So what's the verdict on Jon?
Moderator: Jesus H Christ
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
So what's the verdict on Jon?
Did he run himself because he was outed as an IA ST grad fraudulently claiming Iowa 'bode? Or was it because he was stupid enough to post an almost direct link to a photo of his wife? Will he ever have the testicular fortitude to return to this sordid clambake? Or will he just sit at home waiting for a handout from the federal government and write down this 0-10 locks for Week 1?
Serious replies only, please.
Serious replies only, please.
- indyfrisco
- Pro Bonfire
- Posts: 11684
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
Maybe he's taking time off to get the tooth fixed.


Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
He'll pull an m2 and come back under a different nic. Like m2, he'll immediately get busted. Iowa will still suck on general principle.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
You guys need to stop running all the tards - they are the #1 source of entertainment in this rotting shitbox. At least smackaholic is too thick-headed to get the hint, so he'll be around for awhile.
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
100% lock for Game Over.JON, what are you looking at there? Wait - is that a picture of ME with a pancake on my head?
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
Lordy.THEY'RE LAUGHING AT MY FAKE TOOTH?
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
Am I the only one not really seeing too much of an issue with the whole rooting for the school without attending? Like I said in the thread, this is hardly the first and only case of that. Hell, I have a rooting intrest in Cal and I'm a junior college dropout. If he fancied himself as a member of that university, that's a different story.
There's plenty of things that noj=bitch could be run for without having to grasp at straws.
There's plenty of things that noj=bitch could be run for without having to grasp at straws.
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
I think it has more to do with running 12 years of flailsmack at fans of the school he did attend.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
- Killian
- Good crossing pattern target
- Posts: 6414
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:37 pm
- Location: At the end of the pub with head in arms
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
R-Jack wrote:Am I the only one not really seeing too much of an issue with the whole rooting for the school without attending? Like I said in the thread, this is hardly the first and only case of that. Hell, I have a rooting intrest in Cal and I'm a junior college dropout. If he fancied himself as a member of that university, that's a different story.
Yeah, your last point.
"Well, my wife assassinated my sexual identity, and my children are eating my dreams." -Louis CK
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
How come all you libs are so high on permanent bans? I agree with the sentiment of entertainment value being priority #1.
I say bring back m2, noJ, Dr. Detroit, et.al.....I mean you finally relented on shrubber without too much fallout.
=compassionate conservative
I say bring back m2, noJ, Dr. Detroit, et.al.....I mean you finally relented on shrubber without too much fallout.
=compassionate conservative
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
What are you talking about? Nobody is banned. You're confusing "was run" with banned.The Seer wrote:How come all you libs are so high on permanent bans? I agree with the sentiment of entertainment value being priority #1.
I say bring back m2, noJ, Dr. Detroit, et.al.....I mean you finally relented on shrubber without too much fallout.
=compassionate conservative
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
Well, he is carrying 150 extra lbs.
The "Seer" is very easily confused.MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:What are you talking about? Nobody is banned. You're confusing "was run" with banned.The Seer wrote:How come all you libs are so high on permanent bans? I agree with the sentiment of entertainment value being priority #1.
I say bring back m2, noJ, Dr. Detroit, et.al.....I mean you finally relented on shrubber without too much fallout.
=compassionate conservative
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21096
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
If Stanford thought highly enough of you to offer you an accounting scholarship, you'd probably root for them, instead of the product of some Catholic fucking fairy tale you were indoctrinated in when you were young and that you have absolutely no connection to other than people telling you this fairy tale was the end all be all.R-Jack wrote:Am I the only one not really seeing too much of an issue with the whole rooting for the school without attending? Like I said in the thread, this is hardly the first and only case of that. Hell, I have a rooting intrest in Cal and I'm a junior college dropout. If he fancied himself as a member of that university, that's a different story.
There's plenty of things that noj=bitch could be run for without having to grasp at straws.
- indyfrisco
- Pro Bonfire
- Posts: 11684
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
He went as far as to say he played intramural football at Iowa on Team Hasselhoff. Dude is a lying poser and he was outed (as he outed his wife/cat/dog/sister). He's a mess.R-Jack wrote:Am I the only one not really seeing too much of an issue with the whole rooting for the school without attending? Like I said in the thread, this is hardly the first and only case of that. Hell, I have a rooting intrest in Cal and I'm a junior college dropout. If he fancied himself as a member of that university, that's a different story.
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
If Stanford offered me anything scholastically, I'd probably think less of them.Screw_Michigan wrote:If Stanford thought highly enough of you to offer you an accounting scholarship, you'd probably root for them,
So Jon tried to pass himself off as an actual allum in the past in addition to saying he played a little there? Well there you go. Didn't know that part.
- indyfrisco
- Pro Bonfire
- Posts: 11684
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
Well, you owe Dins a thank you for linking you up as that was a thread NOT to miss.Papa Willie wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Proof that I certainly don't read all of every thread! :D
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
- indyfrisco
- Pro Bonfire
- Posts: 11684
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
He'll be back week 1. He's just lurking now. Too ashamed to show his face. Not sure why (aside from the ISU stuff). Other than his faggoty hairdo, he's a normal looking dude who married up. He has his faults (black tooth, cat ownership, ISU, twin sister that looks like a dude, etc.), but don't we all? I mean, I'm ashamed of my chipping ability on the course, or lack thereof. We can all do better.Papa Willie wrote:Correct - thanks to him, and Screwy as well - he pm'd me. Poor Jon. Dang. He sometimes brought up some decent football takes, but now... Oh well.
He'll be back. This is his crack.
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
- indyfrisco
- Pro Bonfire
- Posts: 11684
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
Not sure where that lexicon came from, but the search feature picks up Adelpiero first using it in 2008.Sudden Sam wrote:And the JONsense nic is great. Who originated that?
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
JONsense...was that Waz? Indy? M Club? Me?
At any rate, JON will be back. My sig box won't be the same until he is.
At any rate, JON will be back. My sig box won't be the same until he is.
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
The "Seer" is very easily confused.[/quote]Goober McTuber wrote: What are you talking about? Nobody is banned. You're confusing "was run" with banned.
Never even opened that thread in the CFB forum until now....
So yes, I was barking at windmills....
revel in it.
“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
- Killian
- Good crossing pattern target
- Posts: 6414
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:37 pm
- Location: At the end of the pub with head in arms
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
Excellent take as usual, mouth breather. Update your spreadsheet, it wasn't an accounting scholarship.Screw_Michigan wrote:If Stanford thought highly enough of you to offer you an accounting scholarship, you'd probably root for them, instead of the product of some Catholic fucking fairy tale you were indoctrinated in when you were young and that you have absolutely no connection to other than people telling you this fairy tale was the end all be all.R-Jack wrote:Am I the only one not really seeing too much of an issue with the whole rooting for the school without attending? Like I said in the thread, this is hardly the first and only case of that. Hell, I have a rooting intrest in Cal and I'm a junior college dropout. If he fancied himself as a member of that university, that's a different story.
There's plenty of things that noj=bitch could be run for without having to grasp at straws.
"Well, my wife assassinated my sexual identity, and my children are eating my dreams." -Louis CK
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
bwahahaha
King Crimson wrote:anytime you have a smoke tunnel and it's not Judas Priest in the mid 80's....watch out.
mvscal wrote:France totally kicks ass.
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
The internet wrecks another home.
If she really is with a legal group, we're all getting summoned.
If she really is with a legal group, we're all getting summoned.
JPGettysburg wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2024 8:57 pm In prison, full moon nights have a kind of brutal sodomy that can't fully be described with mere words.
- Killian
- Good crossing pattern target
- Posts: 6414
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:37 pm
- Location: At the end of the pub with head in arms
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
For what, her husband being dumber than clownshit?Carson wrote:The internet wrecks another home.
If she really is with a legal group, we're all getting summoned.
"Well, my wife assassinated my sexual identity, and my children are eating my dreams." -Louis CK
- Atomic Punk
- antagonist
- Posts: 6636
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:26 pm
- Location: El Segundo, CA
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?


BSmack wrote:Best. AP take. Ever.
Seriously. I don't disagree with a word of it.
- Terry in Crapchester
- 2012 March Madness Champ
- Posts: 8995
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 12:56 pm
- Location: Back in the 'burbs
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
^^^ This.PSUFAN wrote:I think it has more to do with running 12 years of flailsmack at fans of the school he did attend.
Not to mention that he responded to R-Jack, not you.Killian wrote:Excellent take as usual, mouth breather. Update your spreadsheet, it wasn't an accounting scholarship.Screw_Michigan wrote:If Stanford thought highly enough of you to offer you an accounting scholarship, you'd probably root for them, instead of the product of some Catholic fucking fairy tale you were indoctrinated in when you were young and that you have absolutely no connection to other than people telling you this fairy tale was the end all be all.R-Jack wrote:Am I the only one not really seeing too much of an issue with the whole rooting for the school without attending? Like I said in the thread, this is hardly the first and only case of that. Hell, I have a rooting intrest in Cal and I'm a junior college dropout. If he fancied himself as a member of that university, that's a different story.
There's plenty of things that noj=bitch could be run for without having to grasp at straws.
Fwiw, I wanted to go to ND badly enough that I accepted a NROTC scholarship to pay for it, because it was the only way I could afford it, even though spending four years in the Navy was not my first choice after graduation.
As to the topic at hand, I think NOJ will be back, although perhaps not right away. As embarrassing as this no doubt is for him, other posters here have returned after more embarrassing moments (sup, AP).
War Wagon wrote:The first time I click on one of your youtube links will be the first time.
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
IndyFrisco wrote:This is his crack.
A nice one, too -- what gym does he go to?
Sin,
KCScott
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
- indyfrisco
- Pro Bonfire
- Posts: 11684
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
*update*
Who is ready for the major cleavage shot?
Who is ready for the major cleavage shot?
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...
- ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 5532
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:19 pm
- Location: The corner of get a map and fuck off.
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
Are you seriously asking a bunch of dudes if they are 'ready' to see tits?
- indyfrisco
- Pro Bonfire
- Posts: 11684
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:15 pm
Re: So what's the verdict on Jon?
Talk about a blind squirrel and a nut...Atomic Punk wrote:How many times do you see an attractive face but you don't see the lower half?
Goober McTuber wrote:One last post...