T1B

I dont understand going back 50 to 100 years to compare the strength of teams made up of 18-21 year old players, even going back 20 years is too much. Shit we might as well get Princeton fan in here running scoreboard on everyone cause 100 years ago every school was their bitch.
5-10 years back is far enough and in the last 10 years, USC is 4-0 vs the SEC and 3 of those games were blow outs including both times USC went to SEC stadiums, SEC teams are 1-6 on the road vs the Pac this decade, theres no mystery to the reason they play all their OOC games at home, a sorry ass conference like the Pac has kicked the shit out of them when SEC teams had the balls to get on a plane.

Is this person for real? Do you think that it's USC or Auburn thats been ducking another home and home series? Lets take a look at the OOC schedules of each team since they last met

2004
Auburn
Louisiana Monroe @ home
The Citadel @ home 1AA
Louisiana Tech @ home

USC
Virginia Tech in Landover Maryland
Colorado State @ home
@ BYU
Notre Dame @ home

2005
Auburn
Georgia Tech @ home
Ball State @ home
Western Kentucky @ home 1AA

USC
@ Hawaii
Arkansas @ home
@ Notre Dame
Fresno State @ home

2006
Auburn
Washington State @ home
Buffalo @ home
Tulane @ home
Arkansas State @ home

USC
@ Arkansas
Nebraska @ home
Notre Dame @ home

2007
Auburn
Kansas State @ home
South Florida @ home
New Mexico State @ home
Tennessee Tech @ home 1AA

USC
Idaho @ home
@ Nebraska
@ Notre Dame

Yeah its obvious that USC is the team ducking home and homes

Auburn has played 14 games, all of them at home and have played as many 1AA teams (3) as they have played BCS conf teams
USC has played 14 games, 7 of them on the road and have played 9 BCS teams with 0 1AA teams

and dont give me your meat grinder bullshit, there hasnt been a team in that SEC conference that has even kept it close to USC this century, at their place or in LA

This is my last semester at ASU, and I think the Georgia game will be the first time I'm out-and-out rooting for them to win. God help me...

what matters to me is we are in a new era of college bowls...

the worst thing that happened last year was the fucking Rose Bowl protecting the tradition and taking Illinois over UGA or some other high profile team to take on USC in the Rose Bowl...ILL was pretty deece but they were Cap One or Outback material...

fuck you Rose Bowl asshats...had you taken fucking UGA or something or worked out some deal things would have been different...I am sick of this rose bowl tradition...I want the best fucking matchups available...to me OU v Va Tech, KU v Hawaii, USC v UGA, and whatever else would have been better matchups for the bowls...instead we got what that shit was and it sucked...yes and that includes travelling to the bayou to watch tOSU get beat...

FUCK OFF rose bowl tradition...yes I am in game mood, angry, and ready to get on my plane to LAX...FUCK...friday morning can't get here soon enough...

Jsc810 wrote: ... the Pac-10 is 8-4 in BCS bowl games and has won 1 national championship.

You do realize that simply denying the existence of SC's 2003 national championship isn't going to make it go away, right?

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:This is my last semester at ASU, and I think the Georgia game will be the first time I'm out-and-out rooting for them to win. God help me...

i know how that goes. i had season tix at Folsom in section 117 for 5 years and two degrees from CU. but, i just couldn't turn the corner to even pull for them in an unqualified way 95% of the time.

in fact it was more fun to antagonize my buddies....

KC,

What do you teach at Colorado? I understand if you don't want to get into it here, just curious.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:KC,

What do you teach at Colorado? I understand if you don't want to get into it here, just curious.

Media Studies and Telecom Policy (mostly history of). i teach in the Advertising sequence sometimes in the summer sessions.

Those same sorry ass Pac 10 teams that the SEC has gone 1-4 against (excluding USC) on the road this century? And Arkansas, Vanderbilt, Kentucky, South Carolina, Ole Miss, Miss State, Auburn, and Alabama have been just as piss poor as those Pac 10 team you have listed year in and year out. What was LSUs score vs Miss St last year?

The Rose Bowl chose Illinois last year to protect the BCS title game, dont buy that crap about tradition. A game between USC and Georgia would have rivaled the title game and may have swayed voters in to voting the winner of that game champion

The SEC's cream of the crop is probably better than other conferences in most years, but I don't think the conference top-to-bottom is as strong as SECHomer would like us to believe. Half of the conference's teams are bad-to-mediocre, just like most.

Those SEC chants are pretty damn silly. The fact they have that opportunity for tv time, and they sing for their conference over their own team...pretty odd.

Despite the common claims to SEC supremacy—the woofing by people like me—the Pac-10 is actually 10-6 in their last 16 matchups against the SEC.

More important, take away USC, and the Pac-10 is still 6-6. More important still, take away LSU, and the SEC is only 2-10 against the Pac-10.

Well, there goes the theory that it's just the PAC 1.


Game... Set... Match.


Could you imagine how many bowl teams the PAC 10 would have if they had 4 EASY wins to start every season and had to only win 2 conference games the rest of the year to be bowl eligible ???


typo edited:

Could you imagine how many bowl teams the PAC 10 would have if they had 4 EASY wins to start every season and had to only win 2 conference games the rest of the year to be bowl eligible ???

Could you imagine how many bowl teams the SEC teams would have every year if they all got to face Washington, Washington State, Stanford, Oregon State, and Cal every year??? All you need to do is schedule 3 crappy OOC games and that's 8 wins right there.

.m2 wrote:

Despite the common claims to SEC supremacy—the woofing by people like me—the Pac-10 is actually 10-6 in their last 16 matchups against the SEC.

More important, take away USC, and the Pac-10 is still 6-6. More important still, take away LSU, and the SEC is only 2-10 against the Pac-10.

The SEC is 2-10 against the PAC 10 ??? Without U$C and LSU....


Well, there goes the theory that it's just the PAC 1.


Game... Set... Match.


Could you imagine how many bowl teams the PAC 10 would have if they had 4 EASY wins to start every season and had to only win 2 conference games the rest of the year to be bowl eligible ???

Actually, the Pac 10 is 2-6 vs the SEC without counting the USC and LSU games but thanks for playing

The Pac wont get as many BCS bids now that the NCAA has gone to 12 games for everyone, while the majority of BCS conferences (everyone else) decided to use that 12th game as a home game pay day vs a buy a win program with no business in division 1a stadium, the Pac added a 9th conference game giving the collective 5 more losses. So on top of the ballsiest OOC scheduling of any BCS Conference (other than the eastern most school in the conference), the Pac is also the only conference where every team plays 9 home games.

SoCalTrjn wrote:

.m2 wrote:

Despite the common claims to SEC supremacy—the woofing by people like me—the Pac-10 is actually 10-6 in their last 16 matchups against the SEC.

More important, take away USC, and the Pac-10 is still 6-6. More important still, take away LSU, and the SEC is only 2-10 against the Pac-10.

The SEC is 2-10 against the PAC 10 ??? Without U$C and LSU....


Well, there goes the theory that it's just the PAC 1.


Game... Set... Match.


Could you imagine how many bowl teams the PAC 10 would have if they had 4 EASY wins to start every season and had to only win 2 conference games the rest of the year to be bowl eligible ???

Actually, the Pac 10 is 2-6 vs the SEC without counting the USC and LSU games but thanks for playing

Wrong.

The SEC is 2-6.... not the PAC 10.

SoCalTrjn wrote:the Pac is also the only conference where every team plays 9 home games.

Wrong again... toejam.

You may want to start over.

King Crimson wrote:

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:KC,

What do you teach at Colorado? I understand if you don't want to get into it here, just curious.

Media Studies and Telecom Policy (mostly history of). i teach in the Advertising sequence sometimes in the summer sessions.

Nice. I didn't realize that. My degree in in advertising. Brett Robbs is the man.

Conference debates - not everybody gets into it, but I think are one of the great things about CFB. Ripping on the AFC West just doesn't have the same effect for me.

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:Conference debates - not everybody gets into it, but I think are one of the great things about CFB. Ripping on the AFC West just doesn't have the same effect for me.

Do not concur. Ripping on the AFC Worst will never get old.


But I don't get the whole ''yeah my team may have sucked ass for the last 30 years but MY CONFERENCE IS THE SHIT!!!!!!!!' thing.



Then again, I'm not a Cal fan.

But I don't get the whole ''yeah my team may have sucked ass for the last 30 years but MY CONFERENCE IS THE SHIT!!!!!!!!' thing.

That right there sums up the Iowa State fan base. Oh sure, they always have a crappier record than Iowa but it's because the Big-12 is just so much tougher. They're really an awesome program, just ask them they'll tell you. Why are they awesome? Because the Big-12 is super awesome! So what if they have beaten exactly 1 team since 1993 that finished the season in the Top 25 (seriously, no joke)?? The Big-12 is unstoppable, so they are too because they're in the conference.

Gotta listen to this shit from Clone fans on a daily basis.

.m2 wrote:

SoCalTrjn wrote:

.m2 wrote:

The SEC is 2-10 against the PAC 10 ??? Without U$C and LSU....


Well, there goes the theory that it's just the PAC 1.


Game... Set... Match.


Could you imagine how many bowl teams the PAC 10 would have if they had 4 EASY wins to start every season and had to only win 2 conference games the rest of the year to be bowl eligible ???

Actually, the Pac 10 is 2-6 vs the SEC without counting the USC and LSU games but thanks for playing

Wrong.

The SEC is 2-6.... not the PAC 10.

SoCalTrjn wrote:the Pac is also the only conference where every team plays 9 home games.

Wrong again... toejam.

You may want to start over.

whoops, meant the Pac 10 was 6-2 vs the SEC without the 4-0 records that LSU and USC have and that only the Pac 10 teams play 9 conf games.... it was a long night

MiketheangrydrunkenCUfan wrote:

King Crimson wrote:

MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote:KC,

What do you teach at Colorado? I understand if you don't want to get into it here, just curious.

Media Studies and Telecom Policy (mostly history of). i teach in the Advertising sequence sometimes in the summer sessions.

Nice. I didn't realize that. My degree in in advertising. Brett Robbs is the man.

Brett is a good guy. Slayden is a little overconvinced he's the coolest cat around, but he's OK. They've hired a couple new people who are pretty interesting. i had a pretty good gig for a while when Brett and Slayden didn't want to teach the summer stuff. that's easy money. a semester's worth of coin in 5 weeks.

Papa Willie wrote:http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/boxscore?gameId=282570239

Yeah boy. That Pac10 is the best conference. :D

45-17 by BAYLOR??????

Washington. Washington State. Oregon State.

God damned Divsion 2 teams. Pathetic.

Wasn't Mtwat just telling us a couple of weeks ago (and by us I really mean me) how much more competitive Wazzu, Washington, and Stanford are than the bottom feeders in other conferences... especially the Big 12.

You can officially go have a meeting with the shower rod there twat boy.