mvscal wrote:Exception? No, an exception would be you knowing what the fuck you're talking about.
http://www.orww.org/Wildfires/index.htm
Huh?
So, your saying that the largest, most damaging fores occur in the maritime climate zone forests, where large trees grow with reckless abandon, and on the occasional years where weather conditions are ripe for it, it can result in huge fires?
Color me SHOCKED. I never knew that.
Oh, wait.
Yeah, we get some bigazz forest fires... every few years. Probably has something to do with the massive forests resulting in massive forest fires if the weather patterns create the conditions.
But here's the catch, douche... massive forest fires aren't really all that common an occurance around here. The only way they really start is at the end of an exceptionally hot, dry summer.
And you know why that is? Because Western Oregon (where every fire in your link has been) isn't arid or semi-arid, although it takes on the characteristics of such a climate zone for a few months out of the year. But again -- huge fires on the West Side (aka Wet Side) aren't terribly common, considering the amount of standing timber in the region.
Now, ON THE OTHER HAND, once you go east of the Cascades, arid and semi-arid climates are the norm... which, oh-so oddly enough, is where the term "desert" comes from. In what is known as the "Dryside" of the state, wildfires (different from "forest fires") are EXTREMELY common -- to the point it's a damn fine idea to check on fire reports before trying to drive to the Dryside in late summer, since there's always a good chance your highway of choice may be closed.
EXTREMELY common occurance "over there"... in the desert.
But keep it up... you're freaking killing me over here. Humorous shit. Actually, "there's no fires in the desert" is pretty much knee-slapping funny shit.... which you've tried (horribly unsuccessfully, if you didn't notice) to counter by changing the definition of "desert." Classic.