Bears v Pack in game

talking about who was arrested today

Moderators: Shoalzie, Biggie

BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29350
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Bears v Pack in game

Post by BSmack »

Looks like Mace was right about the injury count. Clifton is out and Rodgers has already taken a low shot. Fine with me, the Bears are a better matchup for the Steelers.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 21096
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Screw_Michigan »

BSmack wrote:Bears are a better matchup for the Steelers.
I see what you did there. Moron.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29350
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by BSmack »

Screw_Michigan wrote:
BSmack wrote:Bears are a better matchup for the Steelers.
I see what you did there. Moron.
They're a better matchup for the Jets too. But I don't give a fuck how the Jets match up. I do care how the Steelers match up.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31565
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Mikey »

BSmack wrote:Looks like Mace was right about the injury count. Clifton is out and Rodgers has already taken a low shot. Fine with me, the Bears are a better matchup for the Steelers.
The Bears would still have to win the game. Not a safe assumption at this point.
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29350
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by BSmack »

Mikey wrote:
BSmack wrote:Looks like Mace was right about the injury count. Clifton is out and Rodgers has already taken a low shot. Fine with me, the Bears are a better matchup for the Steelers.
The Bears would still have to win the game. Not a safe assumption at this point.
Agreed. The body count must rise if the Bears are to win.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3598
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Mace »

Looks like it's going to be up to the Bears' defense to score some points....and Hester. The offense has done nothing up to this point. Time for a turnover or three if the Bears hope to get back in this one.
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3598
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Mace »

KC Scott wrote:
Mace wrote: The offense has done nothing up to this point
I don't think Martz has a slant pattern in his playbook -

He's thrown that screen 5 times and the pack has been on it each time

Outplayed and outcoached so far
Agreed. That's what I've been sitting here thinking too.
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3598
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Mace »

Damn, the Bears get a fluke INT and then Cutleritis strikes again.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

So in the last 6 quarters of play between these two teams the Bears have scored a whopping 3 points. Impressive.
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3598
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Mace »

They'd better make those adjustments to their gameplan at the half. They're damn lucky to only be down 2 TDs, so a big Hester return or a pick 6 can still get them within striking distance.

On a positive note, at least the Hawkeyes are handling Indiana and on their way to their first conference win.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Urlacher needed to score on that. Collins now in the game. Bears went from fucked to doomed.
Shoalzie
WingNut
Posts: 14547
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:39 pm
Location: Portland, MI
Contact:

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Shoalzie »

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Urlacher needed to score on that. Collins now in the game. Bears went from fucked to doomed.

Huge play by Rodgers to prevent the cheap TD. If Urlacher takes that the distance, this is definitely a new game...even with Collins.
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31565
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Mikey »

Bears look like real iodots arguing obvious penalties.
BSmack
2005 and 2010 JFFL Champion
Posts: 29350
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Lookin for tards

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by BSmack »

How the fuck you throw an INT to BJ Raji escapes me completely. Then to make it a Pick 6?

Ouch.
"Once upon a time, dinosaurs didn't have families. They lived in the woods and ate their children. It was a golden age."

—Earl Sinclair

"I do have respect for authority even though I throw jelly dicks at them.

- Antonio Brown
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3598
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Mace »

At least they were able to answer with a TD. Good stop by the defense and the Bears will have one more chance to tie it up.

Aside from the pick 6, Hanie has looked more like a #1 QB than either Cutler or Collins.....so far.
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3598
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Mace »

Well, that pick will do it. Props to the Packers and good luck in the Super Bowl.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

What was Cuntler's injury? Given the situation, if he was capable of standing upright on the sideline, he should've been playing. I guess the 3rd string qb was the better option regardless.
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3598
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Mace »

Cutler supposedly injured a knee but I think maybe he just got hit too many times to suit him .....and they were down 14-0 when he left the game. Not exactly the kind of leadership you're looking for in a QB, imo.
Shoalzie
WingNut
Posts: 14547
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:39 pm
Location: Portland, MI
Contact:

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Shoalzie »

In the playoffs, there's a huge difference between being injured and just being hurt. Favre played through basically everything up until this year. Rivers played in the AFC title game with a torn up knee and played quite well. Legendary playoff performances are sometimes from heroic efforts from guys that play through stuff they probably shouldn't be playing through. This only fuels anyone's previous thought that you can't win with Cutler and that he's one of the softest QBs in the league. You at least would give the guy points if he plays through it and gives it an effort. He looks worse by just standing there moping while a 3rd stringer keeps them in the game and damn near got them into overtime. To me, I don't know how guys in the locker room can look at him the same way again no matter how hurt he was.
User avatar
Mace
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 3598
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 1:18 am

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Mace »

Shoalzie wrote:In the playoffs, there's a huge difference between being injured and just being hurt. Favre played through basically everything up until this year. Rivers played in the AFC title game with a torn up knee and played quite well. Legendary playoff performances are sometimes from heroic efforts from guys that play through stuff they probably shouldn't be playing through. This only fuels anyone's previous thought that you can't win with Cutler and that he's one of the softest QBs in the league. You at least would give the guy points if he plays through it and gives it an effort. He looks worse by just standing there moping while a 3rd stringer keeps them in the game and damn near got them into overtime. To me, I don't know how guys in the locker room can look at him the same way again no matter how hurt he was.
All he needed was a fresh tampax and then someone like Ditka or Butkus to tell him to get his ass back on the field.
Shoalzie
WingNut
Posts: 14547
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:39 pm
Location: Portland, MI
Contact:

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Shoalzie »

Other players are crushing Cutler on Twitter

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdo ... nfl-311321

I give Urlacher points for sticking up for a teammate but I don't know how he doesn't want to cave his face in considering how hard he played today.
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by poptart »

Cuntler pussed out when the going got tough.
WHAT a shocker!


- Nobody
User avatar
mvscal
Blank
Posts: 12849
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 4:14 am

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by mvscal »

Granted that Gay Cuntler is a twat bitch but, in that situation, if you can go you go. If you have the mindset of, "Oh, I'm getting kicked in the cunt. Get me out of here!" you get weeded out long before you make it to the NFL.

I'll give him the benefit of the doubt that he couldn't go.
Screw_Michigan wrote: Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Goober McTuber
World Renowned Last Word Whore
Posts: 25891
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Goober McTuber »

What a pleasant surprise. There were times this year that I didn’t believe the Packers would make the playoffs. Now they have a shot at title #13. Sweet.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass

Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
User avatar
R-Jack
Non Sequitur Legend
Posts: 4262
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:36 am

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by R-Jack »

RAAAAAAAAAAAAAACK the fuck out of MJD
Hey I think the urban meyer rule is effect right now... When the going gets tough........QUIT..
User avatar
Screw_Michigan
Angry Snowflake
Posts: 21096
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
Location: 20011

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Screw_Michigan »

^^^^^ Bwaha, I heard that too. Rack the fuck out of him.
kcdave wrote: Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
User avatar
MuchoBulls
Tremendous Slouch
Posts: 5626
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: Wesley Chapel, FL

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by MuchoBulls »

Shoalzie wrote:Huge play by Rodgers to prevent the cheap TD. If Urlacher takes that the distance, this is definitely a new game
Out of curiousity, how would that have been cheap? Urlacher made a good play.
Dreams......Temporary Madness
User avatar
trev
New Sheriff in Town
Posts: 5032
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 10:23 pm
Location: semi retirement

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by trev »

Until Cutler is laying flat out on the field, unable to get up, he should have been in there. No heart. No leadership.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

Reports out are a torn MCL.
User avatar
R-Jack
Non Sequitur Legend
Posts: 4262
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:36 am

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by R-Jack »

I heard it was a sprain.






Doctor: Well Mr. Cutler it looks like you sprained your MCL at some point during the game.

Cutler: A sprain? I swear it was worse than that. I want a second opinion.

Doctor: Fine. You're a pussy too.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

In fairness, a sprained MCL isn't like a sprained ankle or something. The language may sound mild, but it's a pretty serious deal. It's the same thing as a tear. He should've been on crutches on the sideline. The training staff has some explaining to do.
User avatar
indyfrisco
Pro Bonfire
Posts: 11683
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by indyfrisco »

He shoulda taken the needle, taped it up and even worn a brace if necessary and deal with any additional injury he could have gotten later. It's win or go home. He wanted to go home.
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
User avatar
Mikey
Carbon Neutral since 1955
Posts: 31565
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 6:06 pm
Location: Paradise

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Mikey »

IndyFrisco wrote:He shoulda taken the needle, taped it up and even worn a brace if necessary and deal with any additional injury he could have gotten later. It's win or go home. He wanted to go home.
Except that they couldn't win with him healthy, what makes you think they could win with him shot up and in a brace?

The taxi squad guy's a better QB anyway.
Last edited by Mikey on Mon Jan 24, 2011 8:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MgoBlue-LightSpecial
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 21259
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by MgoBlue-LightSpecial »

But is it even an issue of toughness? He was playing like ass at 100%. Would it have been wise to play him at 50%? Collins was horrid, but the 3rd stringer was getting it done...until that pesky game ending INT.
User avatar
indyfrisco
Pro Bonfire
Posts: 11683
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by indyfrisco »

I say leave it up to the coaches to pull him if they are not satisfied with his performance, and maybe they did just that and are not owning up to it. I'm just saying if he was asked if he could go play, he should have played. See: MJD.
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
Shoalzie
WingNut
Posts: 14547
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:39 pm
Location: Portland, MI
Contact:

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Shoalzie »

MuchoBulls wrote:
Shoalzie wrote:Huge play by Rodgers to prevent the cheap TD. If Urlacher takes that the distance, this is definitely a new game
Out of curiousity, how would that have been cheap? Urlacher made a good play.

Cheap from an offensive perspective...the Packers D had kept them out of the end zone and it would've been big for the Bears to get points from another source other than the offense considering they had been shut down up to that point. The fact Rodgers tackled Urlacher instead of letting him go the distance...it allowed his defense to stop them or in that case, for Collins to drool all over himself and not move them anywhere. I don't call the play cheap...just when a team doesn't have to manufacture a drive to get points and instead they get it on one big play...a pick 6 or kick return for 6...I call those "cheap" points.
User avatar
R-Jack
Non Sequitur Legend
Posts: 4262
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:36 am

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by R-Jack »

So in traditional Jay Cutler fashion, is he going to get butt-hurt over all this, put his house up for sale and demand to be traded from the NFL?
User avatar
Bucmonkey
2011 CFB Bowl Pic Champ
Posts: 2828
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: ...

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by Bucmonkey »

Shoalzie wrote:
MuchoBulls wrote:
Shoalzie wrote:Huge play by Rodgers to prevent the cheap TD. If Urlacher takes that the distance, this is definitely a new game
Out of curiousity, how would that have been cheap? Urlacher made a good play.

Cheap from an offensive perspective...the Packers D had kept them out of the end zone and it would've been big for the Bears to get points from another source other than the offense considering they had been shut down up to that point. The fact Rodgers tackled Urlacher instead of letting him go the distance...it allowed his defense to stop them or in that case, for Collins to drool all over himself and not move them anywhere. I don't call the play cheap...just when a team doesn't have to manufacture a drive to get points and instead they get it on one big play...a pick 6 or kick return for 6...I call those "cheap" points.

:meds:
Go Bucs, Gators
User avatar
kcdave
crusader
Posts: 1763
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:52 pm

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by kcdave »

I really dont know why Cutler didnt just keep his ass in the locker room. He doesnt give a shit about his team, winning or losing. He isnt alone though. Watch the replay of the pick 6 Raji took to the house. Aaron Rogers is running around like a crazy bastard. Meanwhile 2 of his team mates are on the bench never even blinking an eye. Face facts peeps, 75% of fans care a whole lot more than 75% of the players.

War Twitter during the games.
User avatar
poptart
Quitty McQuitface
Posts: 15211
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:45 pm

Re: Bears v Pack in game

Post by poptart »

It is professional football - and it's natural for an individual to be interested in their own personal professional advancement over other motivators.

Prior to free agency explosion (and media and money explosion) it was easier to keep players dialed into the concept of TEAM.

Now, not so much.
Post Reply