so what's the over/under on the Emerald Bowl?

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Tue Dec 26, 2006 8:15 pm

It's actually around 40 last I saw.

Good game for the under.

TheChief · Post by **TheChief** » Tue Dec 26, 2006 10:13 pm

I haven't seen much of UCLA this year. Is their offense as awful as ours? If so, then 40 is a lock for under.

Nolesy · Post by **Nolesy** » Tue Dec 26, 2006 10:45 pm

3.
Of course thats the over/under for number of FSU players arrested.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Tue Dec 26, 2006 11:02 pm

TheChief wrote:I haven't seen much of UCLA this year. Is their offense as awful as ours? If so, then 40 is a lock for under.

We have no offense...take the under.....

Adelpiero · Post by **Adelpiero** » Tue Dec 26, 2006 11:48 pm

ucla/fsu over-under is 39, down from 41.

under is 6-1 only over was rice/troy

lines

420 · Post by **420** » Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:39 am

The Seer wrote:
TheChief wrote:I haven't seen much of UCLA this year. Is their offense as awful as ours? If so, then 40 is a lock for under.

We have no offense...take the under.....

Seer, are you going to the game?

I walked over to the game last year, and watched Utah absolutely destroy Georgia Tech by 4 TD's. The weather was rather cold and cloudy, relatively speaking. It's to bad the bowl takes place during the rainy season.

That being said, it should be pretty nasty weather for the game, from what I've heard.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Wed Dec 27, 2006 4:16 am

The weather will be better in my living room, the bathroom lines shorter, the couch is more comfy than a metal seat, the booze is cheaper, etc. etc. etc...

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:23 am

Take the under. My prediction:

UCLA 17
FSU 13

420 · Post by **420** » Wed Dec 27, 2006 5:27 am

The Seer wrote:The weather will be better in my living room, the bathroom lines shorter, the couch is more comfy than a metal seat, the booze is cheaper, etc. etc. etc...

You're running out of money... gotcha.

Put a democrat in the "White House" next time.

The GNP is always the "highest" during this period(demo as prez), and you'll be able to afford to go the game.

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Wed Dec 27, 2006 1:49 pm

No political talk in this forum. Go over to the other one for that shit. This is the reason Dr. Detroit got run from here, so keep it in the Spin Zone forum.

TheJON · Post by **TheJON** » Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:12 pm

I am expecting UCLA's defensive line to do some damage to FSU's offensive line like they did USC. Weatherford will make a lot of mistakes. He'll struggle to throw for over 150 and I can't see FSU running the ball very well. I think UCLA cruises behind their defense and the fact that there is no way a program like FSU is going to be all that motivated to travel 3,000 miles to play in a shit bowl game.

UCLA 31
FSU 10

The over/under in points isn't what I'm looking for. I'm looking for the over/under in yards for FSU. I'll set it at 225 and take the under. The only way FSU gets over 225 yards is if they rack up a bunch of meaningless yards late in the 4th quarter of a blowout when the UCLA defense quits playing.

FSU and Miami are both gonna finish 6-7. While Florida is playing for a national title. Ouch!

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:50 pm

TheJON wrote:I am expecting UCLA's defensive line to do some damage to FSU's offensive line like they did USC. Weatherford will make a lot of mistakes. He'll struggle to throw for over 150 and I can't see FSU running the ball very well. I think UCLA cruises behind their defense

Can you imagine anyone writing this after last year?

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:03 pm

Seer, I dont know about UCLAs defense but anyone could do damage to FSUs offense the last 6 years.

So I could imagine alot of people writing that.

Adelpiero · Post by **Adelpiero** » Wed Dec 27, 2006 10:35 pm

no way ucla scores 31 pts.

fsu 17
ucla 10

many,many,many punts

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 1:28 am

since when did FSU start wearing these goofy colored "red" pants? they don't even match the scarlet on the helmet or uni numbers or facemasks.

Adelpiero · Post by **Adelpiero** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 1:31 am

If FSU doesn't crush UCLA, the bowden needs to retire

ucla is a soft team.

jeff bowden and his awesome offensive game plan at work

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 1:35 am

nice alcatraz-FSU criminal joke from the announcers.....oh my god.

that's uncalled for IMO.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:47 am

Adelpiero wrote:

ucla is a soft team.

You have a soft brain.

Ken · Post by **Ken** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:48 am

Two things:

1. Some NFL team is going to get a gem in Lorenzo Booker. Not sure what round he's going to go in, but I would guess not in the first. If so, late in that round. This guy has been stuck behind a poor o-line and average QB play through his prime years. Yes, he's brought some if it on himself, but nonetheless, I think he's going to be a good one. Very fast, excellent hands, and good power. Stillers, are you listening?

2. Desmond just laid some smack right at the beginning of halftime. I wasn't sure if I should laugh or cringe. On Weatherford's spotty play and the poor fade pass to Carr (6'6") who was being defended by a 5'11" CB: "He threw a fade pass to Carr that even Gary Coleman could have jumped up and caught"

Ouch.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:53 am

Obviously, the defenses are at a disadvantage....on a miserable slick field, the offense, knowing where they are going - the defense having to adjust - look for points....

Jobocky · Post by **Jobocky** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:58 am

King Crimson wrote:nice alcatraz-FSU criminal joke from the announcers.....oh my god.

that's uncalled for IMO.

When I heard it, I wondered if I just heard that right ... I was trying to think of some other meaning, but .....

420 · Post by **420** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 3:01 am

The Seer wrote:
Adelpiero wrote:

ucla is a soft team.

You have a soft brain.

Ya think?

This is the same tard that thinks Missery is going to beat Oregon State.

If it doesn't have bbq sauce on it... the midwest folks may not know what it is.(Pac 10 football)

Look for the University of California la, to pull away in the 2nd half of this game in the crystal clear fresh air of San Francisco.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 3:12 am

420 wrote:
The Seer wrote:
Adelpiero wrote:

ucla is a soft team.

You have a soft brain.
Ya think?

This is the same tard that thinks Missery is going to beat Oregon State.

If it doesn't have bbq sauce on it... the midwest folks may not know what it is.(Pac 10 football)

Look for the University of California la, to pull away in the 2nd half of this game in the crystal clear fresh air of San Francisco.

just like how you got a scholarship offer from ucLAME, right?

fuck off, flute player.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:06 am

Wow, this has turned into a pretty watchable game. I'm assuming I'm in the minority of people who took FSU in the pick'em, so I need them to score on this drive (down 4, 11 mins left).

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:11 am

Deep pass to the left side for a TD on 4th and 9? Rack the fuck outta that.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:18 am

My God and GOD. I turned this game on 3 minutes ago and here's what happened so far on 2 plays:

40 yard TD on 4th and 9. Defender is on the ground and ESPN has no replay to show if there was offensive int or not?

Kickoff fiasco by UCLAme moron and officials don't get it right (on the first try).

I think I'll go back to This Old House.

Ken · Post by **Ken** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:20 am

Believe the Heupel wrote:That's a horrible call. Bobby needs to challenge that. Must be a makeup for not calling the OPI on the TD.

We've yet to see a replay of the supposed OPI, so I'll take the official's word for it. From what little we saw of that catch, the DB didn't seem to throw his arms up in the air in typical "WTF?" style. These idiot announcers are... well, idtiot announcers, so the last thing I'll do is beleve a dmaned thing they say. The color guy has been off all night, particularly here in the 4th qtr.

420 · Post by **420** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:21 am

Believe the Heupel wrote:Nice bonehead play on the kickoff there.

If you don't have the grades... you go to fUCLA.

That guy would never have had a chance in hell of ever attending Cal.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:22 am

420 wrote:
Believe the Heupel wrote:Nice bonehead play on the kickoff there.
If you don't have the grades... you go to fUCLA.

That guy would never have a chance in hell of ever attending Cal.

You mean he's not an obvious flaming faggot or Chinese?

420 · Post by **420** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:25 am

Mikey wrote:
420 wrote:
Believe the Heupel wrote:Nice bonehead play on the kickoff there.
If you don't have the grades... you go to fUCLA.

That guy would never have a chance in hell of ever attending Cal.
You mean he's not an obvious flaming faggot or Chinese?

Racist...

... but, what else would you expect from an Indian.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:25 am

That guy Booker appears to be really hard to bring down.

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:30 am

The announcers suck

The sound sucks.

The field sucks

The Pac-10 sucks

The whole state of california sucks

Players have been falling all over that shitty ass field.

Their wasnt a OPI. Just two guys playing hard and one staying on his feet.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:31 am

That'll do.

420 · Post by **420** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:34 am

Believe the Heupel wrote:Nice fuckin' implosion over the last six minutes, UCLA.

We'll it is fUCLA.

Cal will take care of business tomorrow with aTm.

the truth

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:35 am

Mr T wrote:The announcers suck

The sound sucks.

The field sucks

The Pac-10 sucks

The whole state of california sucks

Players have been falling all over that shitty ass field.

Their wasnt a OPI. Just two guys playing hard and one staying on his feet.

Agree with all of those statements, except one and you can suck m2's cock you AIDS infected Florida faggot.

UCLAme is probably the only team that the Criminoles could have beaten tonight.
Our local high school team could have won this game, and they only won one all season

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:40 am

Like I said in another thread, as long as Dorrell is the opposing coach, you are NEVER out of a game...

Props to FSU & Bowden...that 4th and 9 call was nails....

The announcers sucked
The field sucked
m2ool sucks
and Ucla's defense sucked.

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:40 am

UCLA was 2-1 vs other california schools. In a 3 way tie for 1st in the state with Kal and USC.

You believe UCLA sucks but not the whole state of california?

BTW, FSU does suck but........Atleast even when we have a shitty season, we still could beat a pac-10 school.

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:43 am

The Seer wrote: The announcers sucked
The field sucked
m2ool sucks
and Ucla's defense sucked.

Agreed.

Please do away with this third rate bowl. I dont want to see more young guys risk their ACLs on that shitty ass turf.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 4:44 am

Mr T wrote:UCLA was 2-1 vs other california schools. In a 3 way tie for 1st in the state with Kal and USC.

You believe UCLA sucks but not the whole state of california?

BTW, FSU does suck but........Atleast even when we have a shitty season, we still could beat a pac-10 school.

None of them played San Jose State?

:?