Your 9/17/2017 Top 10

[MgoBlue-LightSpecial]

1 Clempson
2 Bammer
3 OU
4 Ped State
5 OK State
6 Warshington
7 Wisky
8 Fighting Condoms
9 Meatchicken
10 Miss St

[Dinsdale]

Do any of you actually follow college football (except Sam)?

There were 3 teams in FBS that went winless in-conference last season. Washington has played 2 of them, and an FCS.




1. Clemson
2. Bama
3. OU



And no opinion on the rest yet.

[Goober McTuber]

Huh?

[Dinsdale]

Somehow a line got deleted there, so it makes no sense. I'll edit it.

[MgoBlue-LightSpecial]

Do any of you actually follow college football (except Sam)?

There were 3 teams in FBS that went winless in-conference last season. Washington has played 2 of them, and an FCS.




1. Clemson
2. Bama
3. OU



And no opinion on the rest yet.

If only there was a way to determine how Washington would've fared against, say, Pac 12 competition last year...

[Dinsdale]

If only there was a way to determine how Washington would've fared against, say, Pac 12 competition last year...

Wait... we're on to the Transitive Theory Of... Last Year?

Ohhhhhkay.

[MgoBlue-LightSpecial]

So by your logic, Wake Forest should be ranked ahead of Washington since they technically have a better "resume" to this point?

Ohhhhhkay.

We've only played three weeks. There's not enough data yet to confidently rank everyone. This early in the season it's reasonable to factor a little bit of "conventional wisdom" into your rankings based on what teams returned from last year's squads combined with the very early results so far.

[Dinsdale]

So by your logic, Wake Forest should be ranked ahead of Washington since they technically have a better "resume" to this point?

No.

Wake Forest should be ranked ahead of Washington because they're not Washington.