That is IT!

the_ouskull · Post by **the_ouskull** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:17 pm

Two things, 1) I'm sick and tired of Bob Stoops making a sh*tty gameplan, bringing it in and getting kicked in the teeth using it... yet continuing to use it for the course of an entire game, or at least an entire half. 'cause why, exactly? Is he THAT stubborn? Is he THAT pompous? To think that maybe it'll START working? (I realize that the ISU game is featuring a lot of bad breaks that are, in no way, gameplan-related. This is a much deeper-seeded issue...)

2) I'm breaking up with Sam Bradford. No more civil union for us. I'm sticking with the fiancee from here on out. Period.

the_ouskull

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:49 pm

Not if we keep turning the ball over. Sheesh.

Moby Dick · Post by **Moby Dick** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 7:05 pm

first half i was like...where's John Blake???

luckily for us..ISU sucks ass. game is nowhere near over (just ended 3rd quarter) but i'm pretty sure we'll win this damned game.

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 7:07 pm

i wouldn't put this on the staff or gameplan. this is on the field.

this looks like a team that took care of business against 2 ranked teams the last two weeks, read about it the fishwrap and getting caught looking ahead to a bye week off.

the_ouskull · Post by **the_ouskull** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 7:54 pm

This is on the staff, the QB, and the gameplan. The staff's gameplan is to dummy-down the offense for Bradford when we're on the road, allowing opposing defenses to tee off on us. The QB, Bradford, responds in kind, today in particular, by over and under throwing receivers all day long, mainly 'cause he's throwing off of his back foot 'cause our offensive line is having trouble handling the blitzing and stunting of smaller, faster, d-linemen. It's a mess. We should have beaten this team by 30, not 10. Either way, I'll take it, but I'm still dumping Sam. I need to date other, better quarterbacks, like whoever's at Notre Dame this year.

Sin,
Beano Powlus.

Errr...

But, we're still in the running for the BCS title game, so I'll take it. I guess when you're good, you can afford to be nitpicky. :D

the_ouskull

the_ouskull · Post by **the_ouskull** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 7:54 pm

This is on the staff, the QB, and the gameplan. The staff's gameplan is to dummy-down the offense for Bradford when we're on the road, allowing opposing defenses to tee off on us. The QB, Bradford, responds in kind, today in particular, by over and under throwing receivers all day long, mainly 'cause he's throwing off of his back foot 'cause our offensive line is having trouble handling the blitzing and stunting of smaller, faster, d-linemen. It's a mess. We should have beaten this team by 30, not 10. Either way, I'll take it, but I'm still dumping Sam. I need to date other, better quarterbacks, like whoever's at Notre Dame this year.

Sin,
Beano Powlus.

Errr...

But, we're still in the running for the BCS title game, so I'll take it. I guess when you're good, you can afford to be nitpicky. :D

the_ouskull

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Sat Oct 20, 2007 8:07 pm

My boner for an Oklahoma/Oregon BSC Bowl is going a little flaccid at the moment.

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 2:48 am

Where the FUCK was this OU team LAST WEEK??? :x :x :x

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:01 am

So....you're engaged?

Congrats kid.

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:14 am

WolverineSteve wrote:So....you're engaged?

Congrats kid.

Yeah, but he just broke up, so it's a push.

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:38 am

i will say this game did feature two of the dumbest looking plays i've ever seen. the fumble no one from OU saw.....until Bradford comes back from going to the sidelines to make a big tackle. and the goofball run after INT after the ball hit Gresham in the numbers and bounces up in the air for the INT. looked like a peewee game. thankfully, OU made a stop on D so that one stayed off the "highlights".

KatMode · Post by **KatMode** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 12:57 pm

OU needs a year's supply of

the_ouskull · Post by **the_ouskull** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:19 pm

Yeah, engaged. We're still working on the rock, but that's because she's finishing school (pre-med, not high school, a-holes) and I'm still a teacher who has just started coaching. I hate you, money. :D

I hate OU's schemes more right now though. But, so does she, so she's a keeper.

the_ouskull

Cornhusker · Post by **Cornhusker** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:09 pm

the_ouskull wrote:Two things, 1) I'm sick and tired of Bob Stoops making a sh*tty gameplan, bringing it in and getting kicked in the teeth using it... yet continuing to use it for the course of an entire game, or at least an entire half. 'cause why, exactly? Is he THAT stubborn? Is he THAT pompous? To think that maybe it'll START working?

OMG, you could insert Bill Callahan and take this statement to the 10th power if your a Neb. fan.

Listen, I don't wanna hear bitchin' about WINNING by 10 against a team that was amped by a hell'va good coach at home. Hey a one point win against Ball St. looks better every week from where Corn fan stands. Yeah I'm bitter and you're spoiled. I'd trade places with ya in a heartbeat.
You have issues with Stoops...? we sure as hell will take him off your hands.

I had OU in the pick 'em so yeah I was pissed, but if you could see the trainwreak in Lincoln you'd count your blessings. Man we suck sooo bad. OU looks damn good to anyone here, then again most everyone does.

Rack the engagement...marriage IS the toughest thing you'll ever do outside of raising your kids. Just a little fatherly advice D. No charge.

the_ouskull · Post by **the_ouskull** » Mon Oct 22, 2007 11:34 am

I attended school during the Gibbs / Schnellenburger / Blake eras, so to call me "spoiled" is only partially accurate.

My issues with Stoops are just those, and, frankly, for the kind of program he runs, they're more than worth it in the long run. I just get frustrated on Gameday from time to time. At least it's not Natural Light-fueled.

the_ouskull

T1B

That is IT!

That is IT!

Re: That is IT!