T1B

Van wrote:mvscal, don't intentionally be a dumbass. The game being played at all was a farce, yes, but Texas didn't treat it like it didn't matter, since they were forced to hang their national title hopes on winning it. That game was life or death for Texas, and they were literally one second from losing it to a four loss team who lost at home to Iowa freaking St.

You're better than that, so take that weak piss outta here.

Nebraska's defense gave up 9 points in that ISU game. The Clowns had just 1 drive the entire game. Nebraska was -8 in the turnover battle. The fact that they only lost by 2 points in a game where they were -8 shows just how dominant their defense is. Let's give some fucking credit to somebody other than USC once in a while. Nebraska's defense has the ability to, on any given day, do just that to any team out there. They might lose to teams like ISU and get pounded by Taco Tech, but they have the ability to shut you down as well. That's what they did to Texas. If they play that well on defense, they will do that to any team.

Mace, beat Ohio St, try not to scabdick at home against D1-AA and Sunbelt teams, don't get killed by USC in the only meaningful game in Iowa's last decade, and see if you can maybe win a single Rose Bowl before you die.

Until then, shut the fuck up. You're just Iowa, and USC's worst team in recent memory still beat your champion, in their own house.

You're just fucking Iowa, and you're every bit as bland, useless and irrelevant as they are.

Am I the only one that think it's hilarious Van is criticizing teams for scabdicking, losing, or nearly losing to average/lousy teams considering he's the one that claims USC deserves the 2003 national title despite the fact that they lost to a 6-6 football team coached by Jeff Tedford??

It's hilarious how much of a hypocrite he is. Quite literally, he proves some sort of hypocrisy in at least 75% of his posts. It's quite comical to watch, in fact.

Van wrote:Mace, which part of "USC in a Rose Bowl would kill Iowa" is so hard for you to understand? That's what I said: USC in a Rose Bowl.

you wonder why you're a fucking sociopath. here, let me try:

the detroit lions, were they super bowl champions this year, would win at least four games.

your implication was usc would roll iowa. the only thing they'd do against iowa is roll over and ask if the top half of the pac 10 could be the front end of an eiffel tower.

Rack this thread!

don't get killed by USC in the only meaningful game in Iowa's last decade

Iowa has played a handful of more important games than the USC game since then, dipshit. That was a fucking bowl game. Since when are bowl games more meaningful than games that determine conference championships and/or are against big rivals?

Winning a bowl game is nice, but winning conference championships is much more important.

mvscal wrote:

Van wrote:Texas didn't treat it like it didn't matter, since they were forced to hang their national title hopes on winning it. That game was life or death for Texas,

Go ahead and send that postcard to Florida. Evidently they didn't get the memo.

Evidently, they weren't merely playing Nebraska either. You remember Nebraska, right? The team with a good D, and a high school O? The team which lost at home to Iowa St, a week after getting raped at home by lowly Taco Tech?

Yeah, I'm pretty sure Florida beats Nebraska, and by more than one point, without the need for a miracle finish.

Texas has the players to hang with Alabama and they'll show it. I'm not going to apologize for my bias. I think Texas can win this game and even if they don't they shit sure won't ever quit.

Fair enough. I won't be shocked either, if Texas wins. I don't believe they're as good as Bama, but they seem like a team of destiny to me, and a lucky rabbit's foot can go a long way.

Problem is, Bama also seems like a team of destiny, and they look to be the better team.

Jon, you're the clown who says Nebraska would have no chance at beating Iowa, so you've pretty much already cemented your mensan mettle, and were it not for the blessed existence of m2 you'd have the Board Bitch title under permanent lock and key.

Van wrote:Jon, you're the clown who says Nebraska would have no chance at beating Iowa, so you've pretty much already cemented your mensan mettle, and were it not for the blessed existence of m2 you'd have the Board Bitch title under permanent lock and key.

Dude, you're the undoubted dumbest fuck on these boards. It's not even close. At least m2 is a troll. You're just a fucking meth addict.

Nebraska could play all the defense they want against Iowa but it won't matter because Lee would just hand us that game. Our offense wouldn't even have to score. We pounce on QB's like that. It's all about matchups in CFB, something you know nothing about.

Nebraska could not necessarily BEAT anyone, but they sure as fuck can hand around with anyone because their defense has the ABILITY to absolutely shutdown the best offenses in the country. So while you say Texas scabdicked, I say Nebraska's defense played one fucking heck of a ballgame. Now, do I think the Huskers can play THAT GOOD on defense every week? No, of course not.

Iowa is a horrible matchup for Nebraska. It's not that Iowa is without a doubt a much better team, I just don't see any possible way they could beat us. There are actually teams that are probably better than Iowa that I could see them beating. Again, matchups are all that matter in CFB. You mix in emotions with physical talent matchups and that's how games are won and lost in this sport.

This is why Iowa always beats Penn State. Iowa is not always the better team (see 2008), but our style of play matches up well against them and we typically have an emotional edge most years (except for this year because Penn State had the whiteout and revenge on their minds). Penn State cannot beat us right now unless we are having a down year (see 2007). They will not beat us next year. Nebraska also would not beat us this year for similar reasons as to why PSU keeps losing to us.

Matchups, Van...........matchups. Why are simple things so god damn difficult for you to understand?

Van wrote:USC's worst team in recent memory . . .

Forgotten already? Sigh

Sin,

Terry in Crapchester wrote:

Van wrote:USC's worst team in recent memory . . .

Forgotten already? Sigh

Sin,

You'll have to excuse his douchebaggery. He's a USC fan. They only follow their team when they're winning. Biggest bunch of sackless pussies you could ever meet. Van's the poster child.

Jon, Nebraska ain't Northern Iowa. Any team that can come within a blown kickoff of beating a 12-0 Texas team in a game Texas has to win to play for a national title sure as fuck could beat Iowa, and not a single person who follows CF would be the least bit surprised if they did.

If you say another word on this subject other than, "Dude, I was just fucking around. I know Nebraska would stand a pretty fair chance at beating Iowa," then you're the dumbest and most myopic gene displacement this board has ever seen.

mvscal, in all seriousness, what running attack has Texas faced this season which really proved that Texas is all that dominant against the run? There was nobody OOC to even be worth mentioning, and nobody in the Big XII even begins to run the ball like Bama. So, whatever stats they've built up are essentially meaningless, since those stats were built on the backs of a schedule which was one, long non sequitur.

Texas has one weapon which could pose a serious problem for Bama, and it's their passing game. None of Bama's opponents could pass much, with the exceptions of Pick Six Snead and Throw On Every Down Arky Mullet. Problem is, that Texas passing game was completely throttled by the two good Ds Texas played this season, and I'm sorry, but Bama's D is every bit as good as OU's or Nebraska's.

Do they have any one player as good as Suh? No. Nobody does. Overall though, their team D is at least as good, if not better.

The game is going to come down to a couple of things...

-Can Bama consistently pressure Colt? If they can, Texas won't do anything on O.

-Can Texas force Bama to abandon the run?

Other than fluke plays which nobody can foresee, there's your ballgame.

Mace wrote:I'm not sure which is worse......listening to arrogant USC fan tell everyone why their team is far superior to all others, or having them run down other teams when USC isn't worth a shit and is irrelevant to any college football discussion. You know, like when they're on the same level as Cal.

Either way, it'll never be as bad as being Iowa. USC's bad seasons - 8-4, with a win at Big 10 champ Ohio St - are still better than most good seasons for Iowa, so who gives a rat's ass about anything to do with Iowa football?

They're just fucking Iowa. They don't even matter. Their pinnacle is losing two out of their final three games, losing the conference title to a team USC beat, then playing Georgia Tech in a game which defines WGARA?

That's Iowa.

mvscal wrote:

Van wrote:The game is going to come down to a couple of things...

-Can Bama consistently pressure Colt? If they can, Texas won't do anything on O.

-Can Texas force Bama to abandon the run?

Other than fluke plays which nobody can foresee, there's your ballgame.

Thanks, Marcus. The check's in the mail.

Got anything better to add, besides a flatulent, "Texas is good against the run! We match up well!"