Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to Quit
WASHINGTON — President Trump ordered the firing last June of Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel overseeing the Russia investigation, according to four people told of the matter, but ultimately backed down after the White House counsel threatened to resign rather than carry out the directive.
The West Wing confrontation marks the first time Mr. Trump is known to have tried to fire the special counsel. Mr. Mueller learned about the episode in recent months as his investigators interviewed current and former senior White House officials in his inquiry into whether the president obstructed justice.
Amid the first wave of news media reports that Mr. Mueller was examining a possible obstruction case, the president began to argue that Mr. Mueller had three conflicts of interest that disqualified him from overseeing the investigation, two of the people said.
kcdave wrote: ↑Sat Sep 09, 2023 8:05 am
I was actually going to to join in the best bets activity here at good ole T1B...The guy that runs that contest is a fucking prick
Derron wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 3:07 pm
You are truly one of the worst pieces of shit to ever post on this board. Start giving up your paycheck for reparations now and then you can shut the fuck up about your racist blasts.
Ok, but he didn’t fire Mueller, so no harm, no,foul. In the meantime, we have actual texts of two FBI agents involved in the Clinton investigation showing that they gave her preferential treatment so as to better their standing when she became president.
Rooster wrote:Ok, but he didn’t fire Mueller, so no harm, no,foul.
Uh, no.
When Mueller interviews him, he can simply ask "Did you try to fire the Special Counsel?" Answering yes would show intent to obstruct. Answering no would be lying, a crime as well. Trump fucked himself.
In the meantime, we have actual texts of two FBI agents involved in the Clinton investigation showing that they gave her preferential treatment so as to better their standing when she became president.
Uh-oh.
Did they also show all the meetings at Comet Pizza?
“Left Seater” wrote:So charges are around the corner?
Yup, that pretty much meets the definition of "fake news."
A guy (?) who claims to be a "journalist" posted a "story" which cites someone who told someone, who told someone something, with no names or even positions attached.
Rooster wrote:Ok, but he didn’t fire Mueller, so no harm, no,foul.
Uh, no.
When Mueller interviews him, he can simply ask "Did you try to fire the Special Counsel?" Answering yes would show intent to obstruct. Answering no would be lying, a crime as well. Trump fucked himself.
In the meantime, we have actual texts of two FBI agents involved in the Clinton investigation showing that they gave her preferential treatment so as to better their standing when she became president.
Uh-oh.
Did they also show all the meetings at Comet Pizza?
He can always say, I don’t recall saying that.
Moving Sale wrote:I really are a fucking POS.
Softball Bat wrote:
I am the dumbest motherfucker ever to post on the board.
Rooster wrote:Ok, but he didn’t fire Mueller, so no harm, no,foul.
Uh, no.
When Mueller interviews him, he can simply ask "Did you try to fire the Special Counsel?" Answering yes would show intent to obstruct. Answering no would be lying, a crime as well. Trump fucked himself.
In the meantime, we have actual texts of two FBI agents involved in the Clinton investigation showing that they gave her preferential treatment so as to better their standing when she became president.
Uh-oh.
Did they also show all the meetings at Comet Pizza?
He can always say, I don’t recall saying that.
That would be kind of detrimental to that whole stable genius tack.
Joe in PB wrote:
Yeah I'm the dumbass
schmick, speaking about Larry Nassar's pubescent and prepubescent victims wrote:
They couldn't even kick that doctors ass
Seems they rather just lay there, get fucked and play victim
Yup, that pretty much meets the definition of "fake news."
A guy (?) who claims to be a "journalist" posted a "story" which cites someone who told someone, who told someone something, with no names or even positions attached.
Yup, that really just happened.
Die in a fire from ebola.
Won't your face be red when that things happens to those people who did that stuff over at that place...
rock rock to the planet rock ... don't stop
Felix wrote:you've become very bitter since you became jewish......
Kierland drop-kicking Wolftard wrote:
Aren’t you part of the silent generation?
Why don’t you just STFU.
Rooster wrote:Ok, but he didn’t fire Mueller, so no harm, no,foul.
Uh, no.
When Mueller interviews him, he can simply ask "Did you try to fire the Special Counsel?" Answering yes would show intent to obstruct. Answering no would be lying, a crime as well. Trump fucked himself.
In the meantime, we have actual texts of two FBI agents involved in the Clinton investigation showing that they gave her preferential treatment so as to better their standing when she became president.
Uh-oh.
Did they also show all the meetings at Comet Pizza?
Dinsdale wrote:A guy (?) who claims to be a "journalist" posted a "story" which cites someone who told someone, who told someone something, with no names or even positions attached.
Can you please post the part of the article that says that? Thanks.
Yup, that pretty much meets the definition of "fake news."
A guy (?) who claims to be a "journalist" posted a "story" which cites someone who told someone, who told someone something, with no names or even positions attached.
Yup, that really just happened.
Die in a fire from ebola.
So when does something become “real” news? When you actually see it for yourself? When you decide that you want it to be?
Even Faux News is covering this as if it did actually occur.