T1B

Jsc810 wrote:If there was a playoff, then the championship game wouldn't be such an issue.

That depends on the makeup of the playoff system. If we had an 8-team playoff that rewarded conference champions, then the Pac-10 adding a cash game would still be pointless and could only do harm to a team like '07 Oregon.

If we had a 16-team playoff then championship games, out-of-conference games, conference games, ALL games wouldn't be an issue. It would basically be like college basketball. Each conference could even have a mini-conference tournament in December and the games would be just as meaningless as the regular season games, since basically the same top 16 teams would spit out in the end anyways.

Dinsdale wrote:Nice diversionary tactic, WW.

The fact remains that Oregon has still beaten a top 25 team OOC.

Michigan???? Nice.


All of this bellowing about who "deserves" to play in the NC game is hilarious. Let's play the last three weeks and see what happens........and like it or not, if Kansas wins out they will play in the NC game.......and they'll deserve it as much as anybody else. I think Kansas was unlucky to miss Texas this year....they would have defeated Texas. Fuggit, whoever plays in the NC game deserves it and whoever gets left out deserves it. This is the idiotic system that all the colleges wanted and this is what they've got. I don't feel sorry for any of 'em.........

TREX wrote:Gotta ask vs what competition?

52nd rated SOS?

Yeah....way to blow up those numbers vs crap teams.....you gave up 41 to the best team you played.

Again, not buying what you're trying to sell.

I know my avatar is different but, christ TREX, how can you mistake my allegiance? OU fan here, not Mizzou fan.

Everything you pointed out is why I would still favor Oregon or LSU over Missouri. All I'm saying is I know a good team when I see one and Missouri is very good. If the Oregon or LSU players took Missouri as lightly as some on this board do, they would soon be bleeding from the mouth and/or anus.

And by the way......I think the Kansas and Missouri offenses compare quite favorably to Oregon's.......

New Orleans is no f-ing neutral field!

Shine wrote:1-LSU, again they’d be my pick on a neutral field
2-Oregon, but again just barely over the Ducks
3-Oklahoma
4-Kansas, if they beat Mizzou and OU they’ll be deserving of a title shot
5-Missouri
6-Georgia
7-West Virginia
8-Arizona St
9-Clemson
10-Ohio St
11-USC
12-Texas
13-Virginia Tech
14-Virginia
15-Florida
16-Hawaii, only the 0 losses keeps them here as they are a fraud team

War Stoops wrote:I know my avatar is different but, christ TREX, how can you mistake my allegiance?

In his case, it doesn't take much. Shiny objects will pretty much do it.

L45B wrote: Why should the Pac-10 conform when its system of determining a champion is the best out there?

They don't have to conform, and nobody is saying that they should. At least not by moi.

Whose ox is being gored here?

1. LSU
2. Oregon
3. OU
4. WV
5. KU
6. Mizzou
7. OSU
8. Georgia
9. USC
10. ASU
11. Va Tech
12. Virginia
13. Texas
14. Clemson
15. Hawaii