Donnie and Steve have a nasty breakup

[Moving Sale]

The whole nation? Or just the part you live in? Oh, snap...

What you call an embarrassment, the country calls #winning.

You really are an idiot.

Oh and name one fraud the Pedobear has exposed from a media source.

[Diego in Seattle]

[Truman]

electing the most corrupted cunt

He was elected, dingleberry.

No, "he" wasn't, Pee Wee. I thought you fake journo-types carried a style book to help keep genders straight.

[Truman]

The whole nation? Or just the part you live in? Oh, snap...

What you call an embarrassment, the country calls #winning.

You really are an idiot.

Oh and name one fraud the Pedobear has exposed from a media source.

Too easy, Tiny. How about we start with Brian Ross, for one. I'm sure I could scare you up about half-a-dozen fake news reports submitted by CNN if you like too. Why do dicks fall out of mouth every time you open it?

[Screw_Michigan]

Just to make things crystal clear for you, you piss dribbling sack of shit

electing the most corrupted cunt

He was elected, dingleberry.

[Moving Sale]

And how did Pedobear expose this story? And how is one bad story a problem?

[Moving Sale]

Too easy, Tiny.

You should get together with Jayne, he likes to talk about my body too.

[Truman]

Just to make things crystal clear for you, you piss dribbling sack of shit

electing the most corrupted cunt

He was elected, dingleberry.

Fixed That For You. Now what were you saying about President Trump?

[Moving Sale]

I think he was telling you what an absolute POS you voted for.

[Screw_Michigan]

I think he was telling you what an absolute POS you voted for.

Give him a break, MS. Remember who we're dealing with, here. :paul:

[Moving Sale]

He is argument number one against universal suffrage.

[smackaholic]

I'm all for that.

No one on any form of government assistance has no business voting.

[Mikey]

It’s all good now.

(CNN)Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon released a statement Sunday expressing regret for not responding sooner to comments attributed to him that were critical of Donald Trump Jr. in "Fire and Fury," an explosive new book on President Donald Trump's first year in office. CNN obtained the statement from a source close to Bannon.

In the book, author Michael Wolff quotes Bannon as saying the 2016 Trump Tower meeting between Trump campaign officials, including Trump Jr. and former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, and a Russian lawyer purportedly offering damaging information about Hillary Clinton was "treasonous." The book also attributes statements to him denigrating the President.
CNN has not independently verified all the assertions in Wolff's book.
Read the full version of Bannon's statement:

"Donald Trump, Jr. is both a patriot and a good man. He has been relentless in his advocacy for his father and the agenda that has helped turn our country around.

My support is also unwavering for the president and his agenda — as I have shown daily in my national radio broadcasts, on the pages of Breitbart News and in speeches and appearances from Tokyo and Hong Kong to Arizona and Alabama. President Trump was the only candidate that could have taken on and defeated the Clinton apparatus. I am the only person to date to conduct a global effort to preach the message of Trump and Trumpism; and remain ready to stand in the breech for this president's efforts to make America great again.

My comments about the meeting with Russian nationals came from my life experiences as a Naval officer stationed aboard a destroyer whose main mission was to hunt Soviet submarines to my time at the Pentagon during the Reagan years when our focus was the defeat of 'the evil empire' and to making films about Reagan's war against the Soviets and Hillary Clinton's involvement in selling uranium to them.

My comments were aimed at Paul Manafort, a seasoned campaign professional with experience and knowledge of how the Russians operate. He should have known they are duplicitous, cunning and not our friends. To reiterate, those comments were not aimed at Don Jr.

Everything I have to say about the ridiculous nature of the Russian 'collusion' investigation I said on my 60 Minutes interview. There was no collusion and the investigation is a witch hunt.

I regret that my delay in responding to the inaccurate reporting regarding Don Jr has diverted attention from the president's historical accomplishments in the first year of his presidency."

After giving his statement Bannon excused himself to go and administer the President’s daily hummer.

(Truman’s dream job)

[Softball Bat]

What you call an embarrassment, the country calls #winning.

False.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epoll ... -6179.html

And please tell me again why electing the most corrupted cunt in the history of, well, anywhere would've been a good thing for this country.

Wtf is this?

When did I ever advocate voting for Hitlery?

[Mikey]

What you call an embarrassment, the country calls #winning.

False.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epoll ... -6179.html

And please tell me again why electing the most corrupted cunt in the history of, well, anywhere would've been a good thing for this country.

Wtf is this?

When did I ever advocate voting for Hitlery?

“Whataboutism” is the favorite refuge of ignorant Trumpistas who have no legitimate arguments.

[Moving Sale]

I'm all for that.

No one on any form of government assistance has no business voting.

So nobody gets to vote. I don't think that is workable.

[Mikey]

I'm all for that.

No one on any form of government assistance has no business voting.

So nobody gets to vote. I don't think that is workable.

I think based on smackaholic’s post it’s more like nobody gets to not vote.

[Softball Bat]

He butchered that.

Beyond the butchering, it might be the single most idi0tic thing I have ever read.

[smackaholic]

Thanks for pointing that out, Mr double negative police asshole.

[smackaholic]

He butchered that.

Beyond the butchering, it might be the single most idi0tic thing I have ever read.

It's a pretty simple concept.

You receive direct government welfare, you don't vote. Voting is done to select people to spend our tax dollars. If you are not paying those tax dollars, fukk off. And save me the sales tax argument. If you pay a tax with dollars someone else gave to you, you are not a taxpayer.

[Moving Sale]

But you could grow up to be a PedOTUS

[Shlomart Ben Yisrael]

He butchered that.

Beyond the butchering, it might be the single most idi0tic thing I have ever read.

I'm pretty sure I've read worse.

[Shlomart Ben Yisrael]

He butchered that.

Beyond the butchering, it might be the single most idi0tic thing I have ever read.

I'm pretty sure I've read worse.

Okay...you may be onto something...

I went back and looked...that really is single most idiotic thing I have ever read.

[Derron]

I think he was telling you what an absolute POS you voted for.

Give him a break, MS. Remember who we're dealing with, here. :paul:

Well look here the Board Bitch and Vice Board Bitch, bitch in waiting all jump in to give each other a reach around and fellate each others take. Good to see you two working together and propping each other, although you will probably be eating each others assholes out to see who holds onto the title for 2018.

[Softball Bat]

It's a pretty simple concept.

You receive direct government welfare, you don't vote. Voting is done to select people to spend our tax dollars. If you are not paying those tax dollars, fukk off. And save me the sales tax argument. If you pay a tax with dollars someone else gave to you, you are not a taxpayer.

The simple concepts on display here are...

1. You are as dumb as the knot on a tree
2. You are immoral


The only way your proposal might begin to make any sense would be if the only "gov. money" that was given out was welfare money, and the only people who received it were people who had ZERO (and I mean ZERO) income of their own.

Look, if a person makes 8 grand a year and also receives welfare, they are punished MUCH HARDER by sales tax than a person of a high income.
A much larger pct. of THEIR MONEY is taken from them when they make a purchase, compared to a wealthy person.

Beyond that, wealthy people enhance their wealth by taking advantage of "gov. money" all the time.
Do you not know this?

And beyond that, all of us take advantage of services, infrastructure, etc., that "gov. money" has dished out.


Get a grip on some basics, dopey.

Seriously.

[Left Seater]

Pretty funny you calling someone out for what you label as “simple concepts” given your own views on some subjects.

Further your post is all over the place. Back away from “Government Money” and “Their Money” labels. The government has zero money except for the money it takes from its tax payers. Full stop! Any Welfare payments aren’t government money, nor is it the receipents money, it is the tax payers money.

Then you mention infrastructure and services etc that government money pays for and provides. Again that is infrastructure and services provided by the tax payers not the government. And as for your example of sales tax punishing someone who earns $8K a year, it is offset by the fact they are not paying income tax yet still getting the benefit of the infrastructure and services provided by the tax payers.

Finally explain what government money the wealthy are using to their advantage, not including infrastructure and services that everyone is afforded.

[Softball Bat]

Lefty, I would take your post apart, point-by-point, but I have no desire to do so unless you are really claiming to be as brain-dead as smackaholic.

Do you somehow agree with this?

You receive direct government welfare, you don't vote. Voting is done to select people to spend our tax dollars. If you are not paying those tax dollars, fukk off. And save me the sales tax argument. If you pay a tax with dollars someone else gave to you, you are not a taxpayer.

Easily one of the most m0ronic takes ever.

Finally explain what government money the wealthy are using to their advantage, not including infrastructure and services that everyone is afforded.

Click and read.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/won ... f7248eec7d

The examples are quite plentiful, and none of this is new.

Just ONE such example...


Imagine that the tab for dinner and drinks for 10 executives comes to $1,600. Current tax law allows companies to
deduct half of the cost of business meals — in this case, $800. With a corporate tax rate of 35 percent, each dollar
of deductions yields 35 cents of tax savings — so that $800 deduction saves $280 in taxes. This means one dinner for
10 people provides more public food assistance than the $279 an average household receives in food stamps for the
whole month.

[Moving Sale]

Fucking tard

[bigredretard]

Trump 2020

[Shlomart Ben Yisrael]

It's a pretty simple concept.

You receive direct government welfare, you don't vote. Voting is done to select people to spend our tax dollars. If you are not paying those tax dollars, fukk off. And save me the sales tax argument. If you pay a tax with dollars someone else gave to you, you are not a taxpayer.

The simple concepts on display here are...

1. You are as dumb as the knot on a tree
2. You are immoral

Seriously.

The irony is, being a squid, he's part of the biggest welfare-queen gubmint handout scheme ever created.

[Left Seater]

Softball,

I wasn’t discussing Holic’s take. I was discussing your statements. Your use of “government money” vs “their money” and your take that the rich are getting government handouts.

As for the only part you did address with your Washington Post link that is a joke. Each of those 12 examples are tax deductions. Huge difference in reducing one’s tax burden and being given to their people’s tax money to use as you see fit.

In your dinner example that company still had to pay the tab for dinner. No one gave them money to pay that bill. For some stupid reason previous Congresses decided that they should be able to deduct half that meal. But trying to compare a tax deduction to welfare payments is idiotic. Apples and power lines.

So, still waiting for examples of the wealthy using government money for their benefit.

[Softball Bat]

Each of those 12 examples are tax deductions. Huge difference in reducing one’s tax burden and being given to their people’s tax money to use as you see fit.

No difference.

You just refuse to acknowledge what is right in front of your eyes.

That meal tax deduction is not available to the poor.

That deduction is +$280 to the rich person the same as it is +$280 to the poor man when he receives food stamps.

So, still waiting for examples of the wealthy using government money for their benefit.

How did this guy not win 'tard of the year?

[Carson]

The rich person's $280 will go toward payroll.

The food stamps will be traded for lottery tickets and menthol cigarettes.

[Left Seater]

You should work on your own stuff before you call out others for being dumb.

That meal tax deduction is not available to the poor.

Imagine that the tab for dinner and drinks for 10 executives comes to $1,600. Current tax law allows companies to
deduct half of the cost of business meals

Of course the meal deduction isn't available to the poor man. It also isn't available to the rich man. As per your own example it is a corporate tax deduction. Individuals and corporations are different.

That deduction is +$280 to the rich person the same as it is +$280 to the poor man when he receives food stamps.

Again, no it isn't. One is a direct handout of other people's tax payments and one is a corporate tax deduction.

Guess you are just going to ignore your use of the term "government money" as well.

How did this guy not win 'tard of the year?

As long as you think the world is flat I don't have anything to worry about there.

[Mikey]

Individuals and corporations are different.

Not according to Citizens United.

[LTS TRN 2]

Individuals and corporations are different.

Not according to Citizens United.

Oh, you're just noticing that Fake-seater is a total fraud on every level?

His Ayn Rand self-rim job manifesto is typical of these Breitbart morons.

First, the U.S. government has tremendous income that is not from tax dollars. What an inane suggestion that it's all taxes. The natural resources of public land alone is all but incalculable. Of course the morbid legion of Koch brother minions and stooges want everything privatized. No surprised that the slimy fraud is just fine with his tax break. Sort of like one of those impossibly puffed fools on the Titanic just loving his cabin view.

[Softball Bat]

As per your own example it is a corporate tax deduction. Individuals and corporations are different.

In both cases it is a -$280 for the government.

FACT.


Smackaholic said, "You receive direct government welfare, you don't vote."

The concept is laffable on it's face.


The gov. is out $280 in both cases.

Nothing is different about that.

The rich man (PEOPLE own corporations, 'tard), has gotten a $280 handout from the gov., just as the poor food stamp recipient has.

[Left Seater]

The rich man (PEOPLE own corporations, 'tard), has gotten a $280 handout from the gov., just as the poor food stamp recipient has.

If you can't see the difference between paying $280 less in taxes and getting $280 of other people's money handed to you for doing nothing then there is no further point in discussing this. I really feel sorry for you. But I guess this makes sense given some of your other world views.

[Mikey]

I think the Constitution has something to say about denying the right to vote as well.

[Derron]

I think the Constitution has something to say about denying the right to vote as well.

That can be amended pretty easy. Just like all the libs want to do away with the Second Amendment.