![Image](http://images.tsn.ca/images/stories/20070430/lackey_84074.jpg)
![Image](http://images.tsn.ca/images/stories/20070526/escobar_57232.jpg)
![Image](http://www.midwestrake.com/divisions/industrial/22brooms/brooms_images/broom_industrial.jpg)
Another season, another Yankee beatdown by the Halos.
Enjoy trying to climb out of that 12.5 game hole we just dropped you in, you pathetically overrated faggots.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Moderator: Cueball
Neely8 wrote:The best team in baseball.......
Yeah, because spending FAR more $$$ than anybody else to BUY your championships is always fresh....Toddowen wrote:I'll still be going to a couple of games this year. We'll still smash the rest of the leagues attendance to smithereens and eventually get another Champ. And I hope this next one is flat out "all in" bought, sold, and paid for...just to piss off all the bean counters.
It might not be this year {I'm still not counting them out} but you can be assured that someday you will hate the Yankees even more than ever. And when that day comes that we get to wave that Championship in your faces again, we are going to flutter it in your noses and shoot warm gobs of messy enthusiam into your agape complaint boxes.
So prepare now. Get us excited with lots of boasting. Forget that you are our bitches so when the day comes for us to remind you, your squinting and squeeling will be that much more deliciuos.
I don't really see it as "Buying" championships, as much as the yankees and the red sox competing for who will buy up more of the available talent to keep other teams from contending for the post season.R-Jack wrote:Paul you fucking idiot.RevLimiter wrote:Yeah, because spending FAR more $$$ than anybody else to BUY your championships is always fresh....
The last time whole "buying championships" line was fresh, there were two more towers up in NYC and I could bring nailclippers on a plane.
Not only that, your point even sounds more like the typical moron battle cry given the fact that the Yankees didn't really start widening the gap between 1 and 2 in payroll dollars AFTER their World Series run ended. They typically have had one of the largest payrolls, even before they started "buying" their championships with all those players from their farm system. Hell, they even got out-spent by Baltimore in 1998, their 114 win season.
Most of that era they had the top payroll in MLB, but there was someone right there with them almost dollar for dollar. The fact remains that they haven't won shit since they started trying to really "buy" WS titles, so unlike you Paul, your played out and baseless point doesn't hold water.
MuchoBulls wrote:In their current run of winning the division they have been behind by double digits a few times and still ended up winning.
Shoalzie wrote:It's scary how good the Sox could potentially be as the summer rolls on. If you were going to tell me Lowell and Youkilis would be the two leading hitters on the team as we enter June, I would've said...how far ahead are the Yankees in first place?
R-Jack wrote:True. Also, large chunk of that increase in salary came from huge contracts given out to players who were key players in their WS runs, like Jeter, Bernie and Rivera for example. To be fair, that "buying championship" money was more like paying for their past ones. That's nothing new. Teams that have spent a number of years at the top had bloated payrolls after their best years have past (Late 80's Royals, Early 90's A's, Mid 90's Blue Jays, etc).Mister Bushice wrote:[
I don't really see it as "Buying" championships, as much as the yankees and the red sox competing for who will buy up more of the available talent to keep other teams from contending for the post season.
Nobody "buys" championships, but that's not to say that they don't pay for them.
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Shoalzie wrote:Polanco-for-Urbina...that trade is almost a crime it's so good.
It was deece. I'd currently rate it 3 machetes... and maybe 2 machetes + 1.5 blowtorches by year's end if Polanco keeps hitting the way he is.
BIG difference between working magic within reasonable budgetary constraints and buying up talent while leaving the dollar amount on the check blank.Shoalzie wrote: I can't kill teams for spending money when I consider my team wouldn't be where they are at without Dombrowski making some bold moves in free agency but he's also made some of the best trades any GM has made in recent years.
In fairness, I'd put A-Rod on that list as well. At this point his numbers project out to 58 HR's and 154 RBI's for the entire season.MuchoBulls wrote:While you can all you want about the Sox underperforming, you can say the same thing about the Yankees, minus Jeter and Posada.
A lot of Yankee haters like to bitch about this, but they always seem to forget that the last dominant edition of the Yankees had a lot of useful spare parts who were not superstars by any stretch of the imagination, nor were they paid as such. Without Tino Martinez, Paul O'Neill and Scott Brosius, the Yankees probably wouldn't have run off three straight World Series, or four in five years.Mister Bushice wrote:BIG difference between working magic within reasonable budgetary constraints and buying up talent while leaving the dollar amount on the check blank.Shoalzie wrote: I can't kill teams for spending money when I consider my team wouldn't be where they are at without Dombrowski making some bold moves in free agency but he's also made some of the best trades any GM has made in recent years.
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Not even close.ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Worst troll ever.
Van wrote:It's like rimming an unbathed fat chick from Missouri. It's highly distinctive, miserably unforgettable and completely wrong.