the draft

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:13 pm

Dinsdale wrote:
Bizzarofelice wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:
Can we now declare a moratorium on spelling/grammar smack?
no.
Then could you edit that to read "backpedalling?"

sure thing, fag.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:20 pm

Bizzarofelice wrote:
Diogenes wrote:What I was saying is...
No, you got caught in a fuck up...

There was no fuck up, it just went over your head (as usual).

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:36 pm

Diogenes wrote:The military loathes the idea, which is one reason you only hear the left talking about it

explain your way of this statement, Susie.

silvurna · Post by **silvurna** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:44 pm

The entire military decidedly does not loathe the idea of a new draft. The people delivering anti-draft sentiment may just be field-grade officers who fear unpleasant monkey business with their careers if the draft is reinstated.
Personally, I believe it's a great idea, and we'll see it happen within four months.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:08 pm

What part of the statement did you not get? Name someone on the right who supports the draft? Exactly when did you serve anyway, bitch?

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:22 pm

I serve bitches like you. Last time I did that... check the time.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 9:45 pm

Dinsdale wrote:
Bizzarofelice wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:
Can we now declare a moratorium on spelling/grammar smack?
no.
Then could you edit that to read "backpedalling?"

Only if we can call a moratorium on anal retentive posting behavoir.

oh, looky. there I went and missplelled a word or some.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:06 pm

mvscal wrote:
Diogenes wrote: Name someone on the right who supports the draft?
I do. No deferrals. Your number comes up...you pack your shit and go. Bad back? No problem. You can push a pencil as well as that able bodied PAC clerk.

Conscripts won the Civil War and WW2. They'll do just fine today.

Being slightly to the right of Castro (if that) doesn't put you on the right. In WW II we didn't have the same anti-military press corps or a minority party dedicated to subverting the military effort in order to bring down the CinC. And our culture as a whole is slightly differant. And by serve, I didn't mean suck off, I meant enlist in the armed forces. Flat out, those who are serving right now don't want or need chicckenshit losers like you sullying the uniform.

Stick to proofreading, bitch.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:45 pm

Tinker to Evers to Chance · Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:50 pm

silvurna wrote:The entire military decidedly does not loathe the idea of a new draft. The people delivering anti-draft sentiment may just be field-grade officers who fear unpleasant monkey business with their careers if the draft is reinstated.
Personally, I believe it's a great idea, and we'll see it happen within four months.

If the only thing those field grade officers were concerned about was their careers, they would be all for the draft.

A draft means rapid expansion of the Army, which means accelerated promotions for the guys that are already in.

The phantorino · Post by **The phantorino** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:05 pm

I voted No

Obviously the majority of young, serving age Americans are too obese to get through one day on a parade ground. How the fuck are they going to serve in some war except as tank camouflage?

Rich Fader · Post by **Rich Fader** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:17 pm

Rich Fader wrote:Considering that a good number of you clowns are probably still of draft age, I voted "stfu timmah". The idea that somebody might consider some of you even basically qualified to take up the defense of our country gives me hives. (I'm obviously excluding those of you who actually went in and served honorably and well--props, by the way--but you know who I mean.)

This thread is proving my point in spades...except that after reading this thread I'm not sure if I'd even want some of you prior-service guys getting drafted if you hadn't already signed up.

Oh, well...props for your service, anyway.

:D

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:20 am

I voted yes. Nothing like a draft to insipre the young liberals to get out and vote.

Luther · Post by **Luther** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:28 am

BSmack wrote:I voted yes. Nothing like a draft to insipre the young liberals to get out and burn their draft card.

Does "B" stand for Bic?

Rip City

trev · Post by **trev** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 1:35 am

BSmack wrote:I voted yes. Nothing like a draft to insipre the young liberals to get out and vote.

Yes. I was wondering who the 2 who voted yes were. I figured you were one of them.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:05 pm

BSmack wrote:I voted yes. Nothing like a draft to insipre the young liberals to get out and vote.

Nobody wants to hear about your fantasies with young liberals, BFoley.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:10 pm

I have a feeling that re-instating the draft would be somewhat unpopular, politically, particularly with

a. People in the eligible age group

and

b. Their parents

Approval of this "war" would go down to about 2% if anybody actually had to consider making any personal sacrifices for it.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:12 pm

Mikey wrote:Approval of this "war" would go down to about 2% if anybody actually had to consider making any personal sacrifices for it.

So people would be less interested in freedom if it meant their freedoms would be stepped on?

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:17 pm

OCmike wrote:
BSmack wrote:I voted yes. Nothing like a draft to insipre the young liberals to get out and vote.
Nobody wants to hear about your fantasies with young liberals, BFoley.

Non sequiter much?

Must suck to jump on the GOP bandwaggon just in time to see the wheels come off out from under you. Tell me, how's Arnie doing stopping those Messicans from littering your parking lots?

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:27 pm

He does fine every day, 'cept for Cinco de Mayo, like always.

Arnie, while way too far left for my tastes, is still a far cry better than that union whore Gray Davis that he replaced.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:51 pm

While the Governator has done a lot better job than I expected, he still hasn't done much if anything to rein it the most powerful and corrput union in the state.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 6:35 pm

BSmack wrote:I voted yes. Nothing like a draft to insipre the young left-wing morons to get out and vote.

Exactly. Which is why only leftist scum are actually floating the idea as 1) an opportunity to scare the voters and 2) Becuse they actually think that our military is a collection of pathetc losers from the hood who are one step away from incarceratiion (Dims? Bace? Did Ispelt that one right?) Actually those in uniform (and the vast majority of those who have served) don't require or wish for any help from losers who don't care about their country in the first place (something the Dems will never get).

Fuck you and have a nice day.

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 6:51 pm

mvscal wrote:
Diogenes wrote: those who are serving right now don't want or need chicckenshit losers like you sullying the uniform.

I'm sorry, I must have missed it when you posted your branch and unit.

That's okay, I missed when you posted yours. Or I didn't give a shit. The point is that if you have served, you are fit to comenent on these matters. Even if <Bace Alert>your<End Bace Alert> a clueless racist shitstain like you.. Still a step abve a draft(snicker)dodging loser like Bace or Dins.

BTW, USS Hector 1980-1983.

And BTW, Fuck Off~edit~ Do you actually disagree with what I've been saying in this thread or is this just a drive-by blowjob?

Just curious.

Oh wait.
I don't care.

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:16 pm

Mexican Navy maybe?

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 7:43 pm

A repair ship.

In 1980, she received a major overhaul, and HECTOR became one of the first ships in the Pacific Fleet to have women officers report aboard. (One of whom was Ensign Diogenes Iskra who served aboard as Diving Officer 1980-82 who went on to make Naval History in 1990 by becoming the first woman to command a Naval vessel, the USS Boldface.)

Diogenes · Post by **Diogenes** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:06 pm

Actually. Iskra had a pretty nice ass. Her face on the other hand...

No Comment.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:17 pm

BTW, USS Hector 1980-1983.

Oh, so you're a battle hardened veteran.

In 1981, HECTOR began her 25th deployment, visiting Yokosuka Japan; Diego Garcia; Tonga, Western Samoa; Auckland, New Zealand and Melbourne, Australia.

That was the Love boat war, right?

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:47 pm

Mister Bushice wrote:
BTW, USS Hector 1980-1983.
Oh, so you're a battle hardened veteran.

That was the Love boat war, right?

I liked that episode where Isaac whips up a Mai Tai for Sonny Bono, and then he goes and spills it on Gopher.

Oh the laughs!

The phantorino · Post by **The phantorino** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:44 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:A repair ship.

In 1980, she received a major overhaul, and HECTOR became one of the first ships in the Pacific Fleet to have women officers report aboard. (One of whom was Ensign Diogenes Iskra who served aboard as Diving Officer 1980-82 who went on to make Naval History in 1990 by becoming the first woman to command a Naval vessel, the USS Boldface.)

Got to rack the shit out of that one, Goobs.

and it does pain me to do so.

T1B

the draft

should the US reinstate the draft?