BigTen Pairings in Bowl Games

Fuck Jim Delany

Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc

Post Reply
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Post by Van »

2-5, with Ohio St and Michigan garnering the only wins.

But hey, those are the two that matter, the one in particular. If the Big 10 gets both a national championship and a Rose Bowl win over USC in one season that's one helluva good season, regardless of how down the rest of the conference was that year. Nobody's going to remember all those Consolation Bowl losses but they'll sure remember those two wins there at the top.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88

Show me your dicks. - trev
User avatar
Ken
Most epic roll-call thread starter EVER
Posts: 2754
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: the 'burgh

Re: BigTen Pairings in Bowl Games

Post by Ken »

88 wrote:Outback
Tennessee (9-3) (5-3) #17
Penn State (8-4) (5-3) NR

Sorry PSUFAN, but this one looks like a tough draw for Penn State too. Penn State beat all 8 of the bad teams they played, and lost to all 4 of the good teams they played. Tennessee is a good team. Edge, Tennessee.
Any team that can score even 10-14 pts is a tough draw for PSU.
User avatar
420
Chiming For Fags
Posts: 940
Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:21 am

Post by 420 »

Minny over Tech... if they use their "zone blocking" and they don't try and pass the ball.

Tech doesn't have the players to deal with a run game(sup' aTm)

Purdue takes Maryland, if... they can get up early. Fuck it, they take Maryland.

Texas v Iowa?

Texas, since they pussed out and didn't want any part of Cal, in the Holiday Bowl. They had an invite to play Cal, yet Mack Brown didn't want any part of Cal and opted for a lesser team.

UT v Penn St.

This one wont be close.

Hope Penn St. can bounce back next year... since I love the tradition of Happy Valley.

Ark. v Wiscon.... Arkansas huge. This one could get as ugly as LSU v ND.

$C v Mich... this one could be close, but it won't.

Mich. hasn't played anyone other than a rival.

$C big.

Florida v Ohio State?

This one could go either way... both teams have to much talent to even predict the game.
User avatar
Ken
Most epic roll-call thread starter EVER
Posts: 2754
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: the 'burgh

Re: BigTen Pairings in Bowl Games

Post by Ken »

Ken wrote:
88 wrote:Outback
Tennessee (9-3) (5-3) #17
Penn State (8-4) (5-3) NR

Sorry PSUFAN, but this one looks like a tough draw for Penn State too. Penn State beat all 8 of the bad teams they played, and lost to all 4 of the good teams they played. Tennessee is a good team. Edge, Tennessee.
Any team that can score even 10-14 pts is a tough draw for PSU.
I should add... it most likely won't be a blowout though. PSU's D is just too freakin' darned good. While I wouldn't bet on a PSU win, it wouldn't surprise me in the least.
User avatar
WolverineSteve
2012 CFB Bowl Jeopardy Champ
Posts: 3754
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 5:13 pm
Location: The D

Post by WolverineSteve »

Tennessee is capable of laying turds the last couple years. This one could stay close.
"Gentlemen, it is better to have died as a small boy than to fumble this football."
-John Heisman

"Any street urchin can shout applause in victory, but it takes character to stand fast in defeat. One is noise --- the other, loyalty." Fielding Yost



Go Blue!
Screw_Michigan

Post by Screw_Michigan »

88, did those corporations cut you a check? "rose bowl" and "bcs championship" would have sufficed.

but good takes. i too am looking forward to the tejas/iowa debacle. will be one for the ages.
User avatar
PSUFAN
dents with meaning
Posts: 18324
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: BLITZBURGH

Post by PSUFAN »

Tennessee just barely missed the MNC game. After all, they beat Cal.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
User avatar
See You Next Wednesday
De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum
Posts: 1487
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:34 pm

Post by See You Next Wednesday »

Just replace Arkansas with Auburn from last year's discussion about the Capital One Bowl. A little reminder, a lot of pre-game discussion about how Auburn would destroy Wisconsin etc.

Another reminder, Wisconsin 24 Auburn 10.

Expect the same.
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
- H.L. Mencken (1880 - 1956)
buckeye_in_sc
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3257
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 9:25 pm

Post by buckeye_in_sc »

Is Stanford going to a bowl...?

After all they gave KAL fits...
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Post by Goober McTuber »

shit-for-brains wrote:Ark. v Wiscon.... Arkansas huge. This one could get as ugly as LSU v ND.

$C v Mich... this one could be close, but it won't.

Mich. hasn't played anyone other than a rival.

$C big.
Happy, happy, joy, joy.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: BigTen Pairings in Bowl Games

Post by Dinsdale »

88 wrote:Purdue...talk about bad defense... (e.g.42 to Hawaii).

You mean they held Hawaii to under their D1 leading scoring average?

Wouldn't that mean they played "above average" defense that day?
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
PSUFAN
dents with meaning
Posts: 18324
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 10:42 pm
Location: BLITZBURGH

Post by PSUFAN »

PSU scored 12 points on Purdue. They are a virtual sieve.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
User avatar
Danimal
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 1764
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 8:03 pm

Post by Danimal »

Minn has been a good bowl-team under Mason, but without a credible D this one will be tough. Slight edge Tech

I like Pete Carroll over Carr but Mich has played better ball, tough call.

Meyer will take Florida to a MNC but it will be in the Tebow-era. Leak is good but not the ideal qb for the spread-option. Also, they lack a go-to rb and kicking has been questionable.

Ohio State 24
Florida 14
You gonna bark all day little doggie or are you gonna bite?
User avatar
Van
2012 CFB Bowl Pick Champ
Posts: 17017
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2005 4:38 am

Post by Van »

I like Pete Carroll over Carr
I would too, under normal circumstances. Certainly, Lloyd Carr hasn't shown himself to be a particularly good big game coach. His rivalry record sucks and his recent bowl record isn't that great either. However, let's not forget the fact that The Pete Factor didn't work against Mack Brown or Karl Duhrell, neither of whoim will ever be confused with Lombardi. Those were both supposed to be huge mismatches in USC's favor, coaching wise, and USC lost both of 'em in close games where the coaches really did have a lot to do with the outcome.

I'm guessing the effectiveness of The Pete Factor began to dwindle with the loss of Norm Chow and Ed Orgeron. USC's entire coaching staff in '04? Yeah, I'll take that staff in a big game over anybody's, with Tressell and his gang being the only other staff out there I'd consider.

Now? Not so much. I still like Pete a great deal but Lane Kiffin blows and there just doesn't seem to be any separation now between USC's staff and those at many other schools.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88

Show me your dicks. - trev
User avatar
Danimal
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 1764
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 8:03 pm

Post by Danimal »

Van wrote:
I like Pete Carroll over Carr
I would too, under normal circumstances. Certainly, Lloyd Carr hasn't shown himself to be a particularly good big game coach. His rivalry record sucks and his recent bowl record isn't that great either. However, let's not forget the fact that The Pete Factor didn't work against Mack Brown or Karl Duhrell, neither of whoim will ever be confused with Lombardi. Those were both supposed to be huge mismatches in USC's favor, coaching wise, and USC lost both of 'em in close games where the coaches really did have a lot to do with the outcome.

I'm guessing the effectiveness of The Pete Factor began to dwindle with the loss of Norm Chow and Ed Orgeron. USC's entire coaching staff in '04? Yeah, I'll take that staff in a big game over anybody's, with Tressell and his gang being the only other staff out there I'd consider.

Now? Not so much. I still like Pete a great deal but Lane Kiffin blows and there just doesn't seem to be any separation now between USC's staff and those at many other schools.
I do see your point. The loss of ubergenius OC/qb-coach Chow definitely showed against UCLA. The loss of Orgeron is nothing to sneeze-at either. One of the problems with success is that others come raiding your staff.
You gonna bark all day little doggie or are you gonna bite?
Post Reply