KC @ Shittsburg

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:03 am

Might as well get this party started early.

Does KC even have a chance here? Most folks wrote this game off as a loss when it showed up on the schedule, before the season even started. I was one of those folks.

Now, with Trent Green being a sideline coach and LJ questionable after having his freaking head nearly ripped off, what's the story line going to be?

I dunno yet and will reserve my call until later in the week when more info is available on LJ.

But, the pukers are looking vulnerable. Too much hubris, too much reading of their own press clippings. Over-confidence has bit them in the ass thus far.

Damon Huard has been nothing short of remarkable, even though his unreliable receivers drop too many damn balls.

The KC defense, despite a couple of breakdowns at AZ, has played lights out for the most part.

Should be an intense game.

Takes...bring 'em if you got 'em.

Ken · Post by **Ken** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:49 am

If you can't run the ball well, NO ONE that you are playing is a pushover. The Stillers aren't running the ball well. They could lose to the Raiders.

Don't let Willie Parker's #'s fool you. Yes, he's had a few 100 yard games, but he's NOT the gridning, beat you down type that Bettis was. Trust me... the Stiller coaches are still trying to find their running identity. Parker's not the answer. He won't pummel a defense into submission by late in the third quater. That's what won the Stillers so many games w/Bettis. The Stiller get a lead and then just pound, pound, pound until the defense gives and loses.

They've now got Davenport, we'll see how that turns out. They dipped their toes in the water with him last night and I wasn't all that impressed.

Secondly, the Stiller's O-line isn't performing like it is known for. Ben just isn't getting time. He's reluctant to take off and run and make something happen... something he was always very good at. I'm becoming more and more of the ilk that last year, Ben was an average QB on a great team. Now that the Stillers don't have quite the talent around him any longer, his deficiencies are rearing their head.

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:42 am

Proactive Fuck, Wags...

Lookin' t o throw down on ol' B, and you beat me to the punch!

---------------

Memo to No-Sack

I could really give a flying rat’s ass that my Chiefs are a seven-point dog against your Squealers in the crib glossed for the near-ancestor pickle-mogul of the Howard Dean-sucking, John sKerry-marrying, card-carrying-ACLU-supporting, Liberal Cunt.

The Chiefs win outright come Sunday.

The bottom line is that your Sheet Metalers (flimsy stuff; bends at will) were an executed Grandma-ma pass block away in Dallas from calling in early January tee times in Scottsdale and watching my mighty Chiefs run the table.

Poetic Justice. The Jag-offs, Ben-wa’s, and Blots have all exposed Shill Coward, Bend Crotchrocketsbooger, Toy Tuiasopalumalu, and the rest of the Sheet Metalers as the Frauds that they truly are.

I’m calling you out, B, you Western New York, Band-Waggoning Piece of Crap,

Tell you what, B-enedict: Admittedly, I lurk more than I post. However, I will gladly wear your tag for a month in the improbable event that my Chiefs lose. You, on the other-hand, Mister 100-Posts-Per-Week, are only obligated to wear my sig ‘til next Sunday.

Dare to drop your codpiece? Or would that be a chastity belt?

Chiefs 20
B-Schmucks 19

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 3:02 am

Bwa!

Classic. Fucking. Truman.

kcdave · Post by **kcdave** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 3:37 am

Tim, BWA! Rack!

The best I remember, I can not recall making a prediciton on a Chiefs game so far this season. I will this week though. Chiefs win. 23-16

"Bend Crotchrocketsbooger," should be carrying a clip board for this game, but he wont. Next week, maybe.

Shine · Post by **Shine** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 3:51 am

While I'd love to see it I just can't see Pittsburgh losing 4 in a row.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 12:24 pm

Pittsburgh's played a more difficult schedule.
KC is nicked-up, and are playing their 2nd consecutive roadie.
I don't see Pittsburgh covering the 7 point spread, but I do see them making a late play-or-two to get them over.
Tight low-scoring game.

Steelers - 20
Chiefs - 16

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:08 pm

Truman,

If I make a sig bet with you, you have to post at least 50 times in the month following the Steelers beatdown of the Chiefs. Agree to that and we have a bet.

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 2:42 pm

Holy shit! The football gods decided it was ok to have KC visit Pittsburgh? That's totally unprecedented. The steelers have been the visitors in this series...what, 8 straight times?

Raydah James · Post by **Raydah James** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:45 pm

mvscal wrote:
KC Paul 3.0 wrote:It seems pretty clear that Willie Parker can't carry the load for the Stillers
His numbers are slightly better than Larry Johnson's.

Are you saying that Larry Johnson has gone from "shattering Dickerson's record" to "unable to carry the load for the Chiefs" in four games?!?

Are you simply confused from pasting takes from so many different sources? Or are you just an idiot?

RACK

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:47 pm

No way Cowher loses 4 in a row :wink: (plagerized)

Squealers..28
Chiefs.......17

Dante Hall runback accounts for one score.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:26 pm

ChargerMike wrote: Dante Hall runback accounts for one score.

Dante is questionable - hip pointer.

Even if he plays, he won't be at 100%

But it sounds as if LJ is going to be fine. Even though his rushing numbers have been way below expectations, he's still contributing in a big way in the passing game.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:33 pm

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
mvscal wrote:His numbers are slightly better than Larry Johnson's.
RUSHING YARDS
Larry Johnson: 331
Willie Parker: 325

RUSHING ATTEMPTS
Larry Johnson: 90
Willie Parker: 85

RUSHING AVERAGE
Larry Johnson: 3.7
Willie Parker: 3.8

RUSHING TDS
Larry Johnson: 2
Willie Parker: 3

Ummm, whatever you say m2vscal.
Are you saying that Larry Johnson has gone from "shattering Dickerson's record" to "unable to carry the load for the Chiefs" in four games?!?

Are you simply confused from pasting takes from so many different sources? Or are you just an idiot?
Hey fuckhole, that was before Willie Roaf decided to bail on the team right the fuck before training camp. Not to mention that I'm DAMN sure that I NEVER said that LJ was "unable to carry the load for the Chiefs". Dumbass.

...I'm sure mv is most appreciative you proved his point... :paul:

Ken · Post by **Ken** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:20 am

ChargerMike wrote:
KC Paul 3.0 wrote:
mvscal wrote:His numbers are slightly better than Larry Johnson's.
RUSHING YARDS
Larry Johnson: 331
Willie Parker: 325

RUSHING ATTEMPTS
Larry Johnson: 90
Willie Parker: 85

RUSHING AVERAGE
Larry Johnson: 3.7
Willie Parker: 3.8

RUSHING TDS
Larry Johnson: 2
Willie Parker: 3

Ummm, whatever you say m2vscal.
Are you saying that Larry Johnson has gone from "shattering Dickerson's record" to "unable to carry the load for the Chiefs" in four games?!?

Are you simply confused from pasting takes from so many different sources? Or are you just an idiot?
Hey fuckhole, that was before Willie Roaf decided to bail on the team right the fuck before training camp. Not to mention that I'm DAMN sure that I NEVER said that LJ was "unable to carry the load for the Chiefs". Dumbass.

...I'm sure mv is most appreciative you proved his point... :paul:

Yeah, pretty much, he did.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:23 am

KC Paul 3.0 wrote:No I didn't- WP has ONE MORE TD. BIG FUCKING DEAL. All I know is that his bony little ass WILL be shut down on Sunday.

..he also as a higher per carry average based on his 6 less yards on 5 fewer carries.....so yes you DID prove mv's statement that Fast Willie's numbers are slightly beter than LJ's :P

Ken · Post by **Ken** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 12:27 am

KC Paul 3.0 will write next... wrote:Last I checked, ypc are not kept on the scoreboard. TD's are.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:11 am

Ken wrote:
KC Paul 3.0 will write next... wrote:Last I checked, ypc are not kept on the scoreboard. TD's are.

...True... unless he remembers HE's the one who posted those stats. :D

Shine · Post by **Shine** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:27 am

What was posted shows that Willie Parker has slightly better rushing stats than Larry Johnson. But if we add in pass catching:

LJ- 20 for 268 and 1 TD
Parker- 10 for 58 and 0 TD

Then thus far this year I'd say Johnson has been the more productive back.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:10 am

And you would be correct.

kcdave · Post by **kcdave** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 4:34 am

BSmack wrote:Truman,

If I make a sig bet with you, you have to post at least 50 times in the month following the Steelers beatdown of the Chiefs. Agree to that and we have a bet.

Bri, nice way to totally puss out on a lame ass sig bet. Tim post 50 times in one month?

BWA!

Why not ask something a little easier?

BSmack wrote:If I make a sig bet with you, you have to hop in your time machine, go back, and intercept the cum wad that landed upon Monica's dress. Agree to that and we have a bet.

Why not just admit you do not have much faith in your team?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:09 am

kcdave wrote:
BSmack wrote:Truman,

If I make a sig bet with you, you have to post at least 50 times in the month following the Steelers beatdown of the Chiefs. Agree to that and we have a bet.
Bri, nice way to totally puss out on a lame ass sig bet. Tim post 50 times in one month? BWA!

Why not ask something a little easier?

BSmack wrote:If I make a sig bet with you, you have to hop in your time machine, go back, and intercept the cum wad that landed upon Monica's dress. Agree to that and we have a bet.

Why not just admit you do not have much faith in your team?

Hey, I'm doing this for YOU Dave. This board is a better place when Truman posts more often. As for having faith in my team, I have plenty. That's why I want Truman to be posting with the sig I'm going to hang on him.

Shine · Post by **Shine** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:23 pm

Kinda like how you posted all those times with the sig you were saddled with when Pissburgh lost to Cincy?? Oh that's right, you chumped out on that bet.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:48 pm

Shine wrote:Kinda like how you posted all those times with the sig you were saddled with when Pissburgh lost to Cincy?? Oh that's right, you chumped out on that bet.

...ZINGER

Hapday · Post by **Hapday** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:57 pm

Ken wrote:
Don't let Willie Parker's #'s fool you. Yes, he's had a few 100 yard games, but he's NOT the gridning, beat you down type that Bettis was. Trust me...

But does he run "angry"?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:19 am

Shine wrote:Kinda like how you posted all those times with the sig you were saddled with when Pissburgh lost to Cincy?? Oh that's right, you chumped out on that bet.

I just checked that thread again. Quite frankly I had given up on you ever posting anything. Maybe next time you might want to post your sig earlier than say... 10:30 Friday night the next week? But just to show you there's no hard feelings, I'll carry it the rest of this week. Which is about twice as long as I would have had I seen your post last week.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:04 am

Please, would you girls just send each other a PM next time, rather than douching yourselves here?

Thanks.

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:11 am

Considering Davenport will soon be the new "Bus" I'd say the Parker v LJ debate is kinda moot.

Steelers are stuggling, but Cower always seems to find a way against us.

From the coulda, shoulda, woulda file - (one of the) Biggest mistake we ever made was letting him get away

I see a real snoozer

Pitt 17
KC 13

PSUFAN · Post by **PSUFAN** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:34 pm

The Steelers are up against the wall in this one. 1-4 would be tough to surmount.

Deshea Townsend and Joey Porter won't be playing. Unless their replacements have career days, the Steeler defense will be suspect.

Chiefs: 28
Steelers: 17

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:59 pm

PSUFAN wrote:The Steelers are up against the wall in this one. 1-4 would be tough to surmount.

Deshea Townsend and Joey Porter won't be playing. Unless their replacements have career days, the Steeler defense will be suspect.

Chiefs: 28
Steelers: 17

I'm not uncomfortable with McFadden replacing Townshend. Porter's situation is a bit more dicey, as James Harrison went down last week and is out for 2-3 weeks. His replacements are either Arnold Harrison or Rian Wallace.

I'm not ready to call an 11 point Chiefs win in Pittsburgh until I see wether Townshend and Porter move from "questionable" to either "doubtful" or "out".

Still waiting on Truman.

PS: Just read that the Steelers signed Chad Brown. Pretty freakin rare that the Steelers sign back someone who's left via free agency. He's damn sure not an upgrade from James Harrison.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:02 pm

"PS: Just read that the Steelers signed Chad Brown. Pretty freakin rare that the Steelers sign back someone who's left via free agency. He's damn sure not an upgrade from James Harrison"

...and that pretty much sums up the Squealers dilema!

am I reall starting the Pittsburgh D this week???

you're welcome Dan.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:41 pm

..uh oh...I've just been called out!

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:50 pm

ChargerMike wrote:No way Cowher loses 4 in a row :wink: (plagerized)

you post thieving bastige.....

I knew I should have copyrighted that........

as for the game......NO WAY COWHER LOSES (insert number here) IN A ROW*

lets say.....

Squeelers-24
Chefs-21

*raydud fan is hereby granted permission to use this phrase until it becomes a reality

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:55 pm

ChargerMike wrote:..uh oh...I've just been called out!

Just trying to keep your rep together.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:04 pm

BSmack wrote:
ChargerMike wrote:..uh oh...I've just been called out!
Just trying to keep your rep together.

I figured as much...................thought about it for about 1 second. :D

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:05 pm

PSUFAN wrote: Chiefs: 28
Steelers: 17

11 points?

You crazy man.

It's not in Herm (never met a 30 yard FG attempt that he wouldn't galdly accept) Edwards to win a game like this on the road by more than one score, even if he could and should. That tight ass (and KC offensive play calling) will clench as fast and tight as a sprung steel bear trap the nano-second he gets so much as a one point lead. Hell, he clenches those cheeks when he's losing, for Vermeils sake.

I'm going waaay out on a limb here and predicting that KC barely gets over 16-14.

Whose in for sig bets?

Ken · Post by **Ken** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:33 pm

mvscal wrote:
BSmack wrote:PS: Just read that the Steelers signed Chad Brown. Pretty freakin rare that the Steelers sign back someone who's left via free agency. He's damn sure not an upgrade from James Harrison.
I wouldn't think so. He's been around what 13 or 14 years now? Surprised they could get him away from his reptile biz.

I'm sure they wooed he and his wife back to Pittsburgh with some carp sushi, straight from the Monongahela.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 12:03 am

War Wagon wrote:
PSUFAN wrote: Chiefs: 28
Steelers: 17

11 points?

You crazy man.

It's not in Herm (never met a 30 yard FG attempt that he wouldn't galdly accept) Edwards to win a game like this on the road by more than one score, even if he could and should. That tight ass (and KC offensive play calling) will clench as fast and tight as a sprung steel bear trap the nano-second he gets so much as a one point lead. Hell, he clenches those cheeks when he's losing, for Vermeils sake.
I'm going waaay out on a limb here and predicting that KC barely gets over 16-14.

Whose in for sig bets?

HermBall?? kinda makes ya warm and fuzzy all over now doesn't it?

sin, MartyBall is dead...bwahahahaha

godzilla2002 · Post by **godzilla2002** » Sat Oct 14, 2006 3:49 am

War Wagon wrote:Please, would you girls just send each other a PM like me and Scottie do, rather than douching yourselves here?
Thanks.

FTFY

The Chiefs get a big reality check this week, might even see an NFL sack record dropped on em!
Pittsburgh – 26
KC -10

WhatsMyName · Post by **WhatsMyName** » Sat Oct 14, 2006 5:38 am

The Chiefs aren't winning this game you stupid fucks.

Truman · Post by **Truman** » Sat Oct 14, 2006 8:41 pm

BSmack wrote:

Fifty posts, eh?

Might be worthy of consideration were you to chuck in a coupla light-water reactors, but this sordid clambake ain’t exactly North Korea and I ain’t no Duk Ku Kim (or whatever that fucked-up slant’s name is).

I made my concession.

One month to your week. Or perhaps I should suggest, “weak”. But I digress…

You wanna negotiate? Perfect. Start by negotiating the return of your cubes from your bride between now and kickoff.

Why, I’ll even make it easy for ya, Aunt B!

_____Yes, Truman, I will “man-up” and take your bet, though I mortally dread the plunger-raping that you are sure to lay on my junky ass come 8:00 PM EDT Sunday.

_____No, Truman, I will be way too busy licking campaign-flyer envelopes for Mrs. Clinton and shoveling lake-effect snow from the wifey’s side of the driveway to take your bet. Besides, I mortally dread the plunger-raping that you are sure to lay on my junky ass come 8:00 PM EDT Sunday.

So all you really want outta me this next month is 50 posts?

Super. Then content yourself with the next four…