T1B

Cuda wrote:

Looks like you are in full meltdown mode too.

Hope it works out for you.

Mikey wrote:

The prospect of an increase in the capital gains rate ahead could lead to a surge in revenue now as investors take their gains while the lower rate is in effect.

(I'm sort of wondering exactly which "gains" they're referring to.)

Mikey, it reads poorly to me, but I'm no financial wizard.

To me, the author is describing how investors will pull their money out, take the hit on whatever gains they might have on the LOW RATE, that exists now. Since investors will pull their money out of their investments and have to pay a tax on the "gain", there will be an upsurge in revenue. I.E. That money will be taxed NOW, at a lower rate, as opposed to ever being taxed later at a HIGHER rate. So before Obama can impose a higher tax, people will pull their money out, so it will never be taxed at Obama's higher rate. The net effect, according to my interpretation of the article is a lack of capital to grow business. Less jobs, and less raises. Bad for business, apparently.

mvscal wrote: I am exercising my right not to vote for either of these assclowns.

You forgot to call one of them a n..gger. You're slipping you vapid racist fuckhole.

it's only ok to use the word n...igger when you use it, right tvo?

Tom In VA wrote:

Mikey wrote:

The prospect of an increase in the capital gains rate ahead could lead to a surge in revenue now as investors take their gains while the lower rate is in effect.

(I'm sort of wondering exactly which "gains" they're referring to.)

Mikey, it reads poorly to me, but I'm no financial wizard.

To me, the author is describing how investors will pull their money out, take the hit on whatever gains they might have on the LOW RATE, that exists now. Since investors will pull their money out of their investments and have to pay a tax on the "gain", there will be an upsurge in revenue. I.E. That money will be taxed NOW, at a lower rate, as opposed to ever being taxed later at a HIGHER rate. So before Obama can impose a higher tax, people will pull their money out, so it will never be taxed at Obama's higher rate. The net effect, according to my interpretation of the article is a lack of capital to grow business. Less jobs, and less raises. Bad for business, apparently.

That's the theory. But, as mvscal is too blindingly ignorant to figure out, with the market at it's lowest value in about 5 years there are very few "gains" to pull out.

Mikey,

Depends on when you got "in", I suppose.

If you've "gained" $1,000 over the years and then lost $900 due to the recent meltdown, you have still "gained".

Also, I'm not sure if people are taxed for capital gains if they move money out of the market into other investements or not.

While I understand the hair you've split here, I find it immaterial. Your critique doesn't seem to refute the argument that high taxes on capital gains disuade investment in certain areas - areas that are good for business, good for government revenue, and good for people who get jobs.

Is there empirical data that suggests an increase in capital gains taxes is GOOD for the economy ?

mvscal wrote:I haven't pissed away any rights, dumbfuck. I am exercising my right not to vote for either of these assclowns.

As I have already stated, I as well, am not voting for either McCain or Obama. Yet, I am still voting.

You have said that you haven't voted for POTUS since pappy Bush. That's a lonnnng time to not vote.

If that isn't pissing away your right, nothing is. Go ahead and spin it however you care to, you are part of the problem. All talk, no action.

Pathetic.

mvscal wrote:

Cuda wrote:it's only ok to use the word n...igger when you use it, right tvo?

When did I ever say it was wrong to USE the word? What is not ok is to try and use it as a sword by calling someone a ni..gger. In mvsKKal case over and over and over. That's what vile racist fuckstains do. People like you guys.

I get that neither of you can read, but you might want to try it just this once. That way you have a chance of forming a coherent retort.

mvscal wrote:And, given his unsavory personal associations, I have to conclude that this is plan is deliberate and malicious in intent.

I though it was your belief that it was due to his genes. You are PROUD to be a racist right?

Tom In VA wrote: Also, I'm not sure if people are taxed for capital gains if they move money out of the market into other investements or not.

Then you are too ignorant to even comment on the subject.

Kierland wrote:

mvscal wrote: Try reading between the lines someday...

So you can't read, but you want me to know how to read stuff that isn't there?
You are in full meltdown mode as election day nears.
Now go fuck yourself you vile racist fuckstain.

after you actually learn to read in the first place of course.

IKYABWAI smack.

Yeah. He cant read. Thats how he posts on a message board.
FUCKING. STUPID. Ni663r Lover.
I hope your mom gets raped by a giant mandingo cock in every orifice.
Again

Kierland wrote:

Tom In VA wrote: Also, I'm not sure if people are taxed for capital gains if they move money out of the market into other investements or not.

Then you are too ignorant to even comment on the subject.

Haven't offered any comments. I have fully disclosed my lack of knowledge on the subject and maintain an open mind in order to address that ignorance. I've also asked questions of those who have offered comments, presuming, they do know.


Now how about you offer up a take about the issue and stop sucking, if you are so knowledgeable. I'm prepared to read and be enlightened.

The floor is yours counselor.

Quaking Queirland should be what that swollen, puffy cunt should change his name to

Kierland wrote:

Tom In VA wrote: Also, I'm not sure if people are taxed for capital gains if they move money out of the market into other investements or not.

Then you are too ignorant to even comment on the subject.

we know what motivates you to vote, tvo

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27455136/

Free sex toys — and much more — for voting... etc, etc,

you seem more like a "silver bullet" kind of guy, though

Jsc810 wrote:McCain 298
Obama 240

http://www.electoral-vote.com

So, McCain will be sweeping Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, Indiana, Missouri, Arizona, Colorado, Arkansas, Nevada, New Mexico, Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota? Allrighty, then . . .

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Jsc810 wrote:McCain 298
Obama 240

http://www.electoral-vote.com

So, McCain will be sweeping Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, Indiana, Missouri, Arizona, Colorado, Arkansas, Nevada, New Mexico, Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota? Allrighty, then . . .

Nope. Sauron will probably take Colorado and New Mexico.

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Jsc810 wrote:McCain 298
Obama 240

http://www.electoral-vote.com

So, McCain will be sweeping Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, Indiana, Missouri, Arizona, Colorado, Arkansas, Nevada, New Mexico, Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota? Allrighty, then . . .

McCain’s campaign manager Rick Davis said Sunday on ABC News that if suburban and rural voters “haven’t bought into the Obama massage … they’re probably not gonna.”

In a conference call with reporters this weekend, Davis said, "We're pretty jazzed up about what we're seeing in the movement in this election."

"We are witnessing, I believe," he said, "probably one of the greatest comebacks that you've seen since John McCain won the [Republican] primary."

I'm assuming that he means the Republican nomination. Which would make this an extremely amazing comeback, considering that it happened way back in....September.

Mikey wrote:

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Jsc810 wrote:McCain 298
Obama 240

http://www.electoral-vote.com

So, McCain will be sweeping Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, Indiana, Missouri, Arizona, Colorado, Arkansas, Nevada, New Mexico, Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota? Allrighty, then . . .

McCain’s campaign manager Rick Davis said Sunday on ABC News that if suburban and rural voters “haven’t bought into the Obama massage … they’re probably not gonna.”

In a conference call with reporters this weekend, Davis said, "We're pretty jazzed up about what we're seeing in the movement in this election."

"We are witnessing, I believe," he said, "probably one of the greatest comebacks that you've seen since John McCain won the [Republican] primary."

I'm assuming that he means the Republican nomination.

When you assume you make an ass of you and Terry.

Oh wait, you were Dems already. Nevermind.

Rasputin wrote:
When you assume you make an ass of you and Terry.

Oh wait, you were Dems already. Nevermind.

God and GOD you're funny.

Or at least you might seem so to a 5 year old.

Election predictions.

Rob Long-
To be succinct, I would say this about the election: Build an ark.

Rasputin wrote:
Rob Long

Your favorite pron star?

Mikey wrote:

Rasputin wrote:
Rob Long

Your favorite pron star?

Mikey wrote:God and GOD you're funny.

Or at least you might seem so to a 5 year old.

IKYABWAI?

My, your originality knows no bounds.

Mikey wrote:My, your originality knows no bounds.

About time someone recognized.

Do the right thing, S_M.

First you have ACORN commiting massive voter fraud.

Then Obamessiah ensures that his donations can't be tracked so he gets unlimited funds.

What's next, Black Panthers intimidating voters?

As if that wasn't enough, you can always count on CBS to call the race before the polls close.

Democracy in action. Ain't it grand?

Rasputin wrote:First you have ACORN commiting massive voter fraud.

How does it feel to be a braindead spamming fucktard?
Have you ever been right about ANYTHING?

Kierland wrote:

Rasputin wrote:First you have ACORN commiting massive voter fraud.

How does it feel to be a braindead spamming fucktard?
Have you ever been right about ANYTHING?

Nice projection, cock snorkeling faggot

MadRussian wrote:

Kierland wrote:

Rasputin wrote:First you have ACORN commiting massive voter fraud.

How does it feel to be a braindead spamming fucktard?
Have you ever been right about ANYTHING?

Nice projection, cock snorkeling faggot

Clever variation on IKYABWAI. Well, not really.