Super Bowl
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Super Bowl
I like the Giants, especially with Gronk hurting.
38-27
38-27
- Joe in PB
- 2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
- Posts: 4522
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
- Location: Pacific Beach
- Contact:
Re: Super Bowl
X2War Wagon wrote:I like the Giants, especially with Gronk hurting.
38-27
The Giants have better defense (especially pass rush), & more good receivers (who aren't lame).
Giants - 31
Patriots - 24
Of course if Belichick is sandbagging and Gronk has a regular ankle sprain it'll be closer.
Giants - 31
Patriots - 28
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
- ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 5532
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:19 pm
- Location: The corner of get a map and fuck off.
Re: Super Bowl
Giants 34-20
They have two many weapons for NE's shit D and their front 4 is good enough to offset little behind them. I'd like to be wrong. But that's how I see it.
They have two many weapons for NE's shit D and their front 4 is good enough to offset little behind them. I'd like to be wrong. But that's how I see it.
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Super Bowl
NE 31
NYG 24
NYG 24
- Joe in PB
- 2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
- Posts: 4522
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
- Location: Pacific Beach
- Contact:
Re: Super Bowl
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
- Cosmo Kramer
- Troublemaker
- Posts: 776
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 5:19 pm
- Location: Smack dab in the middle of a fucking immigration free-for-all
Re: Super Bowl
Revenge is a powerful motivator. Pats 34 Giants 24
- ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 5532
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:19 pm
- Location: The corner of get a map and fuck off.
Re: Super Bowl
Cosmo Kramer wrote:Revenge is a powerful motivator.
I am sure all 7 players leftover from the 2007-08 season agree with you. What about the other 46?
Re: Super Bowl
I would take the Giants +3 if I was betting the line.
I lean toward thinking NY will win outright, but I have very little interest in the game.
Dislike for the Gaytriots and disdain for the city of New York.
A piss shower for both of 'em.
Hope somebody dies on the field.
Has it ever happened?
Make history, boys. :)
I lean toward thinking NY will win outright, but I have very little interest in the game.
Dislike for the Gaytriots and disdain for the city of New York.
A piss shower for both of 'em.
Hope somebody dies on the field.
Has it ever happened?
Make history, boys. :)
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Super Bowl
Why, yes, pops, a player has died during a game. From a heart attack. I hope you’re happy.poptart wrote:Hope somebody dies on the field.
Has it ever happened?
Make history, boys. :)
I remember when this happened and Howard Cosell covered it the next night on Monday Night Football. You’ll be happy to know, pops, that because of his chest pains weeks beforehand, Hughes came to know the Lord. A religion based on fear, eh?
http://www.aolnews.com/2010/10/22/one-o ... nd-on-him/
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Super Bowl
Which one blasts the larger load across your face, Tardd?Toddowen wrote:Imagine Giant fan being the more scholarly of the two?
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
- MuchoBulls
- Tremendous Slouch
- Posts: 5626
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:00 pm
- Location: Wesley Chapel, FL
Re: Super Bowl
I might watch it.
It's a good time to go out and do other things, though, because normal crowds are pretty thin.
It's a good time to go out and do other things, though, because normal crowds are pretty thin.
Re: Super Bowl
Pats 27
G-men 23
I think the Pats control the game by mid 3rd quarter and give up a late score for the 4 point win
G-men 23
I think the Pats control the game by mid 3rd quarter and give up a late score for the 4 point win
Re: Super Bowl
Joe in PB wrote: The Giants have better defense
NYG - 25.0 PPG
NEP - 21.4 PPG
Maybe "better" according to the eyeball test, and due to getting healthier.
Staistically?
Must be a PB thing.
Pats had more INTs, equalled NYG in forced fumbles, and scored more points on defense. Statistically, the only place the Giants are better than the Pats is over the Pats' pathetic pass D.
Joe, I can provide you with links to multiple sites with NFL stats, so you can bookmark them, and not appear so misinformed all the time.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Super Bowl
Total defense. Giants are 27th, NE 31st.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: Super Bowl
Last time I checked, points is how the game won
-
- 2014 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 4553
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:59 pm
Re: Super Bowl
Dinsdale wrote:Joe in PB wrote: The Giants have better defense
NYG - 25.0 PPG
NEP - 21.4 PPG
Maybe "better" according to the eyeball test, and due to getting healthier.
Staistically?
Must be a PB thing.
Pats had more INTs, equalled NYG in forced fumbles, and scored more points on defense. Statistically, the only place the Giants are better than the Pats is over the Pats' pathetic pass D.
Joe, I can provide you with links to multiple sites with NFL stats, so you can bookmark them, and not appear so misinformed all the time.
Statistically the Eagles had the 8th ranked defense in the NFL. You'd have a hard time convincing ANYONE who watched that team with any regularity that the Eagles had the 8th ranked defense in the league. On the local radio this morning a show had on Ray Didinger who happens to be in enshrined in the Profootball HOF (writer's wing). In short, his resume is impeccable. He happens to watch film. A lot of it since he also works for NFL Films.
His take? The Eagles defense was one of the worst defenses in the NFL.
Yet, they're ranked 8th per NFL.com
I don't think Joe is misinformed. Rather I think he's doing what a lot of (serious) fans tend to do which is to not only look at stats but realistically judge how a team has played over the last half of the season as well as the playoffs with both an eyeball look as well as stats more reflective of how the team is playing now.
I saw one of the premier offensive teams in the NFL this past season get shut down by a really good Giants defense in Wisconsin a few weeks ago. How they played against the Packers matter a lot more than how the Giants D played in weeks 1-8.
- Joe in PB
- 2008 / 2009 JAFFL Champ
- Posts: 4522
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 9:15 am
- Location: Pacific Beach
- Contact:
Re: Super Bowl
What isn't amazing is I don't need to look at stat sheets to have a better & more accurate take than you dim bulb (see 9er Giants NFC champ thread).Dinsdale wrote:Joe in PB wrote: The Giants have better defense
NYG - 25.0 PPG
NEP - 21.4 PPG
Maybe "better" according to the eyeball test, and due to getting healthier.
Staistically?
Must be a PB thing.
Pats had more INTs, equalled NYG in forced fumbles, and scored more points on defense. Statistically, the only place the Giants are better than the Pats is over the Pats' pathetic pass D.
Joe, I can provide you with links to multiple sites with NFL stats, so you can bookmark them, and not appear so misinformed all the time.
Do you ever post a take, or do you just follow me around sucking my ass?
Butkus didn't wear an earring.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Super Bowl
I don't think anyone was contesting that.Cueball wrote:Last time I checked, points is how the game won
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
- Cosmo Kramer
- Troublemaker
- Posts: 776
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 5:19 pm
- Location: Smack dab in the middle of a fucking immigration free-for-all
Re: Super Bowl
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Cosmo Kramer wrote:Revenge is a powerful motivator.
I am sure all 7 players leftover from the 2007-08 season agree with you. What about the other 46?
Brady is the only one that counts so...look for him to have a great game.
-
- 2014 JFFL Champion
- Posts: 4553
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:59 pm
Re: Super Bowl
Why?Cosmo Kramer wrote:ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:Cosmo Kramer wrote:Revenge is a powerful motivator.
I am sure all 7 players leftover from the 2007-08 season agree with you. What about the other 46?
Brady is the only one that counts so....
- ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 5532
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:19 pm
- Location: The corner of get a map and fuck off.
Re: Super Bowl
Yes. I am sure Brady will try harder this time. Yeah. That's the ticket. He wasn't properly motivated back in 2008. Ya know, the chance at 19-0 and immortality wasn't enough. Now that he has a chance to "get someone back" he will surely win.Cosmo Kramer wrote:Brady is the only one that counts so...look for him to have a great game.
I can't decide which shit take of yours stinks worse... the one where you said "all you have to do is outscore the other team to win"... or this pile of rhino dung.
Too close to call.
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Super Bowl
There's liars, damned liars, and stats.Dinsdale wrote: I can provide you with links to multiple sites with NFL stats, so you can bookmark them, and not appear so misinformed all the time.
Then there's Dims, constantly running his trap like a toilet with a bad flapper.
Re: Super Bowl
I'd rather watch the Pro Bowl than this pathetic abortion of a game.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
- Screw_Michigan
- Angry Snowflake
- Posts: 21091
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 2:37 am
- Location: 20011
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Super Bowl
then why post that pathetic abortion of a take?mvscal wrote:I'd rather watch the Pro Bowl than this pathetic abortion of a game.
should be an imminently watchable game. The two teams that deserve to be there, are there.
you just pissed because it's two East coast teams?
Re: Super Bowl
Based on what compelling storyline or matchup? What it will be is a fucking joke.War Wagon wrote:should be an imminently watchable game.
Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 05, 2019 4:39 pmUnlike you tards, I actually have functioning tastebuds and a refined pallet.
Re: Super Bowl
Imminently?
Stop it, Wags. Just...stop it. You're killing me over here.
Stop it, Wags. Just...stop it. You're killing me over here.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
- ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 5532
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:19 pm
- Location: The corner of get a map and fuck off.
Re: Super Bowl
Not every Super Bowl can be as exciting as a 49-26 beatdown, you sniveling cunt.mvscal wrote:I'd rather watch the Pro Bowl than this pathetic abortion of a game.
And truthfully, no one gives a fuck whether you tune in or not. I doubt you SoCal hippie lettuce smoking, no life having, surfer fucks could pull yourselves away from the beach to watch the game even if your own shit franchise was about to get its shit pushed in... again. Hang 10, bbbbrrrraaaahhhhhhhhhhhhh.
Re: Super Bowl
Statistically, in NFL history, one NFC defense (Bears) has actually KILLED an opponent.Dinsdale wrote:Staistically?
No AFC defense has made it's mark.
Thanks, Gobbler.
I think I like the Giants just a little more now.
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Super Bowl
Kansas City. Where big words go to die.Van wrote:Imminently?
Stop it, Wags. Just...stop it. You're killing me over here.
eminently
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Re: Super Bowl
Goober McTuber wrote: Kansas City. Where big words go to die.
eminently
Even spelled correctly, I don't think that word means what Wags think it means.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
-
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 21259
- Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2005 2:35 pm
Re: Super Bowl
The "Rematch?" Brady exacting revenge? Can the Giants pull off another miracle run?mvscal wrote:Based on what compelling storyline or matchup? What it will be is a fucking joke.War Wagon wrote:should be an imminently watchable game.
And really? You need a "compelling storyline" to watch a football game? It's the fucking Super Bowl, and what appears to be a pretty competitive matchup to boot. Two teams are going to line up and smack pads for all the marbles. What more do you want?
Re: Super Bowl
Well, for starters, he wouldn't mind seeing Tim Tebow run a QB sneak in the Super Bowl...naked.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Super Bowl
what?
Definition of IMMINENT
: ready to take place; especially : hanging threateningly over one's head <was in imminent danger of being run over>
Goobs, Van... I just roll words off the top of my head, they perplex you.
Rack my Catholic education, but you guys are 'tards, as in unread.
Definition of IMMINENT
: ready to take place; especially : hanging threateningly over one's head <was in imminent danger of being run over>
Goobs, Van... I just roll words off the top of my head, they perplex you.
Rack my Catholic education, but you guys are 'tards, as in unread.
- War Wagon
- 2010 CFB Pickem Champ
- Posts: 21127
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:38 pm
- Location: Tiger country
Re: Super Bowl
Yes, Goobs, you are an unread idiot.Goober McTuber wrote:Kansas City. Where big words go to die.Van wrote:Imminently?
Stop it, Wags. Just...stop it. You're killing me over here.
eminently
Definition of EMINENT
1: standing out so as to be readily perceived or noted : conspicuous
2: jutting out : projecting
3: exhibiting eminence especially in standing above others in some quality or position : prominent
Re: Super Bowl
That's all well and good, Wags, except you used 'imminently,' not 'eminently,' which is the correction Goobs provided. You wanted to use 'eminently'—your Kansas Citian gray matter was just aching to extract the word from those besotted cobwebs—but when push came to shove you butcherfucked it right the hell up.
Joe Satriani is a mime, right? - 88
Show me your dicks. - trev
Show me your dicks. - trev
-
- World Renowned Last Word Whore
- Posts: 25891
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Re: Super Bowl
Whitey's posts are imminently readable.
Joe in PB wrote: Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote: They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
- ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
- Eternal Scobode
- Posts: 5532
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:19 pm
- Location: The corner of get a map and fuck off.
Re: Super Bowl
So Wags, because it's about to occur, that's what makes it so... watchable? Imminently watchable?
Just admit to the mistake and move on. Or better yet, just ignore the gaffe and move on. Digging a deeper hole for yourself helps you... how?
Just admit to the mistake and move on. Or better yet, just ignore the gaffe and move on. Digging a deeper hole for yourself helps you... how?