Tedford to Oregon?

Fuck Jim Delany

Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc

Post Reply
User avatar
SoCalTrjn
2007 CFB Board Bitch
Posts: 3725
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 7:42 am
Location: South OC

Tedford to Oregon?

Post by SoCalTrjn »

Seems Cals coach is upset that the libs in Berkley dont find football too important and have put off updates to the stadium and facilities another 5 years or so. This has lead to rumors that Tedford is going to jump ship and the leading candidate for his services is the University of Nikerrroregon.
Bellotti would move to the schoos AD and Tedford would take over as head coach in Eugene
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Post by Dinsdale »

There's definitely been rumors floating about that Bellotti might take the AD position. I'm taking them with a grain of salt.

But in the "what if" scenario, I've been wondering who they might hit up. Tedford would be an obvious choice, should he be available...obvious.

I was kinda thinking Coker would be a good guy to call, but maybe out of Oregon's price range.

I'm guessing that June Jones is probably happy in his "other home" right now. He'd be a pretty decent choice, as well, and could bring Glanville along for the ride.

But Tedford would do quite nicely.

That said, I look for Bellotti to be coaching the Ducks next year.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
420
Chiming For Fags
Posts: 940
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:21 am

Post by 420 »

This my friends, is why the PAC has always questioned the entry of USC into the PAC.

The ability to master... down syndrome doesn't qualify them as PAC school.

Let me help out our gifted friends from the south.

FACT:Allowallotti, wants to be AD, if he can be the football coach as well.

I wonder how SC fan feels about CAL being the PAC 10 Champion?

Losing to the University of California la (an actual school) and having CAL win the PAC 10, must be eating them up.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Post by Dinsdale »

If'n I'm not mistaken, USC won the PAC outright, by virtue of their head-to-head win against Cal.

Same conference record, but SC won the head-to-head = BODE USC.


Oh wait...you were kidding...I get it now...

Cal....conference champ...

You funny guy, JSC.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
420
Chiming For Fags
Posts: 940
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:21 am

Post by 420 »

Jsc810 wrote:Wait, that would be co-champ, right? Cal didn't win the conference outright, did it?
You just asked two questions... and you wanted one answer. Gotta love LSU.

We actually take academics into consideration...
SoCalTrjn wrote:Seems Cals coach is upset that the libs in Berkley
Cal is the PAC 10 Champ... by proxy.
User avatar
420
Chiming For Fags
Posts: 940
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:21 am

Post by 420 »

Dinsdale wrote:If'n I'm not mistaken, USC won the PAC outright, by virtue of their head-to-head win against Cal.

Same conference record, but SC won the head-to-head = BODE USC.
Wrong.
Shoalzie
WingNut
Posts: 14547
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:39 pm
Location: Portland, MI
Contact:

Post by Shoalzie »

420 wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:If'n I'm not mistaken, USC won the PAC outright, by virtue of their head-to-head win against Cal.

Same conference record, but SC won the head-to-head = BODE USC.
Wrong.

Care to explain...since you've been avoiding everyone that has called you on that silly statement you've been making all night.
User avatar
420
Chiming For Fags
Posts: 940
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:21 am

Post by 420 »

Shoalzie wrote:
420 wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:If'n I'm not mistaken, USC won the PAC outright, by virtue of their head-to-head win against Cal.

Same conference record, but SC won the head-to-head = BODE USC.
Wrong.

Care to explain...since you've been avoiding everyone that has called you on that silly statement you've been making all night.
Sure. I just usually avoid responding to uneducated idiots. I'll make an exception for you.

Under Pac-10 rules, it technically does count as a co-championship. Doesn't mean we get the Rose Bowl or anything though.
Post Reply