Shout Out to Kyrie Irving...

[LTS TRN 2]

None of the pilots of the four American Airlines planes

And FAIL. Tell your masters to tighten their shit up so you don't look like a first grader when you cut and paste this garbage.

You're just doubling down as usual on your fake bullshit. Atta wasn't a pilot at all, let alone prepared for what's been suggested. The only evidence of he--or any of the supposed 19 hijackers--being involved is the miraculously recovered passport in the rubble . You are a disgusting fraud, and you can't begin to support any part of the official story, let alone the nonsense suggestion that you're an actual pilot. How do you look in the mirror?

[Left Seater]

My fake bullshit? You are the one that can't get even basic facts straight.

[LTS TRN 2]

The facts are exactly what you've been ducking from day one. None of flights signaled a hijacking. Fact. None of the supposed hijackers had any of the pilot skills necessary to carry out what has been alleged. Fact. Modern steel-framed skyscrapers dropped in obvious controlled demolition fashion. Fact. No evidence whatever has been offered to link Bin Laden with anything connected to 9/11. Fact. The pristine lawn of the pentagon was unscathed by a"757" coming in at ground level. Fact. All videos of the pentagon were confiscated and sealed. Fact. And on and on....

You are particularly disgusting.

[Left Seater]

Wash, rinse, repeat...cut, paste, repeat.

[LTS TRN 2]

Exactly, Fake Seater, and you're doing it once again, like a windshield wiper. You can't refute anything I've said, nor defend any part of the official story. You're a slimy little punk.

[Shlomart Ben Yisrael]

Lefty is in on the cabal. It's an inside job...and he's about as inside as it gets.


I just hope there's someone out there with the compassion and strength to comfort his poor wife when his rancid existence comes crashing down.
Someone like...oh...I don't know....uhhhh............me, perhaps?

[Shlomart Ben Yisrael]

[LTS TRN 2]

Yer no Moe Szyslak..though you can dream...







Fake Seater isn't in on anything, but rather is an obdurate and cowardly fraud. As to his "wife," well just like you being a "Canadian," bullshit is everywhere. You know, like the 9/11 Commission Report..??..

Dreamy Dream....

[Left Seater]

You are always good for laughs. Until you can get basic facts correct there is no reason to even refute the vomit you try to pass off. Just going back one page in this thread you have two epic fails. Hijack alert switch and 4 American Airlines jets.

What a tool. But keep it coming we enjoy the laughs.

[LTS TRN 2]

There are no fails--no excuse for you to hide. None of the four airliners purportedly hijacked signaled they were hijacked. So...why are you pretending to laugh? You're the total fraud who squirmingly seems to support the official story--and yet you don't dare to actually present any particular item you can actually defend.

And neither does anyone else!

[Left Seater]

Hijack alert switch.

[LTS TRN 2]

This is just like your shameless quibbling over the difference between a "roll" and a "turn" when the alleged pentagon pilot suddenly displayed flying ability that would make Chuck Yeager proud. Look, the ability to signal a hijacking is right there in front of the pilot. And NONE of them did. Okay? And every other airliner ever hijacked has signaled "hijack." Now, you are a totally fake, squirming little bitch who should be ashamed of yourself, if you were real in any sense.

[Left Seater]

Yeah cause a roll and a turn are not even close to similar. A roll requires some skill while a turn can be accomplished by turning a knob.

[LTS TRN 2]

A 270 degree turn a t 880 km per hour by a guy who "couldn't fly a Cessna"? By "turning a knob"? And then flying in at ground level at a speed which is impossible for a 757? The entire story is ridiculous in its every aspect--and you can't defend any of it. All you can do is quibble like a squirming little creep.

From the Ohio/Kentucky border, Hanjour then supposedly turned the plane around, set course for Washigton D.C. hundreds of miles away, and successfully entered the most restricted airspace in the world without eliciting a single military intercept - despite the crash of two other known hijacked aircraft into the WTC, and a missing third, being covered on every radio and television station in the country. "In order to perform this bit of electronic navigation, he would have to be very familiar with (Instrument Flight Rules) procedures. None of these fellows (the alleged hijackers) even knew what a navigational chart looked like, or even how to plug frequencies into NAV/COM radios, much less input information into flight management computers (FMC) and engage LNAV (lateral navigation automated mode). If one is to believe the official story, all of this was supposedly accomplished by raw student pilots while flying blind at 500 MPH over unfamiliar (and practically invisible) terrain, using complex methodologies and employing sophisticated instruments."

According to the official account, an unidentified aircraft that somebody randomly decided was 'Flight 77' (remember, the transponder needed to identify the aircraft had been turned off) then suddenly pops up over Washington DC out of nowhere and executes an incredibly precise diving turn at a rate of 360 degrees/minute while descending at 3,500 ft/min, at the end of which "Hanjour" allegedly levels out at ground level. The maneuver was in fact so precisely executed that the air traffic controllers at Dulles refused to believe the blip on their screen was a commercial airliner. Danielle O'Brian, one of the air traffic controllers at Dulles who reported seeing the aircraft at 9:25 said, 'The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air traffic controllers, that that was a military plane.'" (ABC News, 10/24/2001, also archived at www.cooperativeresearch.org)

Pummeling you is easy. But...what have you really got? Who and what are you?

[Left Seater]

Nice cut and paste. You can't explain half of what those instruments are so no need to shoot it down.

[LTS TRN 2]

I'm not the one claiming to be a pilot. You are. So..you should be able to answer to the basic technical issues as raised by the fellow trained pilots ...right?

And if you can't answer to fellow trained pilots and air traffic controllers, perhaps you could respond to a U.S. Army General.?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2XV3Edd2dc

Or maybe you'll continue to squirm like a slimy fraud? :wink:

[Left Seater]

How many of those ATC are pilots as well?

Look. You pick the poster and in about 8 hours I could have them fly any of the 9/11 routes.

[Dinsdale]

Look. You pick the poster and in about 8 hours I could have them fly any of the 9/11 routes.

I'm calling bullshit.

Moving Sale couldn't reach the controls.

[Left Seater]

Valid.

[LTS TRN 2]

How many of those ATC are pilots as well?

Look. You pick the poster and in about 8 hours I could have them fly any of the 9/11 routes.

Absolute bullshit. If one is to believe the official story, all of this was supposedly accomplished by raw student pilots while flying blind at 500 MPH over unfamiliar (and practically invisible) terrain, using complex methodologies and employing sophisticated instruments.

Morevover, the actual pilots and air traffic controllers expressed clear experienced opinions that the 270 degree turn was demanding of real expertise. So, where do you get off dismissing them? Or were they all hired by George Soros?

You also suggested that the "auto-pilot" function could be easily programmed for such a precise strike. How much ludicrous bullshit are you capable of spewing?

And really,why do you suppose all of the surveillance videos were immediately confiscated and sealed?

Go ahead, you tedious fraud, actually offer some specific part of the story that you can defend.

[Left Seater]

The only part of your narrative that deserves discussing is the video part. I haven't heard anyone claim they had videos that were confiscated. But if those did exist why hasn't wiki leaks or someone else published them and hidden the individual behind layers of the web?

[LTS TRN 2]

What tedious squirming. And how predictable from a total fraud.

You can't begin to defend the preposterous assertion that the supposed hijacker flew with sudden remarkable expertise. Nor can you--or anyone--explain how the nose of the "757" hit at about ten feet off the ground, while the huge engines hang fifteen-feet below, and should have plowed up the lawn (causing a total crash of course, after the fuel-laden wings erupted in flames after hitting the light poles of course).

Here's a witness to the immediate scene after impact...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BNqgNvUhRQ

Of course no airliner hit the pentagon. And of course if one did it wouldn't pierce through three rings of the recently steel-mesh reinforced massive walls. But a missile would.

But c'mon, humor us with your ludicrous contortions of fake aviation expertise. Tell us how a 757 can fly at 500 mph at ground level.

[Left Seater]

And back to the three rings which has been proven incorrect.

[LTS TRN 2]

Of course it went through three rings, and no there is no open space on the ground floor somehow connecting them all into one big room, as it were.



But why quibble on such a clearly demonstrated fact?

Why not explain how the engines hanging fifteen feet below the nose of the "757" didn't plow up the lawn?

And how could a "757" fly at 500 mph at ground level?

And why didn't the fuel-laden wings burst into flames when striking steel poles?

And how did a completely inexperienced pilot--who'd never flown a plane--supposedly fly hundreds of miles blind, without radar, maps, or anything--at very low altitude, and arrive right on target?

Any why?...would he not simply crash straight onto the pentagon, causing maximum damage, but rather execute the astonishing 270 degree turn so as to attack in an (impossible) fashion at ground level?

The fact is you can't offer any practical explanation for these few basic questions, and neither can anyone else. And there's lots and lots more. And yet you claim to be a pilot? you're a total fraud.

Here's a real pilot



Here, actually examine and consider some basic information about the official story and how it reckons with basic physics, etc.

https://911planeshoax.com/tag/911-crash-test/

[Left Seater]

The ground floor is common to E, D and C. As is clearly visible in your photo between ring E and D there are three floors. Below that is a roof covering the continuous space between the outer wall of E ring and the inner wall of C ring.

Nothing new to see here though we have been thru all of this before.

[LTS TRN 2]

Absolute bullshit. If there are no walls or massive columns, what's holding up the building? You're suggesting that the roof is somehow unsupported?

Here's the pentagon rings


And here's what you're suggesting hit it..


And here's what happens to the nose of an airliner when it hits a bird..


An aluminum airliner does not penetrate through massive concrete (with steel mesh recently added for reinforcement) and certainly doesn't do this..


Now, what about all the other glaring questions? Why wouldn't the engines plow up the lawn? They hang fifteen feet below. So?...Anything, you total fraud?

How can a 757 fly at 500 mph at ground level? C'mon, entertain us with some phony expertise.

What about the clear assertion of the real pilot? It must be embarrassing to see a real pilot making you look like the total fake chump you are.