yep.......Dinsdale wrote:all anyone has to respond with is "4th and 11," and they just clowned your ass.
martyball at it's "best".......
Mississippi Neck wrote:To use as an example, San Diego, a mild favorite, beating a three time SB champion to the huge upset of Nova over Georgetown was quite a reach. If you can't admit that, then you are clueless. It's very simple.
It's possible that it may have contributed to the outcome. That can definitely be argued. If he punted, maybe Gostkowski doesn't end up making a 50 yard FG on the ensuing drive. Subtract 3 pts and the Pats were down 21-10, not 21-13 at the time of the fumble. Which... oh btw, is two scores down, not one.mvscal wrote:Big fucking deal.Dinsdale wrote:4th and 11
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
Surely you aren't stupid enough to suggest that that is why they lost the game...are you?
mvscal wrote: Surely you aren't stupid enough to suggest that that is why they lost the game...are you?
Yea, going one and out with 2 13-3 teams, a 12-4 team and a 14-2 team was all bad luck.mvscal wrote:Fixed.Tom In VA wrote:Marty does have bad luck when it comes to playoffs.
TRANSLATED: If Marty can bring us a 14-2 regular season record, I'm alright with an early exit from the playoffs cause I'm a charger fan and low expectations comes with the territory.mvscal wrote:You're joking, right? C'mon, everybody knows Marty is to blame. As soon as he leaves, championships and glorious success follow as if by magic.
... and the very same argument could have been made about the idiotic red flag. It very well could have contributed to the ill-fated outcome of the game.ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:It's possible that it may have contributed to the outcome. That can definitely be argued.mvscal wrote:Big fucking deal.Dinsdale wrote:4th and 11
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
Surely you aren't stupid enough to suggest that that is why they lost the game...are you?
mvscal wrote: He probably should have punted, though.
mvscal wrote:Then you are a fucking fool. Straight up. Obama is the dumbest motherfucker who has ever run for President.PSUFAN wrote:Seriously - I think we need a different approach - strong, intelligent, principled, and fresh. Obama seems to fit the bill for me best at this point.
mvscal wrote: No, Cam Cameron is calling the plays.
mvscal wrote:The alternative is a 48 yard field goal attempt into the wind or a punt. Both the field goal and the 4th down conversion were very low percentage plays, so I don't see it as a big deal at all let alone the deciding factor in the game.
He probably should have punted, though.
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:I am assuming Kaeding's best facing that direction was less than 48 yards. FG probably was not an option.
Oh, dear.mvscal wrote: The message that he was trying to send is that we needed to score touchdowns not kick field goals to win the game.
How'd that work out for you?The way you beat them is knock them out and put the score out of reach.
It was the right message.
He's not out there dropping passes, getting flagged for dumb penalties or getting the ball stripped loose.
Or maybe he won't. :lightheartedjab:BSmack wrote: Yea, going one and out with 2 13-3 teams, a 12-4 team and a 14-2 team was all bad luck.
The guy hasn't won a playoff game in 13 years. At some point in time "bad luck" ceases to be an excuse.
mvscal wrote: Is that what they work on in practice?
Actually, by going for it, Marty was telling his defense that he had confidence in them to stop the Patriots, even if he gave them such good field position after inevitably failing to make the 4th down play. If he went for the FG, he would still be telling his defense that he was supremely confident in them, because you'd be adding 7 more yards to the Patriots starting field position. You punt if you have less confidence in your D, because you'd be making the Patriots go that much farther in order to score.Dinsdale wrote:In which case, giving the kicker a chance at it anyway would send what kind of message to his defense?ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:I am assuming Kaeding's best facing that direction was less than 48 yards. FG probably was not an option.
A positive one?
Through actions, rather than words, Marty made it VERY clear to his defense that they sucked. Bottom line. There's another term for that...they call it "shitty coaching."
Confidence in the players' ability to do their job is what separates winning coaches from losers...an example that was demonstrated for the umpteenth time in that game...regardless how the idiotic Boltsfans see it.
You're kidding right? So you agreed with Andy Reid's decision to punt the ball on 4th and 15 against the Saints?Dinsdale wrote: Confidence in the players' ability to do their job is what separates winning coaches from losers...an example that was demonstrated for the umpteenth time in that game...regardless how the idiotic Boltsfans see it.
jiminphilly wrote:
You're kidding right? So you agreed with Andy Reid's decision to punt the ball on 4th and 15 against the Saints?
No I'm addressing this-Dinsdale wrote:jiminphilly wrote:
You're kidding right? So you agreed with Andy Reid's decision to punt the ball on 4th and 15 against the Saints?
Absolutely not.
And if you find even the remotest similarities in those two real-game situations, then...
You're kidding, right?
Andy Reid has gotten burned time and time again for doing just this. He is rapidly becoming the NFC version of Marty.Confidence in the players' ability to do their job is what separates winning coaches from losers
mvscal wrote:They are the ones who didn't get it done in crunch time.
mvscal wrote:There ya go.Dinsdale wrote:Yes...the players must execute and make plays.
The scapegoating is based on the fact ...mvscal wrote:
Scapegoating Marty for this loss is wrong and it definitely would send the wrong message both to the shit skids on the team and the morons rooting for the team who seem to think that a change in coaching is the cure to everything that ails the Bolts.
You preaching to the choir about it though. I don't think he should be removed. But I'm also knowledgeable enough about football to know that Marty is accepting and examining HIS role in the loss and accepting responsibility for it. That's all matters, to the team you support. As a fan, he doesn't need YOUR defense.BSmack wrote: The guy hasn't won a playoff game in 13 years. At some point in time "bad luck" ceases to be an excuse.
Tom In VA wrote:At some point in time "bad luck" ceases to be an excuse.
No question SD had superior talent, There was also no question they would Lose to NE.ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote: It is my belief that SD was the better team and lost.
Being an old Redskins fan, I remember Joe Gibbs having a full hitting practice (minus QB/RB) during their bye week in the playoffs. That kept the team sharp for their playoff match up the following week. Based on the poor play by the Bolts WR's and DB's, it looked liked they had been practicing at 3/4 speed ever since the Az game.mvscal wrote:There ya go. Baby steps.Dinsdale wrote:Yes...the players must execute and make plays.
Absolutely correct and last Sunday they didn't execute, they didn't make plays and they lost the game.