Page 2 of 2
Re: So tired
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:47 pm
by trev
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:trev wrote:I wasn't drinking yesterday either. But as ditsy as I am, even I know once 6 points are on the board and the extra point is kicked you can't go back and review a touchdown.
All touchdowns get reviewed. Regardless of whether or not the XP has already been kicked.
No they don't you freaking idiot. They may all be subject to review. They all don't get reviewed. That is neither here nor there. This was an extra point that got reviewed, not a touchdown and you were incorrect, so go suck it up and make me a sandwich, bitch.
Re: So tired
Posted: Mon Sep 19, 2011 11:57 pm
by mvscal
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:trev wrote:I wasn't drinking yesterday either. But as ditsy as I am, even I know once 6 points are on the board and the extra point is kicked you can't go back and review a touchdown.
All touchdowns get reviewed. Regardless of whether or not the XP has already been kicked.
Maybe for a weekly performance review but not in a game situation. The review was for the XP not the TD. Which part of that do you fail to comprehend?
Re: So tired
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:08 am
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
mvscal wrote: Which part of that do you fail to comprehend?
That you think it's conceivable that it would take the booth 5 minutes to count to 12 for an extra point, and yet, they would not take any time whatsoever to take a closer look at a 26 yard one-armed TD catch where the receiver's arm hit ground and the ball came damn close to hitting the ground.
Is that your take?
Re: So tired
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:12 am
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
trev wrote:you were incorrect.
Maybe. Maybe not. Regardless... the
very best you could be batting here is .333
You did say Belichick called for this review and in doing so, he was cheating... yes? Wrong and wrong.
Re: So tired
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:21 am
by mvscal
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:mvscal wrote: Which part of that do you fail to comprehend?
That you think it's conceivable that it would take the booth 5 minutes to count to 12 for an extra point, and yet, they would not take any time whatsoever to take a closer look at a 26 yard one-armed TD catch where the receiver's arm hit ground and the ball came damn close to hitting the ground.
Is that your take?
No, it wasn't
my take. The issue was discussed during the broadcast. Simms and Nantz didn't know what the officials were looking at either and had their staff phone the recall booth and that is the response they got which they shared with the viewing audience.
Why would you review a touchdown after the XP had already been kicked? It's a moot point by then. You can't change or overturn anything.
Re: So tired
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 12:32 am
by trev
Belichick is a known cheater. Once a cheater, always a cheater. Whatever he was doing he had FOREVER during this absurd review and it was to his advantage. It doesn't really matter. The Chargers lost fair and square. STHU.
Re: So tired
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:30 am
by mvscal
trev darling, would you mind terribly to tickle my testicles with your tongue? I'm all awash with thoughts of you. Have you been doing your kegels?
Re: So tired
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 1:29 pm
by ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2
mvscal wrote:No, it wasn't my take. The issue was discussed during the broadcast. Simms and Nantz didn't know what the officials were looking at either and had their staff phone the recall booth and that is the response they got which they shared with the viewing audience.
I stick with my take... the officials haven't told anyone what they were looking at. If you read between the lines below, you can see that people capable of actual thought aren't buying the XP review bullshit either. It is my belief that someone fell asleep at the wheel during Jackson's catch and the booth scrambled around afterwards to make sure it was a catch. Until an NFL official comes out and says otherwise, feel free to go fist yourself.
FOXBOROUGH, Mass. -- Patriots coach Bill Belichick suggested Monday that he remains just as much in the dark about a curious PAT review Sunday as the rest of us.
Officials huddled to seemingly review a PAT that San Diego produced to pull within a touchdown at 28-21 with 5:40 to play in Sunday's game. After a short delay, Nick Novak's boot was upheld. Most of the stadium seemed confused as to why the play was reviewed and Belichick couldn't shed any light a day later.
"That’s not like a [red challenge] flag -- if the opposing team throws a flag, [the officials] come over and say the other team is challenging the runner was down by contact, or the guy scored, or whatever it is. On scoring plays, it’s an automatic review... including extra points.
"What they were looking at, they didn’t tell us. We just sit there and look dumb like everybody else."
Re: So tired
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 3:45 pm
by trev
It's difficult to reason with someone like you ucant. Hoody is really good at lying. He "suggested"...
Not much to say about this one anymore. If I want to talk to a half brain box of rocks, I'll go play with my dog. He's actually more fun and lovable anyway.
Re: So tired
Posted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:00 pm
by mvscal
ucantdoitdoggieSTyle2 wrote:It is my belief that someone fell asleep at the wheel during Jackson's catch and the booth scrambled around afterwards to make sure it was a catch.
What for? They had already kicked the XP, idiot. I don't care if they told Belichick or not. They told the broadcast team.