Wow. NL = #1 QB, ML = #1 RB and DeSean = #1 WR...

M2 · Post by M2 » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:00 am

in the Pac-10 right now:

The Revolution is here

This has to be a good sign.

...and the number 1 DB is Hughes with 5 INTs...next best is 2.

Dinsdale · Post by **Dinsdale** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:07 am

So, Lynch is 124 yards ahead of Johnathan Stewart, and Jackson is 46 yards ahead of Jaison Williams...after playing one more full game than those guys?

Empty-BODE, much?

M2 · Post by M2 » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:13 am

Dinsdale wrote:So, Lynch is 124 yards ahead of Johnathan Stewart, and Jackson is 46 yards ahead of Jaison Williams...after playing one more full game than those guys?

Empty-BODE, much?

Cal is a monster.

Mr T · Post by **Mr T** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:19 am

Unless this is a fantasy football board....

The only stat that matters is....

3-1

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:21 am

Mr T wrote:Unless this is a fantasy football board....

The only stat that matters is....

0-1, away from Berkeley, just as everybody was expecting.

Yup.

Shoalzie · Post by **Shoalzie** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:01 pm

Yawn...

Sincerely,
undefeated teams

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 2:08 pm

At this point it looks like you may be playing Nebraska for the MOLNC (Mythical One-Loss National Championship).

JayDuck · Post by **JayDuck** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 4:39 pm

Dinsdale wrote:So, Lynch is 124 yards ahead of Johnathan Stewart, and Jackson is 46 yards ahead of Jaison Williams...after playing one more full game than those guys?

Empty-BODE, much?

Lynch has played 2 games more than Stewart, by the way.

Lynch is the most overrated player in the country also, by the way.

M2 · Post by M2 » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:03 pm

JayDuck wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:So, Lynch is 124 yards ahead of Johnathan Stewart, and Jackson is 46 yards ahead of Jaison Williams...after playing one more full game than those guys?

Empty-BODE, much?
Lynch is the most overrated player in the country also, by the way.

delusional duck fan is back.

NAME CAR YDS YPC TD
Jonathan Stewart 46 315 6.8 4

NAME CAR YDS YPC TD
Marshawn Lynch 62 449 7.2 3

Lynch had a 190 yards rushing against you with 8 in the box, and you say he's overrated?

Enjoy your loss next week to ASU.

JayDuck · Post by **JayDuck** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:11 pm

m2 wrote:

Lynch had a 190 yards rushing against you with 8 in the box, and you say he's overrated?

Yes

Enjoy your loss next week to ASU.

Okay

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:15 pm

m2 wrote:...and the number 1 DB is Hughes with 5 INTs...next best is 2.

I don't know where you are finding this, but I know Trae Williams has 4.

M2 · Post by M2 » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:20 pm

MuchoBulls wrote:
m2 wrote:...and the number 1 DB is Hughes with 5 INTs...next best is 2.
I don't know where you are finding this, but I know Trae Williams has 4.

Ummm, in the link I posted.

We are talking about the Pac 10 by the way.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:22 pm

Is this really what it comes down to for Pac10Fan? Arguing over rushing statistics?

Do your weekly matchups really bore you that much?

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:26 pm

m2 wrote:We are talking about the Pac 10 by the way.

So you have some statistical leaders in a second rate conference that has one great team?

Props, I guess.

JayDuck · Post by **JayDuck** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:36 pm

This really is probably the lamest gloat ever posted on the board.

Cal has played 4 games, unlike the rest of the conference.

Oregon has only played 3 games.
UCLA has only played 3 games
Oregon State has only played 3 games.
USC has only played 3 games.

Congratz on having some stat leaders, when half of the conference has only played 75% of the games that you have.

Fucking weak, tool. Even for you.

Killian · Post by **Killian** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:40 pm

JayDuck wrote:This really is probably the lamest gloat ever posted on the board.

Cal has played 4 games, unlike the rest of the conference.

To be fair, Cal has only played 3 games also. They didn't get the memo that the season started for them on September 2nd, not 9th.

GreginPG · Post by **GreginPG** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:43 pm

JayDuck wrote:This really is probably the lamest gloat ever posted on the board.

Cal has played 4 games, unlike the rest of the conference.

Oregon has only played 3 games.
UCLA has only played 3 games
Oregon State has only played 3 games.
USC has only played 3 games.

Congratz on having some stat leaders, when half of the conference has only played 75% of the games that you have.

Fucking weak, tool. Even for you.

Yeah but that's never stopped her before.
I know you know this.

M2 · Post by M2 » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:46 pm

Stop crying duck fan...you should have one loss, but you don't. Be happy about that, since the next game you play will be your first loss.

By the way.

Qb ratings and yards per carry have nothing to do with games played.

GreginPG · Post by **GreginPG** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:52 pm

m2 wrote:
JayDuck wrote:
Dinsdale wrote:So, Lynch is 124 yards ahead of Johnathan Stewart, and Jackson is 46 yards ahead of Jaison Williams...after playing one more full game than those guys?

Empty-BODE, much?
Lynch is the most overrated player in the country also, by the way.
delusional duck fan is back.

NAME CAR YDS YPC TD
Jonathan Stewart 46 315 6.8 4

NAME CAR YDS YPC TD
Marshawn Lynch 62 449 7.2 3

Holy SHIT!

Dude is rushing for nearly 14.5 inches more per carry!!!!

We are all in awe!

JayDuck · Post by **JayDuck** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 6:53 pm

m2 wrote:Stop crying duck fan...you should have one loss, but you don't. Be happy about that, since the next game you play will be your first loss.

There is nobody on this board that is as consistantly wrong as you are, so that make me feel pretty good about this weekend. I can't wait for you to predict a Cal win over Oregon next week too.

MuchoBulls · Post by **MuchoBulls** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 7:18 pm

m2 wrote:
MuchoBulls wrote:
m2 wrote:...and the number 1 DB is Hughes with 5 INTs...next best is 2.
I don't know where you are finding this, but I know Trae Williams has 4.

Ummm, in the link I posted.

We are talking about the Pac 10 by the way.

That would explain it

L45B · Post by **L45B** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 8:41 pm

mTurd wrote:...you should have one loss, but you don't.

Riiiiight. And Kal should have zero losses, if it weren't for those 3 plays against Tennessee.

Van · Post by **Van** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 8:49 pm

m2 wrote:Qb ratings and yards per carry have nothing to do with games played.

Really? Then how else are we to arrive at those stats, if not by games played?

Are we to go by haircuts, or nice smiles, or home game scrimmages against Portland St?

Nah. I think we need to go by "games played"...all of 'em.

Mikey · Post by **Mikey** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:43 pm

I hate to break it to you Van but m2's right, assuming he means the number of games played.

Adelpiero · Post by **Adelpiero** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:51 pm

what a bunch of short sighted twats. neither one of the rb's mentioned have numbers close to these.(ps he had over 200 yards of offense against Ohio st)

garrett wolfe 96 att 828 yards 207.4 per/game 8.6 per carry

this kid is the real deal, he's running against 8 in the box, and dominating.

WolverineSteve · Post by **WolverineSteve** » Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:10 pm

^^True. The guy was a beast when UM played him last year.

M2 · Post by M2 » Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:33 am

Mikey wrote:I hate to break it to you Van but m2's right, assuming he means the number of games played.

Don't ever ask Van to understand what everyone else did. He's to busy typing to ever read and comprehend.

Adelpiero wrote:what a bunch of short sighted twats. neither one of the rb's mentioned have numbers close to these.(ps he had over 200 yards of offense against Ohio st)

garrett wolfe 96 att 828 yards 207.4 per/game 8.6 per carry

First we have MuchoBulls who can't read... now we have Adelpiero.

Amazing.... let me help you out here.

The Pac 10!!!

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:39 am

Mikey, m2, in order for any player to compile stats he must first play in games. So, yeah, games played matters like crazy in terms of YPC and such.

Within those games played are all sorts of factors which skew the stats, least among them being the quality level of the opponent and their effect on your stats.

Sincerely,
Portland St

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:36 am

You mean you have to actually play games in order to produce stats?

Sin,

m2's football "career"

M2 · Post by M2 » Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:09 am

Van wrote:Mikey, m2, in order for any player to compile stats he must first play in games. So, yeah, games played matters like crazy in terms of YPC and such.

Within those games played are all sorts of factors which skew the stats, least among them being the quality level of the opponent and their effect on your stats.

Sincerely,
Portland St

Hmmm... Portland State is rated higher than 60% of every Div. I team in the country by the computer. They beat New Mexico by the same amount as Missouri. Missouri has a chance to take the Big 12 north.

That's right... Portland State is rated by the computer, well above Arkansas(the team $C played)!!!

Would you like to take another angle... Mr. Know it all???

Van, you really don't know shit about football... do you???

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:25 am

m2, really, just STFU.

"The computer..."???

Yeah.

Portland St isn't even ranked, in either major poll. They couldn't be ranked. Portland St isn't even a D-1A team. Marshawn played against a D-1AA team so yeah, which games you play has a lot to do with your YPC and any other individual stats.

There isn't a person on this board who'd take Marshawn over Adrian Peterson..and there's a LOT of people here who hate OU.

M2 · Post by M2 » Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:31 am

Van wrote:m2, you're correct...Portland State is ranked above Arkansas on the computer.

Cool...your brain has reached your keyboard.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:38 am

m2,

Smack aside, where's the link to this "computer" that has Arkansas behind Portland St? The only significant computer poll is the BCS, and we all know that hasn't come out yet. And when it does, these teams will have no part in it.

Shit, your boy Jeff Sagarin has Arkansas ahead of Portland St by 19 spots, so you can't play that card.

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:54 am

Obviously m2 has his own 'puter, with his own 'puter rankings.

M2 · Post by M2 » Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:55 am

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:m2,

Smack aside, where's the link to this "computer" that has Arkansas behind Portland St? The only significant computer poll is the BCS, and we all know that hasn't come out yet. And when it does, these teams will have no part in it.

Shit, your boy Jeff Sagarin has Arkansas ahead of Portland St by 19 spots, so you can't play that card.

Look at Sagarin's... ranking of teams, prior to Portland State vs. Cal in week 3. $C had already played Arkansas.

Arkansas(last week) beat a horrible Alabama team that was ranked the #22 team in the country and almost lost to Hawaii. This is why they may have been bumped up this week.

Like I said.... Portland State beat New Mexico by the same amount as Missouri did. And Missouri has a good chance to take the north in the Big 12. Arkansas will be lucky, not to be last in the SEC.

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:58 am

You played Portland St.

You got bikini waxed by Tennessee.

Win something of some import, in our lifetimes, not Joe Kapp's.

M2 · Post by M2 » Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:02 am

Van wrote:You played Portland St.

You got bikini waxed by Tennessee.

Who the fuck has $C played???

Shit, you only beat Arizona by 17 and scored only 20 points!

20 points against Arizona???

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:15 am

Look, Hump Dumpling...

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt06.htm

Your own linked Harris poll shows USC having a higher SOS than Cal.

#9, to Cal's #11.

Bottom line, you played one good team and you went Ned Beatty against 'em. Other than that you played all home games and one of 'em was against a D-1AA team. SOS really doesn't count in your favor when you got blown out in the one game that gave you your decent SOS ranking.

Jeez.

Beyond that, you're still nothing but Cal. You remain the perennial Do Nothing When It Matters team.

You don't really wanna try to be a Cal Fan who runs smack at USC, do you??

Cal isn't even UCLA.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial · Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:16 am

The only poll that matters...

Van · Post by **Van** » Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:22 am

:-)

Mgo, bump Marshawn's YPC up a slot and add "Pics I Pulled Off The Web Of C- Carnie 'Hotties' I Never Fucked Anyway"...

T1B

Wow. NL = #1 QB, ML = #1 RB and DeSean = #1 WR...

Wow. NL = #1 QB, ML = #1 RB and DeSean = #1 WR...

Re: Wow. NL = #1 QB, ML = #1 RB and DeSean = #1 WR...

Re: Wow. NL = #1 QB, ML = #1 RB and DeSean = #1 WR...

Re: Wow. NL = #1 QB, ML = #1 RB and DeSean = #1 WR...

Re: Wow. NL = #1 QB, ML = #1 RB and DeSean = #1 WR...