Page 2 of 2

Re: Texas-Alabama

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 3:26 pm
by King Crimson
Harvdog wrote:
Please double cover Shipley and leave Malcolm WIlliams in single coverage.....please.... Please do not worry about anyone other than Shipley.
Williams really lit up the Huskers. that was a sweet drop he had the one time Davis called his shot down the sidelines. homer on Harv.

if i'm Greg Davis, i put the TE in play. Williams is no Limas Sweed.

Re: Texas-Alabama

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 4:08 pm
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
King Crimson wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: If this system is what we're subjected to, then give me Bama-Cincy or Bama-TCU. Now THAT would offer up some intrigue.
with this system, Bama-UT is what it ought to be. but give me a Final Four type Bama-Cincy and UT-TCU (at Jerry's place?) semis and we're talking. sorry Boise.
I know...but what it ought to be only justifies the system, and that's where the luster wears off for me. Like I said, if they met in a playoff it'd have all the appeal of a sexy AND legitimate match up. That's the ultimate goal cfb should strive for. Probly won't happen anytime soon.

Re: Texas-Alabama

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:58 pm
by Harvdog
King Crimson wrote:
Harvdog wrote:
Please double cover Shipley and leave Malcolm WIlliams in single coverage.....please.... Please do not worry about anyone other than Shipley.
Williams really lit up the Huskers. that was a sweet drop he had the one time Davis called his shot down the sidelines. homer on Harv.

if i'm Greg Davis, i put the TE in play. Williams is no Limas Sweed.
It was Kirkendoll that dropped the pass, not Williams. We do not have a TE as we lost our top 3 before the start of the season. Homer? Yeah, and you are unbiased about OU...

Re: Texas-Alabama

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:15 pm
by War Wagon
mvscal wrote:
Harvdog wrote:Please double cover Shipley and leave Malcolm WIlliams in single coverage.....please.... Please do not worry about anyone other than Shipley.
Oh, why even bother? They'll just snap their fingers and shut him down too just like Shipley. It's all so hopeless really. We should petition the team to forfeit.
:lol:

Re: Texas-Alabama

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:26 pm
by War Wagon
Sudden Sam wrote: Dammit, I'm not doing the SECBSH thang! Am I coming across that way? I'm tryng to be logical and rational and discuss this thing in terms of weaknesses and strengths.
And then:
Logically, when I look at both teams, I see a Tide win. Something like 31-10 seems right.
Your BSHism is so deeply ingrained you don't even realize when you're doing it.

I like Bama, but not in a laffer and not by anywhere close to 3 TD's.

I'll call it 17-14.

Re: Texas-Alabama

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:27 pm
by Killian
In fairness to Sam, he did call a rather large beat down of UF in the SEC championship game. Rammer Jammer has a good team this year and Sam is confident. I'd be the same way. Hell, I was back in the late 80's. :oops: