Its Mitt Romney time!!!!!!!

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 12:13 pm

WOW, Rick perry is done. stick a fork in his freakin extreme face, he is toast. After watching that debate in Orlando last night, Perry looked like a ventriloquests' dummy, with a stiff wood like posture, and an evil grin on his oak face, and a hole in his back. ROMNEY looked like a poised and "REAGAN-LIKE" executive with a lifetime of business experience and leadership.

GAME CHANGER!!

I am a life=long republican "reagan" conservative. and, last night, things became crystal clear. Romney is the man, he is the shiznit, he's the whole enchillada as they say.

I cant fuckin wait for obama to have to face off in a debate with Romney, Romney will make him look like a young opie from mayberry, with freckles and a cow-lick. Romney will make Obama look like a foolish community street peddler handing out leaflets.

I cant fuckin wait!!!!!!!!!!!

R-Jack · Post by **R-Jack** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:07 pm

bradhusker wrote:I can fuckin wait!!!!!!!!!!!

Bart Scott is smarter than you.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:08 pm

Perry sucks, yes.
You're right on that score, mr huskerdo.

I'm not sure how that equates to Romney being THE MAN all of a sudden.
And especially to an alleged conservative voter.

I know it's hard to believe, but you're not making a lick of sense here, brad.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:21 pm

poptart wrote:I seriously question whether this will work out well for Rick Perry.

He speaks slower than George Bush, often struggles to find words, and sounds a lot like GW.

Perry lacks charisma.
He honestly comes across as a slighly advanced Fred Thompson.

We'll see much more of this from Perry in the debates.
Slow, stammering, searching for words...

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=38995&hilit=perry

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:55 pm

poptart wrote:Perry sucks, yes.
You're right on that score, mr huskerdo.

But he "speaks to the base."

BSmack · Post by **BSmack** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:01 pm

Rick Perry reminds me of Dubya. He better hope his brother is elected Governor of Florida.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:49 pm

watch johnson. i like him. don't really know a heck of a lot about him other than what i saw last night though. the shovel ready project line was good.

it's a shame that newt looks like a weasel and acts like one when it comes to marriages. cause dude is fukking brilliant.

he would make barry look even dumber than barry makes barry look.....if that is possible.

i think newt could have made it despite his marital issues if he had handled the explanation better than he did. he should have said "i'm human. i fukked up" instead he came up with that ridiculous bit about how he was working soooooooo fukking hard because he loves his country sooooooo fukking much, that it caused him to fukk around.

how can a guy that smart do something so fukking dumb? yeah, bill idd something even dumber, but, he's not as smart as newt.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:51 pm

smackaholic wrote:how can a guy that smart do something so fukking dumb?

Because he's not that smart. Do you have to have everything explained to you?

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:24 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
smackaholic wrote:how can a guy that smart do something so fukking dumb?
Because he's not that smart. Do you have to have everything explained to you?

The thinking with the little head rather than the big head part, I get. The really bad explanation of why afterwards, i don't.

And yes, he is that smart when it comes to things other than explaning being a cad.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 6:58 pm

smackaholic wrote:watch johnson.

Irie Lagos...is that really you in a Fat New Englander disguise?

Imus · Post by **Imus** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:26 pm

bradhusker wrote:WOW, I can fuckin wait!!!!!!!!!!!

I can't wait until you gag on a used kotex maxi, in a rain of male ballerina bukakhi mist.

Goober McTuber · Post by **Goober McTuber** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:34 pm

How about Rick Santorum?

CNN) -- Former U.S. Sen. and Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum has a well-known Google problem.

For the uninitiated, if you Google Santorum's name, the first result you'll probably get is not his personal website but a fake definition of "santorum," a sexual byproduct that's a bit too graphic to talk about in detail here. (Of course, you can Google him and easily find out.)

We'll get into how that all happened in a second, but here's what's new: On Tuesday, the socially conservative politician lashed out at Google, saying the company could get rid of the sexual references to his name on the search results if it wanted to -- and perhaps would do so if he were a Democrat.

"I suspect if something was up there like that about Joe Biden, they'd get rid of it," he told Politico. "If you're a responsible business, you don't let things like that happen in your business that have an impact on the country."

He continued: "To have a business allow that type of filth to be purveyed through their website or through their system is something that they say they can't handle, but I suspect that's not true."

Santorum contacted Google and asked the company about the issue, Politico said.

In an e-mail to CNN, a Google spokeswoman said, "Google's search results are a reflection of the content and information that is available on the Web. Users who want content removed from the Internet should contact the webmaster of the page directly. Once the webmaster takes the page down from the Web, it will be removed from Google's search results through our usual crawling process."

She added: "We do not remove content from our search results, except in very limited cases such as illegal content and violations of our webmaster guidelines."

Santorum is just the latest to gripe at Google over how it ranks search results. The CEO of Yelp posted a blog Tuesday saying that Google purposefully ranks its own products -- like Google Places -- above its competitors.

"We believe Google has acted anti-competitively in at least two key ways: by misusing Yelp review content in their competing Places product and by favoring their own competing Places product in search results," Yelp's Jeremy Stoppelman wrote.

Google CEO Eric Schmidt was scheduled to testify before Congress on Wednesday about similar antitrust complaints.

The lewd "santorum" definition popped up after the former senator compared homosexuality to pedophilia and bestiality in a 2003 interview with The Associated Press:

"In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality," he said. "That's not to pick on homosexuality. It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be."

That angered gay rights supporters, including gay podcast host and sex columnist Dan Savage, who launched a campaign for his listeners to redefine Santorum's name. Savage created a website to promote the winning definition (again, you'll have to search for that elsewhere), and enough bloggers linked to it that the spoof site eventually eclipsed Santorum's campaign website in search rankings.

Danny Sullivan, who writes at the blog SearchEngineLand, notes that Google has a history of being hands-off when it comes to these controversies, regardless of the politics or sensitivities involved:

"Google is loathe to touch its results in any way, shape or form. That's because if it does intervene in any way, there's some interest group that will immediately claim a bias. Way back in 2004, an anti-Jewish web site started ranking in Google's top results for 'Jew.'

"Despite Google co-founder Sergey Brin being Jewish and himself disgusted with the result, it stood. Intervention, when Google's ranking algorithms had spoken, was seen as harmful to user trust," Sullivan writes.

In December 2009, when racist images of first lady Michelle Obama popped to the top of Google search results, the company took a similar free-speech stance.

"We have a bias toward free expression," Google spokesman Scott Rubin said at the time. "That means that some ugly things will show up."

Still, Google has removed offensive content from searches, usually by making changes to how its overall search equations function.

In 2007, for example, a change to Google's search algorithm stopped the search term "miserable failure" from directing Internet users to pages about former president George W. Bush, according to SearchEngineLand.

It's worth noting that some of these Internet weirdnesses have shown up on other search engines, too, not just on Google.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 8:37 pm

poptart wrote:Perry sucks, yes.
You're right on that score, mr huskerdo.

I'm not sure how that equates to Romney being THE MAN all of a sudden.
And especially to an alleged conservative voter.

I know it's hard to believe, but you're not making a lick of sense here, brad.

ok, pop. I guess I need to explain things to you.

Did you read the part when I said "reagan" conservative???? You do realize that Ronald Reagan was not a far right wing nut like Perry? Dont you?
Anyone who knows Reagan like I do knows that reagan was a conservative slightly to the right of center.
Perry is extremely to the far right. DO YOU GET IT NOW?

Reagan worked well with Tip O neil, and at the end of the day, TURNED THIS COUNTRY BACK TO PROSPERITY! We went from a horrible recession, to creating millions of jobs and najor prosperity.

Perry is a polarizing figure, HISTORY looks back on Reagan, and the dems look foolish when they opposed his every move. Reagan looks like the wisdom of solomon with his core beliefs, and his decisions which turned the country around.

SO, this brings me to Mitt Romney, a slightly right of center conservative. YA GOT IT NOW?

are we on the same page here numbnuts?
Beuller?

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 9:57 pm

Screw_Michigan wrote:
smackaholic wrote:how can a guy that smart do something so fukking dumb?
Because he's not that smart. Do you have to have everything explained to you?

You are confusing intelligence with wisdom as part of your overall confusion.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:12 pm

Romney/Cain - I would like their chances against Obamao/Biden.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 6:32 am

The Seer wrote:Romney/Cain - I would like their chances against Obamao/Biden.

YES YES YES, and free godfathers pizza for every man woman and child. The dems had better not say anything bad about Cain, lest they be branded as racists.

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 6:53 am

Perry is extremely to the far right. DO YOU GET IT NOW?

Is he?

Is that based on his policy of giving ILLEGALS ---> in-state tuition rates, or based on his issuing of an executive order to MANDATE that girls receive the Gardasil vaccination prior to entering 6th grade?

You know, those FAR RIGHT policies. lol

Perry and Romney are both phony baloney bullshitters.

No thanks.

Newt is clearly the sharpest of the bunch, but Ron Paul is the only one there who REALLY has it as a mission to do his very best to give the people liberty.

I won't vote for Paul, but he's the only one I see there who could be worthy of a vote.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:04 am

poptart wrote:
Perry is extremely to the far right. DO YOU GET IT NOW?
Is he?

Is that based on his policy of giving ILLEGALS ---> in-state tuition rates, or based on his issuing of an executive order to MANDATE that girls receive the Gardasil vaccination prior to entering 6th grade?

You know, those FAR RIGHT policies. lol

Perry and Romney are both phony baloney bullshitters.

No thanks.

HEY pop? not everybody is rank and file on every single issue, does that make sense??
Sure I like some of what Ron Paul is about, HOWEVER, he also says some pretty looney stuff as well.
You can say Romney is baloney all yopu want, BUT, it just shows me how short sighted and narrow minded you really are.

Sorry pal, BUT, Mitt Romney is an experienced leader, a proven executive with tremendous business experience. Ron Paul is a great republican, but, sometimes he goes off on weird tangents, like when he made that Bruno movie, and was alone in a hotel room with bruno, unaware that bruno wanted him to get naked and have gay sex with him.

I am usually dead on about these matters, and MITT will slowly settle in as the front runner. AND, mark my words, When Mitt and Barack meet for their first of 3 debates? Romney will make Barrry look like opie with downs syndrome.

It will be a turkey shoot for Mitt against Barry.

Newt is clearly the sharpest of the bunch, but Ron Paul is the only one there who REALLY has it as a mission to do his very best to give the people liberty.

I won't vote for Paul, but he's the only one I see there who could be worthy of a vote.

Terry in Crapchester · Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:10 am

I'll give Romney one thing: at least he has a built-in campaign song.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:46 pm

see that? Romney is a man of the people, ALL people, regardless of race creed or sexual proclivity.
Im putting my FULL support and heavy resources behind MITT ROMNEY!!!

poptart · Post by **poptart** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 1:57 pm

Do you know happen to know what the mormons think of balck people?

Hint: they're pretty much front pew in the mvscal church of love.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 2:10 pm

poptart wrote:Do you know happen to know what the mormons think of balck people?

Hint: they're pretty much front pew in the mvscal church of love.

From my vantage point Mitt is not only a brilliant businessman, BUT, the most "down to earth" guy you will ever come across. The "race card" will NOT work against him, in fact, nothing you can bring up will stick to him, HE is the PERFECT candidate for our next president. He is the "everyman", the hard working executive, who actually cares for the common man. He dresses well, has the classic "salt and pepper" look, just like george clooney, so he will also play well to the ladies, if you know what I mean.

This guy has it all, and may I say, he is as close to the perfect candidate as I have seen in a very very long time, since reagan even.

THIS IS THE GUY!! if I were you, I'd jump on board now, if you want, I will send you some fresh printed bumper stickers and coffee mugs.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:43 pm

Things Mitt Romney believes in:
--magical golden plates were found in upstate New York
--blacks are second class citizens who can't get into Momo heaven
--anything the public wants him to believe if it will further his career. he has absolutely no principles.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 4:01 pm

Bizzarofelice wrote:Things Mitt Romney believes in:
--magical golden plates were found in upstate New York
--blacks are second class citizens who can't get into Momo heaven
--anything the public wants him to believe if it will further his career. he has absolutely no principles.

wow Bizz, see, the shit you just spewed? it didnt stick, TEFLON!! In fact, those talking points you listed? I am way more inclined to believe thats a portrait of you, and not mitt.

Nice try though, you are sad and pitiful with your HATE, too bad though, I was gonna send you some nice coffee mugs.

At the end of the day, its you who comes across as a hater, not mitt. The public will agree with me on this, Romney is a fine decent man, and you Bizz? the public views you the same way they view Kenye West, a hater racist who called GW Bush a black hater.

The public overwhelmingly views kenye west as a racist, and he was the one who said Bush hates blacks.
Remember? The same Bush who sent 50 billion in aid to the poor in africa.
Its so easy to take your arguement and rip it to pieces. too easy.

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 4:03 pm

bradhusker wrote:
Bizzarofelice wrote:Things Mitt Romney believes in:
--magical golden plates were found in upstate New York
--blacks are second class citizens who can't get into Momo heaven
--anything the public wants him to believe if it will further his career. he has absolutely no principles.
wow Bizz, see, the shit you just spewed? it didnt stick, TEFLON!!

In fact, those talking points you listed? I am way more inclined to believe thats a portrait of you, and not mitt.

I'm not Mormon. He is.

And the constant flip-flopping, you'll hear more about it now that Perry is against the wall.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 5:11 pm

Bizzarofelice wrote:
bradhusker wrote:
Bizzarofelice wrote:Things Mitt Romney believes in:
--magical golden plates were found in upstate New York
--blacks are second class citizens who can't get into Momo heaven
--anything the public wants him to believe if it will further his career. he has absolutely no principles.
wow Bizz, see, the shit you just spewed? it didnt stick, TEFLON!!

In fact, those talking points you listed? I am way more inclined to believe thats a portrait of you, and not mitt.
I'm not Mormon. He is.

And the constant flip-flopping, you'll hear more about it now that Perry is against the wall.

sorry to be the one to break this to you Bizz, but Perry is TOAST. he's done, stick a fork,

After watching Perry in Orlando the other night, I have come to the conclusion that he is very un-electable, very un-presidential, and, Perry would get destroyed by barack Obama in a nationally televised debate, or, any debate for that matter.

Romney, on the other hand, is very presidential, very reagan like, very handsome, AND, this is HUGE,
Romney would destroy, embarrass, and humiliate Barack Obama in a debate, ANY debate, anywhere.

Romney would tear barry a new one, remember, Romney is a big time corporate executive, with leadership abilities, and governing abilities. Obama, on the other hand, comes across as a book smart YET totally impotent community rabble rouser.

Obama is just sharp enough to beat Perry, but, he falls way short to beat a seasonned Mitt Romney/

I sincerely hope this clears matters up for you son.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sat Sep 24, 2011 6:04 pm

bradhusker wrote:
Romney, on the other hand, is very presidential, very reagan like, very handsome, AND, this is HUGE,

Okay, so Romney is huge...

I wasn't aware he was running for mayor of Kansas City.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:09 pm

Dude, I wasnt talking about the size of his genitals, I was talking about the size of his brain.
You may not be aware of it yet, but this Romney fella is one smart cookie. Perry falls way short of the intellect of a Mitt Romney, be advised.

In the weeks and months ahead, you will certainly know what it is I am saying here about our next and future president.

Atomic Punk · Post by **Atomic Punk** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:41 pm

Bizzarofelice wrote:Things Mitt Romney believes in:
--blacks are second class citizens who can't get into Momo heaven

Not unless they attend BYU on an athletic scholarship.

I think Newt would be a good fill-in for Steve Hartman with Pat O'Brien and Vic "The Brick" Jacobs on the "Loose Cannons" radio show. That's a double entendre BTW for our Kansas City followers.

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 8:45 pm

Nah, even the balck athletes at BYU get shat upon.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Sat Sep 24, 2011 10:17 pm

Don't look now, but Herman is making a move.

I hope he wins it. He will make barry his nigga next november.

bradhusker · Post by **bradhusker** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 2:01 pm

I like Herman too, he is a reagan conservative. HOWEVER, I see him as Mitt's running mate, putting an end to all this bullshit about Mitt being a racist once and for all.

Thats a powerful ticket, Herman and MITT, MITT and herman, it covers all the bases, and will get the "smart black vote", ULTIMATELY, come debate time, Herman makes Biden look like a sniffling idiot, and Romney humiliates Obama.

If Herman can turn Godfathers pizza around, just think what he can do for the country?

Bizzarofelice · Post by **Bizzarofelice** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:20 pm

bradhusker wrote:If Herman can turn Godfathers pizza around, just think what he can do for the country?

Is that a question?

And I agree that the needs of America and the needs of a regional pizza chain are comparable.

Diego in Seattle · Post by **Diego in Seattle** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 5:38 pm

bradhusker wrote: He is the "everyman",.....
who actually cares for the common man.

Yeah, this multi-millionaire really has a lot of simpathy for those who are unemployed & have don't have millions to fall back on....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHLnT3zsJGI

mvscal · Post by **mvscal** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:32 pm

smackaholic wrote:Don't look now, but Herman is making a move.

No, he isn't. Straw polls a joke.

The Seer · Post by **The Seer** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:07 pm

Too bad, he woulda made a better 1st time kneegrow as President.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:38 pm

mvscal wrote:
smackaholic wrote:Don't look now, but Herman is making a move.
No, he isn't. Straw polls a joke.

they might be a joke, but, they give him some needed exposure. and if people look at him, many will like what they see.

just wish he was a bit younger.

Shlomart Ben Yisrael · Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:43 pm

Is Godfathers Pizza any good?

Screw_Michigan · Post by **Screw_Michigan** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:55 pm

It's worth the money, although I haven't eaten there since 2006. When I was in college the Godfather's in Kzoo had a good lunch buffet and if you came after 5 pm, you could get $1.25 drafts. Why we didn't go there more often and get just absolutely obliterated is beyond me.

smackaholic · Post by **smackaholic** » Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:20 pm

Martyred wrote:Is Godfathers Pizza any good?

OK. nothing special. typical for mega chain pizza. good mom and pop places are better, of course. probably why they are most successful in the south where many locally owned shops are teh suck.