Sudden Sam wrote:Driving back from Mississippi yesterday, I heard that bookies would have had LSU a 13-15 point favorite over Okie State.
The Alabama-LSU pairing is rated EVEN.
So whiners and morons, just STFU.
whiners and morons, huh?
actually, lose at Iowa State you got no claims.
anyway, Sam, LSU is pretty good bet here. you lost at home to LSU.....and now you play them in NO. I've been to the Sugar Bowl when LSU plays.....it ain't a neutral site.
""On a lonely planet spinning its way toward damnation amid the fear and despair of a broken human race, who is left to fight for all that is good and pure and gets you smashed for under a fiver? Yes, it's the surprising adventures of me, Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar!"
"
The betting line actually has nothing to do with everyone with any knowledge whatsoever of college football . It's all about he (betting) public's perception of how the games will go.
Mikey wrote:The betting line actually has nothing to do with everyone with any knowledge whatsoever of college football . It's all about he (betting) public's perception of how the games will go.
And the Greater SEC Area has a higher population than <50% of the Oklahoma area (you know SECBSH will bet along party lines), meaning bait was tossed out.
In short Sam, it means the bookies think your a bunch of blinders-wearing dumbfucks, and LSU would have little chance at covering 13-14.
Mikey wrote:The betting line actually has nothing to do with everyone with any knowledge whatsoever of college football . It's all about he (betting) public's perception of how the games will go.
And the Greater SEC Area has a higher population than <50% of the Oklahoma area (you know SECBSH will bet along party lines), meaning bait was tossed out.
In short Sam, it means the bookies think your a bunch of blinders-wearing dumbfucks, and LSU would have little chance at covering 13-14.
Sorry you had to find out this way.
You are the buttfucked welcher who wouldn't pay up when Missouri finished (much) higher in the polls than Oregon a few years back, HOMO.
Kansas City Kid wrote:You are the buttfucked welcher who wouldn't pay up when Missouri finished (much) higher in the polls than Oregon a few years back, HOMO.
If I had any idea what you were talking about, I'd offer up a response.
Kansas City Kid wrote:You are the buttfucked welcher who wouldn't pay up when Missouri finished (much) higher in the polls than Oregon a few years back, HOMO.
If I had any idea what you were talking about, I'd offer up a response.
It's fucking Kaley. What does he ever talk about, other than male-on-male sexual activities.
Joe in PB wrote:
Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote:
They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Van wrote:That being said, I'm off to a sterling 0-3 in Pick 'Em.
That's because you couldn't resist Wyoming, Utah State and San Diego State, you WestCoastBallSuckingHomer, you.
actually, Wyoming has been pretty good against the spread all year.
Air Force has been the killer. and i'm kind of a Troy Calhoun fan. Utah State, always stay away from. They'll play someone good early in the year, Oklahoma or Auburn, and then fuck you the next few weeks.
""On a lonely planet spinning its way toward damnation amid the fear and despair of a broken human race, who is left to fight for all that is good and pure and gets you smashed for under a fiver? Yes, it's the surprising adventures of me, Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar!"
"
