OCmike's Humpday Challenge

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed May 02, 2007 9:02 pm

Are you from Fresno, per chance?

The "I got clowned, therefore I rule" is strong in this one, indeed.

Dude -- you've made a mockery out of trivia contests. While you did indeed drop a turd, the people who flush said turd down the toilet aren't "flies," even as badly as you want that to be so.

Dude...Let's review, s-l-o-w-l-y...

You put up trivia questions, score the contest, and have no fucking clue what the correct answers are. If that don't define "fucking retarded," I don't know what does.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed May 02, 2007 9:03 pm

Toddowen wrote:This is incorrect.

In an OCMike trivia contest?

No fucking way, dude.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Wed May 02, 2007 9:10 pm

Dinsdale wrote:Are you from Fresno, per chance?

The "I got clowned, therefore I rule" is strong in this one, indeed.

Who said I ruled? I said I laid a turd and you sniffed it. Be proud of who you are.

Dinsdale wrote: Dude -- you've made a mockery out of trivia contests. While you did indeed drop a turd, the people who flush said turd down the toilet aren't "flies," even as badly as you want that to be so.

I wasn't aware there were an established set of standards for on-line trivia contests in which no prizes are awarded and people who participate are admittedly only doing so to waste time while at work. Learn something new every day...

Dude...Let's review, s-l-o-w-l-y...

You put up trivia questions, score the contest, and have no fucking clue what the correct answers are. If that don't define "fucking retarded," I don't know what does.

No, what's retarded is 13,000 posts and a 20 post/day average over several years. Seriously Clavinsdale, when are you going to bust out the slides of your trip to Florida?

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed May 02, 2007 9:19 pm

OCmike wrote:Learn something new every day...

You're almost catching on. It's just that what you learn every day isn't accurate.

And...post total smack? Wow, you've really outdone yourself. The KC Contingent should be proud.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Wed May 02, 2007 9:33 pm

Clavinsdale wrote:You're almost catching on. It's just that what you learn every day isn't accurate.

So you're an authority on online trivia games with no prizes? Who knew?

Clavinsdale wrote: And...post total smack? Wow, you've really outdone yourself. The KC Contingent should be proud.

The KC contingent are known for IKYABWAI smack, just as you are known for being an embellishing, blowhard, balding, chubby date-rapist.

And, the only people who whine about others smacking post totals are those with high totals themselves. Because everyone knows that nothing screams loser like someone who lives and breathes message boards. Hell, even when I was going to college and had spare time coming out my ears, I don't think I ever amassed more than 5K posts in a year on TNW and I thought THAT was a lot.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Wed May 02, 2007 10:15 pm

Jay in Phoenix wrote:
Mister Bushice wrote:
#3. A Magic Harp.

And I agree with Mikey. Us left coasters get screwed on these early starts. Hell, by the time I get up, Bsmack is having lunch. :)
You forgot the "damn big mouth" part of that answer. So it seems did OCMike. Hmmmm.

Sorry, Dude. When I checked the list at the top of page one, that question was not bolded out and the thread was already halfway down page two. I just missed it on the skim thru.

and the "damn big mouth"? When was the story re written as "Dinsdale and the Beanstalk?"

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Wed May 02, 2007 10:19 pm

OCmike wrote:
I wasn't aware there were an established set of standards for on-line trivia contests in which no prizes are awarded and people who participate are admittedly only doing so to waste time while at work. Learn something new every day...

You know, these trivia threads were far more interesting when they didn't turn into yet another "PAY ATTENTION TO ME" dinsdale abortion.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Wed May 02, 2007 10:38 pm

Mister Bushice wrote:Sorry, Dude. When I checked the list at the top of page one, that question was not bolded out and the thread was already halfway down page two. I just missed it on the skim thru.

and the "damn big mouth"? When was the story re written as "Dinsdale and the Beanstalk?"

No sorry due Bushice, not at all. I was just wondering myself why Mike hadn't "bolded" it yet. Thus the "hmmm". At any rate, I believe if you Google 'incessant damn big mouth', it results in about a 12,980 and counting hits on 'Dinsdale'.

Weird huh?

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed May 02, 2007 10:38 pm

I see you've confused your fantasy world with reality once again.

The ONLY times I've ever posted in these threads has been to answer a question (CORRECTLY), or to point out inaccuracies.

Sorry if that doesn't fit into your little scheme of "if I badmouth Dinsdale enough, people will think I'm epic and I'll lose my place as one of the Tard Twins," but it's the truth.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Wed May 02, 2007 11:14 pm

OCmike wrote:And, the only people who whine about others smacking post totals are those with high totals themselves. Because everyone knows that nothing screams loser like someone who lives and breathes message boards. Hell, even when I was going to college and had spare time coming out my ears, I don't think I ever amassed more than 5K posts in a year on TNW and I thought THAT was a lot.

I see you workin', but high post totals don't necessarily coincide with large amounts of time spent here. Some people log on the board and post incessantly until they leave. Others log on and just read. Either way, you're spending useless time on the internet, right? Who cares if you're reading or posting?

Just sayin'. For all we know, some 50 post lurker could be the biggest "loser" here and we'd never know it.

Like, say...uhhh, a certain someone who we all "obsess" over.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed May 02, 2007 11:25 pm

I'd say it's much more likely that people who complain about "post total 'smack' " are those who are tired of the weakest of the weak trying to flex their nonexistant "muscle."

Yet there's certain posters here, who rather than trying to be anything besides the bottom dwellers they were born to be, instead embrace the Tard Handbook, and memorize each page for their next blast -- "IKYABWAI," "you take this too seriously" (yeah, trying to assess the motives and mental state of people on the internet you've never met is a fine working example of "not taking things seriously"), "you post more than me, BODE," "you smacked me silly, so I have BODE," and in general remind the rest of us how board bitches got to be board bitches in the first place.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Wed May 02, 2007 11:28 pm

Dinsdale wrote:I see you've confused your fantasy world with reality once again.

The ONLY times I've ever posted in these threads has been to answer a question (CORRECTLY), or to point out inaccuracies.

This is a classic example of what a self absorbed HEADCASE you really are.

How many people do you suppose attempt to answer questions incorrectly, you idiot?

So then the only reason for you to point out that YOU answer questions "CORRECTLY" is to wave your pathetic little "I'm the smartest, pay compliments to ME" freak flag once again. Pathetic.

Oh and for the record you do NOT just post in these quiz threads for those two reasons. Last week you sucked the life out of the quiz and turned it into a Grateful dead lyric quoting snooze fest.

How about you steer clear of future humpday quizzes so the rest of us can enjoy them without your anal retentive dinspeak fucking them up?

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Wed May 02, 2007 11:33 pm

Mister Bushice wrote:Last week you sucked the life out of the quiz and turned it into a Grateful dead lyric quoting snooze fest.

Yeah, that was a pretty sweet hijack, which was done entirely in response to the hijacking done by others.

How about you steer clear of future humpday quizzes so the rest of us can enjoy them without your anal retentive dinspeak fucking them up?

Please tell me a Tard Twin didn't deign to speak for others?

Since we've gone down that road, I'll speak for the masses, as well...

How about you ONLY post in the Humpday For The Intellectually Challenged, and then the rest of us won't have to endure...well...you.

Deal...since we're speaking for others, and all?

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Wed May 02, 2007 11:51 pm

1st city to a mil?

hows about beizing,uhh beiji.. uhhhh, that gook place.

I liked it better when it was peking.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu May 03, 2007 12:03 am

Dinsdale wrote:I'd say it's much more likely that people who complain about "post total 'smack' " are those who are tired of the weakest of the weak trying to flex their nonexistant "muscle."

Or, "they" know that there's no real defense for "you're a motormouth" other than "No, I'm not!!!!", so they go for the ridiculous "That's not smack" card. Which, other than calling others tards when you're incapable of coming up with something remotely original, is the last refuge of the weak.

Dinsdale wrote:Yet there's certain posters here, who rather than trying to be anything besides the bottom dwellers they were born to be, instead embrace the Tard Handbook, and memorize each page for their next blast -- "IKYABWAI," "you take this too seriously" (yeah, trying to assess the motives and mental state of people on the internet you've never met is a fine working example of "not taking things seriously"), "you post more than me, BODE," "you smacked me silly, so I have BODE," and in general remind the rest of us how board bitches got to be board bitches in the first place.

There's nothing worse than reading another boring Dullsdale "That's not smack", "tard" post. Wait, I stand corrected. There's clearly no worse feeling on the planet than being an overweight U&L divorcee who groggily wakes up in a semi-hungover daze thinking that she's resting her head on a damp bathroom shag carpet, and realizes that it's a man's hairy back. Wait, I take that back. That pales in comparison to her leaning over oh-so-carefully so as not to wake you, getting a good look at your hefty beer gut and man teets, sees your down's syndrome-stricken face and realizes that she actually let herself get fucked by THAT.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Thu May 03, 2007 12:17 am

OCmike wrote:There's nothing worse than reading another boring Dullsdale...

You seem awfully eager to eloborate about my "real life" (which is about as accurate as your "trivia contests"-btw) for someone who claims such pain at having to read my posts.

So, to recap -- you decried "that's not smack smack" by going with the "that's not smack" card...sheer brilliance. But not satisfied, you decided to shore it up with "reading your posts sucks" smack, which you then detailed things about my "personal life" that were no doubt gleened by...reading my posts.

Great googly moogly, you suck at this.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu May 03, 2007 12:26 am

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: I see you workin', but high post totals don't necessarily coincide with large amounts of time spent here. Some people log on the board and post incessantly until they leave. Others log on and just read. Either way, you're spending useless time on the internet, right? Who cares if you're reading or posting?

All totally true. I'm sure Dinsdale isn't really a date rapist either.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Thu May 03, 2007 12:27 am

Dinsdale wrote:
Mister Bushice wrote:Last week you sucked the life out of the quiz and turned it into a Grateful dead lyric quoting snooze fest.

Yeah, that was a pretty sweet hijack, which was done entirely in response to the hijacking done by others.

Except, once again, you took it to heretofore unknown tediously new heights by outposting everyone else 5 to 1.

Please tell me a Tard Twin didn't deign to speak for others?

Oh? You mean like when you deigned to speak for the "Legends" a week or so ago, and none of them showed up to back your bullshit up? You remember, the thread you ran away from when it became clear you were getting assfucked from 5 directions for flapping your unsupported big mouth?

You can shut the fuck up anytime now. When it's your turn to talk, someone will pull on the string.

and then the rest of us won't have to endure...well...you.

YOU, everyone has to endure.
ME, they just have to tolerate.

Big difference. :)

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu May 03, 2007 12:30 am

Dinsdale wrote: Great googly moogly, you suck at this.

I guess this is me "getting the horns" again.

Let me know if you're even going to bother trying at this.

<--------------------------I'll wait over here.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Thu May 03, 2007 12:35 am

You'll be waiting a long time...you've made my "scroll on past" list.

Bucmonkey · Post by **Bucmonkey** » Thu May 03, 2007 12:39 am

# 11 Blue whale or...
http://www.gavinrymill.com/dinosaurs/la ... -ever.html

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu May 03, 2007 12:42 am

In other words, you got nothing. Thanks for playing.

Mister Bushice · Post by **Mister Bushice** » Thu May 03, 2007 12:47 am

Dinsdale wrote:
RUN AWAY!!! RUN AWAY!!!

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Thu May 03, 2007 12:47 am

if you two ladies could quit bickering for a second, how 'bout my answer for 1st city to 1 million.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu May 03, 2007 12:51 am

It's Rome. Someone already answered it correctly.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Thu May 03, 2007 1:00 am

Dinsdale wrote:You'll be waiting a long time...you've made my "scroll on past" list.

I should hope so. You've out posted OCMike 10 fold by now.

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Thu May 03, 2007 1:04 am

Rack OC Mike for trying to bring some entertainment once a week to this board !!

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Thu May 03, 2007 1:06 am

yeah, rome was my first thought, but, I saw it posted and the question wasn't boldfaced yet, so I figured it was still on the board.

Looks like somebody's falling down on the job.

Is number of #1 babs songs still alive? If so, how 'bout....

what is too fukking many for that miserable cunt, alex?

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu May 03, 2007 1:16 am

Doh! Sorry 'bout that. It's bolded now.

The only question still in play is #1.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu May 03, 2007 1:18 am

Mister Bushice wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:
RUN AWAY!!! RUN AWAY!!!

Careful, dude. You'll make his scroll wheel list.

Terry in Crapchester · Thu May 03, 2007 1:28 am

OCmike wrote:Doh! Sorry 'bout that. It's bolded now.

The only question still in play is #1.

Since you brought it up, I'll say seven.

Just a guess, I'm not about to google the answer.

OCmike · Post by **OCmike** » Thu May 03, 2007 1:30 am

It's late, so I'll give the answer. It's two.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Thu May 03, 2007 1:45 am

OCmike wrote:Careful, dude. You'll make his scroll wheel list.

I'm chuckling over here at the image of Dins having a torn and tattered piece of Mead notebook paper scotch-taped to his monitor with about 8 or 9 T1B nicks on there.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu May 03, 2007 2:10 am

Toddowen wrote:
The Whistle Is Screaming wrote:14. What bad 1970s rock band took its name from a "very 'umble person" and sycophantic blackmailer in 'David Copperfield'?

Uriah Heep
This is incorrect.

"Rainbow Demon" and "Easy Living" aren't bad.

Neither is "Stealing When I Shoulda Been Buying" if that's the name of that song.

If there's a better lyric than

I done the ranchers daughter, and I sure did hurt his pride... hah hah

I want to know what it is.

Rack Uriah Heep, and it's no surprise that TWIS is clueless about music.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Thu May 03, 2007 2:13 am

War Wagon wrote:If there's a better lyric than ...TWIS is clueless about music.

An all-time great oxymoron...which WW just won't get. And I won't explain...I'll just put it in the "what a dumbass" file.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Thu May 03, 2007 2:19 am

Haven't you been getting your ass handed to you enough already in this thread, Dins?

Your reach exceeds your grasp.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Thu May 03, 2007 2:26 am

I knew there was a reason I tended to ignore Bore Wagon, as well.

I won't make the same mistake of giving you "second chances" nearly so quickly next time.

Jay in Phoenix · Post by **Jay in Phoenix** » Thu May 03, 2007 2:51 pm

Seriously Dins, the bottom line is...this is a once a week trivia contest thread which awards a sweet-ass no-prize. It's for time wasting and fun. Quit taking it and yourself so damn seriously would ya'.

Here's a tip, that Bushice already suggested. If you don't like the thread, stay the fuck out of it.

See, simple...like you.

Or, in other words:

"Lighten up Francis."

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Thu May 03, 2007 3:24 pm

Chicks dig me, because I rarely wear underwear and when I do it's usually something unusual. But now I know why I have always lost women to guys like you... I mean, it's not just the uniform, it's the stories you tell. So much fun and imagination.... Lee Harvey, you are a madman!! When you stole that cow, and your friend tried to make it with the cow. I want to party with you, cowboy. The two of us together, forget it....

The Whistle Is Screaming · Fri May 04, 2007 1:50 pm

War Wagon wrote:
Toddowen wrote:
The Whistle Is Screaming wrote:14. What bad 1970s rock band took its name from a "very 'umble person" and sycophantic blackmailer in 'David Copperfield'?

Uriah Heep
This is incorrect.

"Rainbow Demon" and "Easy Living" aren't bad.
Neither is "Stealing When I Shoulda Been Buying" if that's the name of that song.

If there's a better lyric than

I done the ranchers daughter, and I sure did hurt his pride... hah hah

I want to know what it is.

Rack Uriah Heep, and it's no surprise that TWIS is clueless about music.

You, commenting on my musical taste is laughable at best as you know little or nothing about my musical taste. Of course, as you've so painfully proven with each of your posts, the statement "you know little or nothing" just about sums you up in general. Anyway, let's have some fun with it ...

I'll do my best to dumb this down for you, but you may need some help so don't be shy about enlisting the likes of Tardowen or ciceroo to help you out.

Go to page 1 of this thread and look at the 1st post. Notice who created that post and write it down, you'll need that information for later. Anyway, you will find a series of questions (those are the sentences with a "?" at the end) in that post. No need to read all the questions, just limp your way down to question #14. Read the question, carefully. Don't worry that your lips are moving, I'm sure anyone who knows you isn't surprised by it. I'll wait for you to finish...

... OK, you done? Good!

Did you ~~comprehend~~ ~~understand~~ never mind, that part isn't all that important to the overall purpose here. What I'm getting at and what you need to learn here is that I didn't pose that question. I did not caste judgment on Uriah Heep, that was done by the person who posted the question, look at the name on the piece of paper (remember I told you to do that earlier). Look at the name & study the letters carefully, notice the sequence they are in, OK? Now compare that to "TWIS" or if you're up to it "The Whistle Is Screaming". This part is critical so take your time. Here, let me help you little.

name on paper is OCmike
I need to compare that to The Whistle Is Screaming or TWIS

Using a modified version of the popular Sesame Street game, 1 of these things is not like the others, we can ~~deduce~~ figure out that TWIS is not OCmike.

I know you haven't figured all this out and that's perfectly understandable, so let me conclude with this.

You are a dumb fuck. You must, at the very least, understand that much by now.