so what's the over/under on the Emerald Bowl?

Cicero · Post by **Cicero** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 5:37 am

Booker played out of his ass and FSU made some big plays in the 2nd Half. Weatherford will never lead this team anywhere though.

FREE XAVIER LEE!

TheJON · Post by **TheJON** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 5:55 am

That was some fantastic effort by the UCLA team in the 2nd half. I like Dorrell's strategy of "lay down and quit." Worked out real well for them. What a swell coach he is.

TheChief · Post by **TheChief** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:30 pm

Mikey wrote: UCLAme is probably the only team that the Criminoles could have beaten tonight.
Our local high school team could have won this game, and they only won one all season

Considering FSU had a running back with 200 all purpose yds, a QB who threw for 325, a block kicked which turned into a special teams touchdown and also a defensive touchdown. I would think that FSU could have beaten a lot of teams last night. I realize you are just smacking T, but man that is a bad sentence to throw together.

indyfrisco · Post by **indyfrisco** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:58 pm

I'm just glad we didn't take the under. ;)

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 8:55 pm

Mikey wrote:
Mr T wrote:UCLA was 2-1 vs other california schools. In a 3 way tie for 1st in the state with Kal and USC.

You believe UCLA sucks but not the whole state of california?

BTW, FSU does suck but........Atleast even when we have a shitty season, we still could beat a pac-10 school.
None of them played San Jose State?

:?

Is your team Stanford?

Because only a stanford fan would think San Jose State is a top rate team.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Thu Dec 28, 2006 11:36 pm

I guess any and all sarcasm goes way over your head.

All I can reply to that with is.

And yes, I've been a Stanford fan since I was a little kid. It's getting harder and harder, though, as their program sinks to unknown depth of suckage,

AND they recently denied both my nephew and my daughter admission. Elitist pricks.