Top 5 and bottom 5

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 1:52 am

Cicero wrote:1 Patriots
2 Dallas
3 Indy
4 Green Bay
5 Detroit

I look forward to you explaining this.

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:31 am

I don't.

1. NE*
2. Indy
3. Dal
4. GB
5. Pitt

28. St.L
29. NYGiants
30. Atl
31. Chi
32. Miami

upstart · Post by **upstart** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 2:43 am

1 Patriots "Dynasty'
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
2 Dallas
3 Indy
4 Green Bay
5 Detroit

28 Dolphins
29 Falcons
30 Browns
31 Saints
32 Rams

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:15 am

upstart wrote:"Dynasty'

You've become quite tedious, upchuck dynasty.

ucant and Neely wish you'd just go away and even Th thinks you suck.

1. Pats
2. Packers (impressive division road win at Minny)
3. Colts
4. Cowboys
5. Steelers (stubbed toe, will get over it)

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:39 am

upstart wrote:1 Patriots "Dynasty'

NFL "Dynasties" don't include any teams that MISS THE PLAYOFFS during their alleged "reign", dipshit.

The sooner you figure that out, the better off this board will be.

ANYWAY, here's my top 5 and bottom 5:

TOP 5
1. Patriots
2. Cowboys
3. Colts
4. Packers
5. Seahawks

BOTTOM 5
28. Falcons
29. 'Aints
30. Bills
31. Rams
32. Dolphins

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:48 am

1. New England
2. Oakland
3. Indianapolis
4. Pittsburgh
5. Dallas

28. Cincinnati
29. Kansas City
30. San Diego
31. New Orleans
32. St. Louis

See You Next Wednesday · Wed Oct 03, 2007 3:50 am

1. Pats
2. Cowboys
3. Colts
4. Packers
5. Titans

28. Saints
29. Fins
30. Falcons
31. Bills
32. Rams

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:25 am

poptart wrote: 29. Kansas City

Hater.

Qbert · Post by **Qbert** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:37 am

upstart wrote:
crown wrote: 30. Browns

really????

are you both SURE that you're Not COWBOYFan TROLLS hoping for that HIGHER 1st Rd. draft pick next year???? S'up DF.....nice to see you too!!!!

BROWNS are 27th at worst....

btw...upstart--->most DYNASTIES don't have a Name as long as ASTERIK.

MING; out front, should of told'ya...... :wink:

Th · Post by Th » Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:59 am

poptart wrote:2. Oakland

I laughed

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 12:43 pm

Th wrote:
poptart wrote:2. Oakland

I laughed

We ALL did.

Sin,
T1B

Degenerate · Post by **Degenerate** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 1:16 pm

Cicero wrote: 30 Browns

upstart wrote: 30 Browns

Way to mail it in, guys.

jiminphilly · Post by **jiminphilly** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 1:33 pm

Why the hell are the Detroit Lions popping up in some Top 5 lists? Anyone remember the drubbing they took at the hands of the Eagles 2 weeks back- the same Eagles that gave up 12 sacks in a loss to a shitty Giants team?

Neely8 · Post by **Neely8** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:42 pm

Degenerate wrote:
Cicero wrote: 30 Browns

upstart wrote: 30 Browns
Way to mail it in, guys.

I think they are planning ahead for the NE drubbing of the Shit Stains this week....

DallasFanatic · Post by **DallasFanatic** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:27 pm

Qbert wrote:
upstart wrote:
crown wrote: 30. Browns
really????

are you both SURE that you're Not COWBOYFan TROLLS hoping for that HIGHER 1st Rd. draft pick next year???? S'up DF.....nice to see you too!!!!

BROWNS are 27th at worst....

btw...upstart--->most DYNASTIES don't have a Name as long as ASTERIK.

MING; out front, should of told'ya...... :wink:

Sup Q. Keep in mind there's still a 12 game losing streak in your teams future.

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 · Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:20 pm

War Wagon wrote:ucant and Neely wish you'd just go away and even Th thinks you suck.

upstart
Elwood
Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 134
Location: the north shore of Boston

About 1/3 of these 134 posts have occurred after “SpyGate Scandal”… seems to me like this obvious troll should be lauded for his efforts. Way too many idiots are eating up his chum. Furthermore… no one actually from the area would say their location is “the north shore of Boston.”

You’d say “Bah-stun … Nath Shore-Ah” to anyone outside of New England and just “Nath Shore-Ah” if you’re talking to locals.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 7:53 pm

1. Patriots
2. Cowboys
3. Colts
4. Packers
5. Steelers

28. Vikings
29. Jets
30. Saints
31. Dolphins
32. Rams

Bucmonkey · Post by **Bucmonkey** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 1:48 am

1 NE
2 Ind
3 Dal
4 Pit
5 Sea

28 Atl
29 Buf
30 Stl
31 NO
32 Mia

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:41 pm

Anyone with the Lions in the top 5 is insane...they didn't beat the Bears at full strength on Sunday. They were one freak quarter away from being 2-2. They are the worst 3-1 team in the NFL. If they can go on the road and beat Washington for the first time in forever, that might be the first win this season that is meaningful in my eyes. For now, they're a minus in the point differential for the season, they're the second worst running team in the league and 29th in total defense...is that a top 5 team?

RumpleForeskin · Post by **RumpleForeskin** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 3:43 pm

1. New England
2. Dallas
3. Indy
4. Green Bay
5. Tampa Bay

28. Atlanta
29. Buffalo
30. Minnesota
31. St. Louis
32. Miami

upstart · Post by **upstart** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 9:24 pm

ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
War Wagon wrote:ucant and Neely wish you'd just go away and even Th thinks you suck.

upstart
Elwood
Joined: 19 Jan 2005
Posts: 134
Location: the north shore of Boston

About 1/3 of these 134 posts have occurred after “SpyGate Scandal”… seems to me like this obvious troll should be lauded for his efforts. Way too many idiots are eating up his chum. Furthermore… no one actually from the area would say their location is “the north shore of Boston.”

You’d say “Bah-stun … Nath Shore-Ah” to anyone outside of New England and just “Nath Shore-Ah” if you’re talking to locals.

I live in Wakefield and I call it the north shore

trev · Post by **trev** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:02 pm

Real trolls know that trolling isn't allowed in the NFL forum.

upstart is legit.

Qbert · Post by **Qbert** » Fri Oct 05, 2007 5:25 am

trev wrote:Real trolls know that trolling isn't allowed in the NFL forum.

upstart is legit.

BRILLIANT!!!!!!!!!!

have a furkin' Guinness 'trev......

sissyCrownroo and upstart both listed the BROWNS as #30 on the List this week....which is RETARDED.

i was calling them out as COWBOYFan TROLLS....as the COWBOYS benefit from the BROWNS sucking worse than your Team CURRENTLY IS.

the Cowboys get Cleveland's 1st rd. draft pick next year.

of course upstart is LEGIT.

upstart/Crown is a moron for thinking that there are only 2 Teams in the NFL that are worse than the Browns. i say that there are 5.

28. Saints
29. Bills
30. Falcons
31. St. Louis
32. Mami

upstart · Post by **upstart** » Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:05 pm

Qbert wrote:
trev wrote:Real trolls know that trolling isn't allowed in the NFL forum.

upstart is legit.
BRILLIANT!!!!!!!!!!

have a furkin' Guinness 'trev......

sissyCrownroo and upstart both listed the BROWNS as #30 on the List this week....which is RETARDED.

i was calling them out as COWBOYFan TROLLS....as the COWBOYS benefit from the BROWNS sucking worse than your Team CURRENTLY IS.

the Cowboys get Cleveland's 1st rd. draft pick next year.

of course upstart is LEGIT.

upstart/Crown is a moron for thinking that there are only 2 Teams in the NFL that are worse than the Browns. i say that there are 5.

28. Saints
29. Bills
30. Falcons
31. St. Louis
32. Mami

After Sundays slap down Browns fan are going to be walking with bags over there heads with a # 32 on it.

Qbert · Post by **Qbert** » Sun Oct 07, 2007 6:15 am

BROWNS will Cover....it WILL be Close.

St. Louise will be 0-5....so, #32 will be taken anyways.

get YE HENCE!

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Sun Oct 07, 2007 8:11 pm

Shoalzie wrote:Anyone with the Lions in the top 5 is insane...they didn't beat the Bears at full strength on Sunday. They were one freak quarter away from being 2-2. They are the worst 3-1 team in the NFL. If they can go on the road and beat Washington for the first time in forever, that might be the first win this season that is meaningful in my eyes. For now, they're a minus in the point differential for the season, they're the second worst running team in the league and 29th in total defense...is that a top 5 team?

Any of those who had the Lions in the top 5 now understand what I'm talking about now? 34-3 against a so-so offensive team...played without Randel El the entire second half and didn't have Moss for the game and Campbell still carved 'em up. 106 yards passing by Kitna and they were only able to get 149 net yards against pretty much a base defense all game long. The Skins didn't do anything exotic but they dominated this game from the start. They were the worst 3-1 team in the NFL and I'd now call them the worst 3-2 team.

Rogue · Post by **Rogue** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:30 am

War Wagon wrote:This is too easy. After 3 weeks we have 5 undefeated and 5 winless teams. Just go by the point differentials. Yeah, I know that's a subjective criteria, but it's as good as any. Save the SoS arguements, because it really doesn't hold water in the NFL. You play the hand you're dealt. It will get tougher to grade these teams once the weeks start to click off.

1. Patriots +79 - that's totally insane
2. Steelers +71 - so's that
3. Cowboys +41
4. Colts +39
5. Packers +32

I just had to respond to this and one of the points someone else agreed with. Playing the hand you're dealt doesn't mean you don't take into consideration who someone has played. Stating SoS doesn't hold water in the NFL makes absolutely no sense what so ever. SoS holds water in any sport in which you are trying to determine rankings, how else do you judge? Oh based on point differential. LOL that is ridiculous. So, NWE beating on stiffs in a division that has 7 wins holds more water than IND beating on a near complete schedule of opponents that at this time have playoff hopes?

Wow, I hope you're not someone that actually has an opinion this board values, lol. That would be pretty sorry but it appears the board is still trying to grasp the concept of how SoS doesn't matter in terms of who has a better chance to make the playoffs within each division. If you guys are still trying to figure that out and don't understand the concept of ranking teams based on the quality of competitionthen maybe you should just let your girlfriends and wives posts because not many people will be able to tell the difference.

Green Bay has an "impressive win over MIN on the road"?
What in the world is impressive about beating Kelly Holcomb and the offensively challenged Vikings who have only managed to take down their former best divisional friend, Joey Harrington?

The defending champs are still #1.
There is no reason what so ever to think that NWE is, other than being overly impressed with the fantasy stats of Brady to Moss. Heck IND even just smoked a division leading TB without Addai and Harrison.

The best thing NWE has going for them is they are 2-0 in a division that has 7 wins. IND obviously has a tougher challenge given that their division has 14 wins. I'm sure they will have continued success throughout the season and when it's all done, are you still gonig to be in here saying SoS doesn't hold water? If you are, you really should consider judging gymnastics or ice skating.

1) Colts
2) Patriots
3) Steelers

Who gets to win another ring to add to their collection this year?

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:54 pm

1. Patriots
2. Colts
3. Cowboys
4. Steelers
5. Packers

28. Jets
29. Bills
30. Saints
31. Dolphins
32. Rams

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:08 pm

1. New England
2. Oakland
3. Dallas
4. Indianapolis
5. Pittsburgh

28. St. Louis
29. San Diego
30. Denver
31. Kansas City
32. UTEP

See You Next Wednesday · Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:20 pm

1. New England
2. Indianapolis
3. Pittsburgh
4. Cowboys
5. Jacksonville

28. Broncos
29. Niners
30. Rams
31. Saints
32. Dolphins