USC-OSU in game...

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:04 am

Cal likely won't get to face Eastern Washington and Maryland at home all season, so probably not.

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:09 am

I really have trouble believing USC wouldn't have a more effective O with Corp in at qb.

Neither qb in this game is that good. Barkley has an excuse, he is a true-frosh, just not ready to face a top defense. Pryor is still an athlete trying to be a qb.

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:11 am

Eastern Washington went 34-24 late in the game against Texas Tech last year....

The same Texas Tech team that was ranked #1 in the country and beat Tejas last year.

And they brought back all their starters...

Cal beat that same team today with a year more experince.... 59-7.

It's gonna get ugly in "Strawberry Canyon".

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:12 am

It usually does.

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:13 am

Danimal wrote:I really have trouble believing USC wouldn't have a more effective O with Corp in at qb.

They would've... I'm not sure why Corp isn't in there with his wheels and experience.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:15 am

I wanna see that one again. That spot seemed mighty short.

M Club · Post by **M Club** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:23 am

gonna ride pryor's arm, yo.

M Club · Post by **M Club** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:24 am

i guess if he's ever going to be the next vince young he should become so against usc.

M Club · Post by **M Club** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:28 am

uh, nevermind.

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:28 am

These two teams are simply pathetic.

the truth

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:29 am

That safety is still looming large. Minus that safety, OSU would need to go the distance right now. Instead, they only need to go thirty yards to send it into O.T.

Regardless, I still have to think that OSU fan cannot be happy with Tressell's conservatism.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:31 am

Jesus, OSU is a bitch to beat at home. That game was like being constipated, and finally USC managed to at least squirt out one little chunk, and that's all they needed, thanks to Tressell playing not to lose rather than playing to win.

Laxplayer · Post by **Laxplayer** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:32 am

Nice fucking defense OSU...way to isolate a slow, white LB on McKnight on a huge 3rd down play. At least I took the condoms in the pick em so I think I have one win.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:32 am

Btw m2, this is Exhibit A of the exact type of game Cal would never win.

This was known as a "gut check game," m2. These are the games teams with balls find ways to win.

These are the games Cal doesn't even schedule, much less win.

JMak · Post by **JMak** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:34 am

Pathetic. OSU just fell apart with 7/8 minutes left. Just fell apart. That or SC just brought a totally different game plan in the 4th qtr.

Tressel sucks.

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:35 am

Van wrote:
These are the games Cal doesn't even schedule, much less win.

You fucking dipshit.... Cal will be playing OSU in Columbus in a couple of years....

... go back to being irrelevant in slowcal.

Laxplayer · Post by **Laxplayer** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:35 am

Cal...win, you're kidding....shit they beat maryland last week who had to go to OT to beat fucking James Madison? Are you shitting me?

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:36 am

Laxplayer wrote:Nice fucking defense OSU...way to isolate a slow, white LB on McKnight on a huge 3rd down play. At least I took the condoms in the pick em so I think I have one win.

Nope. You lost. The Condoms double fucked you, since the spread was USC -6.5.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:37 am

Blueblood wrote:
Van wrote: These are the games Cal doesn't even schedule, much less win.
You fucking dipshit.... Cal will be playing OSU in Columbus in a couple of years....

... go back to being irrelevant in slowcal.

Yeah, finally. They haven't played any of those games up to now though, have they?

Cal never wins tonight in the The Horseshoe. They could never win ugly like that.

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:40 am

The way the season is playing out....

Cal and $uc will be the game of the year....

... it'll end with Cal winning by at least two td's.

Danimal · Post by **Danimal** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:41 am

Pryor just isn't ready to carry the load, neither is Barkley but USC has guys that can carry the load for him. McKnight is a beast, he owned OSU in that last series. Pryor could've used a year of scout-team like VY had. He is still raw as hell, I'd rather have Griffith from Baylor.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:43 am

Blueblood wrote:The way the season is playing out....

Cal and $uc will be the game of the year....

... it'll end with Cal winning by at least two td's.

A prediction which you won't back up with a wager.

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:45 am

Van wrote:
Blueblood wrote:The way the season is playing out....

Cal and $uc will be the game of the year....

... it'll end with Cal winning by at least two td's.
A prediction which you won't back up with a wager.

I don't need too... you'll disapear after that game.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:48 am

m2, back it up with a wager or shut up.

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:49 am

Van wrote:m2, back it up with a wager or shut up.

Ok.

The loser of that game NEVER posts on this board again....

.... you in ???

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:50 am

Cal by 14, and that bet?

In. Now don't waffle.

Laxplayer · Post by **Laxplayer** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:50 am

You're right van...double fucked....and then the GD amish lose again. Weis needs to go.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:51 am

Lax..the 'amish'??

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:53 am

Van wrote:Cal by 14, and that bet?

In. Now don't waffle.

I see your fear....

As far as NEVER posting here again...

Straight up....

Laxplayer · Post by **Laxplayer** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:57 am

Fuck yeah Van...the fighting Amish.
Hey MStool, as much as I hate $C they're going to ass rape your little cubby bears.

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:00 am

m2, I already went over this with you. I'm not doing a death match bet with you over something you'd do anyway. If USC beats Cal this year, when everything lines up perfectly for Cal, you won't want to come in here and take your beating. You'll want to bail, so no, I won't give you the easy way out. If Cal loses you sure as fuck had better get back in here and take your beating.

You keep saying Cal will win by a minimum of 14. Stand by it. If you really want a face saving way to never have to post here, there you go, I'll give you that one: Death match, for the 14 point win you keep guaranteeing.

Otherwise it's just the usual sig bet.

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:01 am

Laxplayer wrote:Fuck yeah Van...the fighting Amish.
Hey MStool, as much as I hate $C they're going to ass rape your little cubby bears.

Would like the same bet as Spammie ???

TheJON · Post by **TheJON** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:02 am

Arguing football with m2ool..........????

Why bother, Van? Really dude.......it's a losing proposition. We're talking about a guy that thinks Calitucky is anything other than a mediocre football program and continually tries to argue otherwise. He's a child, he's a moron, and he should be banned from this board. Why would anyone even try and have a serious conversation about football with this Troll??

Don't get me wrong, fucking with him is fun. But actually trying to have a serious FOOTBALL debate with him?? Talk about a complete waste of time........

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:04 am

m2, if you really want a reason to bail, just bail. Quit looking for Cal to do it for you.

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:08 am

Van wrote:m2, I already went over this with you. I'm not doing a death match bet with you over something you'd do anyway. If USC beats Cal this year, when everything lines up perfectly for Cal, you won't want to come in here and take your beating. You'll want to bail, so no, I won't give you the easy way out. If Cal loses you sure as fuck had better get back in here and take your beating.

You keep saying Cal will win by a minimum of 14. Stand by it. If you really want a face saving way to never have to post here, there you go, I'll give you that one: Death match, for the 14 point win you keep guaranteeing.

Otherwise it's just the usual sig bet.

Vannie, $uc was in the spotlight tonight on a National level .... yet, you know better.

Do you really want the smartest kids in America... to spot you 14 points in a game... ???

Cal vs. Suck.... straight up.

U in ????

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:11 am

For a sig bet? Sure. For a death match bet? No. You'll have to back up your prediction of a 14 point win if you want the easy way out with a death match.

See, I don't want you to leave.

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:14 am

Van wrote:For a sig bet? Sure. For a death match bet? No. You'll have to back up your prediction of a 14 point win if you want the easy way out with a death match.

You do know this fear.... has been sensed by Cal for about a year now.

So, Vannie.... put up or shut up....

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:15 am

You're the one making the two TD claim, so you put up or shut up.

Blueblood · Post by **Blueblood** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:18 am

Van wrote:You're the one making the two TD claim, so you put up or shut up.

Vannie, do you fear CAL ???

It seems as much....

I don't blame you....

Van · Post by **Van** » Sun Sep 13, 2009 4:22 am

Do you fear backing up your claim? I definitely don't blame you.

As you're so fond of saying, like a nine year old girl...

psssst....USC doesn't lose to anybody by 14. You know it as well as I do, which is why despite all your bluster you won't back it up.