smackaholic wrote:BTW, my wife and I went the IVF route for our son. Best 8 grand I ever spent. That's right, me.
Overweight.
Shooting blanks.
Watches American Idol.
Yeah, you da man.
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
smackaholic wrote:BTW, my wife and I went the IVF route for our son. Best 8 grand I ever spent. That's right, me.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
I'm assuming that's what it's in reference to in some way.Coca-Cola may not be promoting its product as a spermicidal douche, but the idea ain't new. Coke (and Dr. Pepper in the southern States) douches have been part of contraceptive lore at least since the 1950s, with the common belief being that the carbonic acid in Coke killed the sperm and the sugar "exploded" the sperm cells, while the carbonation of the drink forced the jet of liquid into the vagina. Back in the 1950s and 1960s, this method of parenthood prevention proved somewhat popular because not only was it cheap and universally available at a time when reliable birth control methods were hard to come by, but it also came in its own handy "shake and shoot" disposable applicator. After intercourse, the girl would uncap a warm Coke, put her thumb over the mouth of the bottle, shake up the beverage, then insert the neck of the bottle in her vagina and move her thumb out of the way. The warm well-shaken Coke became an effervescent spermicidal douche, with the traditional (at that time) six-ounce bottle providing what was deemed to be just the right amount for one application.
Drop some Mentos in there and you've got the makings of some homemade porn.Tom In VA wrote:http://www.snopes.com/cokelore/sperm.asp
I'm assuming that's what it's in reference to in some way.Coca-Cola may not be promoting its product as a spermicidal douche, but the idea ain't new. Coke (and Dr. Pepper in the southern States) douches have been part of contraceptive lore at least since the 1950s, with the common belief being that the carbonic acid in Coke killed the sperm and the sugar "exploded" the sperm cells, while the carbonation of the drink forced the jet of liquid into the vagina. Back in the 1950s and 1960s, this method of parenthood prevention proved somewhat popular because not only was it cheap and universally available at a time when reliable birth control methods were hard to come by, but it also came in its own handy "shake and shoot" disposable applicator. After intercourse, the girl would uncap a warm Coke, put her thumb over the mouth of the bottle, shake up the beverage, then insert the neck of the bottle in her vagina and move her thumb out of the way. The warm well-shaken Coke became an effervescent spermicidal douche, with the traditional (at that time) six-ounce bottle providing what was deemed to be just the right amount for one application.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Overweight? Yeah, a bit, but I'm working on it.Goober McTuber wrote:smackaholic wrote:BTW, my wife and I went the IVF route for our son. Best 8 grand I ever spent. That's right, me.
Overweight.
Shooting blanks.
Watches American Idol.
Yeah, you da man.
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
See, this is just so much fresher than that whole "I fucked your mom" smack. Tell her I said hi.smackaholic wrote:Ofcourse this could change if your sister doesn't stop bothering me.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Almost correct. IRC Section 125 caps employee contributions to a Dependant Daycare FSA at $5,000. However, the plan limit for Unreimbursed Medical FSA is solely determined by the plan sponsor - usually the employer in most cases. Why? Because by definition, an Unreimbursed Medical FSA is a prefunded account and the plan sponsor assumes all the liability for the plan.BSmack wrote:There is a way that you can get some of the cost defrayed. If your district offers flexible health care spending accounts, just set up an account next year for the cost of the procedure. Since the limit is 5,000 dollars and most lasik procedures are in the 2500 dollar range you can realize a real savings of around 500-600 dollars on that procedure. Plus, the money is deducted on a per pay period basis over the year. So it amounts to a tax free, interest free loan.
I'm planning on doing it next year. Unwar me not thinking of it sooner.
https://www.fsafeds.com/fsafeds/faq.asp#g1a
I don't mind the glasses so much -- if the vision had declined to a certain point and then leveled off, that is. It's the fact that my vision continues to decline with every eye appointment that gets to me.Y2K wrote:Hell, I've only been wearing glasses for a little over 5 years and I hate the fucking things.
I'm already saving up for the Laser Doc.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.