![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v122/missjo/Image023.jpg)
![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v122/missjo/Image022.jpg)
![Image](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v122/missjo/Image021.jpg)
It's only a week old so it still has to settle in yet
It's hard to take a good pic of your own arm with a mobile phone camera though
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
mvscal wrote:The only precious metals in a SHTF scenario are lead and brass.
'sa matter? Get tired of the old one?missjo wrote:A new Tattoo!!
If not for the quotation marks, one of my greatest grammatical pet peeves would have just come into play -- a qualifier with "unique."MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:it's almost more "unique" to be pure.
Dins is right.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:What the fuck are you babbling about?
Sadly, "unusual" is already one its accepted definitions. :-(Mike the Lab Rat wrote:Unfortunately, it'll probably become one of those words that will have its meaning modified to mean "rare, unusual, or special" due to the frequent misuse of the term.
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:[melatonin]I think Dins was going grammar smack on you, MGO.
Mikey wrote:OK, please add the use of "penultimate", to mean the most ultimate or maximum example of something, to the list of pet peeves.
Penultimate has no meaning other than the next to last member of a series.
So what's wrong with that? Language isn't static, it moves forward, evolves and progresses. For example, 'awful' has a negative connotation now where once it meant, 'full of awe'.ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Sadly, "unusual" is already one its accepted definitions. :-(Mike the Lab Rat wrote:Unfortunately, it'll probably become one of those words that will have its meaning modified to mean "rare, unusual, or special" due to the frequent misuse of the term.
Dr_Phibes wrote:With that sort of attitude, you'd all be grunting at each other over who sucks more woolly mammoth meat and posting finger paintings at each other.
Van wrote:Kumbaya, asshats.
R-Jack wrote:Yes, that just happened.Atomic Punk wrote:So why did you post it?
Thanks for capping your income at $32k. The rest of the job market thanks you. Not that you're worth anything close to that, stank ho.missjo wrote:A new Tattoo!!
Stupid is supposed to hurt. -- mv
Jeez I thought that was your back.......missjo wrote:A new Tattoo!!
It's only a week old so it still has to settle in yet
It's hard to take a good pic of your own arm with a mobile phone camera though
I can't believe it took this many posts to mention that. I've seen smaller arms on 'roided up wrestlers.Neely8 wrote:Jeez I thought that was your back.......
Since the subject is spelling/grammar/punctuation/syntax smack, I'll go ahead and make my contribution: failing to include a space before the open parenthesis(like this). I won't mention who is serially guilty of this, however, since I wouldn't wanna single out any of our omniscient U&L posters.Dinsdale wrote:using the quotation marks generally excuses improper usage of a word.
I knew who you were referring to even before I got to the "U&L" part.Smackie Chan wrote:Since the subject is spelling/grammar/punctuation/syntax smack, I'll go ahead and make my contribution: failing to include a space before the open parenthesis(like this). I won't mention who is serially guilty of this, however, since I wouldn't wanna single out any of our omniscient U&L posters.
Mace wrote:You're right, of course, unless they're referring to Abe Lincoln or JFK who, even though their being "mad" had nothing to do with the explosion, were undoubtedly pissed off a bit about the whole explosion thing.
I would, of course, if it were proper to do so. But since it isn't, I don't.Dinsdale wrote:since you entered the fray, Smackie...
Might wanna consider capitalizing the first letter after a colon, eh? You know, since we're airing our grammatical grievances and all.
Some sources don't even go this far, and do not advocate capitalization even if what follows the colon is a complete sentence.Capitalization after a colon
Capitalize the first letter after a colon only if the clause it begins forms a complete sentence. EXCEPTIONS: Where colons fall within titles of papers, articles, chapters, and books, the first word after a colon will always be capitalized. Colons will usually go outside of quotation marks.
Wet-Brained Fucktard wrote:I know we here like to talk shit and we do tend to get, how you say, immature at times. At some points, the banter on a board like this can be somewhat childish. It happens.
If you mean what we think you mean, then we are the authority on capitalizing on colons! Join us Friday night for a demonstration.Smackie Chan wrote:What authority advocates ALWAYS capitalizing after a colon?
Ingse Bodil wrote:rich jews aren't the same as real jews, though, right?
Smackie Chan wrote:What authority advocates ALWAYS capitalizing after a colon?
Tired of taking off your shirt and standing in front of a mirror, hmmmm?RevLimiter wrote:How 'bout throwing up a pic of your bare rack to go along with that inked-up arm? Or is that too much to ask?
I disagree. I believe the usage was proper, although a dash might also be appropriate. The "list of one" attack doesn't hold water, since no insinuation of a list to follow was given. The text following the colon was describing the singular "contribution," which would not lead the reader to expect any sort of list. A punctuation mark is definitely needed to separate the two clauses that make up the sentence, and a colon is more appropriate than a comma or semicolon. Granted, this argument is probably not an authoritative one, but many style guides cite examples similar to the sentence I used as examples of proper colon usage. {Feel free to tee off on that softball.}Dinsdale wrote:But then again, your use of the colon was improper to begin with ----> (the text after the colon completed your first statement, and the text that followed was a "list of one")....
Not from me. I typically refrain from this sort of thing, although one could make it a full-time avocation on this board. Just couldn't hold myself back this time.Post pointing out grammatical/punctuation errors in this post in:
5...
4...
3...
Nah. Besides, isn't there some sort of unwritten "one per thread" policy that's been fulfilled by TWIS?Dinsdale wrote:Sin,
Do I Even Need To Post It.jpg?
I'm too sexy for my shirt. Tell me you knew.Mister Bushice wrote:Tired of taking off your shirt and standing in front of a mirror, hmmmm?RevLimiter wrote:How 'bout throwing up a pic of your bare rack to go along with that inked-up arm? Or is that too much to ask?
Wet-Brained Fucktard wrote:I know we here like to talk shit and we do tend to get, how you say, immature at times. At some points, the banter on a board like this can be somewhat childish. It happens.
Wet-Brained Fucktard wrote:I know we here like to talk shit and we do tend to get, how you say, immature at times. At some points, the banter on a board like this can be somewhat childish. It happens.
A tool for THE tool.RevLimiter wrote:For those of you that aren't gearheads, good luck figuring out what it is.
Van wrote:Kumbaya, asshats.
R-Jack wrote:Yes, that just happened.Atomic Punk wrote:So why did you post it?
Rack.smackaholic wrote:so, when did you come out of the lezbo closet, jo?
Van wrote:It's like rimming an unbathed fat chick from Missouri. It's highly distinctive, miserably unforgettable and completely wrong.
Van wrote:It's like rimming an unbathed fat chick from Missouri. It's highly distinctive, miserably unforgettable and completely wrong.