that, dumbfuck.

The BBC misquoted him? Link?