How's 'bout it Sooner?

Cornhusker · Post by **Cornhusker** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 3:50 am

Can we get it on?

montinelevin · Post by **montinelevin** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 3:58 am

Cornhusker wrote:Can we get it on?

This sounds like it should be a PM... and should be taken out behind the barn.

If it meant something else... please explain.

Cornhusker · Post by **Cornhusker** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:09 am

montinelevin wrote:
Cornhusker wrote:Can we get it on?
This sounds like it should be a PM...

That's a perfect example you're on the left coast...and I'm in the Heartland.

OUMO · Post by **OUMO** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:10 am

We have to take care of the sheep fuckers first.

Harvdog · Post by **Harvdog** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 5:09 am

OUMO wrote:We have to take care of the sheep fuckers first.

I thought that's what we were supposed to do today. :sad:

OUMO · Post by **OUMO** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 6:16 am

Well here is another way to look at things.

OU is not just playing to beat Okie st tomorrow, they are also up against Texas.

There are major recruiting implications with the possibilites of BCS bowls.

The win or loss has thrice importance, if I may say the last being...

An OU win means an old fuck you to the whole state of Texas and the OU/NU rivalry renewed!

WuRd

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 6:26 am

The OU/NU rivalry was built-on playing for high stakes. When the stakes aren't high it just isn't the same. It isn't like Texas/OU or Texas/ATM where no-matter-what emotions are running high. While I would snicker a bit if OU blew-it against OSU I would also like so see NU and OU playing-for-it-all like old times.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 6:36 am

Well, let's be honest here, folks...

Nebraska is a three loss team which lost all three big games they played this season. They're going to play either a D.O.A. three loss Texas team or a no big deal two loss OU team in a dismal conference's CCG for the right to play Boise St in a Fiesta Bowl which will easily be one of this post season's two most ignored major BCS bowl games.

So, no, this isn't exactly "playing-for-it-all like old times"...

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:17 am

Van wrote:Well, let's be honest here, folks...

Nebraska is a three loss team which lost all three big games they played this season. They're going to play either a D.O.A. three loss Texas team or a no big deal two loss OU team in a dismal conference's CCG for the right to play Boise St in a Fiesta Bowl which will easily be one of this post season's two most ignored major BCS bowl games.

So, no, this isn't exactly "playing-for-it-all like old times"...

How does our loss at OSU count as a big game and our win at ATM not count genius? ATM was ranked and OSU wasn't. OU would be a one-loss team and still in the MNC-mix if not for a blatant screwjob by your conference's shitty officials. Plus don't even start dysmal conference-smack when your con never gets two teams in the major bowls.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:41 am

Believe the Heupel wrote:Yeah, winning a conference title is no big deal at all.

For fuck's sake, Van, you're generally at least coherent, but sometimes you sound like Schmick with a high-school education.

B-t-H, please. Compared to OU-Nebraska games of "old times" this season's Big XII title game (regardless of who gets in now from the South) in NO way rates.

"Winning-it-all" between those three teams (OU/Nebraska/Texas) used to mean completing a perfect regular season and earning a shot at the national title. It didn't mean surviving a conference cripple fight with the winner getting Boise St in a game with zero BCS implications and nearly zero national interest.

Fact. Deal with it. Instead of bitching at the messenger maybe you ought to just sit down, shut the fuck up and humbly accept that winning the Big XII this season means precisely fuckall compared to what it meant in year's past...which is all I'm saying.

I'm getting awfully tired of P.C. bitches around here who can't accept a spade being called a spade. Look, YOUR little achievements often times simply don't matter much to the rest of the nation. Winning the ACC this year? BFD. The Big East? Same? The WAC? The MEAC?

Try to dress it up anyway you want but nobody....gives...a...crap. The Big XII is equally irrelevant this season. OU/Nebraska/Texas, in season's past, playing in the CCG with three losses apiece?? Boise St, as their bowl game opponent?

Flush that season, for all of 'em. They'd all just want to forget it. It's beneath 'em.

Fuck, B-t-H, with the way you can't accept this it's almost like I have more respect for OU/Nebraska/Texas than you do...

montinelevin · Post by **montinelevin** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:52 am

Van... shut the fuck up!!!

You lost to Oregon State!!!

Hell, we played you even for 3 1/2 quarters with our heads up our ass, and getting screwed by the PAC 10 officials.

My apologies to everyone for letting the crazy cousin(Van) out for College Football season.

Nebraska, OU, and Texas are very good teams that could beat any team in the country on a given day/night.

Vannie, you do remember the Rose Bowl last year??? When you talked shit about Texas???

Van · Post by **Van** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 8:06 am

Danimal wrote:
Van wrote:Well, let's be honest here, folks...

Nebraska is a three loss team which lost all three big games they played this season. They're going to play either a D.O.A. three loss Texas team or a no big deal two loss OU team in a dismal conference's CCG for the right to play Boise St in a Fiesta Bowl which will easily be one of this post season's two most ignored major BCS bowl games.

So, no, this isn't exactly "playing-for-it-all like old times"...
How does our loss at OSU count as a big game and our win at ATM not count genius? ATM was ranked and OSU wasn't. OU would be a one-loss team and still in the MNC-mix if not for a blatant screwjob by your conference's shitty officials. Plus don't even start dysmal conference-smack when your con never gets two teams in the major bowls.

Nebraska considers games against USC, OU and Texas to be big games.

Nebraska considers games against Okie St and Texas A&M to be schedule filler.

I made one error there. I forgot that one of Nebraska's losses was to Okie St, not OU. So, in reality, Nebraska's only played two big games this season, and they lost 'em both. They also lost a third game to a conference doormat.

Like I said, apparently I have more respect for OU/Nebraska/Texas than you Big XII honks do. I obviously expect more of the Big XII's elite than you do. I'm not about to call Okie St a big game loss and I'm not about to call A&M a big game win. A real Nebraska team rolls 'em both easily, as expected.

A real Nebraska team would consider this season already over, for all intents and purposes. They lost their only two big games and they even managed to lose a third game to Okie St, of all people. More damning still, they flat out turtled against USC. They played scared, for all the nation to see. All in all this season would be viewed by normal Big Red standards as a catastrophe, a downright train wreck. A real OU or Texas team would've left such a Nebraska team in the dust. Such a Nebraska team would normally be relegated to watching Colorado or even K State lining up to get mugged by OU or Texas in the CCG.

Instead, we have a three loss Texas team still thinking they have a shot to play a three loss Nebraska team for the right to play Boise St.

Why?

Because it's not even a lock that OU will beat Okie St to earn a shot at the CCG.

Texas, having to hope for Okie St, in order for them to have a shot at a three loss team in a CCG....in order to earn a bowl game shot at a team from Idaho.

Trainwrecks everywhere, nothing but trainwrecks. Can't believe it takes a USC fan to see it that way. Can't believe a Big XII fan could see it any other way. What's the world coming to when USC fan has higher expectations than Big XII fan for the Big XII's elite??

Sad.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 8:33 am

m2, I think Joelyn's calling you...

Something about, "Being a Cal fan like you are, and the most classless poor loser on the board to boot, hey, maybe you need this rope more than I do..."

Also, no, you didn't play us even for 3 1/2 quarters. You got shut out from the second quarter forward. You got dominated statistically and on the scoreboard and then you got dismissed. You also didn't get screwed by the officials. They got every reviewed call correct. You were simply begging, hoping for the refs to bail you out by making bad calls that went your way.

Didn't happen. They got it right in each instance.

Complaining afterwards about the calls, like you got screwed? Saying you were in the game for 3 1/2 quarters?

Watch football much? You cunt your way along in here like a whiny middle school brat who only watches football so that you can get the star QB to assfuck you after the prom.

B-t-H, nothing I've ever said would ever lead anybody who doesn't have an agenda to say I only follow USC. That's utter bullshit and you know it.

Just because I have more respect and higher expectations than you do for the Big XII's elite programs doesn't mean I don't follow them and it doesn't mean you're not being a total bitch right now. It's normally not like you to be a bitch like this but hey, that's exactly what you're being right now when you can't accept people telling you this season's conference championship doesn't stack up to "old times", which is what Danimal originally said; which is the only point I'm refuting.

Sorry, pal. It doesn't. This season sucks by Big XII champion standards, period. This season sucks by Big XII standards, period. Hearing this may not make you happy but it doesn't make the messenger any less observant and it doesn't make him any less correct.

Face it: Some years, winning the Big XII means a lot. This year, it won't mean nearly as much. It'll mean a trophy, and a big BCS paycheck, and little else. It usually means so much more, in The Big Picture.

Are you really going to continue to sit there and deny this??

montinelevin · Post by **montinelevin** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 10:04 am

^^^^^^^^^^

I was going to edit this post, just to point out the inaccuracy's.

I think I'll just leave the melt of the century... for everyone to view.

WoW, just WoW!

War Stoops · Post by **War Stoops** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 1:58 pm

You know, both Van and BtH are in the right. An OU/NU game for the Big 12 Title would be HUGE for NU, OU, and Big 12 fans but probably wouldn't register for the rest of the country. I wish there were higher stakes but there aren't

Still, as a college football fan, you have to get excited about a great rivalry game for a conference championship. Especially since this would be the first time OU and NU have both made it to the CCG.

IF, IF, IF OU beats lOSUr.

Oh, and either way, GO NEVADA!

Carson · Post by **Carson** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 3:46 pm

The conference championship games don't matter anyway.
They were supposed to give teams that last push in the polls before the bowl selections.
Now they're used to give the sports writers another reason to choose their fair-haired boys.
"You only won your conference championship by seven points?"

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 3:51 pm

In the old days the OU/Neb game was a can't miss game every year. I remember always watching these classics from beginning to end. The formation of the Big 12 ruined this once great (top 3) rivalry.

Switzer vs. Osborn...man, those were the days.

Husker4ever · Post by **Husker4ever** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:03 pm

USC lost to a garbage program (this is college football....it happens) and now stand on the outside looking in. A win over ND and they will have even more bitter fodder to chew. USC "fans" are probably digging out the Laker gear already.

Meanwhile, the Big 12 is abuzz the last couple days with all the variables that will determine who gets to play for a conference title. The possible renewal of one of the nation's best rivalries with a conference title on the line adds to the excitement.

Van describes Nebraska, OU, Texas as trainwrecks and the Big 12 in general as a total shitbox conference. He rationalizes his comments by saying he has more respect and expectations from the teams he denigrates gleefully and often in here...thriving on any misery or loss by them. I think your real problem is USC losing the spotlight and focus of discussion for the first time in a couple years...here and in the national media. When not a single "The Genius of Carroll" thread was started, you really got bitter.

Got news for ya Vanny... Okie State (one of those doormats you mentioned) has more loyal fans than the Hollywood Trojans.

Where's USC going to be in 5 years? A" trainwreck"....a flipped over bandwagon with a USC banner in the mud.

the_ouskull · Post by **the_ouskull** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:14 pm

Yeah, it's not Barry versus Tom or anything, but it's still for a Conference Championship, a BCS bowl, which, after the year OU has had, would be absolutely amazing, and it's OU freakin' Nebraska. ANY game is bigger when there's more on the line, but OU / Nebraska doesn't have to justify itself to ANY rivalry. Period. If you don't like it, Van, eat a bag of dick you USC bandwagoning homer dipshit. Call us when you watch a football game.

the_ouskull

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 4:40 pm

the_ouskull wrote:Yeah, it's not Barry versus Tom or anything, but it's still for a Conference Championship, a BCS bowl, which, after the year OU has had, would be absolutely amazing, and it's OU freakin' Nebraska. ANY game is bigger when there's more on the line, but OU / Nebraska doesn't have to justify itself to ANY rivalry. Period. If you don't like it, Van, eat a bag of dick you USC bandwagoning homer dipshit. Call us when you watch a football game.

the_ouskull

Rack!!!

Cornhusker · Post by **Cornhusker** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 5:59 pm

Van

^^^^^^
Well, I have a definite rooting interest for the Irish tonight.
Thanks for that.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 6:28 pm

Cornhusker wrote:Van

^^^^^^
Well, I have a definite rooting interest for the Irish tonight.
Thanks for that.

:-) :-)

shutyomouth's still considered the devil 'round these parts, eh?

ou-skull, it's getting old. Come up with something else besides, "You don't watch football".

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:20 pm

Yeah, maybe the matchup isn't what it used to be, but that doesn't mean it's unimportant. Those two concepts aren't mutually inclusive.

Any major conference title game is a big one. If we had a playoff, this game would mean more, but, I'm not going to go down that road right now.

Chalk me up as one of those CF fans who DOES indeed give a crap.

I'll be watching.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:41 pm

This game and this season's Big XII CCG won't be "like old times".

That's all I said. It's a simple fact. No reason for Sooner Nation to get their crimson and cream panties in a bunch over it. It just means the "old times" for the Big XII's elite were REALLY DAMN GOOD times and that this current season doesn't compare...

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:44 pm

Van wrote:This game and this season's Big XII CCG won't be "like old times".

So all that typing for a Marcus Allen take, huh?

Your CF cliche-hating wife would be disappointed.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:56 pm

Yep, just one simple M.A. type comment...

Amazing that something so simple and so irrefutable can inspire such virulent defensiveness from Big XII Honk. What's the world coming to when Pac 10 Fan can't even compliment Big XII Honk's former glory without having Big XII Honk assblasting away like m2 following a correctly overturned bad call...

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 10:49 pm

SunCoastSooner wrote:
the_ouskull wrote:Yeah, it's not Barry versus Tom or anything, but it's still for a Conference Championship, a BCS bowl, which, after the year OU has had, would be absolutely amazing, and it's OU freakin' Nebraska. ANY game is bigger when there's more on the line, but OU / Nebraska doesn't have to justify itself to ANY rivalry. Period. If you don't like it, Van, eat a bag of dick you USC bandwagoning homer dipshit. Call us when you watch a football game.

the_ouskull
Rack!!!

Second. RACK it.

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:36 pm

Believe the Heupel wrote:Mods, do you think we could get a separate "Van acts like a tard" thread so people who actually give a shit about college football can discuss it?

11 paragraph response from Van in 3,2,1.....He makes Dinsdale look like William Carlos Williams or Basho.

Cornhusker · Post by **Cornhusker** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:45 pm

Believe the Heupel wrote:I'm so looking forward to Nebraska attempting to run the WCO in Arrowhead in December.

Keeping in mind it truely isn't defined by the pass alone...besides, wind plays a larger role than cold.
In Nebraska, the wind freekin' blows here 360 days a year. We've had plenty of practice.
We've run the ball all season, now against OU...that looks pretty salty.

I know Zac ain't Brett Farve, (he is however the best QB in the Big 12) but he's done pretty well in a place called Green Bay...and don't forget, it hasn't been spring here for quite sometime now.
I'm actually wondering how OU players will enjoy the brisk evening and 50,000 + NU fans.

Bottom line, if Cosgrove is his stupid self, you'll run fairly well, probably well enough, if he somehow pulls his head out of his ass and plays Carriker at tackle only, and plays Major Culbert in place of Bo Rudd or Stu Bradley, gets Thernares in on defense as well, we'll have a chance of getting some stops. NU would be better playing a nickel, even against the run...cut backs kill this team and missed tackles. OU's backs are a recipe for disaster as long as Kevin Cosgrove is on our sideline.

At Large · Post by **At Large** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:27 am

That Oklahoma State game was probably Zac Taylor's worse day I've ever seen. The guy missed passes all over the place. I wouldn't base that performance on how he's going to do in KC (although bad games can come any time).

the_ouskull · Post by **the_ouskull** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:39 am

Van wrote:ou-skull, it's getting old. Come up with something else besides, "You don't watch football".

Fuck you and what YOU think is getting old. You're the freakin' barnacle, swinging from the sack of this place like Ahmad Rashad back when MJ was still around. If you think us saying, "you don't watch football" is getting old THEN WATCH A FUCKING GAME BEFORE YOU OPEN YOUR FUCKING MOUTH !!!

Or, in terms you might get:

You: I'm an idiot. I'm an idiot. I'm an idiot. Submit.
Us: You're an idiot.
You: Stop calling me an idiot. It's getting old.

If you're tired of people calling you out on the fact that it is PAINFULLY obvious that you don't actually watch, or if you DO watch, you know absolutely NOTHING about; football, then either do something to make it less obvious or stop fucking posting. You make the bed. Stop bitching to us about how well you sleep.

And, while I'm thinking about it, whoever said, "11 paragraph response from Van..." Yes, TECHNICALLY, 11, 1-sentence paragraphs IS 11 paragraphs, but we're only pulling a sentence fragment's worth of substance out of all of it...

the_ouskull

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:59 am

So, okay, it's settled. You've got nothing.

Oh well. Enjoy your little hissy fit. No matter how much you continue to cunt bubble you still can't come up with anything and the Big XII still ain't like "old times".

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:06 am

LET ME CHIME IN,

VAN? right now, usc is irrelevant, you lost to un-ranked piece of shit, oregon st.
you may think the trojans are something special, think again, a special team does NOT lose to an un-ranked piece of shit, PERIOD.

as for the big 12 title game? FUCK YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by the way, does anyone know if peterson is gonna play?
cause, in my opinion, without peterson, its nebraska's game to lose.
without your best runner, oklahoma does not scare me at all,
just sayin.

SunCoastSooner · Post by **SunCoastSooner** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:23 pm

Cornhusker wrote:Keeping in mind it truely isn't defined by the pass alone...besides, wind plays a larger role than cold.
In Nebraska, the wind freekin' blows here 360 days a year. We've had plenty of practice.
We've run the ball all season, now against OU...that looks pretty salty.

Yeah ya know the Oklahoma is known for its lack of wind

and that tropical fauna gives the weather away too huh?

Adelpiero · Post by **Adelpiero** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:58 pm

Believe the Heupel wrote:Mods, do you think we could get a separate "Van acts like a tard" thread so people who actually give a shit about college football can discuss it?

wouldn't that be pretty much every thread he hits submit in??? I don't see much difference in his daily dribble and a posts in a tard forum.

the_ouskull · Post by **the_ouskull** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 6:14 pm

Can you move indidivual posts to TROTS or does it have to be entire threads?

the_ouskull

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 6:42 pm

Van wrote:This game and this season's Big XII CCG won't be "like old times".

That's all I said. It's a simple fact. No reason for Sooner Nation to get their crimson and cream panties in a bunch over it. It just means the "old times" for the Big XII's elite were REALLY DAMN GOOD times and that this current season doesn't compare...

Allow me to take a stab at this from somewhat of a neutral, more objective angle, Van. You're correct in saying that it won't be like "old times", but for a different reason than you intended. The Big XII is only in it's 11th or 12th year of existence, and this will be the first time that tradition rich OU and NU will meet in the CCG.

Toss in the fact that the game will be played at most likely a jam packed Arrowhead stadium, and this game, despite the relatively "weak" records of both teams, is freaking HUGE in and of itself. Scalpers for this game are going to make a killing. It's a dream match-up for the conference, both teams and their hordes of fans, and even just the casual CFB observer.

It doesn't need or require your snobbish approval or interest, pal.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As for the game itself, on paper OU should be a prohibitive favorite. I believe they are a much better team. But unexplainable shit always seems to happen in this game. Witness K-State bitchslapping OU a few years back, and ATM getting over Nebraska prior to that. Simply absurd outcomes that neither team should have even been in, much less actually winning.

The fact that Husker nation has had weeks to prepare for the road trip, they'll turn KC into Lincoln South. OU fan is rather surprised to be here, and won't represent nearly as well. The ones that do, however, will make up for their lack of numbers by sheer vociferousness and obnoxiousness.

This is going to be a great freaking game. I like the Corn 32-29

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 6:49 pm

again, VAN is too STUPID to realize that usc is irrelevant, they lost to an un-ranked piece of garbage, nuff said,

when nebraska wins the big 12 on saturday, they are an attractive matchup in ANY bcs bowl against anybody in the nation.
let me repeat that staggerring FACT.
once we win the big 12 title, the nebraska cornhuskers are the most attractive matchup against any team in any bcs bowl, WHY?
because come january, NO TEAM wants to face the big 12 champion HUSKERS.
and we travel bettter than ANY team, and we will get the best TV ratings of any team,
ive got a huge chip on my shoulders, and nebraska is the most balanced attack in the country right now,
I love how arrogant the sooner fans are, with their banners reading, "HERE WE COME NEBRASKA!"
ok, I'll bite, here you come? what, to get fucked in the mouth?
cause on saturday, in kansas city, you WILL get fucked hard in the throat.
I can personally guarentee it.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Nov 26, 2006 6:55 pm

bradhusker wrote: ive got a huge chip on my shoulders...

No way!

cause on saturday, in kansas city...

You gonna' be here, brad?

I need to know whether or not to hide the women and children.

Cornhusker · Post by **Cornhusker** » Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:20 am

SunCoastSooner wrote:
Cornhusker wrote:Keeping in mind it truely isn't defined by the pass alone...besides, wind plays a larger role than cold.
In Nebraska, the wind freekin' blows here 360 days a year. We've had plenty of practice.
We've run the ball all season, now against OU...that looks pretty salty.
Yeah ya know the Oklahoma is known for its lack of wind and that tropical fauna gives the weather away too huh?

'twas a response to Chilly Landgrabbers "how will NU's WCO playin' in KC on a Dec. night fair."
I'm well aware the wind blows in Oklahoma 'ya know "where the wind goes whistlin' down the plains."
I never called out OU's offense in such conditions.
Read it all.

T1B

How's 'bout it Sooner?

How's 'bout it Sooner?

Re: How's 'bout it Sooner?

Re: How's 'bout it Sooner?

?

?

Re: ?