Ohio State-Florida: In Game

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:36 am

Damn...Ginn looks fresh. 7-0, Bucks...

Cross Traffic · Post by **Cross Traffic** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:38 am

Ginn made it look way too easy.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:39 am

It's a PAC 10 officiating crew?

Oh shit. Look for Oregon to win on a disputed play.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:44 am

Mikey wrote:Look for Oregon to win on a disputed play.

Like the last time, when Oklahoma's coaching staff disputed whether or not they should play any defense or tackle anybody, and decided against it?

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:44 am

Did anyone take the over?

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:49 am

So far both sides have made it look too easy.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:56 am

You can already see the difference between Michigan and Florida's defense...the Gators' secondary is much more athletic and talented. They can hang with the speed of the Buckeye receivers. I don't agree with Brenneman that Florida's front four is the best Ohio State has faced...I'd still give that nod to Branch, Woodley, Taylor and company.

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:02 am

OK two drives for Florida and in both they look unchallenged. Something has gotta give or this could be a blowout.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:03 am

That wasn't a TD...what did the booth see that we didn't?

Cross Traffic · Post by **Cross Traffic** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:05 am

What can you expect from the conference with the worst officials of the BCS conferences?

Bobby42 · Post by **Bobby42** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:05 am

Jsc810 wrote:Will OSU be able to keep up?

Not if they keep giving them the short field and those penalties.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:09 am

Vito Corleone wrote:OK two drives for Florida and in both they look unchallenged. Something has gotta give or this could be a blowout.

Short fields on both, but yeah. I see what you're seeing.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:14 am

Shoalzie wrote:Did anyone take the over?

In.

moon · Post by **moon** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:18 am

How many press clipping did Ohio St. read?

It should have been an easy game but if you come out and play like that you get this result.

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:21 am

Mikey wrote:It's a PAC 10 officiating crew?

Oh shit. Look for Oregon to win on a disputed play.

Is that why they didn't call UF for a 15 yard penalty for the dude taking his helmet off after the kick return?

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:23 am

Haven't seen anyone push the Buckeyes around like this in quite a while...

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:27 am

Pretty tacky roughing the passer call

the_ouskull · Post by **the_ouskull** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:29 am

Dinsdale wrote:
Mikey wrote:Look for Oregon to win on a disputed play.
Like the last time, when Oklahoma's coaching staff disputed whether or not they should play any defense or tackle anybody, and decided against it?

That'd be a LOT funnier if you were RIGHT.

Considering that EVERYBODY involved has come out and said that this guy fucked OU, including the guy himself, are you really STILL trying to act like it DIDN'T happen, you ignorant dipshit?

the_ouskull

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:29 am

The over/under should have been set at 100

Cross Traffic · Post by **Cross Traffic** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:30 am

Defense anyone?

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:30 am

Very strong response by the Bucks...gonna be a lot of fun if we get four quarters of this.

Bobby42 · Post by **Bobby42** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:32 am

Somebody wake up the Buckeye's offense? Bout time for a Gator turnover.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:34 am

the_ouskull wrote:Considering that EVERYBODY involved has come out and said that this guy fucked OU, including the guy himself, are you really STILL trying to act like it DIDN'T happen, you ignorant dipshit?

Link?

And "the guy" has said repeatedly that he never saw the replays. Should they bend the replay rules just to cater to OU?

Never denied that OU wasn't the recipient of a bad break due to officiating(OK, never since about a day after the game). Are YOU denying that OU's defense didn't take the last two minutes of that game off, which was the REAL reason OU lost?

One play....all they had to do was make ONE PLAY...in HOW many opportunities? One freaking play...they didn't.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:35 am

Cross Traffic wrote:Defense anyone?

Jeebus...both teams are playing D like they're waiting for the officials to bail them out...Sooner-style.

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:37 am

Here is a novel idea, tOSU needs to actually play defense and stop Florida.

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:37 am

How many times is Florida going to get away with that crossing route?

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:41 am

Dinsdale wrote:
the_ouskull wrote:Considering that EVERYBODY involved has come out and said that this guy fucked OU, including the guy himself, are you really STILL trying to act like it DIDN'T happen, you ignorant dipshit?

Link?

And "the guy" has said repeatedly that he never saw the replays. Should they bend the replay rules just to cater to OU?

Never denied that OU wasn't the recipient of a bad break due to officiating(OK, never since about a day after the game). Are YOU denying that OU's defense didn't take the last two minutes of that game off, which was the REAL reason OU lost?

One play....all they had to do was make ONE PLAY...in HOW many opportunities? One freaking play...they didn't.

Have you EVER seen a piece of bait you didn't immediately latch onto?

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:42 am

That might be the stop Ohio State needed

420 · Post by **420** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:45 am

MuchoBulls wrote:That might be the stop Ohio State needed

Ohio State is in for a long night... they just don't know it yet, or do the folks that picked Ohio State to win.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:51 am

Mikey wrote: Have you EVER seen a piece of bait you didn't immediately latch onto?

Oh dear God...

please tell me you aren't trying to set up a "I was just trolling you" defense for the absolute beating you put on yourself in that other forum?

Please fucking tell me I didn't just read that?

Please?

When I suggested you "stop," I was actually being sincere, dipshit.

campinfool · Post by **campinfool** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:51 am

For a so called "dual threat" QB, Troy Smith looks like a pussy tonight. Looks scared to run. Another Heisman Trophy flame out performance so far.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:52 am

420 wrote:
MuchoBulls wrote:That might be the stop Ohio State needed
Ohio State is in for a long night... they just don't know it yet, or do the folks that picked Ohio State to win.

if we didn't figure that out after the first quarter, we'll never figure it out

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:52 am

It's a 7 pt game, that might be a blow out by kal standards but to the rest of us it's still close.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:56 am

Vito Corleone wrote:It's a 7 pt game, that might be a blow out by kal standards but to the rest of us it's still close.

He's just setting us up for the "I told you so" thread after this game is over...I'm assuming he took the Gators in this game.

See You Next Wednesday · Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:03 am

Geezus, that Dodge truck commercial with the Rock'em Sock'em Robots sucks ass, is unbelievably stupid and it they have already shown it 100 times tonight

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:03 am

Tressel just Lloyded his team...

Cross Traffic · Post by **Cross Traffic** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:03 am

Odd call to make at this point of the game....how about going outside with that run?

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:04 am

Cross Traffic wrote:Odd call to make at this point of the game....how about going outside with that run?

How about "punting?"

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:07 am

The way Florida has moved the ball on Ohio State made going for it the right call. A bad read by the RB not to go outside.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:07 am

Atomic Punk wrote:
Cross Traffic wrote:Odd call to make at this point of the game....how about going outside with that run?
How about "punting?"

It's very easy to second guess when they failed to get the first...