T1B

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:26 am**

m2 wrote:
20 points against Arizona???

It doesn't get any funnier than this!

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:35 am**

Actually, basing an argument on "We're a GREAT team because we crushed a D1AA opponent who beat New Mexico just as much as Missouri did!" is much, MUCH funnier.

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:42 am**

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Actually, basing an argument on "We're a GREAT team because we crushed a D1AA opponent who beat New Mexico just as much as Missouri did!" is much, MUCH funnier.

But, nothing is funnier than MisterMagoo State losing to a Div II team(Notre Dame)... which almost lost to Div II LSJU!!!

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:42 am**

Here's something funnier...

California Golden Bears at Tennessee Volunteers

1st 2nd 3rd 4th Final

#9 CAL 0 0 3 15 18

#23 TENN 7 7 21 0 35

September 2, 2006 - Neyland Stadium

35-3, before #23 decides to call off the dogs to spare #9 any further embarrassment. Morever, we ALL knew it was going to happen, too. Well, anyway, everyone but you knew it.

Comedy gold, Jerry.

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:45 am**

Van wrote:Here's something funnier...

California Golden Bears at Tennessee Volunteers

1st 2nd 3rd 4th Final

#9 CAL 0 0 3 15 18

#23 TENN 7 7 21 0 35

September 2, 2006 - Neyland Stadium

35-3, before #23 decides to call off the dogs to spare #9 any further embarrassment. Morever, we ALL knew it was going to happen, too. Well, anyway, everyone but you knew it.

Comedy gold, Jerry.

m2 wrote:
20 points against Arizona???

In the 3rd game of the year.

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:48 am**

Wasn't the spread around 20? USC pushed. What's the big deal then, m2?

You'd shoot wads all over your chimes if your team beat ANYBODY by 20, and you know it.

edit: scratch that, they won by 17 and pushed.

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:52 am**

m2 wrote:
Van wrote:You played Portland St.

You got bikini waxed by Tennessee.
Who the fuck has $C played???

Shit, you only beat Arizona by 17 and scored only 20 points!

20 points against Arizona???

USC beat Nebraska who "skull-fucked" mighty Troy St. who would bitch Portland State who is ranked higher than Arkansas neither of which would stand a change against FSU who almost lost to Troy who got run by Nebraska who lost to USC...carry the 2, divide by 6 and click your heels = it's way too early to know much of shit about anything. Run that through the computer.

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:52 am**

3-0, ranked #2 in the coach's poll and #2 in the AP poll...

vs...

3-1, no major wins in your lifetime and once again they put their foot down and re-established themselves as the embarrassment of the conference.

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:00 am**

MgoBlue-LightSpecial... I'm so stupid I make Van look smart wrote:Wasn't the spread around 20? USC pushed. What's the big deal then, m2?

You'd shoot wads all over your chimes if your team beat ANYBODY by 20, and you know it.

Hey dipshit... Cal just beat the #18 team in the country, by 4 TD's.

Cal 49- Arizona State 21-.

Would you like to still play at Van's level? Or would you like to pick it up a bit?

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:08 am**

Van wrote:
3-1, no major wins in your lifetime

Van, your stupidity is reaching Crown25 levels...

Did we not beat you in 2003, when you claimed to have won the MNC???

We also did this with students ...and not thugs that get paid to play football.

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:09 am**

Look, pastey little twigman, nobody really thinks CAL is a horrible team. Like many others, they're a decent little team, who manage to hang around the bottom half of the top 25 every once in awhile. That's about it. Usually nothing more, and routinely less.

If, in that in ren faire, fairy tale little world of yours, you want to believe CAL is anything more than that, fine. Cool. Indulge yourself. But if you really think your nightly mashings of the keyboard are going to convince ANYONE to agree with you, you're wasting valuable wind chime crafting time.

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:10 am**

m2, just to keep things clear here, you're still attempting to pimp Cal, on a CF BBS board loaded with fans of teams like USC, Michigan, Texas, OU, OSU, FSU and ND.

You know, teams that have actually won games in the month of January; games with the letters "BCS" as part of the title.

National titles, conference championships, major bowl wins and countless NFL stars.

You're pimping...Cal. Cal, of Taco Tech and Tennessee fame, and, well, little else.

Check that. Make it "nothing else". Cal has never won a big game in your lifetime. Even their ONE notable win, their double O.T. win against USC at home three years ago, hey, Cal managed to parlay that win into precisely nothing.

You're a funny guy and all and I often enjoy your goofball shtick but make no mistake, pimping for Cal means you're pretty much insane.

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:14 am**

Van wrote:m2, just to keep things clear here, you're still attempting to pimp Cal, on a CF BBS board loaded with fans of teams like USC, Michigan, Texas, OU, OSU, FSU and ND.

You know, teams that have actually won games in the month of January; games with the letters "BCS" as part of the title.

National titles, conference championships, major bowl wins and countless NFL stars.

You're pimping...Cal. Cal, of Taco Tech and Tennessee fame, and, well, little else. Check that.

Nothing else. Cal has never won a big game in your lifetime.

You're a funny guy and all and I often enjoy your goofball shtick but make no mistake, pimping for Cal means you're pretty much insane.

Vannie, once again you can't shut your trap long enough to read... and continue to make yourself out to be the dork you are...

m2 wrote:
Van wrote:
3-1, no major wins in your lifetime
Van, your stupidity is reaching Crown25 levels...

Did we not beat you in 2003, when you claimed to have won the MNC???

We also did this with students ...and not thugs that get paid to play football.

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:17 am**

Check that. Make it "nothing else". Cal has never won a big game in your lifetime. Even their ONE notable win, their double O.T. win against USC at home three years ago, hey, Cal managed to parlay that win into precisely nothing.

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:20 am**

Mikey wrote:I hate to break it to you Van but m2's right, assuming he means the number of games played.

Everyone... but Vannie got it!

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:35 am**

Portland St

Meaningless individual statistics

Adrian Peterson is better than any Cal back, ever. Yes, even Russell White :chuckle:

Tennessee

Portland St.

Taco Tech

Portland St

Zero national championships in your lifetime

Zero top five finishes in your lifetime

Zero Heismans in your lifetime

Zero BCS Bowl Game wins

Have you even won any Rose Bowls in your lifetime??

Relatively homely cheerleaders

Gayest fight song in the land

Little Brother UC university that stole your girl, your song, your lunch and any chance of glory

Less revered academically than your rival across the Bay. Less successful athletically overall too

So many asskickings over the years at the hands of USC that you reflexively bend over and spread 'em at the mere sight of cardinal and gold

Portland St
Taco Tech
Tennessee

Abject failure, always, over and over, whenever the lights are brightest

Cal=Redheaded step child of the Pac 10

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:48 am**

The Vannie melt... is in overdrive....

Let me take it up a notch.

Pac 10 Player of the Week for 2 of the first 4 weeks!

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:34 am**

You call that "taking it up a notch"?? You really are...Cal Fan!!

:-)

Hey, maybe he can even get his name and face inscribed on a little wooden plaque above "September 23rd"...

You can hang it up there in your empty trophy case in your version of Heritage Hall. You know, the utility room beneath Pete Newell Court, or whatever it's called...

"Player Of The Week"...twice!! Really? Twice?? Sweet!

-NoCal

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:54 am**

It's funny watching Vannie melt...

You could ask the guy what time is it?...

...and he'd start talking about pluto and saturn, and how they'd never be offered a scholarship to $C.

Classic shit!

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:39 pm**

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:The only poll that matters...

Wow. Just, wow. Fucking rack that

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:08 pm**

m2 wrote:Vannie, once again you can't shut your trap long enough to read... and continue to make yourself out to be the dork you are...

You just called someone a dork and then claim Van is melting? Dork? Are you serious? Is that really the best you can come up with. OK, whatever, player of the week.

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 7:21 pm**

Killian wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:The only poll that matters...

Wow. Just, wow. Fucking rack that

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2006 8:37 pm**

RACK Mgo for that one...

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 7:17 am**

http://www.pac-10.org/sports/m-footbl/s ... fldrs.html

Rushing:
#1 Jonathon Stewart, 114 yards per game. 7.9 yards per carry
#3 Marshawn Lynch, 111 yards per game, 7.0 yards per carry

Passing:
#1 Dennis Dixon, 258 yards per game
#2 Nate Longshore, 244.2 yards per game

Total Offense:
#1 Dennis Dixon, 286.5 yards per game
#4 Nate Longshore, 237.4 yards per game

Recieving:
#1 Jaison Williams, 115.5 yards per game
#2 DeSean Jackson, 89.0 yards per game

M2 wrote:Stop crying duck fan...you should have one loss, but you don't. Be happy about that, since the next game you play will be your first loss.

Nice Call, bitch. Please, pretty fucking please, give me another fearless Oregon loss prediction against Cal this week!

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 4:38 pm**

JayDuck wrote: #1 Jonathon Stewart, 114 yards per game. 7.9 yards per carry

Not bad for a guy who's only played one full game all season, and has missed 6 quarters out of a possible 24 with injuries.

And he hasn't even had the chance to pad his stats against Portland State...yet.

Speaking of...gotta give some props to Portland State. A once proud program in the also-ran divisions, they took a big dive after joining the Big Sky. Unfortunately, they lost to 1AA powerhouse Montana over the weekend. But, their OOC schedule this season is:

D1 doormat New Mexico (W)

D1 top 25 Cal (L-blowout)

D1 top 25 Oregon(will be a L-blowout).

Pretty funny that a 1AA team that's in the rebuilding process has a tougher OOC schedule than any SEC team, all road games.

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:11 pm**

JayDuck wrote:Nice Call, bitch. Please, pretty fucking please, give me another fearless Oregon loss prediction against Cal this week!

I doubt it. m2 will be on a hiatus for awhile.

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:17 pm**

Killian wrote: I doubt it. m2 will be on a hiatus for awhile.

If he isn't, I have a hunch that there's at least one person on here who might hit him up for a sig bet.

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:18 pm**

Dins, check out the OOC schedules of Rice and Troy.

In one three week stretch Rice played roadies at UCLA, Texas and Florida State.

Rice.

Troy was just about the same, with Florida State, Georgia Tech and Nebraska.

Mind boggling.

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:20 pm**

Killian wrote:
JayDuck wrote:Nice Call, bitch. Please, pretty fucking please, give me another fearless Oregon loss prediction against Cal this week!
I doubt it. m2 will be on a hiatus for awhile.

What's that all about? Really, where has m2 been this week? Banned? Suspended? Wha' happened?

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:23 pm**

Troy and Rice don't have trumped up "legend" status to protect.

But props to Portland State, for finally acknowledging that Cal and Oregon have elevated themselves to where they have earned a visit from the Vikings OOC. We're all just lucky that Portland State has now lent validity to Oregon's prior BCS appearences by granting them a game.

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:24 pm**

Van wrote:Mind boggling.

Not really. These schools generate a lot of dollars from playing these games. The OOC genius that is Van, of all people, should know this. These schools have scheduled like this for years, and will continue to do so.

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:30 pm**

Mgo, I'm not saying it's mind boggling that they scheduled those games. Obviously, we all know why they do it.

I just think those are two mind boggling three game roadies.

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:31 pm**

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:These schools generate a lot of dollars from playing these games.

Wha?

I resent any implications that suggest that Oregon might be pandering to financial interests by playing a "at-home and at-our-home" with Portland State....the largest school in the state which resides downtown in the largest city in the state, where the bulk of Oregon's ~~finacial base~~ fan base resides...

It's not true. It's all about the spirit of competition. Sure, there may be evidence to the contrary...sure, both games are in Autzen, rather than the 20,000 seat building Portland State plays in...

But it's all about the football.

Oregon playing Portland State, I can understand...may not approve, but I can certainly understand it...it's about the money. Cal? I'm not sure what the motivation is, outside of the easy W. Who in the city of Portland does Cal need to impress?

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:34 pm**

I won money on Oregon covering this Sat, with what was essentially a pick'em over ASU.

What the fuck were the oddsmakers smoking on that one? The idea is to get people to pick 50/50, not 100% in favor of one team.

May go with them again against CAL. I'm assuming that'll be close to a pick'em too.

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:35 pm**

Van wrote:What's that all about? Really, where has m2 been this week? Banned? Suspended? Wha' happened?

He decided to spam the fourm and post some PM's. He's in time out.

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:36 pm**

Who in the city of Portland does Cal need to impress?

Tennessee Fan wrote:Me.

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:49 pm**

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: May go with them again against CAL. I'm assuming that'll be close to a pick'em too.

I have no idea what's going to go on in the oddsmakers' heads, but looking at the Sagarins, which are about as accurate as horoscopes IMO, Oregon should get about 1.5 at Cal.

Lead-pipe that one. Not a big fan of road favorites, but if it's within a couple of points, and there a significant disparity between home-crowd-population-bases, then they're alright.

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:53 pm**

Go Aflac!

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:57 pm**

M2 may have singlehandedly affected the betting line on this game...no easy task for one man.

But his efforts to make the entire CFB world root for team Anyone-But-Cal surely must have produced at least a little bump on the CFB landscape.

Normally, I'd automatically pull for Cal over Washington...but now, I'm more inclined to put my rooting interest behind a giant meteor hitting the stadium during the opening kickoff.

Posted: **Mon Oct 02, 2006 6:54 pm**

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:May go with them again against CAL. I'm assuming that'll be close to a pick'em too.

Holy smokes, just saw the spread...Oregon gets 5.5.

Stone cold, lead pipe, Fort Knox action, right there.

T1B

Wow. NL = #1 QB, ML = #1 RB and DeSean = #1 WR...