Page 2 of 5

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 3:06 pm
by Goober McTuber
Bullshit. Most microbrews I’ve sampled use no preservatives, so they do have somewhat limited shelf lives and I would never store them unrefrigerated. Tardowen bought this stuff last fall and is just now getting around to drinking them? Sounds like user error.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 4:33 pm
by Mikey
When I was in college everybody thougt that Heineken was the be all to end all of beers.

Seems like about half the time I ever got that stuff it had a skunky taste. But, hey, it was a Heinie, so that must be the way beer's supposed to taste.

Six months in Germany when I was 19 sort of set me straight on that. The Budweiser in Germany was pretty damn good, and it didn't have any rice in it.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:02 pm
by JMak
Not into the beer scene in Portland just yet, however, I was very happy to see a bar while heading out to the coast on Highway 26 with a Blue Moon sign in the window. I stopped...

BTW, Linenkuegel aint got nuthin on Naragansett...ahhh, I miss my summers out East.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:11 pm
by JMak
Following up - college was dominated by the "ice" beers for me starting with Ice House then the Canadian "Ice" beers like Molson Ice. But then we found it, the it of all college beers...

40s of Bull Ice. Buck forty-nine per with 8 plus percent alcohol...cool thing was turning the bottle around and seeing the picture of the bull on the back of the label.

Man all of that stuff was shit...

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:42 pm
by JMak
You're right...Oberon and Blue Moon I like. I'll even run a little Michelob every once in a while, too. Cheers to me...now go fuck yourself with a frozen garden hose, knob.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:46 pm
by Goober McTuber
That's a garden horse, you idiot.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:53 pm
by Go Coogs'
I turned 32 today, so I'll be having a Ziegenbock or ten tonight.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:01 pm
by BSmack
Goober McTuber wrote:Bullshit. Most microbrews I’ve sampled use no preservatives, so they do have somewhat limited shelf lives and I would never store them unrefrigerated. Tardowen bought this stuff last fall and is just now getting around to drinking them? Sounds like user error.
Ding!

I did a tour of the Otter Creek brewery in Middlebury last summer. One of the things they emphasized was that any beer bought from their brewery was 100% organic and therefore had a refrigerated shelf life of about 90 days. They made a pretty big point of saying that drinking any beer after that date was absolutely not advised. They also said Todd should go ahead and pull the trigger already.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:05 pm
by Goober McTuber
This is from my local microbrewery:
ALE ASYLUM is unfiltered and all natural. We use no additives, preservatives, fruit, horse hooves, fish guts, or extracts. Our ingredient list: water, malt, hops, and yeast. This is what we mean when we say our beer is FERMENTED IN SANITY. You know who makes it, you know what it's made with. You know after having one you'll want another.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:26 pm
by smackaholic
i was under the impression even good beers had a half way decent (3-4 months) shelf life if stored at normal room temps. i guess that ain't so.

wonder if this explains heineken tasting like skunk piss, the few times I've tried it. that fukking pisswater has got to be the all time king of over rated over priced beer. i actually think beast light tastes better or should i say less bad.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 9:52 pm
by Trampis
smackaholic wrote:i was under the impression even good beers had a half way decent (3-4 months) shelf life if stored at normal room temps. i guess that ain't so.

wonder if this explains heineken tasting like skunk piss, the few times I've tried it. that fukking pisswater has got to be the all time king of over rated over priced beer. i actually think beast light tastes better or should i say less bad.
I tried a couple of times to be "cool Heineken guy" in my early twenties. That stuff tastes terrible. It has to be a bad joke Europe is playing on us stupid Americans.

Whats Beast Light? Ive been guessing for a long time now that it is Busch Light?

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:35 pm
by Mikey
Toddowen wrote: "Water, Malt, Yeast, Hops, and that's all"

In Germany that's all that's allowed. Or at least was from 1516 until 1987. Apparently most German beers still comply.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinheitsgebot

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:14 pm
by War Wagon
Trampis wrote: Whats Beast Light? Ive been guessing for a long time now that it is Busch Light?
Not sure myself, but I think it may be Natural Light aka natti light.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:24 pm
by War Wagon
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: It's just beer, people.
And after 15, who gives a fuck?

But I love a good beer snob thread where the usual suspects all rush in to enlighten us with their superior knowledge.

I'll stick with my Bud Rice @17.99 a 30 pack, only occasionally splurging for some Corona or St. Pauli Girl.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:35 pm
by smackaholic
corona- another marketing scam. not as big a farce as heineken, but, it is watered down mediocre beer which they put in a nice bottle, tell you to put a twist of lime in it and charge double what they should.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:51 pm
by Stanley Pickkkle
One hasn't fully lived life until one induldges in a heineken in the bulldog district in Amsterdam.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:59 pm
by Mikey
smackaholic wrote: corona- another marketing scam. not as big a farce as heineken, but, it is watered down mediocre beer which they put in a nice bottle, tell you to put a twist of lime in it and charge double what they should.

It's fine on a hot day while eating Mexican food.

Prefer Modelo or Bohemia, though.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 12:58 am
by smackaholic
pretty much anything cold and wet is fine when it's hot out. i prefer a cold glass of ice water or homemade ice tea with a ridiculoud amount of freshly squeezed lemon.

corona, imo. is basically expensive coors light.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 1:28 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
ridiculoud
Could be a keeper.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 2:19 am
by smackaholic
and the T1B lexicon grows again. :D

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 2:26 am
by Moving Sale
mvscal wrote:
Goober McTuber wrote:Tardowen bought this stuff last fall and is just now getting around to drinking them? Sounds like user error.
That shouldn't be an issue with an Imperial Stout. They run 9 to 10% ABV.
mvscal wrote:
smackaholic wrote:wonder if this explains heineken tasting like skunk piss,
That is a consquence of improper storage and handling.

Beer is photosensitive and will develop that skunky taste after prolonged exposure to light. The green bottles also don't filter out the harmful wavelengths as well as brown bottles.
Nice white flag you fucking coward.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 2:41 am
by War Wagon
mvscal wrote: Spluring on Corona? I laughed. Try splurging on buckshot next time, you pasting eating dimwit.
Tsk, tsk....

Spluring and then pasting?

Do you feel well?

I sense a seizure about to come on, or maybe it already has.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 2:42 am
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Mikey wrote:It's fine on a hot day while eating Mexican food.

Prefer Modelo or Bohemia, though.

You, my friend, are certainly not the most interesting man in the world.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 2:47 am
by MgoBlue-LightSpecial
War Wagon wrote:
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: It's just beer, people.
And after 15, who gives a fuck?

But I love a good beer snob thread where the usual suspects all rush in to enlighten us with their superior knowledge.

I'll stick with my Bud Rice @17.99 a 30 pack, only occasionally splurging for some Corona or St. Pauli Girl.
I'm saying that spending 20 bucks on a six pack isn't wholly necessary. Corona? That is some wretched bed pan piss, right there.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 2:49 am
by smackaholic
what the fukk are you jabbering about, TiVO?

guess it wouldn't be a short beer review without you chiming in, would it now?

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 2:51 am
by smackaholic
what do they get for a six of messican bud rice lite corona, anyway? don't forget the price of the lime. :meds:

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 3:34 am
by War Wagon
MgoBlue-LightSpecial wrote: Corona? That is some wretched bed pan piss, right there.
Not in my estimation, but to each their own.

btw, I would never squeeze a lime into it.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 5:12 am
by Mikey
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:
Mikey wrote:It's fine on a hot day while eating Mexican food.

Prefer Modelo or Bohemia, though.

You, my friend, are certainly not the most interesting man in the world.
:lol: :lol:

I used to drink Dos Equis, but then my finger was shot off in the Spanish Civil War.
The middle finger on my right hand.
After that I could only pleasure Gina Lollobrigida with the middle finger of my left hand.
I blame this on Dos Equis because now, though I am still quite interesting, I am no longer the most interesting man in the world.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 5:16 am
by BSmack
War Wagon wrote:
Trampis wrote: Whats Beast Light? Ive been guessing for a long time now that it is Busch Light?
Not sure myself, but I think it may be Natural Light aka natti light.
I always assumed that it was Milwaukee's Best Light.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 5:19 am
by Dr_Phibes
Legend has it the lime origin isn't just chic, the acidity destroys germs and kills the taste of any methane left over after brewing :shock:

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 5:29 am
by Dr_Phibes
Well it is Mexican and that's what I was taught. Lager and Lime came from breweries using water out of the Thames five minutes after someone took a crap in it.
There's always something practical behind these habits.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:35 am
by SunCoastSooner
Who's going to start the Long beer review thread? :popcorn:

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 6:38 am
by PSUFAN
I thought the lime was to keep flies from landing on the top of the bottle?

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 7:25 pm
by Dinsdale
mvscal wrote: That shouldn't be an issue with an Imperial Stout. They run 9 to 10% ABV.
I'll pass, thanks.

To get to more than about 6.5%, it requires what are essentially wine yeasts. And the problem with wine yeasts is they create strong wine notes, which is all well and good...

in wine.

In beer, a "wine note" is much like an "ass note."


BTW -- I get that cheap beer exists for a reason, and if I'm going to be mercilessly pounding canned beer (like floating the river, for example)...

why the fuck would anyone opt for Beast Light? You've resigned yourself to drinking assy beer, and are obviously drinking-for-æffect, so why not spend that same cash on the fortified version, Beast Ice, rockin the higher ABV?

It makes no sense.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 7:44 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
Screw_Michigan wrote:Coupla fuckin' geniuses we got here.
I think ignorance of matters of this type may actually work to their advantage. Isn't knowing shit beer admitting to KYOA?

I couldn't keep up with all the shit beers named in this thread. I do recall wanting to punch my fucking "Anchorman" teammates at UConn in the face most weekends (who am I kidding, I drank 7 days a week) for bringing Piels to the table.

Piels? Seriously?

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:49 pm
by smackaholic
What's the deal with college kids and pbr these days?

growing up, pbr was what old drunks drank. apparently now, it's the cool in beer among college kids, apparently to the point that the makers realize they have a "cool" beer and are jacking the price up some. this of course negates the only possible reason for drinking this swill in the first place.

and yes, beast light is milwaukee's best light. back in my pre beer snob days, i drank plenty of the stuff. actually, i'd usually go with teh beast ice. never claimed it was good, but did believe that it was tolerable and the best tasting of the shit cheap beers. nowadays, i would much prefer to drink fewer good beers.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:55 pm
by Goober McTuber
Drank a bit of PBR back in high school around 1968-1970. I swear, it had a better more pronounced flavor back then. Of course I also drank Schlitz, Blatz, Hudepohl, Strohs or whatever else we could get our hands on.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:56 pm
by War Wagon
Speaking of PBR, anybody tried Schlitz since it's come back? That was my dads beer 40-50 years ago. Haven't been able to bring myself to try it just yet.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:12 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
War Wagon wrote:anybody tried Schlitz since it's come back? That was my dads beer 40-50 years ago.
Yup... I remember being sent to the fridge to fetch my dad another can of Schitz as a lad. Damn pull tops.

Re: Short beer review

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:14 pm
by Goober McTuber
War Wagon wrote:Speaking of PBR, anybody tried Schlitz since it's come back? That was my dads beer 40-50 years ago. Haven't been able to bring myself to try it just yet.
You're kidding, right? You'll drink Budwhizzer but you're too good to drink Schlitz?