More evidence that the GW crowd is using junk science

It's the 19th Anniversary for T1B - Fuckin' A

Moderator: Jesus H Christ

Rooster
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:49 am

Re: More evidence that the GW crowd is using junk science

Post by Rooster »

So, LTS, does all the political activity and funding that Tom Steyer pays for Global Warming Fearmongering equate to the Koch brothers? After all, according to your definition of political activism they are opposite sides of the same coin. Where is all your anguish and hand wringing for his nefarious interference in the process?
Cock o' the walk, baby!
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: More evidence that the GW crowd is using junk science

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

But SS, while you claim that the Climate Change scientists are in on some kind of scam, you offer nothing whatever to support this claim. And yet there is no dispute that your denial position is standing shoulder to shoulder with Sarah Palin, James Inhofe, and similar Christer morons. The leading "expert' denialists have been clearly revealed to be paid shills--the leading "expert' receiving $1.2 million for his denial opinion. So...why aren't you embarrassed?
Before God was, I am
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: More evidence that the GW crowd is using junk science

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

All you're doing is reciting the catechism of Inhofe and Palin. The evidence of Climate Change is overwhelming on several fronts. Ocean acidification, for example. desertification for another. You r auto-dismissal of actual scientific bodies such as NASA as being part of a scam is shameless and just a cheap Rusp Limpdick-like weaseling.

Here,
http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

and more,

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/indicators/

These are actual non-biased and non-whored out shills. And of course you can't refute their evidence. Just like you can't support any part of the 9/11 report.
Before God was, I am
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: More evidence that the GW crowd is using junk science

Post by Dinsdale »

LTS TRN 2 wrote:Ocean acidification
Swing-and-amiss.

Ocean pH varies quite wildly, and has since well before the industrial revolution, over short periods. But I forgot -- in the "new science," correlation/coincidence = proof.


And anyone who passed a 101 level chemistry class understand how laughable this "evidence" is.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: More evidence that the GW crowd is using junk science

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

So all you've got is more simplistic dismissals--in the manner of Rusp Limpdick's fierce anti-intellectual appeal to the moronic Tea Bagger contingent.

Here's actual scientific data about ocean acidification

http://www.nrdc.org/oceans/acidification/

http://ocean.si.edu/ocean-acidification


And of course, as with all the other evidence, you can't refute any of it.
Before God was, I am
User avatar
Dinsdale
Lord Google
Posts: 33414
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:30 pm
Location: Rip City

Re: More evidence that the GW crowd is using junk science

Post by Dinsdale »

http://junkscience.com/2014/12/22/marit ... rch-fraud/

Yup, once again, the "new science" comes into play -- if the data doesn't support the desired outcome, go back and alter it.

And the whole "ocean acidification" hysteria/boondoggle doesn't fly with anyone with even a basic understanding of chemistry... seriously, it's laughable. And what's really sad, it the people working the scam around it know full well it's garbage.
I got 99 problems but the 'vid ain't one
Rooster
Eternal Scobode
Posts: 2517
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:49 am

Re: More evidence that the GW crowd is using junk science

Post by Rooster »

What cracks me up is when I hear the words, "the science is settled" in relation to AGW. Note that this is said about a subject about which little is known and even less understood. But it is particularly funny because as we just saw last week the supposed "science" of something so settled as cholesterol and how bad it is for you has been completely turned on its' head. Now those smarty pants scientists are saying, "Umm, never mind what we've been preaching for the past forty years. You can eat bacon again. Sorry about that." :lol:

If food's effects-- something we are intimately familiar with --can be found to be 180* out from what was boldly "known" then it is safe to say we shouldn't be making world wide adjustments to our economies and industries based on something utterly speculative. ESAD, you Chicken Littles.
Cock o' the walk, baby!
User avatar
LTS TRN 2
I suck Jew cock
Posts: 8802
Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2006 7:42 pm
Location: Here

Re: More evidence that the GW crowd is using junk science

Post by LTS TRN 2 »

Who and what are you fake asshole fraudulent cowardly evasive paid-off whored-out prostituted hollowed cadavers?

Why do you persist? Are you like mosquitoes? Just buzzing on some simple vein of temporary existence ?

You can't speak or reason, make a joke or respond to an actual idea. What are you? And why do you insist on clogging up breathable air?
Before God was, I am
Carson
2012 CFB Pickem Champ
Posts: 4947
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 3:11 pm
Location: NOT in The Gump

Re: More evidence that the GW crowd is using junk science

Post by Carson »

Sorry, I had chili last night. :oops:
JPGettysburg wrote: Fri Jul 19, 2024 8:57 pm In prison, full moon nights have a kind of brutal sodomy that can't fully be described with mere words.
Post Reply