Re: How Do You Define
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:30 am
Page 2 of 5
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:30 am
I dunno, Don Draper's life seemed pretty ideal.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:48 am
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:55 am
An utterly asinine simplification. Look at Harlem in the 40s and 50s. Low income income to be sure, but culturally vibrant and populated by hard working families. It wasn't perfect, but it was a far cry from the animalistic, degenerate slaughterhouses that our inner cities have become under decades of progressive management. “I’ll have those niqqers voting Democratic for 200 years.” said LBJ as he instituted the Great Society which destroyed minority families and rendered them dependent on gov't handouts from cradle to (early) grave. The politics of the Democratic party since then have been nothing but promising more tax payer dollars to the Free Shit Army and it never gets better.Softball Bat wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:20 am
Prosperity.
White rule, with women and minorities knowing their place.
So, yes, Make America Great Again, for all Americans.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:03 am
You clearly don't know jack shit about Harlem. Just fuck yourself, already.mvscal wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:55 am Look at Harlem in the 40s and 50s. Low income income to be sure, but culturally vibrant and populated by hard working families. It wasn't perfect, but it was a far cry from the animalistic, degenerate slaughterhouses that our inner cities have become under decades of progressive management.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:03 am
"Keep 'em on the plantation"...
It's a tactic to keep black people from entering the middle class and controlling their own economic destiny as a people.
The Panthers have been saying this for almost 60 years.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:06 am
Do tell. Share your wisdom. Tell us how things have improved.Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:03 amYou clearly don't know jack shit about Harlem. Just fuck yourself, already.mvscal wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:55 am Look at Harlem in the 40s and 50s. Low income income to be sure, but culturally vibrant and populated by hard working families. It wasn't perfect, but it was a far cry from the animalistic, degenerate slaughterhouses that our inner cities have become under decades of progressive management.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:09 am
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:10 am
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:10 am
Duh.Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:03 am"Keep 'em on the plantation"...
It's a tactic to keep black people from entering the middle class and controlling their own economic destiny as a people.
The Panthers have been saying this for almost 60 years.
You think the Panthers are the only ones who have been saying that? Progressive policies destroy the middle class. Look at California.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:13 am
Well, actually I didn't. I called it a poor, but culturally vibrant place populated by hard working families. Harlem today is being...gentrified. I understand that as a modern journalist your grasp of context and basic English is tenuous at best.Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:10 amI'm not the one calling Harlem an "animalistic, degenerate slaughterhouses"
Do you need directions to your nearest animalistic, degenerate inner city slaugherhouse?
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:16 am
"inner city"
That's all I need to know about your perspective on cities. Don't you live in Omaha?
Get fucked.
That's all I need to know about your perspective on cities. Don't you live in Omaha?
Get fucked.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:16 am
Cabrini Green
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:22 am
Were you attempting to make a some sort of point? You appear to be struggling.Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:16 am "inner city"
That's all I need to know about your perspective on cities. Don't you live in Omaha?
Get fucked.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:29 am
Sorry, but if screw is a "journalist", then I'm Peter North.88 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:25 amYou are supposed to be a journalist. How can it be delusional for me to believe in my own world view?Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:48 amYou are fucking delusional if you actually believe this to be your world view.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:31 am
They're kicking illegal aliens out of the military. Bathhouse Barry admitted several hundred of them into the military in yet another blatantly illegal program. None of them ever reached permanent duty stations.Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 11:08 pmShit they're kicking immigrants out of the military.
Actually, the laws fast tracking green card holding vets has not changed one iota. All they have to do is apply for it.it's no longer a good way for immigrants to gain citizenship.
So many lies, so much stupidity.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:31 am
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:37 am
In order to serve in the armed forces, one must be a citizen or resident permanent alien (green card holder).
https://www.usa.gov/join-military
It has brightly colored picture bubbles so that even a moron like you can understand.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:44 am
The US has always welcomed immigrants to use military service to expedite citizenship. Too bad you're too racist to ever understand or appreciate that.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:50 am
I think his point was enlistment after acquiring a green card...
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:57 am
You throw around that word "racist" quite a bit.Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:44 am The US has always welcomed immigrants to use military service to expedite citizenship. Too bad you're too racist to ever understand or appreciate that.
Makes you feel superior, doesn't it.
You get some sort of perverse power trip using that word.
A thrill goes up your leg.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:08 am
The US welcomes legal immigrants to military service and recognizes the commitment to their new country with an expedited path to citizenship should they choose to apply for it. Too bad you're too fucking stupid to ever understand or appreciate the difference between an illegal alien and a lawful permanent resident.Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:44 am The US has always welcomed immigrants to use military service to expedite citizenship. Too bad you're too racist to ever understand or appreciate that.
Oh, by the way, what unit were you in? What in the actual fuck do YOU know about military service?
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:19 am
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:30 am
I think smackaholic went to the drive-thru to salute the fry cook and "thank him for his service", just in case...Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:19 am
Is the Burger King Kid's Club an officially recognised branch of the service?
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 4:41 am
OK, so a great nation is a proud nation. But those institutions should have to earn that pride and not be given it blindly, as you insinuate when you say:
It sounds as if you are among those whose pride in the institutions you referenced has waned, which I wouldn't consider to be a partisan characteristic; plenty of Americans across the political spectrum have either lost whatever pride they might have once had, or are too young to have ever had any. Is it your contention that only conservatives demand honesty from government and the media? Again, I don't believe that to be the case. In general, both sides will claim to want the same thing. In practice, however, both sides will also put up with indiscretions that will benefit them.Respect for Congress, the courts, the police, political figures, the press, educational institutions, corporations, and fellow citizens has dropped precipitously.
...
It starts with the citizens requiring that government and the press be honest, and that the rule of law be followed. You can't have a set of rules for Her and people she hangs out with, and another for Cheetolini. There needs to be consistency. That is the core of the "drain the swamp" meme that underpins MAGA.
Seems to me both individuals you cited are able to do whatever the fuck they want with no repercussions, so I see no inconsistency there. Even if the POTUS is impeached, he sure as shit won't be removed from office, and will likely be re-elected. And the swamp is at least as full now as it's ever been, and the stench hasn't gotten any better.
I find it interesting, especially for one in your line of work, that you disregard "innocent until proven guilty" when it comes to the Clintons. If you've been able to dig up enough unimpeachable evidence against them to remove them from free society, why hasn't law enforcement or our judicial system taken appropriate action? Who's protecting them from prosecution/incarceration? Are you contending that liberals and the media wield so much power that they've rendered the Clintons bulletproof? Lay this out for me - how does this happen? EAP seems to think the hammer is about to come down on all the bad actors from the previous administration; I guess we'll see.
I have jaded ideas about many things, but that's not one of them. There are plenty of areas in which our country can vastly improve, but ours is still a great nation. I have no problem with "Make America Greater." I question those who chant MAGA, as I have in this thread, because it implies we were great before but aren't any longer. I originally asked the questions as open-ended and got no meaningful responses before yours. I then offered as possible options some hot-button issues to which you took umbrage and took my asking them as meaning that that's how I felt they thought. I was simply asking questions, partly from a sense of "call 'em as I see 'em," and partly to see what else it may be.I think you have jaded ideas about the feelings of those who cherish the United State's greatness.
I consider myself an independent who can see good and bad in both conservative and liberal ideologies, and I agree with what you stated above. The portion I bolded is key. I don't like Donald Trump. I wouldn't like him if he were still a Democrat. My dislike for him has nothing to do with his party affiliation. It has to do with how he goes about his business - with his process. He is childish, petty, egotistical, self-centered, thin-skinned, and displays no positive leadership qualities. I agree with some of the positions he takes - border security, legal immigration, and favorable trade agreements being among them. But there are many others who take similar stances that would make far better leaders. In fact, there aren't very many who would do worse from a process perspective. You yourself have characterized him as a narcissistic megalomaniac, and you'll get no argument from me on that. Your support for him may be from a "lesser of two evils" standpoint, but I don't know that for sure.Conservatives generally prefer that the federal government take a limited role in daily life. The most power should be concentrated in the people themselves, then in the states and lastly and least in the federal government. Being conservative does not necessarily mean that you have to oppose some classic liberal notions. It is more about the process than the issue.
Who doesn't want that? Except, of course, those with the shovels, and they aren't all on the left.The MAGA crowd mostly wants their government to play far. To be left alone and not forced to eat bags of horse shit shoveled by special interest groups.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:46 pm
THANK YOU RABBI.Shlomart Ben Yisrael wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:03 am"Keep 'em on the plantation"...
It's a tactic to keep black people from entering the middle class and controlling their own economic destiny as a people.
The Panthers have been saying this for almost 60 years.
As Lyndon Johnson was putting his sig on civil rights?
He was snickering the "N" word.
"We got their (N*****r) votes for generations!!!
Proving for all time that the dem party is indeed about power and control.
The republicans weren't signing civil rights legislation for votes.
THAT'S the BIG difference between the Reagan conservative and the left wing socialist.
The left wing socialists on this board are too stupid to understand this.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:16 pm
I did. You responded with a straw man and there is nothing to explain when you reference said straw man.Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 11:04 pmI'm not playing a role on the internet. Why won't you explain yourself?Left Seater wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 7:58 pm You are the one throwing up strawmen to attack and then want to wonder why I care?
Quit trying so hard at playing a role on the internet.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:27 pm
Hopefully as an independent voter, you understand that there's a big difference between a real liberal and the left.Smackie Chan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 4:41 amOK, so a great nation is a proud nation. But those institutions should have to earn that pride and not be given it blindly, as you insinuate when you say:
It sounds as if you are among those whose pride in the institutions you referenced has waned, which I wouldn't consider to be a partisan characteristic; plenty of Americans across the political spectrum have either lost whatever pride they might have once had, or are too young to have ever had any. Is it your contention that only conservatives demand honesty from government and the media? Again, I don't believe that to be the case. In general, both sides will claim to want the same thing. In practice, however, both sides will also put up with indiscretions that will benefit them.Respect for Congress, the courts, the police, political figures, the press, educational institutions, corporations, and fellow citizens has dropped precipitously.
...
It starts with the citizens requiring that government and the press be honest, and that the rule of law be followed. You can't have a set of rules for Her and people she hangs out with, and another for Cheetolini. There needs to be consistency. That is the core of the "drain the swamp" meme that underpins MAGA.
Seems to me both individuals you cited are able to do whatever the fuck they want with no repercussions, so I see no inconsistency there. Even if the POTUS is impeached, he sure as shit won't be removed from office, and will likely be re-elected. And the swamp is at least as full now as it's ever been, and the stench hasn't gotten any better.
I find it interesting, especially for one in your line of work, that you disregard "innocent until proven guilty" when it comes to the Clintons. If you've been able to dig up enough unimpeachable evidence against them to remove them from free society, why hasn't law enforcement or our judicial system taken appropriate action? Who's protecting them from prosecution/incarceration? Are you contending that liberals and the media wield so much power that they've rendered the Clintons bulletproof? Lay this out for me - how does this happen? EAP seems to think the hammer is about to come down on all the bad actors from the previous administration; I guess we'll see.
I have jaded ideas about many things, but that's not one of them. There are plenty of areas in which our country can vastly improve, but ours is still a great nation. I have no problem with "Make America Greater." I question those who chant MAGA, as I have in this thread, because it implies we were great before but aren't any longer. I originally asked the questions as open-ended and got no meaningful responses before yours. I then offered as possible options some hot-button issues to which you took umbrage and took my asking them as meaning that that's how I felt they thought. I was simply asking questions, partly from a sense of "call 'em as I see 'em," and partly to see what else it may be.I think you have jaded ideas about the feelings of those who cherish the United State's greatness.
I consider myself an independent who can see good and bad in both conservative and liberal ideologies, and I agree with what you stated above. The portion I bolded is key. I don't like Donald Trump. I wouldn't like him if he were still a Democrat. My dislike for him has nothing to do with his party affiliation. It has to do with how he goes about his business - with his process. He is childish, petty, egotistical, self-centered, thin-skinned, and displays no positive leadership qualities. I agree with some of the positions he takes - border security, legal immigration, and favorable trade agreements being among them. But there are many others who take similar stances that would make far better leaders. In fact, there aren't very many who would do worse from a process perspective. You yourself have characterized him as a narcissistic megalomaniac, and you'll get no argument from me on that. Your support for him may be from a "lesser of two evils" standpoint, but I don't know that for sure.Conservatives generally prefer that the federal government take a limited role in daily life. The most power should be concentrated in the people themselves, then in the states and lastly and least in the federal government. Being conservative does not necessarily mean that you have to oppose some classic liberal notions. It is more about the process than the issue.
Who doesn't want that? Except, of course, those with the shovels, and they aren't all on the left.The MAGA crowd mostly wants their government to play far. To be left alone and not forced to eat bags of horse shit shoveled by special interest groups.
Real liberals cherish liberty as do Reagan conservatives.
Over the past few decades, the left has taken control of the Democrat socialist party, making real liberals or "blue dog moderates", a minority if you will.
That's an important distinction for real independent voters like you to fully understand.
The mainstream press and media deny that there even is an extreme left wing every chance they get.
The most important thing to remember is that the left is government control and the enemy of liberty and our constitution.
Not liberals, but the left.
I cannot stress this enough.
Good luck.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 4:03 pm
It’s amazing to me that you two can type so much and say so little.
MAGA is the last ditch effort to keep the “others” down and get back to the homogeneity of the past.
As to this BS that you HAD to pick orange or her, that’s what they wanted, and you gave it to them. Nice going.
MAGA is the last ditch effort to keep the “others” down and get back to the homogeneity of the past.
As to this BS that you HAD to pick orange or her, that’s what they wanted, and you gave it to them. Nice going.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 4:16 pm
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 4:20 pm
Wanna know who knows 1940 Harlem?Screw_Michigan wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 1:03 amYou clearly don't know jack shit about Harlem. Just fuck yourself, already.mvscal wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:55 am Look at Harlem in the 40s and 50s. Low income income to be sure, but culturally vibrant and populated by hard working families. It wasn't perfect, but it was a far cry from the animalistic, degenerate slaughterhouses that our inner cities have become under decades of progressive management.
Thomas Sowell. He lived in it.
Read something from him about this period. He would echo exactly what mvscal says. Actually, mvscal is pretty much plagerizing the fukk outta what Clarence has said repeatedly.
Jesus, mv, I'm gonna start calling you Jimmy Page.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 4:38 pm
Seth Rich died for the DNC's sins. Guccifer already exposed the manipulations within the 2016 election engineered by the Bohemian Grove insiders. Since Herself the Cold and Joyless lost, can only assume they wanted her to.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 5:24 pm
What's amazing to me, is how an alleged attorney could not look at the exchange between two of my favorite peeps in this dumpster and not be impressed.Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 4:03 pm It’s amazing to me that you two can type so much and say so little.
MAGA is the last ditch effort to keep the “others” down and get back to the homogeneity of the past.
As to this BS that you HAD to pick orange or her, that’s what they wanted, and you gave it to them. Nice going.
Note that they had an intellectual discussion where they defended their positions well and as far as I recall, not once did they the topic of African American fellatio come up.
Rack the fukk out of both of them.
I think SC and 88 hold very similar personal beliefs, both being pretty firmly in the Libertarian camp, as am I. We all hold pretty similar opinions of TBOM,
88 let's him slide because he's a cold heartless money grubing attorney, worried chiefly in the bottom line.
SC has a little more hippy in him who truly does believe in and appreciate the goodness of man. And when he comes across someone a little light in the goodness gene, he can not back that person.
Or maybe it's just because he's a fukking wetback. Fukk if I know.
I just know that in the really, really important areas, such as not letting the rest of the planet not at least throw us a courtesy reach around, every now and then, he gets it.
He also realizes that if we continue to allow SC's cousins to continue to rush the border, unchecked, it ain't gonna be good. I mean yeah, bring some in. SC is proof that most are solid people and well, those fukking lawns ain't gonna mow themselves, but we can't take them all.
And lastly, is showing some love for the rule of law and those tasked with upholding those laws.
The worst thing Obama did, was give support to the idea that the po-po do their job, chiefly because it's fun to hit nigggers with clubs.
This isn't the case, for a large majority. Most also like the dental plan.
And where has this gotten us?
If has caused cops in general to say fuggit, I'll be down at dunkin donuts. You kneeegahs is on your own. And we have skyrocketing murder levels in the hood to show for it, because, well, when the cats away, the mice will bust caps into one another.
Getting back to Trump's being a rotten human being. It bugged the hell out of me, early on. He was far from my number 1 pick in the primary.
But once he won and the dems went scorched earf on his ass, I am becoming increasingly OK with his shtick. I hope he teabags Nancy at the next SOTU address. Fukk those assholes.
They didn't MAKE Trump an asshole.
He was born that way.
But they have been uberassholes to him from day one, which really shows what fukking morons they are.
If they had even the slightest bit of smarts and actually did give a fukk about getting their agenda through, they'd say, OK, Mr President, you won. We know you were just telling those racist homophobe republicans what they wanted to hear to get elected. Now lets get some shit done.
Bill Clinton was actually pretty good in this regard. He saved his presidency when he realized that working with the Republicans on some things was a good thing. Of course, if he didn't have the need to prowl on the help, it would have went better.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 5:31 pm
It was a bunch of pablum. Like what you typed.
The worst thing Obama did was give people hope for change and then not change anything, at least not for the better. That is the only reason people even wanted to take a flyer on Drumph.
Poor/desperate people cap each other, regardless of race. Just more of your echo chamber bullshit.
Nobody made Don the Con act this way. He did it on his own and deserves everything he gets, which won’t be much. I’m sorry you are too much of a snowflake to get that.
The worst thing Obama did was give people hope for change and then not change anything, at least not for the better. That is the only reason people even wanted to take a flyer on Drumph.
Poor/desperate people cap each other, regardless of race. Just more of your echo chamber bullshit.
Nobody made Don the Con act this way. He did it on his own and deserves everything he gets, which won’t be much. I’m sorry you are too much of a snowflake to get that.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 5:33 pm
https://youtu.be/k9DO26O6dIg/youtube]smackaholic wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 5:24 pmWhat's amazing to me, is how an alleged attorney could not look at the exchange between two of my favorite peeps in this dumpster and not be impressed.Kierland wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 4:03 pm It’s amazing to me that you two can type so much and say so little.
MAGA is the last ditch effort to keep the “others” down and get back to the homogeneity of the past.
As to this BS that you HAD to pick orange or her, that’s what they wanted, and you gave it to them. Nice going.
Note that they had an intellectual discussion where they defended their positions well and as far as I recall, not once did they the topic of African American fellatio come up.
Rack the fukk out of both of them.
I think SC and 88 hold very similar personal beliefs, both being pretty firmly in the Libertarian camp, as am I. We all hold pretty similar opinions of TBOM,
88 let's him slide because he's a cold heartless money grubing attorney, worried chiefly in the bottom line.
SC has a little more hippy in him who truly does believe in and appreciate the goodness of man. And when he comes across someone a little light in the goodness gene, he can not back that person.
Or maybe it's just because he's a fukking wetback. Fukk if I know.
I just know that in the really, really important areas, such as not letting the rest of the planet not at least throw us a courtesy reach around, every now and then, he gets it.
He also realizes that if we continue to allow SC's cousins to continue to rush the border, unchecked, it ain't gonna be good. I mean yeah, bring some in. SC is proof that most are solid people and well, those fukking lawns ain't gonna mow themselves, but we can't take them all.
And lastly, is showing some love for the rule of law and those tasked with upholding those laws.
The worst thing Obama did, was give support to the idea that the po-po do their job, chiefly because it's fun to hit nigggers with clubs.
This isn't the case, for a large majority. Most also like the dental plan.
And where has this gotten us?
If has caused cops in general to say fuggit, I'll be down at dunkin donuts. You kneeegahs is on your own. And we have skyrocketing murder levels in the hood to show for it, because, well, when the cats away, the mice will bust caps into one another.
Getting back to Trump's being a rotten human being. It bugged the hell out of me, early on. He was far from my number 1 pick in the primary.
But once he won and the dems went scorched earf on his ass, I am becoming increasingly OK with his shtick. I hope he teabags Nancy at the next SOTU address. Fukk those assholes.
They didn't MAKE Trump an asshole.
He was born that way.
But they have been uberassholes to him from day one, which really shows what fukking morons they are.
If they had even the slightest bit of smarts and actually did give a fukk about getting their agenda through, they'd say, OK, Mr President, you won. We know you were just telling those racist homophobe republicans what they wanted to hear to get elected. Now lets get some shit done.
Bill Clinton was actually pretty good in this regard. He saved his presidency when he realized that working with the Republicans on some things was a good thing. Of course, if he didn't have the need to prowl on the help, it would have went better.
I posted this video because,
EVERY TIME you address kierland, he's that blonde pussy in the front row, AND, all your answers to him are spot on!
And, "I like the way you think".
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 5:34 pm
Even if true, all the more reason not to vote for her. Which I didn’t.Innocent Bystander wrote: ↑Sat Nov 23, 2019 4:38 pmSeth Rich died for the DNC's sins. Guccifer already exposed the manipulations within the 2016 election engineered by the Bohemian Grove insiders. Since Herself the Cold and Joyless lost, can only assume they wanted her to.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 5:37 pm
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 5:38 pm
If you only want to list three then sure.
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 5:38 pm
Re: How Do You Define "Great"?
Posted: Sat Nov 23, 2019 5:40 pm