This should send a few posters int a tizzy

missjo · Post by **missjo** » Sun Apr 26, 2009 5:19 am

My latest additions :twisted:

so now my artwork extends from just above my left elbow up to wrap around my shoulder
the next piece will extend it around my bicep I'm still working on what it's going to be

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Apr 26, 2009 5:37 am

Weren't satisfied with a simple little tramp stamp and just had to go whole hog, eh?

Pardon the pun, but I've seen sides of beef with less flesh.

Bobby42 · Post by **Bobby42** » Sun Apr 26, 2009 1:53 pm

Lovely work. Subic Bay, Philippines?

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sun Apr 26, 2009 2:02 pm

A graduate of the Atomic Punk Institute Of Poor Judgement.

More sad than anything, really.

Jerkovich · Post by **Jerkovich** » Sun Apr 26, 2009 2:14 pm

Nice work. Welcome to the world of dumb ass.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:34 pm

:doh:

RJ · Post by RJ » Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:49 pm

R-Jack wrote:
missjo wrote:the next piece will extend it around my bicep I'm still working on what it's going to be
How about something you have never seen there before, like definition?

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:52 pm

I've never seen a woman who had a tat that made her look prettier/sexier/more attractive. Sorry, but that's the way it is.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Apr 26, 2009 4:00 pm

Not good, when I couldn't quite figure out what part of the body I was even looking at. Definitely not good, when even after I re-read it and noticed it said the left arm, and I'm sitting there with my head cocked like the RCA dog, still trying to sort it out.

I can't even imagine how that thing'll look when you're truly matronly...and older.

What would possess someone (who doesn't have serious self esteem issues) to befoul their body like that?

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Apr 26, 2009 4:24 pm

Wolfman wrote:I've never seen a woman who had a tat that made her look prettier/sexier/more attractive. Sorry, but that's the way it is.

Not entirely true.

When I spy a doable woman with a discreet tramp stamp on the small of her back, it just screams out:

"I'm a very bad girl and like to get nasty"

Which is kinda' sexy and attractive.

As for sides of beef branding their entire torso with "artwork"... pass. They couldn't be made sexy or attractive with a blindfold and a ballgag.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Apr 26, 2009 4:41 pm

Gotta agree with Wolfman.

On rare occasions, a woman might be able to overcome her nasty tat. That's as good as it gets, though. She still looks attractive despite her manufactured societal bruise, not because of it.

99 times out of 100, she might as well be walking around with dogshit smeared all over her. It'd be equally compelling, and equally intuitive.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:56 pm

Roach wrote: Not going well for Missjo so far. Don't call it a pile on...

No doubt we're all just having a "tizzy".

Or maybe that happens on page 2.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Apr 26, 2009 11:08 pm

Van wrote: 99 times out of 100, she might as well be walking around with dogshit smeared all over her. It'd be equally compelling, and equally intuitive.

Dogshit? That's going a bit too far.

No, I'll stick to my angle.

She's very naive and easily taken advantage of. Probably takes it up the ass while pretending to like it, and she swallows.

What's not to like?

Of course, if she's fugly to begin with, all bets are off. Lipstick on a pig and all.

But I've seen some pretty hot chicks sporting tats. If you'd let that be the deciding factor of rolling her or not... then by all means pass her along to some guy who knows how to treat a slut. That's what she wants anyway.

ChargerMike · Post by **ChargerMike** » Sun Apr 26, 2009 11:23 pm

...your bicep?? LMAO

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Apr 26, 2009 11:31 pm

WW, take that same chick, or take any chick...now remove her tats.

She will look better, guaranteed. No ifs, ands or buts. A tat never improves her appearance, unless it's covering up a disfiguring scar, or something like that. Whether it's Angelina Jolie or some sow at the corn dog stand at the State Fair, she's diminished her appearance by having tats.
Does that mean she's no longer do-able? Of course not. She just diminished her look.

Think of it like a nice neighborhood, and suddenly some dirtbag family moves in. They park heir hooptie sleds in the driveway, they don't mow their lawn, they play horrible music, loudly, all the time.

The neighborhood is still a good neighborhood. It took a hit, though.

Wolfman · Post by **Wolfman** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:10 am

Van and Roach better be careful--some will think they are getting old and senile. I have no problem with some gal who wants to get a little heart or butterfly where only her boyfriend or husband sees it. My aversion is especially to those things that look like a fungus growth on the arms and ones that look like a clothing tag on the back of the butt or neck. The word fugly comes to mind.

Derron · Post by **Derron** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:17 am

Wolfman wrote: clothing tag on the back of the butt or neck.

Those are called jizz targets..when she don't want you blowing the load in the hole or you feel like a porn star, you pull it out and try and hit the target on the small of her back.

Then let the bitch clean it off, whilst you wipe your cock on the curtains.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:29 am

Derron wrote:whilst you wipe your cock on the curtains.

It's drapes, you fucking dunce. How long have you been posting here?

KC Scott · Post by **KC Scott** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:45 am

War Wagon wrote:
Wolfman wrote:I've never seen a woman who had a tat that made her look prettier/sexier/more attractive. Sorry, but that's the way it is.
Not entirely true.

When I spy a doable woman with a discreet tramp stamp on the small of her back, it just screams out:

"I'm a very bad girl and like to get nasty"

You can take Whitey out of the trailer..........

Dude what are you going to say when baby gurl comes home with this halfway down her back:

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 1:54 am

Same thing I said when she got a small crucifix tatted across her ankle.

"It's your body..."

Probably the only thing she's ever done I didn't approve of.

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:05 am

War Wagon wrote:Same thing I said when she got a small crucifix tatted across her ankle.

"It's your body..."

I would've carved it off her, with a butter knife.

Probably the only thing she's ever done I didn't approve of.

That you know of. She's done way worse, if she was willing to do something as visible to you as throwing on a lesbian badge, knowing full well it was against your wishes.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:49 am

Van wrote: That you know of. She's done way worse, if she was willing to do something as visible to you as throwing on a lesbian badge, knowing full well it was against your wishes.

Yes, that I know of...

But I don't think she knew I didn't approve of her getting a tat, not that it would've mattered. She got it not as a "lesbian badge", but to honor Christ.

I was like, couldn't you have just bought a necklace or something?

Darn kids.

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:13 am

Ummm, Wags, it wasn't to "honor Christ."

It was to honor Tila Tequila. Hate to have to be the one to break it to you.

RadioFan · Post by **RadioFan** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:19 am

Van wrote:It was to honor Tila Tequila.

Bwah. Ouch.

Katy · Post by **Katy** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:47 am

I don't have any tats. Never had the desire.

I love them on guys--but on chicks, they look cheap.

To each their own, I guess.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:47 am

Van wrote:Ummm, Wags, it wasn't to "honor Christ."

It was to honor Tila Tequila. Hate to have to be the one to break it to you.

Wrong.

You don't know my daughter. Quit acting as if you do.

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:14 am

Quit posting about her, if you don't want people posting about her.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:19 am

Scott brought her up, not me.

If someone slanders my daughter, I'll damn sure respond.

But go ahead and talk about her all you want. She's my favorite subject.

Best to get your facts straight, or at least not be talking out your ass.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:21 am

War Wagon wrote:Scott brought her up, not me.

If someone slanders my daughter, I'll damn sure respond.

How about if I just glue her eyes shut?

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:24 am

You could try I suppose.

Road trip?

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:26 am

Road trip? Nah, I'll jut send her a bus ticket.

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:29 am

War Wagon wrote:Scott brought her up, not me.

Don't be stupid, Wags. You brought her up, or Scott wouldn't know about her. You then posted multiple pics threads about her, and now you've revealed she's got a tat.

Scott's not Kreskin.

If someone slanders my daughter, I'll damn sure respond.

That's fine. If you post about your daughter, on a smack board, especially with softball team pics and talk of tats, expect her to get slandered.

If you're thin skinned about it, well, guess what? Your fault. You brought it on yourself. Live with it, or quit doing it.

But go ahead and talk about her all you want.

Okay, Sybil.

She's my favorite subject.

:banjo music?:

Best to get your facts straight, or at least not be talking out your ass.

The only facts I know about her, I know because you told us. Ankle tats, on softball playing college chicks who claim to be hung up on Christ?

Yeah, it's a huuuuuge stretch, thinking she's likely hiding her "college experimenting" from you.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:36 am

Goober McTuber wrote:Road trip? Nah, I'll jut send her a bus ticket.

Cool.

Make sure it's refundable.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:43 am

War Wagon wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Road trip? Nah, I'll jut send her a bus ticket.
Cool.

Make sure it's refundable.

I'll make damn sure it's round-trip.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:54 am

Van wrote: That's fine. If you post about your daughter, on a smack board, especially with softball team pics and talk of tats, expect her to get slandered.

If you're thin skinned about it, well, guess what? Your fault. You brought it on yourself. Live with it, or quit doing it.

No thin skin here... don't mind a bit. In fact, I expect and welcome it... well, not the slander, but I can deal with it.

See, I'm not some anonymous message board punkass troll. I've never even had a troll, just WW from day one. What you see is what you get. I'm not afraid of anybody... except R-Jack. That guy, the way he did OC Mike, now that was freaking brutal. But I'm not OC Mike.

Yeah, it's a huuuuuge stretch, thinking she's likely hiding her "college experimenting" from you.

Yeah, it is. She comes from good stock.

As unimaginable as it may seem to you, there really are people in this world who don't live down to your standards. My daughter happens to be one of those.

Sorry to disappoint.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 5:00 am

Oh, have we reached a "tizzy" yet?

Must be getting close.

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 5:08 am

Actually, Wags, you have no idea what my standards are, because I've never posted about them.

Well, except for tats. You know how I feel about those, and right on cue your daughter went and white trashed herself up. On that score, yep, she lived down to what I consider a pretty low standard.

As far as I'm concerned, if you weren't in the military and buddies of yours didn't get eaten by sharks after your ship got sunk, you shouldn't have a tat. If you're an every day college chick and you get a tat, you're just as weak and dumb as I suspected you were.

I just know the particulars you've given us about your daughter, and if you weren't her dad you'd be thinking the same thing most everyone else here is thinking about her.

That's okay. By design, the parents are usually the last ones to know, especially the hyper-protective ones.

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 5:55 am

Van wrote:Ummm, Wags, it wasn't to "honor Christ."

It was to honor Tila Tequila. Hate to have to be the one to break it to you.

Rack that....

WW does it look like this....

If so she is whoring it up and it is just a matter of time before she has some foreign language tat, stars on her hips or a butterfly/fairy above her ass crack.

At least she'll be honoring St. Peter in more ways than one when she has those ankles up by her ears.

missjo · Post by **missjo** » Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:41 am

I love Tattoos always have, I think if done well they are an amazing art form
I started out with the tiny easily covered ones
then I met the love of my life
who also happens to love tattoos
in fact he has almost a complete Japanese style bodysuit
whole back, 3/4 sleeves on both arms, plates at the top of each side of the chest
& both legs top to bottom & I think he looks absolutely Hot neekid :p
he encourages me to explore what I want as far as tattoos go , & thinks it adds to my hotness in his eyes
& his eyes are the only ones that matter to me.
I doubt I will get a great deal more ,but I LOVE the ones I have now & have NO regrets on any of them
Where I live here in Sydney every second person you see has ink so it's more socially acceptable here.

Terry in Crapchester · Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:28 pm

88 wrote:I think we've officially reached the predicted "tizzy" condition.

Of course, that prediction bordered on the Marcus Allen-esque.

Unless it's your intent to cause a tizzy, posting about your own tattoos on this board is never a good idea. This out front told me so.

For the record, no tattoos here, and never will get one voluntarily. This even though I served in the Navy (in fairness, I was an officer).

I got plenty of scars on my body for free, why pay someone to put another one on me?