Chiefs vs Raiduhs

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 6:26 pm

OK, so here's where we all clinch winning poptarts money yet again

Two really bad offenses
One pretty bad defense

Culpepper tosses two or three INTs
Brodie throws a TD to Gonzo
The Pollock kicks 4 FGs

Chiefs - 13
Raiduh's - 12

It's gonna be a snoozer in Arrowhead (where they'll still be finding passed out drunks from Saturday night's Mizzou massacre of KU)
Funny that the biggest game in the history of Arrowhead will be a college game
No it's not.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:13 pm

Until I see differently, I assume Oakland will find a way to crap the bed.

Anyone and everyone is a star on Raider week.

Priest Tomlinson, running behind the '92 Dallas Cowboy O-line, goes off for 212 yds.
Brodie Marino slings it around the yard for 347 yds.
Herm Lombardi motivates his squad masterfully, and watches them execute his brilliant gameplan to perfection.

Chiefs - 27
'duds - 6

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:03 am

Wow, what news I've just heard.

Priest may be OUT.

Time to alter my prediction.

Priest's replacement runs for 187 and the Chiefs win 24-6.

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:25 am

poptart wrote:Wow, what news I've just heard.

Priest may be OUT.

That's news to me. Care to validate that?

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:38 am

Jay Glazer reporting Priest may be out for the year. It's all over the radio talk shows.

kcdave · Post by **kcdave** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:56 am

another raiduh beat down week starts now.

Since 1990, the Chiefs hold a 28-8 win ratio over the duhs, including winning the last 9. Subtract Chucky, (Only good coach the duhs have had in 20+ years) it would even be worse.

Chiefs 21
duhs 9, 10 penalties, 2 int's, 1 fumble, qb sacked 6 times.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 4:43 am

Yes dave, the last two decades have been pretty horrible for the Raiders (save for about a 3-or-4 year period).
But it's fixin' to turn.
Soon as we get our 60 million dollar QB up and running.

You know, the fat 'weight issue' kid.
The one who is a li'l slow to pick up the playbook and talks like he's got rocks in his mouff.

We'll be bitchin' when he gets goin'.

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:37 pm

The Raiders will break out of their slump with a balanced offense and a dominating defense. Culpepper will throw for 275 yards while Fargas will break the century mark with at least one long TD run. The queefs won't hit the endzone until the 4th qtr when the game is already over.

Raiders - 31
pussy farts - 10

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:42 pm

RevLimiter wrote:
poptart wrote:Wow, what news I've just heard.

Priest may be OUT.
That's news to me. Care to validate that?

Here you go, tubby:

http://sports.aol.com/fanhouse/2007/11/ ... to-retire/

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 3:50 pm

Sirfindafold wrote:The Raiders will break out of their slump ......

Yes, that pesky little 6 game slump.

Well, I like reading your take on the game, 'fold.

I liked watching the '77 Super Bowl highlights on YouTube earlier today too.

Those were the days, my friend, I thought they'd never end .......

Tonight I'll watch Charlie Brown.

Nixhex · Post by **Nixhex** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 6:04 pm

poptart wrote:Yes dave, the last two decades have been pretty horrible for the Raiders (save for about a 3-or-4 year period).
But it's fixin' to turn.
Soon as we get our 60 million dollar QB up and running.

You know, the fat 'weight issue' kid.
The one who is a li'l slow to pick up the playbook and talks like he's got rocks in his mouff.

We'll be bitchin' when he gets goin'.

Do you think that Maybe Dwayne Bowe and Craig Davis made Russell look better than he really is?

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 7:21 pm

Nixhex wrote:Do you think that Maybe Dwayne Bowe and Craig Davis made Russell look better than he really is?

no.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Thu Nov 22, 2007 3:45 am

Nixhex wrote:Do you think that Maybe Dwayne Bowe and Craig Davis made Russell look better than he really is?

We'll just have to wait and see about Russell.
So to your question, I don't know.

I'm not terribly comfortable when I think about Russell though.
But maybe it's just my overall sour opinion of our organization right now, I dunno.

But I see a 60 million dollar QB, ... a KID ..., who has a weight issue.
For me, a red flag pops up right there.
Is this guy disciplined and dedicated?
Aren't 33 yr old DTs supposed to battle weight issues?

When I hear him speak, about the last thing that comes to mind is, "wow, this cat is REALLY bright!"
And they apparently, due to his 'slowness', they can't dumb the playbook down sufficiently for him to step on the field, despite the fact that our current QBing licks sweaty dick.

But he's got a rocket arm, maybe the biggest ever in league history.
And at the college level the players around him responded to him and were eager to follow his lead.
And he was a winner.

All in all, we just have to wait and see.

I expect the worst, however.

Raider Loco · Post by **Raider Loco** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 4:27 pm

Hopes and prayers today for a Raider victory, were going to need it. That field looked like shit last night during the Mizzou game, excpect some slipping and sliding.

Raiders 13
Queefs 10

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 4:29 pm

poptart wrote:
When I hear him speak, about the last thing that comes to mind is, "wow, this cat is REALLY bright!"
And they apparently, due to his 'slowness', they can't dumb the playbook down sufficiently for him to step on the field, despite the fact that our current QBing licks sweaty dick.

But he's got a rocket arm, maybe the biggest ever in league history.
And at the college level the players around him responded to him and were eager to follow his lead.
And he was a winner.

All in all, we just have to wait and see.

I expect the worst, however.

They said the same thing about Vince Young and that seems to have worked out pretty well.

Things could be worse - you could be rolling out a starting backfield of Kolby Smith and Brodie Croyle

I got offered tix to this mess today and declined.

It's such ugly football, I can barely stand to watch

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 4:38 pm

Yeah, the Chiefs are a disaster.

Maybe the Raiders can luck out and finally capture a division win.
..... or not.

Kiffin's got to start winning some games, bottom line.
The "Hey, at least I'm not Art" honeymoon is over.

I think more points will be scored in this game than most people are predicting.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 7:03 pm

Kolby Payton on pace for 200+ yds rushing v. Oakland.

Committment to Excellence.

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 8:16 pm

LOL - it's a better game than I expected - Still glad I'm watching it from the couch.

Felix · Post by **Felix** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 8:53 pm

Herm needs to be a little more creative if he's going to go for it on 4th down......

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:07 pm

We're runnin' the table, beeeetches!

woot!

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:16 pm

We lost to the RAYDAHS....the apocolypse is officially here.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:45 pm

First off, props and congrats to the Raiders for ending that ignominious streak.

Now that that obligatory nicety is out the way:

OH MY FUCKING GAWD ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

To say that the Chiefs performance today was dismal would be a compliment. Even a dismal effort would've won that game.

No, what that was, was a total freaking pathetic FAILURE and breakdown in every aspect of the game. Offense, Defense, Special Teams, and most importantly, coaching decisions and game management.

While I could go on and get into specifics about each area, it's not worth the time. Anybody who watched the game knows exactly what I'm talking about. Suffice to say that they played like a bunch of lifeless pussies and that Herm is a freaking joke, a parody unto himself.

Thankfully, I'm still basking in the glow of the MIZZOU-rah Tigers accomplishment last nite, so this doesn't sting near as bad as it normally would.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:03 pm

Herm crapped the bed.

- If I had been coaching KC today Brodie Croyle would have thrown about 7 passes, seriously.
Facing an absolute lay-up of a run defense, and there is no reason why Croyle should have been back to pass as often as he was on 1st and 2nd down.
Oakland can't stop ANYBODY's run game.

- The timeout challenge for the spot on the Kennison knee catch was classic Herm.
Wasted.

The Chiefs were short-handed, no doubt, but the team demonstrated nowhere near the level of energy I'm accustomed to seeing from a KC team ...... especially at home.

Y'all will get another year of Herm though.
Get comfortable in that chair.

He ain't going anywhere, IMO.

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 1:28 am

War Wagon wrote: Thankfully, I'm still basking in the glow of the MIZZOU-rah Tigers accomplishment last nite, so this doesn't sting near as bad as it normally would.

Yep - Thankfully we have # 1 ranked Mizzou to fall back on.

This Chefs debacle had all the classics of a Herm squirm: Bad playcalling, wasted challenges and timeouts, poor special teams play
Amazing when running against swiss cheese you decide to pass - Just brilliant
And when we really, really need to run - and the "duhs knew we were gonna run up the middle, we ran up the middle and they stuffed it.
Just classic.

Glad I tunred down the free ticket - but when I went outside I found 4 more on my windshield.
You couldn't pay me to watch this crap

kcdave · Post by **kcdave** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 3:15 am

Since 1990, the Chiefs hold a 28-9 win ratio over the duhs, including winning 9 of the last 10.

Congrats to the duhs. For once, they forgot to shit themselves and give away the game in the last 2 minutes.

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 4:16 pm

poptart wrote:Oakland can't stop ANYBODY's run game.

Yet they were able to stop them on 4th and 1 when it mattered most.

Props to the Raiders for a divisional win on the road.

Fuck it, props to them for ANY WIN!!!

bring on the fading donkeys

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 4:23 pm

Go fuck yourself.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 4:31 pm

Sirfindafold wrote:
poptart wrote:Oakland can't stop ANYBODY's run game.
Yet they were able to stop them on 4th and 1 when it mattered most.

Props to the Raiders for a divisional win on the road.

Fuck it, props to them for ANY WIN!!!

bring on the fading donkeys

Yes, please do.

sin

Andre Hall owners

Sirfindafold · Post by **Sirfindafold** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 4:39 pm

BSmack wrote:Yes, please do.

sin

Andre Hall owners

I thought slavery was abolished here in the states.

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 4:57 pm

Sirfindafold wrote:
BSmack wrote:Yes, please do.

sin

Andre Hall owners
I thought slavery was abolished here in the states.

Not for purposes of Fantasy Football.

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:02 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:Go fuck yourself.

What a wonderfully thought out and provocative take pertaining to the subject at hand.

Or not so much. Enough with the drive-bys, Goobs.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:10 pm

RevLimiter wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Go fuck yourself.
What a wonderfully thought out and provocative take pertaining to the subject at hand.

Or not so much. Enough with the drive-bys, Goobs.

It’s a canned response I have for sirfuckafold and his ubiquitous “who gives a fuck?” responses.

The subject at hand is a meaningless game between two horrendous teams going nowhere.

Go fuck yourself, you FAT fucking RETARD.

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:41 pm

You know, I COULD go with the standard "Eat a dick you fucking mongoloid ankle-biting jackoff"....but lowering myself to your level would be unsavory.

Hugs and kisses.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 7:43 pm

Lowering yourself? Did you buy a crane?

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 8:36 pm

Now I'm TALL and fat? If you say so Goobs.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Nov 26, 2007 10:17 pm

No, you're RETARDED and FAT. Sheesh.

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 2:16 am

Goobs, are you really KALEY?

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:11 am

Sirfindafold wrote:
poptart wrote:Oakland can't stop ANYBODY's run game.
Yet they were able to stop them on 4th and 1 when it mattered most.

Blind pigs and acorns.

Oakland's run defense is an atrocity.

KC, with Kolby Smith running behind a poor o-line, was carving Oakland the fuck up in the 1st quarter.
Hell, Oakland has been carved up by EVERYONE's running game this year.
It's sick.

Only Herm, with a highly inexperienced QB, would be dull enough to decide it's a good idea to mix in some passes on 1st and 2nd down.
What a moron.

Rat won't do the Raiders that same favor.
Denver will slam away with the run all day long.
If they don't put up 200 yds rushing I'll be surprised.

The things is, Denver has a poor run defense of their own that Oakland will keep slamming at.
Who takes care of the ball, who keep mistakes and penalties to a minimum, will win the game.

Good luck with that, Oakland.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 1:48 pm

RevLimiter wrote:Goobs, are you really KALEY?

Yes, and so is R-Jack, mvscal, Dinsdale, and everyone else who smacks you upside your Twinkie inhaler, you stupid fuck.

Oh, and speaking of the 4th and 1, why didn’t KC kick the tying field goal instead of going for it?

RevLimiter · Post by **RevLimiter** » Tue Nov 27, 2007 2:53 pm

Goober McTuber wrote:
RevLimiter wrote:Goobs, are you really KALEY?
Yes

At least you're honest.

Oh, and speaking of the 4th and 1, why didn’t KC kick the tying field goal instead of going for it?

Because Herm Edwards is an ignorant mixed-breed that couldn't coach his way out of a paper bag.