Stanford-VT

Fuck Jim Delany

Moderators: 88BuckeyeGrad, Left Seater, buckeye_in_sc

MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Stanford-VT

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Auburn is a good team, but it's not like they've blown people away 95 Huskers style. No reason to think Oregon can't hang. Tough game to get a read on. I picked Auburn but if I could get a re-do I'd probably go with Oregon. There is still uncertainty over suspended players, yes? Dunno, just seems like Oregon's time.
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Stanford-VT

Post by Dinsdale »

MONEY wrote: All those loses came against the PAC.

Silly me -- I'd totally forgotten that Nevada joined the PAC a few years ago.


But I see ya working -- when Oregon beats Auburn by more than 2 points... the MTransitive Property kicks in, giving Kal their 18th straight.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Stanford-VT

Post by Dinsdale »

stuckinia wrote:Props to Stanford for kicking VT's ass in the second half.

PAC10 Track Meet, baby!

And what Stanford did to VT in the 2nd half, is exactly what Oregon did to Stanford in the 2nd half -- passed the baton in the 800 meter relay, and left the opponent in the dust.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: Stanford-VT

Post by Dinsdale »

King Crimson wrote:only a matter of time until the option is back.

About 6 days.


But it ain't your daddy's option.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
SoCalTrjn
2007 CFB Board Bitch
Posts: 3725
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 7:42 am
Location: South OC

Re: Stanford-VT

Post by SoCalTrjn »

USC should have hired David Shaw last year, hopefully they fix that problem this year and hire him
Post Reply