Sooners looking like crap

DiT · Post by **DiT** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:37 am

offensive is lost with the new line and new wideouts plus the loss of Gresham.
Bradford looks like he's out.
the D looks promising then gives up big plays.
damnit,this is gonna be a long year.

campinfool · Post by **campinfool** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:39 am

It's the same as years past. Play a ranked team on a neutral field and this is the Oklahoma that shows up.

DiT · Post by **DiT** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:41 am

I don't think this is OU being a great team and not showing up.
I think this is OU not being a great team.

campinfool · Post by **campinfool** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:43 am

Perhaps, but maybe BYU is a tad better than they are given credit for. Hard to tell in week one either way.

War Wagon · Post by **War Wagon** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 12:46 am

campinfool wrote:Perhaps, but maybe BYU is a tad better than they are given credit for.

A tad?

I'd say they are waay better than people give them credit for. At least on defense.

Moby Dick · Post by **Moby Dick** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:19 am

game over.

note to OU

schedule like texas!

DiT · Post by **DiT** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:20 am

yeah,that was painful to watch.

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:26 am

OU is going to stay in the hunt with that D line and Bradford should be back in a couple of weeks.

I like OU's chances against Tejas.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:26 am

Believe the Heupel wrote:Props to the God-botherers.

God-botherers?

Degenerate · Post by **Degenerate** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:26 am

BYU's still not a legitimate team. They don't play a real schedule.

Sincerely,

Sudden Van810

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:27 am

No, I say that about Boise, not BYU. Get your insults straight.

:D

Moby Dick · Post by **Moby Dick** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:29 am

Mark May just said Idaho St. is a "winnable" game.

WHAT THE FUCK??

DiT · Post by **DiT** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:30 am

without Gresham and Bradford OU is fucked.
period.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:31 am

DiT wrote:without Gresham and Bradford OU is fucked.
period.

Nuh-uh. Injuries play no part in the outcome of football games.

-T1B

GreginPG · Post by **GreginPG** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:36 am

OU lost?

To Bring'em Young?

Holy shit.

TheJON · Post by **TheJON** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:37 am

OU just didn't have it today. Even when Bradford was in, they weren't scoring. They will be fine. Give the O-line time to gel, and they'll finish with 10 wins. Probably not a national title this year but still a good season. I'm going to assume OU fans are going to meltdown so I think I will check out there message boards tomorrow. Fire Stoops!

Vito Corleone · Post by **Vito Corleone** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 6:48 am

Blueblood wrote:OU is going to stay in the hunt with that D line and Bradford should be back in a couple of weeks.

I like OU's chances against Tejas.

Coming from you, that is music to my ears.

Roger_the_Shrubber · Post by **Roger_the_Shrubber** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:43 am

Is it ok to laugh yet?

King Crimson · Post by **King Crimson** » Sun Sep 06, 2009 2:37 pm

well, fuck. my chinese neighbor is wearing his OU hat today. gotta give it up to the guy. maybe he lost a bet.

T1B

Sooners looking like crap

Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap

Re: Sooners looking like crap