Well I'll be Damned, 1.7 million votes

Cornhusker · Post by **Cornhusker** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 3:22 am

Got the mutha fugga right!
'71 NU vs '95 NU for the all time best teams.
In spite of the conference that can't count apologists Kirk the kiss ass Herbstriet and that cheatin' sonna bitch Penn St. basturd...he was out of freekin' bounds...QB...
NU dominates the ESPN (probby sorry they thought of it now) best team evah.
Thank you CFB fan America US of A!
Just goes to show ya the spin shit ESPN displays is jus' that!
Herbshit was pissed! HA!
I been propin' '71 Corn forever...finally got their moment in the sun.
Course we all knew '95 was all that.

kinda brad but what the hell...we ain't so much these days.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Thu Dec 14, 2006 3:30 am

I doubt brad will have any opinions on this particular topic.

Shawn Marion · Post by **Shawn Marion** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 3:38 am

Where did 05 USC finish?

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 3:48 am

dont get me wrong, 71 was sick and insane, they beat bear bryants best team by a landslide, they dry raped bear bryants squad, BUT,
anyone who thinks that 71 is better than 95 is a stupid fool,
95 is the all time JAUGGERNAUT, the felon laden beast, the smashmouth powerhouse to end all smashmouth powerhouses,
what else can I say?

Cornhusker · Post by **Cornhusker** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:06 am

Shawn Marion wrote:Where did 05 USC finish?

Can't find the bracket results at the moment on ESPN.
Why?
Cuz the little bitch that is ESPN frontpage pulled if off immediatley after the show.
Fugg'em.
See, they didn't expect the real football fans to be home this evening.
They were hoping for their groupies to be watchin'.
Sorry, those bitches are in bed after milk and cookies.
Mark May is a POS. Just cuz he is. Pitt, right Mark...ya see he's ALWAYS had a hard-on for Nebraska cuz they didn't recruit him!
Douche' couldn't make the grade!
Time for bed.

Husker4ever · Post by **Husker4ever** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:40 am

Shawn Marion wrote:Where did 05 USC finish?

In the collective mouths of the entire ESPN staff.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:50 am

I hate SuC. Period.

But I'd take their '72 squad vs. just about anyone.

NjSooner · Post by **NjSooner** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 9:07 am

[web]http://espn.go.com/page2/s/list/colfoot ... /best.html[/web]

BlindRef · Post by **BlindRef** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 3:38 pm

There is no better way to settle something than to let a bunch of idiots vote online.

Cornhusker · Post by **Cornhusker** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 4:06 pm

http://sports.espn.go.com/chat/sportsna ... d=tab2pos1

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 8:01 pm

BlindRef wrote:There is no better way to settle something than to let a bunch of idiots vote online.

rack.

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Thu Dec 14, 2006 8:43 pm

Husker4ever wrote:
Shawn Marion wrote:Where did 05 USC finish?
In the collective mouths of the entire ESPN staff.

Fucking awesome. Rack that.

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Sat Dec 16, 2006 3:03 am

No offense but Texas 2005 would beat the shit out over every team on that list except for 95 Nebraska. i know you can't compare teams from different eras but hell there is no way even if you put those teams on modern training they would take a modern team like Texas 2005. Miami 01 was very good but still would not have a way of stopping Vince. My top 3 would be

1. 95 corn
2. 05 Horns
3. 01 Canes

Husker4ever · Post by **Husker4ever** » Sat Dec 16, 2006 3:44 am

Vito... mobile QB's able to buy another half second were the only QB's with any shot of success (success defined as positive yardage once in awhile) against that 95 defense. They were fucking unbelievable with speed at every spot....3 deep.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Sat Dec 16, 2006 5:59 am

let me first say that, I love threads like this, now, to whom it may concern,
"the modern era", can be considered the nineties to right now, meaning that there is no major drop-off in speed and or physical strength,
if you go back to the eighties and the seventies, that is where you see noticeable differences in speed and physical strength,
and of course, should you go back even further to the sixties and fifties, it becomes a total joke, the drop-offs in both strength and speed are laughable,
again, the 95 huskers are very current to todays teams, IN FACT, if you could line them up against the usc trojans of today? meaning the 95 huskers, vs. the 06 trojans, the game would be an ass fuck rape of major proportions!!
its funny, usc fans talking about how much bigger and faster the teams of today are? try again, the trojans of today are stronger and faster than teams from the 50's , 60's, and 70's and the 80's, BUT, 95 nebraska is just as fast, certainly just as strong if not stronger, MEANING that the modern era includes the nineties right up to RIGHT NOW,
besides, usc cant even beat un-ranked teams like oregon st. and ucla,
much less an all time JAUGGERNAUT, like 95 NU.
the defense of the 95 blackshirts was too frightenning, too physical, and way too fast, for usc to even have a chance,
mark may, kirk herbstreet and those girly girls over at espn, dont have a friggin clue, ACTUALLY, behind closed doors, they realize that 95 NU is the all time JAUGGERNAUT, but publically? they wont admit to it on national tv, because the 95 NU monster team had too many felons, therefore its not politically correct for those guys to embrace them,
there you have it folks, thats the truth of the matter, in case you were wondering.